Knowledge

Concurrent majority

Source 📝

824:, held that any state, as part of its rights as sovereign parties to the Constitution, had the power to declare specific federal laws void within its borders if it considered the law to be unconstitutional. Therefore, under Calhoun's schema, a law required two forms of majorities: a majority of the federal legislature and a concurrent majority of the legislatures of each state. It was on that authority in 1832 that South Carolina passed the 615: 770:, more familiarly known at the time as the "federal ratio," allowed slaves to count as three-fifths of free men for the purposes of representation and taxation. The compromise secured Southern votes for ratification of the Constitution and ensured disproportionate influence to Southerners for the first 50 years of the Constitution's history. 664:
composed of majorities within various subgroups. As a system of government, it means that "major government policy decisions must be approved by the dominant interest groups directly affected ... each group involved must give its consent". There must be majority support within each affected group
794:. As the South's dependence on slavery sharply differentiated its agricultural economy from the North's, the difference in power afforded by population threatened interests that Calhoun considered essential to the South. 747:
defending the interests of the state governments. The House was to be elected by popular vote, and the Senate was to be chosen by state legislatures. The executive veto and the implied power of
949: 700:
whose governments (local, regional, and federal) were democratic by contemporary standards. The conception of government that materialized during the separation of the United States from
601: 596: 803:(1851), argued a method for protecting voting minorities from the tyranny of the majority. In life, Calhoun had been a leading proponent of the concept of 643: 740: 704:
marked a movement away from such control toward wider suffrage. The problem of tyranny then became a problem of limiting the majority's power.
809: 954:
Ford Jr., Lacy K. "Inventing the Concurrent Majority: Madison, Calhoun, and the Problem of Majoritarianism in American Political Thought,"
763:, judicial review was used to strike down most of the obstacles to absolute majority rule by declaring such measures unconstitutional. 752: 804: 553: 453: 636: 408: 799: 739:
Having two houses was intended to serve as a brake on popular movements that might threaten particular groups, with the
468: 1000: 498: 263: 825: 713: 672:, its most vocal proponents have tended to be minority groups. The concurrent majority was intended to prevent the 629: 1005: 701: 692:, most governments were controlled by small minorities of ruling elites. Most of the population was completely 533: 378: 238: 767: 673: 538: 473: 383: 358: 213: 791: 787: 733: 363: 353: 320: 248: 203: 183: 164: 104: 94: 89: 69: 418: 398: 373: 368: 310: 285: 348: 833: 744: 725: 591: 393: 295: 228: 159: 154: 134: 40: 985: 689: 586: 576: 413: 388: 325: 305: 275: 258: 253: 243: 218: 173: 149: 124: 99: 84: 558: 488: 478: 423: 198: 193: 114: 79: 74: 62: 813:, which was published anonymously while he was vice president, in response to the protectionist 797:
His theory of the "concurrent majority," elaborated in his posthumous work of political theory
1010: 760: 581: 508: 233: 223: 169: 50: 23: 518: 513: 463: 290: 178: 139: 129: 109: 668:
As a political principle, it enables minorities to block the actions of majorities. In the
779: 748: 693: 619: 443: 403: 188: 736:
and the three branches of the national government: legislative, executive, and judicial.
845: 837: 829: 821: 814: 783: 548: 438: 208: 614: 994: 680:
by granting some form of veto power to each of the conflicting interests in society.
669: 448: 315: 268: 144: 756: 729: 946:
Calhoun And Popular Rule: The Political Theory of the Disquisition and Discourse.
786:
revived and expounded upon the concurrent majority doctrine. He noted that the
720:, worked to ensure that a simple majority of voters could not infringe upon the 717: 697: 428: 119: 914: 841: 503: 433: 300: 755:, created further obstacles to absolute majority rule; with the rise of the 677: 528: 483: 343: 45: 30: 712:
Even so, the widening of the franchise caused concern. The framers of the
