Knowledge (XXG)

Control order

Source 📝

107:
states that the government cannot deprive any person of their liberty without due process of law. This process must include informing the person of the accusation against him, giving him access to legal assistance to prepare his defence, and giving him the right to have his case heard and decided in
73:
The list of possible restrictions and obligations that can be included in a control order is long. It can place restrictions on what the person can use or possess, their place of work, place of residence, whom they speak to, and where they can travel. Furthermore, the person can be ordered to
287:
revealed that two men who are subject to control orders had absconded and were on the run. One suspect had escaped some months previously and the second had gone missing in the last two weeks, but authorities had kept these security breaches out of the public domain until this
277:
11 September 2006 - 9 new orders were made; 2 were against British citizens on 19 June and 5 September, the rest against foreign nationals, one on 31 July and the other 6 on 1 August. There were now 15 orders in force, 6 of which are against British
208:(TPIM). Although intended to be more flexible and to focus more on the investigation of the individual suspected of terrorism-related activity with increased judicial oversight, they have been dubbed as mere re-brandings of control orders. 111:
The government has claimed that the terrorist allegations against certain individuals are of such a nature and from such sources that they cannot be prosecuted "because that would mean revealing sensitive and dangerous intelligence".
189:
He cannot attend any prearranged meetings or gatherings, but was present at the anti-war demonstration at Hyde Park the previous Saturday. He says he stumbled across it while playing football in the park with his
301:
31 October 2007 - Supreme Court of the United Kingdom rules on three cases involving control orders. They ruled that 18-hour curfews are a deprivation of liberty but that 12- and 14- hour curfews are acceptable.
274:, saying: "I am left in no doubt whatsoever that the cumulative effect of the order has been to deprive the respondents of their liberty, in breach of article 5. I do not consider that this is a borderline case." 321:(2009) UKHL 28, the House of Lords rules 9-0 that sufficient detail of the allegations must be disclosed to suspects to enable them to give effective instructions to the special advocates representing them. 74:
surrender their passport, let the police visit their home at any time, report to officials at a specific time and place, and allow themselves to be electronically tagged so their movements can be tracked.
204:
On 23 May 2011, following a Government Review of Counter-Terrorism and Security Measures published in January 2011, the Home Office announced the scheme intended to replace the control orders:
304:
11 September 2007 - 9 new orders were made; 2 were against British citizens on 19 June and 5 September - 14 control orders in force, 8 in respect of British citizens. There were 3 absconders.
869: 205: 62: 182:
On March 24, 2005, one of the men, Abu Rideh, gave a newspaper interview where he denied having any connection with terrorism, and was able to outline the contents of his order.
357: 39:
to restrict an individual's liberty for the purpose of "protecting members of the public from a risk of terrorism". Its definition and power were provided by Parliament in the
223:
11 March 2005 - The act came into force and 11 orders were in place, all against former Belmarsh prisoners who had been held under the previous Anti-terrorism regime.
249:
12 April 2006 - A court ruled that the review procedure for the control orders was not compatible with Article 6 of ECHR (Right to a fair hearing), however the then
1134: 549: 900: 1124: 172: 100:
must apply to a court for the authority. Derogation is only allowed when there is a "war or other public emergency threatening the life of the nation".
955:"Opinions of the Lords of Appeal for Judgment in the Cause: Secretary of State for the Home Department (Appellant) v. JJ and others (FC) (Respondents)" 983:"Opinions of the Lords of Appeal for Judgment in the Cause: Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent) v. E and another (Appellants)" 614: 58:
or other tribunal, the Home Office could simply re-apply the same order again). This has led to many court rulings highly critical of the orders.
925: 193:
He is banned from having visitors to his home unless they are vetted in advance, but he is allowed to arrange to attend group prayers at a mosque
876: 1144: 1129: 564: 219:
requires the Home Secretary to make a statement to Parliament every three months reporting about their exercise of the control order powers.
1087: 271: 104: 93: 89: 78: 901:"Home Office | | Home Secretary's statement in response to Lord Carlile's recommendations on the reporting of control orders" 365: 241:
15 February 2006 - both the House of Commons and the House of Lords agreed to renew the legislation on the terms of the sunset clause.
