Knowledge (XXG)

Copyright Arbitration Royalty Panel

Source 📝

71:
When determining the reasonable royalty rates, the Copyright Arbitration Royalty Panel attempts to make the creative works accessible to the public, to grant the copyright holder a fair reward for the work, and to minimize any disruptive effects the industries involved or associated with the
85:, also known as CRJs, establish the conditions and rates for (compulsory) copyright statutory licenses, and govern the distribution system of royalties collected by the Copyright office on these statutory licenses. 17 U.S.C. Section 801. 465: 312: 307: 652: 80:
The CARP was phased out by the Copyright Royalty and Distribution Reform Act of 2004, which amended chapter 8 of the U.S. Copyright Act in its entirety. Pub. L. No. 108-419, 118 Stat. 2341. Under the new system, three
92:
with the possibility for reappointment. In order to avoid replacing all three judges at the same time, the first three judges appointed will serve staggered terms of two, four, and six years. 17 U.S.C. Section 802.
740: 523: 239: 1050: 636: 839: 547: 500: 460: 863: 791: 716: 628: 871: 855: 895: 935: 232: 799: 700: 1058: 612: 275: 975: 708: 392: 225: 122: 991: 847: 620: 959: 1191: 580: 449: 692: 72:
copyright holder and user. Additionally, arbitrary decisions are made concerning the adjustment of the copyright royalty rates by this group.
1114: 879: 783: 767: 676: 483: 1082: 887: 1098: 1074: 951: 724: 1106: 1007: 668: 350: 1066: 911: 823: 732: 644: 414: 259: 248: 967: 759: 171: 454: 1156: 1023: 269: 1015: 983: 919: 420: 1122: 1090: 443: 431: 1196: 604: 1169: 903: 1151: 999: 408: 1201: 425: 506: 437: 300: 285: 102: 82: 295: 39: 27: 927: 775: 376: 360: 345: 340: 335: 355: 52:
panels. The primary purpose of the panel is to make decisions involving the adjustment of copyright
1162: 588: 660: 596: 197: 556: 290: 198:"H.R.1417 - 108th Congress (2003-2004): Copyright Royalty and Distribution Reform Act of 2004" 1141: 815: 572: 264: 1042: 943: 831: 684: 564: 807: 1185: 1146: 217: 65: 147: 53: 46: 89: 49: 43: 466:
WIPO Copyright and Performances and Phonograms Treaties Implementation Act
313:
Copyright status of works by subnational governments of the United States
57: 308:
Copyright status of works by the federal government of the United States
61: 221: 30:
involved in making decisions regarding copyright royalties.
123:"Copyright Arbitration Royalty Panel Rules and Procedures" 38:
The system itself was created upon the suggestion of the
1051:
Elektra Records Co. v. Gem Electronic Distributors, Inc.
88:
The CRJ appointees will serve for a full-time six-year
840:
Computer Associates International, Inc. v. Altai, Inc.
501:
Unlocking Consumer Choice and Wireless Competition Act
461:
Online Copyright Infringement Liability Limitation Act
864:
Itar-Tass Russian News Agency v. Russian Kurier, Inc.
792:
Midway Manufacturing Co. v. Artic International, Inc.
629:
Sony Corp. of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc.
872:
Sony Computer Entertainment, Inc. v. Connectix Corp.