661: 523: 493: 458: 280: 971:
Safford, John L. "John C. Calhoun, Lani Guinier, and Minority Rights,"
959: 721: 976: 790:, with its industrial economy, had become far more populous than the 543: 885:. Ithaca and New York: Cornell university Press. pp. 141–42. 937:
Brown, Guy Story. "Calhoun's Philosophy of Politics: A Study of
964:
Potter, David M., Don E. Fehrenbacher and Carl N. Degler, eds.
848:
was passed, the compromise being largely the work of Calhoun.
716:, even while they reiterated that the people held national 981:
Loo, Andy. "John C. Calhoun’s Concurrent Majority" (2016)
759:
in the 1960s and its establishment of a precedent of
975:
Vol. 28, No. 2 (Jun., 1995), pp. 211–216
676:that proponents feared might arise in an unlimited 901:The Negro President: Jefferson and the Slave Power 807:, as he most forcefully articulated in the 1828 724:of the rest of the people. One protection was 915:"John C. Calhoun: Disquisition on Government" 828:on the Tariff of 1828 and its successor, the 637: 8: 958:Vol. 60, No. 1 (Feb., 1994), pp. 19–58 903:. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. pp. xv-14. 820:Nullification, an outgrowth of Jeffersonian 817:, also called the "Tariff of Abominations." 844:, but armed conflict was avoided after the 778:During the first half of the 19th century, 16:Democratic provision limiting majority rule 644: 630: 18: 869:American Government: Readings and Cases 857: 751:, which was later made explicit by the 743:representing the common people and the 29: 966:The South and the Concurrent Majority. 863: 861: 741:United States House of Representatives 810:South Carolina Exposition and Protest 7: 894: 892: 973:PS: Political Science and Politics, 968:(1973). 89 pp., essays by scholars 753:Supreme Court of the United States 14: 956:The Journal of Southern History, 871:(Pearson/Longman, 2006), p. 259. 613: 597:Latin America and the Caribbean 883:Dreams of a More Perfect Union 1: 409:Democracy and economic growth 939:A Disquisition on Government 800:A Disquisition on Government 602:Middle East and North Africa 469:Peaceful transition of power 499:Proportional representation 1027: 826:Ordinance of Nullification 714:United States Constitution 708:United States Constitution 774:Calhoun and nullification 696:, even in countries like 554:Wars between democracies 534:Territorial peace theory 379:Democratic confederalism 768:Three-Fifths Compromise 674:tyranny of the majority 539:Tyranny of the majority 474:Political demonstration 384:Democratic peace theory 359:Deliberative referendum 734:United States Congress 364:Democratic backsliding 354:Criticism of democracy 899:Wills, Garry (2005). 881:Kersh, Rogan (2004). 832:, thus beginning the 419:Electoral competition 399:Democratic transition 374:Democratic centralism 369:Democratic capitalism 944:Cheek, Jr., H. Lee. 834:Nullification Crisis 745:United States Senate 726:separation of powers 394:Democratic socialism 840:responded with the 690:American Revolution 658:concurrent majority 620:Politics portal 414:Democracy promotion 389:Democratic republic 1001:Political theories 983:The Princeton Tory 559:Waves of democracy 519:Right to candidacy 489:Popular referendum 479:Political equality 349:Citizens' assembly 766:Furthermore, the 761:one man, one vote 654: 653: 509:Right to petition 1018: 925: 924: 922: 921: 911: 905: 904: 896: 887: 886: 878: 872: 865: 646: 639: 632: 618: 617: 514:Right to protest 464:Nomination rules 19: 1026: 1025: 1021: 1020: 1019: 1017: 1016: 1015: 1006:John C. Calhoun 991: 990: 934: 929: 928: 919: 917: 913: 912: 908: 898: 897: 890: 880: 879: 875: 866: 859: 854: 780:John C. Calhoun 776: 749:judicial review 710: 686: 650: 612: 607: 606: 572: 564: 563: 444:Majoritarianism 404:Democratization 339: 331: 330: 65: 55: 24:Politics series 17: 12: 11: 5: 1024: 1022: 1014: 1013: 1008: 1003: 993: 992: 989: 988: 986:online version 979: 969: 962: 952: 950:online edition 942: 933: 930: 927: 926: 906: 888: 873: 856: 855: 853: 850: 846:Tariff of 1833 838:Andrew Jackson 830:Tariff of 1832 822:compact theory 815:Tariff of 1828 784:South Carolina 775: 772: 709: 706: 685: 682: 665:concurrently. 