197:
On April 16, 2005, it was reported that all 10 control orders had been printed with the same reason, connecting individuals with the
779: 231:
10 October 2005 - 9 orders had been revoked, one new one in made against a British national. Therefore, there were 3 in operation.
1083:
Clive Walker, 'Keeping control of terrorists without losing control of constitutionalism' (2007) 59 Stanford Law Review 1395-1463
148:
A requirement to allow specified persons to confiscate and/or scientifically examine any object on premises owned by the subject.
50:
The control orders section of the Prevention of Terrorism Act provides for extremely limited rights of appeal and the absence of
40: 295:
made his first annual review of control orders and recommended that more information be included in the ministerial statements.
1011:"Opinions of the Lords of Appeal for Judgment in the Cause: Secretary of State for the Home Department v. MB (FC) (Appellant)" 870:"Home Office | | Lord Carlile's review of the Home Secretary's quarterly reports to parliament on control orders" 77:
In short, it provides for a graduated scale of technological "prisons without bars" that are intended to work within the
904: 1139: 44: 228:
16 June 2005 - Nothing had changed, except that 3 of the orders were varied to take account of change of address.
954: 84:
When the control order crosses the line and "deprives liberty", rather than "restricts liberty", it is called a
1010: 982: 599: 337: 168: 1071: 556: 527: 488: 267: 198: 798: 186:
He is not allowed to make arrangements to meet anybody, but he can meet them if he does so unannounced
331: 216: 461: 394: 1082: 696: 1109: 1051: 379: 721: 570: 560: 436: 167:
was voted through Parliament on the evening of 11 March 2005 after a famously long session of
1037: 828: 682: 414: 783: 766: 749: 1099: 665: 648: 578: 133:
Restriction on association and communications with specified people, or people in general.
55: 51: 61:
The Prevention of Terrorism Act and control orders were repealed in December 2011 by the
415:"- ETS no. 005 - Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms" 1014: 986: 958: 762: 745: 725: 700: 678: 661: 644: 440: 253: 250: 151:
A requirement to allow electronic surveillance to be carried out and photographs taken.
97: 36: 32: 244:
13 March 2006 - 11 control orders were in place, 3 of which were on British nationals.
1118: 1077: 1104: 550:
Review of counter-terrorism and security powers: review findings and recommendations
1033: 824: 803: 622: 466: 399: 292: 1067: 506: 697:"Prevention and Suppression of Terrorism: 15 Feb 2006: House of Commons debates" 545: 284: 154:
Any other restrictions whatsoever for up to 24hrs, when it is deemed necessary.
17: 574: 1006: 978: 950: 842: 582: 437:"It is the advice of the security...: 10 Mar 2005: House of Commons debates" 298:
11 December 2006 - 16 control orders were in force, 7 on British nationals.
722:"Prevention of Terrorism Act 2005...: 15 Feb 2006: House of Lords debates" 847: 511: 176: 270:
judge nullified six of these orders as being incompatible with the
261:
12 June 2006 - 14 control orders in force, 5 on British nationals.
54:
restrictions (i.e. if a recipient managed to win an appeal in the
136:
Restriction of place of residence, and visitors to the residence.
395:"Restrict freedom to preserve liberty: cunning Home Office plan" 309:
21 February 2008 - Parliament renewed the Act for another year
92:. This can only happen if there is a derogation according to 799:"New blow for Home Office as judge quashes six terror orders" 145:
A requirement to admit specified persons to certain premises.
1036:
Written Ministerial Statement, 17 September 2007 col. 126WS
827:
Written Ministerial Statement, 11 September 2006 col. 122WS
139:
Movements at certain times of the day, or to certain places.
681:
Written Ministerial Statement, 12 December 2005 col. 131WS
319:
Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF and another
380:"Terrorism Prevention and Investigation Measures Act 2011" 314:
3 March 2009 - Parliament approved again for another year.
121:
Possession and/or use of specified objects and substances.