1034: 751: 546: 537: 516: 493: 476: 401: 385: 369: 328: 321: 148:"U.S. Copyright Office: CARP Structure and Process" 856:Dr. Seuss Enters., L.P. v. Penguin Books USA, Inc. 172:"Chapter 8. Copyright Arbitration Royalty Panels" 936:Bill Graham Archives v. Dorling Kindersley, Ltd. 800:Apple Computer, Inc. v. Franklin Computer Corp. 701:American Broadcasting Cos., Inc. v. Aereo, Inc. 1059:Broderbund Software Inc. v. Unison World, Inc. 896:Veeck v. Southern Building Code Congress Int'l 613:White-Smith Music Publishing Co. v. Apollo Co. 276:Compendium of U.S. Copyright Office Practices 233: 8: 42:, and is sanctioned to appoint and organize 976:Penguin Group (USA) Inc. v. American Buddha 621:Williams & Wilkins Co. v. United States 393:Berne Convention Implementation Act of 1988 992:Viacom International Inc. v. YouTube, Inc. 848:American Geophysical Union v. Texaco, Inc. 543: 325: 240: 226: 218: 960:Cartoon Network, LP v. CSC Holdings, Inc. 693:Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 581:Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. Sarony 450:Fairness in Music Licensing Act of 1998 114: 20:The Copyright Arbitration Royalty Panel 1115:Equals Three, LLC v. Jukin Media, Inc. 888:A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc. 784:Walt Disney Productions v. Air Pirates 768:Roth Greeting Cards v. United Card Co. 677:Costco Wholesale Corp. v. Omega, S. A. 484:Family Entertainment and Copyright Act 176:Stanford Copyright and Fair Use Center 1083:RealNetworks, Inc. v. Streambox, Inc. 7: 1099:Arista Records LLC v. Lime Group LLC 1075:Bridgeman Art Library v. Corel Corp. 952:Perfect 10, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc. 725:Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, Inc. 1107:Capitol Records, LLC v. ReDigi Inc. 1008:Authors Guild, Inc. v. Google, Inc. 880:Nunez v. Caribbean Int'l News Corp. 741:Andy Warhol Foundation v. Goldsmith 669:MGM Studios, Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd. 351:International Copyright Act of 1891 1067:Playboy Enterprises, Inc. v. Frena 912:In re Aimster Copyright Litigation 824:Vault Corp. v. Quaid Software Ltd. 733:Google LLC v. Oracle America, Inc. 645:Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc. 415:Copyright Remedy Clarification Act 249:Copyright law of the United States 14: 968:Ahanchian v. Xenon Pictures, Inc. 760:Berlin v. E.C. Publications, Inc. 717:Fourth Estate v. Wall-Street.com 709:Star Athletica v. Varsity Brands 455:Digital Millennium Copyright Act 1157:Home Recording Rights Coalition 76:Distribution Reform Act of 2004 1192:United States Copyright Office 270:United States Copyright Office 1: 1016:Lenz v. Universal Music Corp. 984:Monge v. Maya Magazines, Inc. 920:NXIVM Corp. v. Ross Institute 421:Copyright Renewal Act of 1992 64:of royalties that fall under 1123:Hachette v. Internet Archive 1091:Mannion v. Coors Brewing Co. 444:Copyright Term Extension Act 432:Uruguay Round Agreements Act 605:Bobbs-Merrill Co. v. Straus 196:Smith, Lamar (2004-11-30). 26:) system was a part of the 1218: 904:Kelly v. Arriba Soft Corp. 1137: 1000:Seltzer v. Green Day, Inc 409:Visual Artists Rights Act 255: 16:American copyright agency 1170:You Wouldn't Steal a Car 426:Audio Home Recording Act 83:Copyright Royalty Judges 507:Music Modernization Act 438:No Electronic Theft Act 301:Section 108 Study Group 103:Copyright Royalty Board 1152:Don't Copy That Floppy 907:(9th Cir. 2002 / 2003) 653:Quality King v. L'anza 296:Register of Copyrights 40:Register of Copyrights 28:United States Congress 928:BMG Music v. Gonzalez 776:Eltra Corp. v. Ringer 377:Copyright Act of 1976 361:Copyright Act of 1909 346:Copyright Act of 