263:
42:
376:
277:
624:
has made no determination that any individual included in the registry is currently dangerous. Individuals included within the registry are included solely by virtue of their conviction record and state law. The main purpose of providing this data on the
Internet is to make the information more easily available and accessible, not to warn about any specific individual.
667:
In a unanimous opinion, the Second
Circuit Court's judgment was reversed on the basis that due process does not require the opportunity to prove a fact that is not material to the State's statutory scheme. Injury to reputation in itself, even if defamatory, does not constitute deprivation of liberty.
623:
The registry is based on the legislature’s decision to facilitate access to publicly-available information about persons convicted of sexual offenses. has not considered or assessed the specific risk of reoffense with regard to any individual prior to his or her inclusion within this registry, and
127:
The Second
Circuit's judgment must be reversed because due process does not require the opportunity to prove a fact that is not material to the State's statutory scheme. Mere injury to reputation, even if defamatory, does not constitute the deprivation of a liberty
289:
420:
312:
556:
908:
380:
528:
637:
913:
798:
695:
648:
542:
514:
246:
83:
893:
636:
regarding the law's public disclosure provisions. The Court of
Appeals affirmed, concluding that such disclosure did indeed violate the Due Process Clause of the
628:
John Doe, a convicted sex offender who was thereby subject to the law, filed suit in
Federal court, claiming that the law violates the Fourteenth Amendment's
656:
582:
507:
601:'s Department of Public Safety (PDS) to collect information gathered from sex offenders who registered into a sex offender registry and publicize it on an
888:
305:
447:
862:
903:
549:
875:- Urging the court to find that governmental dissemination of truthful information about a person does not trigger "due process" requirements.
872:
898:
575:
46:
65:
Connecticut
Department of Public Safety, et al., Petitioners v. John Doe, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
336:
358:
766:
Wright, Richard G. (2003). "Sex
Offender Registration and Notification: Public Attention, Political Emphasis, and Fear".
741:"Oyez: Connecticut Dept. of Public Safety v. Doe, 538 U.S. 1 (2003), U.S. Supreme Court Case Summary & Oral Argument"
262:
454:
375:
845:
720:
521:
159:
114:
17:
802:
699:
75:
276:
351:
187:
827:
629:
151:
143:
775:
329:
818:
740:
475:
183:
171:
867:
809:
868:
ACLU Brief for the
Respondents in Connecticut Dept. of Public Safety v. Doe (10/2/2002)
779:
613:
609:
298:
195:
163:
640:
because registrants were not provided with a hearing prior to the public disclosure.
882:
836:
702:
489:
482:
586:
461:
395:
175:
598:
579:
212:
Rehnquist, joined by O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy, Souter, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer
78:
644:
633:
90:
854:
602:
724:
605:
652:
863:
Brief for the
Unisted States as Amicus Curiae Supporting Petitioner
111:
585:
requirement which required public disclosure of information on
41:
873:
Amicus brief in
Connecticut Dept. of Public Safety v. Doe
529:
Movement to reform sex offender laws in the United States
909:
United States Supreme Court cases of the Rehnquist Court
612:
in specific state offices, as Connecticut's version of
649:
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
515:
National Association for Rational Sexual Offense Laws
421:
Effectiveness of sex offender registration policies
232:
224:
216:
208:
203:
132:
121:
103:
98:
70:
60:
53:
34:
589:after they had been released from incarceration.