684:
Control Order Powers (11 September 2005-10 December 2005)
615:"Control orders have been rebranded. Big problems remain" 236:
12 December 2005 - 5 new orders made, making the total 8.
173:
Part 4 of the Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001
1039:
Control Order Powers (11 June 2007 to 10 September 2007)
664:
Written Ministerial Statement, 10 October 2005 col. 9WS
63:
Terrorism Prevention and Investigation Measures Act 2011
765:
Written Ministerial Statement, 24 April 2006 col. 32WS
748:
Written Ministerial Statement, 13 March 2006 col. 88WS
212:
Timeline of ministerial statements and legal challenges
782:
Written Ministerial Statement, 12 June 2006 col. 48WS
647:
Written Ministerial Statement, 16 June 2005 col. 23WS
528:"Home Office says sorry to suspects for ricin blunder" 43:. Control orders were also included in the Australian 830:
Control Order Powers (11 June 2006-10 September 2006)
751:
Control Order Powers (11 December 2005-10 March 2006)
667:
Control Order Powers (11 June 2005-10 September 2005)
600:"Terrorism Prevention and Investigation Measures Act" 358:"Judges reject government appeal over control orders" 594: 592: 926:"Control Orders and mobile phone and internet bans" 785:Control Order Powers (11 March 2006-19 June 2006) 650:Control Order Powers (11 March 2005-11 June 2005) 1074:, a British jihadi who escaped his control order 460:Bright, Martin; Hinsliff, Gaby (13 March 2005). 179:and were immediately subject to control orders. 1110:First House of Commons debate on control orders 256:was undeterred in his stance on Control Orders. 206:Terrorism Prevention and Investigation Measures 1100:Independent Reviewer of Terrorism Legislation 1088:JUSTICE report on Secret Evidence (June 2009) 797:Travis, Alan; Gillan, Audrey (29 June 2006). 8: 640: 638: 124:Use of specified services and/or facilities. 1078:BBC News article explaining Control Orders 1050:Commons Debate, 21 February 2008 col. 561 1068:BBC News - Jihadi diary: Inside the mind 201:. It was blamed on a "clerical error". 1053:Prevention and Suppression of Terrorism 555:(Report). Cm. Vol. 8004. Norwich: 462:"Chaos as first terror orders are used" 349: 1135:Counterterrorism in the United Kingdom 171:. The ten detainees being held under 7: 1125:Terrorism laws in the United Kingdom 507:"Apology over control orders error" 127:Certain occupations and employment. 79:European Convention on Human Rights 843:"Two terror suspects 'on the run'" 613:Ryder, Matthew (28 January 2011). 130:Carrying out specified activities. 25: 108:public before a competent court. 526:Gillan, Audrey (16 April 2005). 364:. 18 August 2006. Archived from 41:Prevention of Terrorism Act 2005 435:Blears, Hazel (10 March 2005). 393:Lettice, John (1 March 2005). 317:10 June 2009 - In the case of 1: 489:"Control order flaws exposed" 142:Passport must be surrendered. 1145:Islamic terrorism in England 1130:Home Office (United Kingdom) 362:Garden Court North Chambers 1161: 1105:Text of the Terrorism Act 1070:14/06/07 - the diary of 495:. London. 24 March 2005. 86:derogating control order 31:is an order made by the 768:Control Order Judgement 338:Anti-Terrorism Act 2005 199:Wood Green "ricin plot" 169:Parliamentary ping-pong 45:Anti-Terrorism Act 2005 283:16 October 2006 - the 1072:Zeeshan Anis Siddiqui 557:The Stationery Office 90:Article 5 of the ECHR 88:because it infringes 368:on 24 December 2007. 332:Security Certificate 116:List of restrictions 1009:(31 October 2007). 