1870 341:Copyright Act of 1831 336:Copyright Act of 1790 356:Printing Act of 1895 1163:Nimmer on Copyright 1046:(C.C.D. Mass. 1841) 589:Banks v. Manchester 1197:Copyright agencies 661:Eldred v. Ashcroft 597:Callaghan v. Myers 1179: 1178: 1133: 1132: 1086:(W.D. Wash. 2000) 557:Wheaton v. Peters 533: 532: 291:Copyright Catalog 152:www.copyright.gov 1209: 1142:Berne Convention 1118:(C.D. Cal. 2015) 1070:(M.D. Fla. 1993) 1062:(N.D. Cal. 1986) 1024:Naruto v. Slater 816:Whelan v. Jaslow 573:Trade-Mark Cases 544: 326: 265:Copyright Clause 242: 235: 228: 219: 212: 211: 209: 208: 202:www.congress.gov 193: 187: 186: 184: 183: 168: 162: 161: 159: 158: 144: 138: 137: 135: 134: 127:Federal Register 119: 1217: 1216: 1212: 1211: 1210: 1208: 1207: 1206: 1202:Music licensing 1182: 1181: 1180: 1175: 1129: 1126:(S.D.N.Y. 2023) 1110:(S.D.N.Y. 2013) 1102:(S.D.N.Y. 2010) 1094:(S.D.N.Y. 2005) 1078:(S.D.N.Y. 1999) 1054:(E.D.N.Y. 1973) 1043:Folsom v. Marsh 1030: 1027:(9th Cir. 2018) 1019:(9th Cir. 2015) 1003:(9th Cir. 2013) 987:(9th Cir. 2012) 971:(9th Cir. 2010) 963:(2nd Cir. 2008) 955:(9th Cir. 2006) 947:(2nd Cir. 2006) 944:Blanch v. Koons 939:(2nd Cir. 2006) 931:(7th Cir. 2005) 915:(7th Cir. 2003) 899:(5th Cir. 2002) 891:(9th Cir. 2001) 883:(1st Cir. 2000) 875:(9th Cir. 2000) 859:(9th Cir. 1997) 851:(2nd Cir. 1995) 835:(2nd Cir. 1992) 832:Rogers v. Koons 827:(5th Cir. 1988) 811:(9th Cir. 1986) 795:(7th Cir. 1983) 787:(9th Cir. 1978) 779:(4th Cir. 1978) 771:(9th Cir. 1970) 747: 685:Golan v. Holder 565:Baker v. Selden 539: 529: 512: 489: 472: 397: 381: 365: 317: 251: 246: 216: 215: 206: 204: 195: 194: 190: 181: 179: 170: 169: 165: 156: 154: 146: 145: 141: 132: 130: 121: 120: 116: 111: 99: 78: 56:as well as the 36: 17: 12: 11: 5: 1215: 1213: 1205: 1204: 1199: 1194: 1184: 1183: 1177: 1176: 1174: 1173: 1166: 1159: 1154: 1149: 1144: 1138: 1135: 1134: 1131: 1130: 1128: 1127: 1119: 1111: 1103: 1095: 1087: 1079: 1071: 1063: 1055: 1047: 1038: 1036: 1032: 1031: 1029: 1028: 1020: 1012: 1011:(2d Cir. 2015) 1004: 996: 995:(2d Cir. 2012) 988: 980: 979:(2d Cir. 2011) 972: 964: 956: 948: 940: 932: 924: 923:(2d Cir. 2004) 916: 908: 900: 892: 884: 876: 868: 867:(2d Cir. 1998) 860: 852: 844: 843:(2d Cir. 1992) 836: 828: 820: 819:(3d Cir. 1986) 812: 808:Fisher v. Dees 804: 803:(3d Cir. 1983) 796: 788: 780: 772: 764: 763:(2d Cir. 1964) 755: 753: 752:Appeals courts 749: 748: 746: 745: 737: 729: 721: 713: 705: 697: 689: 681: 673: 665: 657: 649: 641: 637:Feist v. Rural 633: 625: 617: 609: 601: 593: 585: 577: 569: 561: 552: 550: 541: 535: 534: 531: 530: 528: 527: 520: 518: 514: 513: 511: 510: 504: 497: 495: 491: 490: 488: 487: 480: 478: 474: 473: 471: 470: 469: 468: 463: 452: 447: 441: 435: 429: 423: 418: 412: 405: 403: 399: 398: 396: 395: 389: 387: 383: 382: 380: 379: 373: 371: 367: 366: 364: 363: 358: 353: 348: 343: 338: 332: 330: 323: 319: 318: 316: 315: 310: 305: 304: 303: 298: 293: 288: 279: 267: 262: 256: 253: 252: 247: 245: 244: 237: 230: 222: 214: 213: 188: 163: 139: 113: 112: 110: 107: 106: 105: 98: 95: 77: 74: 35: 34:Panel function 32: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1214: 1203: 1200: 1198: 1195: 1193: 1190: 1189: 1187: 1171: 1167: 1165: 1164: 1160: 1158: 1155: 1153: 1150: 1148: 1147:Uruguay Round 1145: 1143: 1140: 1139: 1136: 1125: 1124: 1120: 1117: 1116: 1112: 1109: 1108: 1104: 1101: 1100: 1096: 1093: 1092: 1088: 1085: 1084: 1080: 1077: 1076: 1072: 1069: 1068: 1064: 1061: 1060: 1056: 1053: 1052: 1048: 1045: 1044: 1040: 1039: 1037: 1033: 1026: 1025: 1021: 1018: 1017: 1013: 1010: 1009: 1005: 1002: 1001: 997: 994: 993: 989: 986: 985: 981: 978: 977: 973: 970: 969: 965: 962: 961: 957: 954: 953: 949: 946: 945: 941: 938: 937: 933: 