652: 651: 649: 648: 641: 634: 626: 623: 622: 609: 608: 605: 604: 599: 594: 589: 584: 579: 573: 570: 569: 566: 565: 562: 561: 556: 551: 549:War referendum 546: 541: 536: 531: 526: 521: 516: 511: 506: 501: 496: 491: 486: 481: 476: 471: 466: 461: 456: 451: 446: 441: 439:Libertarianism 436: 431: 426: 421: 416: 411: 406: 401: 396: 391: 386: 381: 376: 371: 366: 361: 356: 351: 346: 340: 338:Related topics 337: 336: 333: 332: 329: 328: 323: 318: 313: 308: 303: 298: 293: 288: 283: 278: 273: 272: 271: 266: 261: 256: 251: 241: 239:Representative 236: 231: 226: 221: 216: 211: 206: 201: 196: 191: 186: 181: 176: 167: 162: 157: 152: 147: 142: 137: 132: 127: 122: 117: 112: 107: 102: 97: 92: 87: 82: 77: 72: 66: 61: 60: 57: 56: 54: 53: 48: 43: 37: 34: 33: 27: 26: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1023: 1012: 1009: 1007: 1004: 1002: 999: 998: 996: 987: 984: 980: 978: 974: 970: 967: 963: 961: 957: 953: 951: 947: 943: 940: 936: 935: 931: 916: 910: 907: 902: 895: 893: 889: 884: 877: 874: 870: 864: 862: 858: 851: 849: 847: 843: 839: 835: 831: 827: 823: 818: 816: 812: 811: 806: 805:nullification 802: 801: 795: 793: 789: 785: 781: 773: 771: 769: 764: 762: 758: 754: 750: 746: 742: 737: 735: 731: 727: 723: 719: 715: 707: 705: 703: 702:Great Britain 699: 695: 694:disfranchised 691: 688:Prior to the 683: 681: 679: 675: 671: 670:United States 666: 663: 659: 647: 642: 640: 635: 633: 628: 627: 625: 624: 621: 616: 611: 610: 603: 600: 598: 595: 593: 590: 588: 585: 583: 580: 578: 575: 574: 568: 567: 560: 557: 555: 552: 550: 547: 545: 542: 540: 537: 535: 532: 530: 527: 525: 524:Right to vote 522: 520: 517: 515: 512: 510: 507: 505: 502: 500: 497: 495: 492: 490: 487: 485: 482: 480: 477: 475: 472: 470: 467: 465: 462: 460: 457: 455: 452: 450: 449:Majority rule 447: 445: 442: 440: 437: 435: 432: 430: 427: 425: 422: 420: 417: 415: 412: 410: 407: 405: 402: 400: 397: 395: 392: 390: 387: 385: 382: 380: 377: 375: 372: 370: 367: 365: 362: 360: 357: 355: 352: 350: 347: 345: 342: 341: 335: 334: 327: 324: 322: 319: 317: 316:Supermajority 314: 312: 309: 307: 304: 302: 299: 297: 294: 292: 289: 287: 284: 282: 279: 277: 274: 270: 267: 265: 262: 260: 257: 255: 252: 250: 247: 246: 245: 242: 240: 237: 235: 232: 230: 227: 225: 222: 220: 217: 215: 214:Participatory 212: 210: 207: 205: 202: 200: 197: 195: 192: 190: 187: 185: 182: 180: 177: 175: 171: 168: 166: 163: 161: 158: 156: 153: 151: 148: 146: 145:Hybrid regime 143: 141: 138: 136: 133: 131: 128: 126: 123: 121: 118: 116: 113: 111: 108: 106: 103: 101: 98: 96: 93: 91: 88: 86: 83: 81: 78: 76: 73: 71: 68: 67: 64: 59: 58: 52: 49: 47: 44: 42: 39: 38: 36: 35: 32: 28: 25: 21: 20: 982: 972: 965: 955: 945: 938: 918:. Retrieved 909: 900: 882: 876: 868: 867:Peter Woll, 819: 808: 798: 796: 777: 765: 757:Warren Court 738: 730:bicameralism 711: 687: 667: 657: 655: 321:Totalitarian 204:Non-partisan 184:Majoritarian 165:Jeffersonian 105:Deliberative 95:Cosmopolitan 90:Conservative 70:Anticipatory 22:Part of the 718:sovereignty 698:Switzerland 429:Kleroterion 311:Substantive 286:Semi-direct 995:Categories 920:2015-09-27 852:References 842:Force Bill 728:, such as 684:Background 592:Historical 504:Referendum 459:Ochlocracy 434:Liberalism 424:Initiative 301:Sociocracy 229:Procedural 199:Multiparty 160:Jacksonian 155:Industrial 135:Grassroots 120:Electronic 678:democracy 529:Sortition 484:Polyarchy 344:Anarchism 326:Workplace 306:Sovereign 296:Socialist 276:Sectarian 254:Christian 244:Religious 219:Pluralist 174:Illiberal 150:Inclusive 125:Empowered 100:Defensive 85:Consensus 31:Democracy 1011:Majority 977:in JSTOR 960:in JSTOR 941:" (2000) 662:majority 494:Populism 249:Buddhist 194:Monitory 115:Economic 80:Cellular 75:Athenian 948:(2004) 932:Sources 732:in the 722:liberty 259:Islamic 234:Radical 224:Popular 170:Liberal 51:Indices 41:History 587:Europe 577:Africa 571:Region 544:Voting 454:Motion 291:Social 269:Mormon 264:Jewish 179:Liquid 140:Guided 130:Ethnic 110:Direct 46:Theory 792:South 788:North 660:is a 189:Media 63:Types 582:Asia 281:Semi 209:Oral 782:of 997:: 891:^ 860:^ 836:. 656:A 172:/ 923:. 645:e 638:t 631:v

Index

Politics series
Democracy
History
Theory
Indices
Types
Anticipatory
Athenian
Cellular
Consensus
Conservative
Cosmopolitan
Defensive
Deliberative
Direct
Economic
Electronic
Empowered
Ethnic
Grassroots
Guided
Hybrid regime
Inclusive
Industrial
Jacksonian
Jeffersonian
Liberal
Illiberal
Liquid
Majoritarian

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.