981:(31 October 2007). 953:(31 October 2007). 548:(26 January 2011). 417:. Council of Europe 291:17 November 2006 - 175:were released from 1140:2005 introductions 932:. 13 December 2006 728:. 15 February 2006 703:. 15 February 2006 602:. 26 October 2016. 163:The power to make 851:. 17 October 2006 566:978-0-10-180042-6 266:29 June 2006 - a 16:(Redirected from 1152: 1056: 1048: 1042: 1031: 1025: 1024: 1022: 1021: 1003: 997: 996: 994: 993: 975: 969: 968: 966: 965: 947: 941: 940: 938: 937: 922: 916: 915: 913: 912: 903:. Archived from 897: 891: 890: 888: 887: 881: 875:. Archived from 874: 866: 860: 859: 857: 856: 839: 833: 822: 816: 815: 813: 812: 794: 788: 777: 771: 760: 754: 743: 737: 736: 734: 733: 718: 712: 711: 709: 708: 693: 687: 676: 670: 659: 653: 642: 633: 632: 630: 629: 610: 604: 603: 596: 587: 586: 554: 542: 536: 535: 523: 517: 516: 515:. 16 April 2005. 503: 497: 496: 485: 479: 478: 476: 475: 457: 451: 450: 448: 447: 432: 426: 425: 423: 422: 411: 405: 404: 390: 384: 383: 376: 370: 369: 354: 21: 1160: 1159: 1155: 1154: 1153: 1151: 1150: 1149: 1115: 1114: 1096: 1064: 1062:Further reading 1059: 1049: 1045: 1032: 1028: 1019: 1017: 1007:Lords of Appeal 1005: 1004: 1000: 991: 989: 979:Lords of Appeal 977: 976: 972: 963: 961: 951:Lords of Appeal 949: 948: 944: 935: 933: 924: 923: 919: 910: 908: 899: 898: 894: 885: 883: 879: 872: 868: 867: 863: 854: 852: 841: 840: 836: 823: 819: 810: 808: 796: 795: 791: 778: 774: 761: 757: 744: 740: 731: 729: 720: 719: 715: 706: 704: 695: 694: 690: 677: 673: 660: 656: 643: 636: 627: 625: 619:comment is free 612: 611: 607: 598: 597: 590: 567: 552: 544: 543: 539: 525: 524: 520: 505: 504: 500: 487: 486: 482: 473: 471: 459: 458: 454: 445: 443: 434: 433: 429: 420: 418: 413: 412: 408: 392: 391: 387: 378: 377: 373: 356: 355: 351: 347: 328: 214: 161: 118: 71: 56:Court of Appeal 52:double jeopardy 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 1158: 1156: 1148: 1147: 1142: 1137: 1132: 1127: 1117: 1116: 1113: 1112: 1107: 1102: 1095: 1094:External links 1092: 1091: 1090: 1085: 1080: 1075: 1063: 1060: 1058: 1057: 1043: 1026: 1015:House of Lords 998: 987:House of Lords 970: 959:House of Lords 942: 917: 892: 861: 834: 817: 789: 772: 763:Charles Clarke 755: 746:Charles Clarke 738: 726:TheyWorkForYou 713: 701:TheyWorkForYou 688: 679:Charles Clarke 671: 662:Charles Clarke 654: 645:Charles Clarke 634: 605: 588: 565: 537: 518: 498: 480: 452: 441:TheyWorkForYou 427: 406: 385: 371: 348: 346: 343: 342: 341: 335: 327: 324: 323: 322: 315: 311: 310: 306: 305: 302: 299: 296: 289: 280: 279: 275: 263: 262: 258: 257: 254:Charles Clarke 251:Home Secretary 246: 245: 242: 238: 237: 233: 232: 229: 225: 224: 213: 210: 195: 194: 191: 187: 165:control orders 160: 157: 156: 155: 152: 149: 146: 143: 140: 137: 134: 131: 128: 125: 122: 117: 114: 98:Home Secretary 70: 67: 37:United Kingdom 33:Home Secretary 24: 18:Control orders 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1157: 1146: 1143: 1141: 1138: 1136: 1133: 1131: 1128: 1126: 1123: 1122: 1120: 1111: 1108: 1106: 1103: 1101: 1098: 1097: 1093: 1089: 1086: 1084: 1081: 1079: 1076: 1073: 1069: 1066: 1065: 1061: 1055: 1054: 1047: 1044: 1041: 1040: 1035: 1030: 1027: 1016: 1012: 1008: 1002: 999: 988: 984: 980: 974: 971: 960: 956: 952: 946: 943: 931: 927: 921: 918: 907:on 2007-01-06 906: 902: 896: 893: 882:on 2007-01-06 878: 871: 865: 862: 850: 849: 844: 838: 835: 832: 831: 826: 821: 818: 806: 805: 800: 793: 