619:The website contained the following disclaimer:
621:
795:Connecticut Department of Public Safety v. Doe
692:Connecticut Department of Public Safety v. Doe
571:Connecticut Department of Public Safety v. Doe
403:Connecticut Department of Public Safety v. Doe
292:and Sexually Violent Offender Registration Act
35:Connecticut Department of Public Safety v. Doe
550:
8:
914:Sex offender registries in the United States
578:case regarding the constitutionality of the
508:Alliance for Constitutional Sex Offense Laws
381:Constitutionality of sex offender registries
894:United States criminal due process case law
313:International Megan's Law to Prevent Demand
608:and to make the registry available to the
557:
543:
306:Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act
241:
31:
687:
685:
683:
681:
448:Julia Tuttle Causeway sex offender colony
18:Connecticut Dept. of Public Safety v. Doe
290:Jacob Wetterling Crimes Against Children
716:Doe v. Dep't of Pub. Safety ex rel. Lee
677:
655:the public disclosure of Connecticut's
253:
108:Doe v. Dep't of Pub. Safety ex rel. Lee
735:
733:
469:Controversial designations as offender
29:2003 United States Supreme Court case
7:
780:10.1111/j.1745-9133.2003.tb00026.x
47:Supreme Court of the United States
25:
889:United States Supreme Court cases
374:
337:California Proposition 83 (2006)
275:
261:
40:
805:1 (2003) is available from:
768:Criminology & Public Policy
632:. The District Court issued an
522:Women Against Registry - W.A.R.
904:2003 in United States case law
359:Sexually violent predator laws
1:
643:The Supreme Court granted
576:United States Supreme Court
574:, 538 U.S. 1 (2003), was a
930:
855:Oyez (oral argument audio)
228:Souter, joined by Ginsburg
899:Sex offender registration
647:to determine whether the
597:A state statute required
583:sex offender registration
315:for Child Sex Trafficking
137:
126:
39:
245:This article is part of
54:Argued November 13, 2002
389:Supreme Court decisions
254:Sex offender registries
626:
657:sex offender registry
236:Stevens (in judgment)
89:123 S. Ct. 1160; 155
56:Decided March 5, 2003
663:Opinion of the Court
638:Fourteenth Amendment
423:in the United States
383:in the United States
256:in the United States
846:Library of Congress
721:271 F.3d 38
352:PROTECT Act of 2003
188:Ruth Bader Ginsburg
160:Sandra Day O'Connor
630:Due Process Clause
148:Associate Justices
567:
566:
371:Constitutionality
240:
239:
144:William Rehnquist
16:(Redirected from
921:
859:
853:
850:
844:
841:
835:
832:
826:
823:
817:
814:
808:
783:
753:
752:
750:
748:
737:
728:
718:
712:
706:
689:
559:
552:
545:
378:
279:
265:
242:
133:Court membership
44:
43:
32:
21:
929:
928:
924:
923:
922:
920:
919:
918:
879:
878:
857:
851:
848:
842:
839:
833:
830:
824:
821:
815:
812:
806:
790:
765:
762:
760:Further reading
757:
756:
746:
744:
739:
738:
731:
714:
713:
709:
690:
679:
674:
665:
651:was correct in
595:
563:
534:
533:
503:
502:Reform activism
495:
494:
476:Genarlow Wilson
455:Miracle Village
436:
428:
427:
422:
416:
408:
407:
382:
372:
364:
363:
341:
319:
314:
291:
273:
255:
186:
184:Clarence Thomas
174:
172:Anthony Kennedy
162:
152:John P. Stevens
94:
55:
49:
30:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
927:
925:
917:
916:
911:
906:
901:
896:
891:
881:
880:
877:
876:
870:
865:
860:
828:Google Scholar
789:
788:External links
786:
785:
784:
761:
758:
755:
754:
743:. www.oyez.org
729:
707:
676:
675:
673:
670:
664:
661:
594:
591:
565:
564:
562:
561:
554:
547:
539:
536:
535:
532:
531:
525:
524:
518:
517:
511:
510:
504:
501:
500:
497:
496:
493:
492:
486:
485:
479:
478:
472:
471:
465:
464:
458:
457:
451:
450:
444:
443:
437:
434:
433:
430:
429:
426:
425:
417:
414:
413:
410:
409:
406:
405:
399:
398:
392:
391:
373:
370:
369:
366:
365:
362:
361:
355:
354:
348:
347:
340:
339:
333:
332:
326:
325:
318:
317:
309:
308:
302:
301:
295:
294:
286:
285:
274:
271:
270:
267:
266:
258:
257:
251:
250:
238:
237:
234:
230:
229:
226:
222:
221:
218:
214:
213:
210:
206:
205:
201:
200:
199:
198:
196:Stephen Breyer
164:Antonin Scalia
149:
146:
141:
135:
134:
130:
129:
124:
123:
119:
118:
117:(2d Cir. 2001)
105:
101:
100:
96:
95:
88:
72:
68:
67:
62:
61:Full case name
58:
57:
51:
50:
45:
37:
36:
28:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
926:
915:
912:
910:
907:
905:
902:
900:
897:
895:
892:
890:
887:
886:
884:
874:
871:
869:
866:
864:
861:
856:
847:
838:
829:
820:
811:
804:
800:
796:
792:
791:
787:
781:
777:
774:(1): 97–104.