930: 929: 925: 922: 921: 917: 914: 913: 909: 906: 905: 901: 898: 897: 893: 890: 889: 885: 882: 881: 877: 874: 873: 869: 866: 865: 861: 858: 857: 853: 850: 849: 845: 842: 841: 837: 834: 833: 829: 826: 825: 821: 818: 817: 813: 810: 809: 805: 802: 801: 797: 794: 793: 789: 786: 785: 781: 778: 777: 773: 770: 769: 765: 762: 761: 757: 756: 754: 750: 743: 742: 738: 735: 734: 730: 727: 726: 722: 719: 718: 714: 711: 710: 706: 703: 702: 698: 695: 694: 690: 687: 686: 682: 679: 678: 674: 671: 670: 666: 663: 662: 658: 655: 654: 650: 647: 646: 642: 639: 638: 634: 631: 630: 626: 623: 622: 618: 615: 614: 610: 607: 606: 602: 599: 598: 594: 591: 590: 586: 583: 582: 578: 575: 574: 570: 567: 566: 562: 559: 558: 554: 553: 551: 549: 548:Supreme Court 545: 542: 536: 525: 522: 521: 519: 515: 508: 505: 502: 499: 498: 496: 492: 485: 482: 481: 479: 475: 467: 464: 462: 459: 458: 456: 453: 451: 448: 445: 442: 439: 436: 433: 430: 427: 424: 422: 419: 416: 413: 410: 407: 406: 404: 400: 394: 391: 390: 388: 384: 378: 375: 374: 372: 368: 362: 359: 357: 354: 352: 349: 347: 344: 342: 339: 337: 334: 333: 331: 327: 324: 320: 314: 311: 309: 306: 302: 299: 297: 294: 292: 289: 287: 284: →  283: 280: 278: 277: 273: 272: 271: 268: 266: 263: 261: 258: 257: 254: 250: 243: 238: 236: 231: 229: 224: 223: 220: 203: 199: 192: 189: 177: 173: 167: 164: 153: 149: 143: 140: 128: 124: 118: 115: 108: 104: 101: 100: 96: 94: 91: 86: 84: 75: 73: 69: 67: 66:copyright law 63: 59: 55: 54:royalty rates 51: 48: 45: 41: 33: 31: 29: 25: 21: 1161: 1121: 1113: 1105: 1097: 1089: 1081: 1073: 1065: 1057: 1049: 1041: 1035:Lower courts 1022: 1014: 1006: 998: 990: 982: 974: 966: 958: 950: 942: 934: 926: 918: 910: 902: 894: 886: 878: 870: 862: 854: 846: 838: 830: 822: 814: 806: 798: 790: 782: 774: 766: 758: 739: 731: 723: 715: 707: 699: 691: 683: 675: 667: 659: 651: 643: 635: 627: 619: 611: 603: 595: 587: 579: 571: 563: 555: 281: 274: 205:. Retrieved 201: 191: 180:. Retrieved 178:. 2013-07-11 175: 166: 155:. Retrieved 151: 142: 131:. Retrieved 129:. 2011-07-13 126: 117: 87: 79: 70: 37: 23: 19: 18: 540:and rulings 47:arbitration 1186:Categories 538:Precedents 207:2021-07-27 182:2021-07-27 157:2021-07-27 133:2021-07-27 109:References 260:17 U.S.C. 44:copyright 524:CASE Act 329:Pre-1976 322:Statutes 97:See also 62:payments 457:(1998) 50:royalty 744:(2023) 736:(2021) 728:(2020) 720:(2019) 712:(2017) 704:(2014) 696:(2013) 688:(2012) 680:(2010) 672:(2005) 664:(2003) 656:(1998) 648:(1994) 640:(1991) 632:(1984) 624:(1975) 616:(1908) 608:(1908) 600:(1888) 592:(1888) 584:(1884) 576:(1879) 568:(1879) 560:(1834) 526:(2020) 509:(2018) 503:(2014) 486:(2005) 446:(1998) 440:(1994) 434:(1994) 428:(1992) 417:(1990) 411:(1990) 517:2020s 494:2010s 477:2000s 402:1990s 386:1980s 370:1970s 58:terms 282:CARP 90:term 60:and 24:CARP 286:CRB 68:. 1188:: 200:. 174:. 150:. 125:. 1172:" 1168:" 241:e 234:t 227:v 210:. 185:. 160:. 136:. 22:(

Index

United States Congress
Register of Copyrights
copyright
arbitration
royalty
royalty rates
terms
payments
copyright law
Copyright Royalty Judges
term
Copyright Royalty Board
"Copyright Arbitration Royalty Panel Rules and Procedures"
"U.S. Copyright Office: CARP Structure and Process"
"Chapter 8. Copyright Arbitration Royalty Panels"
"H.R.1417 - 108th Congress (2003-2004): Copyright Royalty and Distribution Reform Act of 2004"
v
t
e
Copyright law of the United States
17 U.S.C.
Copyright Clause
United States Copyright Office
Compendium of U.S. Copyright Office Practices
CARP
CRB
Copyright Catalog
Register of Copyrights
Section 108 Study Group
Copyright status of works by the federal government of the United States

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.