790: 787: 786: 781: 776: 773: 770: 769: 764: 759: 756: 753: 752: 747: 742: 739: 727: 723: 717: 714: 702: 698: 692: 689: 686: 685: 680: 675: 672: 669: 668: 663: 658: 655: 652: 651: 646: 641: 639: 635: 624: 620: 616: 609: 606: 601: 595: 593: 589: 584: 580: 576: 572: 568: 562: 558: 551: 547: 541: 538: 533: 529: 522: 519: 514: 513: 508: 502: 499: 494: 490: 484: 481: 469: 468: 463: 456: 453: 442: 438: 431: 428: 416: 410: 407: 402: 401: 396: 389: 386: 381: 375: 372: 367: 363: 359: 353: 350: 344: 339: 336: 333: 330: 329: 325: 320: 316: 313: 312: 308: 307: 303: 300: 297: 294: 290: 286: 282: 281: 276: 273: 269: 265: 264: 260: 259: 255: 252: 248: 247: 243: 240: 239: 235: 234: 230: 227: 226: 222: 221: 220: 218: 211: 209: 207: 202: 200: 192: 188: 185: 184: 183: 180: 178: 174: 170: 166: 158: 153: 150: 147: 144: 141: 138: 135: 132: 129: 126: 123: 120: 119: 115: 113: 109: 106: 101: 99: 95: 91: 87: 82: 80: 75: 68: 66: 64: 59: 57: 53: 48: 46: 42: 38: 34: 30: 29:control order 19: 1052: 1046: 1038: 1034:Tony McNulty 1029: 1018:. Retrieved 1001: 990:. Retrieved 973: 962:. Retrieved 945: 934:. Retrieved 929: 920: 909:. Retrieved 905:the original 895: 884:. Retrieved 877:the original 864: 853:. Retrieved 846: 837: 829: 825:Tony McNulty 820: 809:. Retrieved 804:The Guardian 802: 792: 784: 775: 767: 758: 750: 741: 730:. Retrieved 716: 705:. Retrieved 691: 683: 674: 666: 657: 649: 626:. Retrieved 623:The Guardian 618: 608: 540: 532:The Guardian 531: 521: 510: 501: 493:The Guardian 492: 483: 472:. Retrieved 467:The Observer 465: 455: 444:. Retrieved 430: 419:. Retrieved 409: 400:The Register 398: 388: 374: 366:the original 361: 352: 318: 293:Lord Carlile 215: 203: 196: 181: 164: 162: 110: 102: 85: 83: 76: 72: 60: 49: 28: 26: 546:Home Office 340:(Australia) 285:Home Office 1119:Categories 1020:2011-05-08 992:2011-05-08 964:2011-05-08 936:2011-05-08 911:2006-12-13 886:2006-12-13 855:2011-05-08 811:2011-05-08 732:2011-05-08 707:2011-05-08 628:2011-05-08 621:. London: 474:2011-05-08 446:2011-05-08 421:2011-05-08 345:References 268:High Court 217:Section 14 96:, and the 94:Article 15 780:John Reid 583:28251337W 575:700136320 534:. London. 334:of Canada 278:citizens. 930:Spy Blog 848:BBC News 807:. London 512:BBC News 470:. London 326:See also 190:children 177:Belmarsh 159:History 35:of the 581:  573:  563:  69:Powers 880:(PDF) 873:(PDF) 553:(PDF) 288:date. 571:OCLC 561:ISBN 272:ECHR 105:ECHR 103:The 1121:: 1013:. 985:. 957:. 928:. 845:. 801:. 724:. 699:. 637:^ 617:. 591:^ 579:OL 577:. 569:. 559:. 530:. 509:. 491:. 464:. 439:. 397:. 360:. 81:. 65:. 47:. 27:A 1023:. 995:. 967:. 939:. 914:. 889:. 858:. 814:. 735:. 710:. 631:. 585:. 477:. 449:. 424:. 403:. 382:. 20:)

Index

Control orders
Home Secretary
United Kingdom
Prevention of Terrorism Act 2005
Anti-Terrorism Act 2005
double jeopardy
Court of Appeal
Terrorism Prevention and Investigation Measures Act 2011
European Convention on Human Rights
Article 5 of the ECHR
Article 15
Home Secretary
ECHR
Parliamentary ping-pong
Part 4 of the Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001
Belmarsh
Wood Green "ricin plot"
Terrorism Prevention and Investigation Measures
Section 14
Home Secretary
Charles Clarke
High Court
ECHR
Home Office
Lord Carlile
Security Certificate
Anti-Terrorism Act 2005
"Judges reject government appeal over control orders"
the original
"Terrorism Prevention and Investigation Measures Act 2011"

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.