773:
769:
764:
763:
759:
742:
736:
734:
730:
726:
722:
717:
711:
708:
704:
701:
697:
693:
688:
686:
684:
682:
678:
671:
669:
662:
660:
658:
654:
650:
646:
641:
639:
635:
631:
625:
620:
617:
615:
611:
607:
604:
600:
592:
590:
588:
587:sex offenders
584:
581:
577:
573:
572:
560:
555:
553:
548:
546:
541:
540:
538:
537:
530:
527:
526:
523:
520:
519:
516:
513:
512:
509:
506:
505:
499:
498:
491:
490:Kevin Gillson
488:
487:
484:
483:Janet Allison
481:
480:
477:
474:
473:
470:
467:
466:
463:
460:
459:
456:
453:
452:
449:
446:
445:
442:
439:
438:
435:Social issues
432:
431:
424:
419:
418:
415:Effectiveness
412:
411:
404:
401:
400:
397:
394:
393:
390:
387:
386:
385:
384:
377:
368:
367:
360:
357:
356:
353:
350:
349:
346:
343:
342:
338:
335:
334:
331:
330:Jessica's Law
328:
327:
324:
321:
320:
316:
311:
310:
307:
304:
303:
300:
297:
296:
293:
288:
287:
284:
281:
280:
278:
269:
268:
264:
260:
259:
252:
248:
244:
243:
235:
231:
227:
223:
219:
215:
211:
207:
204:Case opinions
202:
197:
193:
189:
185:
181:
177:
173:
169:
165:
161:
157:
153:
150:
147:
145:
142:
140:Chief Justice
139:
138:
136:
131:
125:
120:
116:
113:
109:
106:
102:
97:
92:
86:
85:
80:
77:
73:
69:
66:
63:
59:
52:
48:
38:
33:
27:
19:
794:
771:
767:
745:. Retrieved
715:
710:
705: (2003).
691:
666:
642:
627:
622:
618:
596:
570:
569:
568:
468:
462:Pervert Park
441:Homelessness
440:
402:
396:Smith v. Doe
388:
379:
344:
322:
282:
191:
179:
176:David Souter
167:
155:
107:
99:Case history
82:
64:
26:
727: 2001).
614:Megan's Law
599:Connecticut
580:Connecticut
299:Megan's Law
272:Legislation
233:Concurrence
225:Concurrence
217:Concurrence
883:Categories
672:References
645:certiorari
634:injunction
593:Background
747:March 16,
653:enjoining
128:interest.
91:L. Ed. 2d
71:Citations
793:Text of
603:Internet
247:a series
209:Majority
819:Findlaw
810:Cornell
725:2d Cir.
606:website
283:Federal
122:Holding
858:
852:
849:
843:
840:
837:Justia
834:
831:
825:
822:
816:
813:
807:
723: (
719:,
694:,
610:public
249:on the
220:Scalia
194:
192:·
190:
182:
180:·
178:
170:
168:·
166:
158:
156:·
154:
110:, 271
801:
698:
345:Other
323:State
104:Prior
803:U.S.
749:2008
700:U.S.
112:F.3d
84:more
76:U.S.
74:538
799:538
776:doi
696:538
885::
797:,
770:.
732:^
680:^
659:.
616:.
115:38
93:98
782:.
778::
772:3
751:.
703:1
558:e
551:t
544:v
87:)
81:(
79:1
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
