Knowledge (XXG)

Settlement (litigation)

Source 📝

643:
In controversial cases, it may be written into a settlement that both sides keep its contents and all other information relevant to the case confidential or that one of the parties (usually the one being sued) does not, by agreeing to the settlement, admit to any fault or wrongdoing in the underlying
785:
In Israel, which is a common law jurisdiction, settlements almost always are submitted to the court, for two reasons: (a) only by submitting the settlement to the court can the litigants control whether the court will order one or more parties to pay costs, and (b) the plaintiff (claimant) usually
776:
and no further action can be taken in court (except for referring a dispute in the implementation of the order to court, which is allowed). The order also deals with payment of costs, and payments of money out of court if any money is held by the court (as these are matters which must be dealt with
748:
have laws limiting confidentiality as well, although judicial interpretation has weakened the application of these types of laws. In the U.S. Congress, a similar federal Sunshine in Litigation Act has been proposed but not passed in 2009, 2011, 2014, and 2015. Confidentiality agreements which keep
631:
The majority of cases are decided by a settlement. Both sides (regardless of relative monetary resources) often have a strong incentive to settle to avoid the costs (such as legal fees, finding expert witnesses, etc.), the time and the stress associated with a trial, particularly where a trial by
619:
The contract is based upon the bargain that a party forgoes its ability to sue (if it has not sued already), or to continue with the claim (if the plaintiff has sued), in return for the certainty written into the settlement. The courts will enforce the settlement. If it is breached, the party in
647:
A "global settlement" is one employed where suits have been filed or charges brought in multiple jurisdictions and is defined as "a legal agreement that addresses or compromises both civil claims and criminal charges against a corporation or other large entity". Examples of a global settlement
719:
preventing the release, but the party seeking to prevent disclosure must show that harm or prejudice would result from the disclosure. In specific states such as California, however the burden is on the party seeking release of the confidential settlement.
777:
by Court Order). However, the actual terms of the settlement are dealt with in a 'schedule' to the order, which can remain confidential. Breach of the schedule can be dealt with as breach of contract, or breach of the consent order.
963:
Barkai, John; Kent, Elizabeth (1 January 2014). "Let's Stop Spreading Rumors About Settlement and Litigation: A Comparative Study of Settlement and Litigation in Hawaii Courts". Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network.
1012: 703:
Most settlements are confidential. In these cases, the court order may refer to another document which is not disclosed, but which may be revealed to prove a breach of the settlement. Confidentiality is not possible in
1129: 627:
by the parties. In other situations (as where the claims have been satisfied by the payment of a certain sum of money), the plaintiff and defendant can simply file a notice that the case has been dismissed.
596:
A settlement, as well as dealing with the dispute between the parties is a contract between those parties, and is one possible (and common) result when parties sue (or contemplate so doing) each other in
732:. In response, some states have passed laws which limit confidentiality. For example, in 1990 Florida passed a 'Sunshine in Litigation' law which limits confidentiality from concealing public hazards. 761:, if the matter is already before the courts, except in a case where the claim is to be dismissed outright and the Claimant agrees to pay the Defendant's costs, the matter is usually dealt with by a 559: 1065: 1004: 689:
Under Federal Rule of Evidence 408, settlement negotiations cannot usually be introduced as evidence at trial, and many state rules of evidence have similar rules modeled after it.
1104: 925: 838: 401: 1034: 552: 1200:
Fan, Mary D. (18 September 2015). "Private Data, Public Safety: A Bounded Access Model of Disclosure". Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network.
899: 545: 620:
default could be sued for breach of that contract. In some jurisdictions, the party in default could also face the original action being restored.
749:
secrets from regulators about violations is probably unenforceable, but a specific carveout granting regulators access is usually not included.
49: 1088: 868: 623:
The settlement of the lawsuit defines legal requirements of the parties and is often put in force by an order of the court after a joint
653: 649: 440: 1061: 729: 489: 209: 921: 826: 494: 652:
between the attorneys general of 46 U.S. states and the four major U.S. tobacco companies in 1999. Another example is within the
709: 445: 60: 1259: 669:
Usually, lawsuits end in a settlement, with an empirical analysis finding that less than 2% of cases end with a trial, 90% of
91: 450: 65: 728:
The confidentiality of settlements is controversial as it allows damaging actions to remain secret, as occurred in the
435: 86: 1041: 200: 708:
cases in the United States, where all settlements are subject to approval by the court pursuant to Rule 23 of the
37:"Settlement agreement" redirects here. For settlement agreements in relation to employment matters in the UK, see 698: 139: 102: 673:
settle, and around 50% of other civil cases settle. In American law, settlement agreements are normally private
1264: 1244: 768:
To get around the issue of confidentiality referred to above, a standard procedure consent order, known as a
324: 319: 96: 891: 584:
is a settlement of multiple similar legal cases. The term also has other meanings in the context of law.
1213: 977: 637: 585: 419: 356: 119: 31: 500: 168: 107: 38: 773: 351: 256: 230: 132: 1155: 1175: 800: 733: 301: 271: 236: 1130:"Confidentiality in Settlement Agreements Is Bad for Clients, Bad for Lawyers, Bad for Justice" 1205: 1201: 1096: 969: 965: 860: 758: 485: 715:
In some cases, confidential settlements are requested in discovery. Federal courts can issue
1167: 633: 346: 341: 311: 1156:""Quality, Not Quantity: An Analysis of Confidential Settlements and Lit" by Alison Lothes" 1226: 990: 306: 296: 195: 162: 678: 430: 276: 30:"Collective settlement (litigation)" redirects here. For an intentional community, see 1253: 762: 455: 769: 705: 470: 266: 241: 226: 205: 74: 765:, signed by the legal representatives of both parties and approved by the judge. 805: 636:
early in litigation. The parties may hold (and indeed, the court may require) a
624: 613: 601: 598: 383: 153: 125: 17: 716: 531: 475: 246: 1100: 745: 605: 412: 393: 388: 261: 190: 772:
is entered into. The order itself contains an agreement that the claim is
588:
provide for future periodic payments, instead of a one time cash payment.
795: 741: 674: 524: 221: 178: 1179: 609: 577: 480: 286: 251: 947:
Global Settlement of Tobacco Litigation: Hearing Before the Commerce,
1171: 513: 1062:"Confidential Settlement Agreements: To Produce Or Not To Produce?" 737: 373: 786:
prefers for the settlement to be given the effect of a judgment.
670: 632:
jury is available. Generally, one side or the other will make a
407: 1089:"Albany Diocese Settled Abuse Case for Almost $ 1 Million" 827:"Uncertainty and the Advantage of Collective Settlement" 580:, reached either before or after court action begins. A 1005:"Admissibility of Settlement-Related Evidence at Trial" 27:
Resolution between disputing parties about a legal case
681:, which are relatively uncommon in the United States. 892:"Negotiation & Settlement: What You Need To Know" 640:, at which they attempt to reach such a settlement. 576:is a resolution between disputing parties about a 612:can end the dispute between themselves without a 1056: 1054: 712:and counterpart rules adopted in most states. 553: 8: 1035:"THE SETTLEMENT PRIVILEGE: FACT OR FICTION?" 1245:The Regressive Effect of Legal Uncertainty 560: 546: 45: 1040:. Ethics & Privilege. Archived from 953:(U.S. Government Printing Office, 1997) 817: 512: 372: 332: 285: 177: 152: 73: 48: 1222: 1211: 986: 975: 841:from the original on 21 September 2021 1160:University of Pennsylvania Law Review 1124: 1122: 7: 902:from the original on 25 October 2020 871:from the original on 6 October 2014 654:Global Analyst Research Settlements 650:Tobacco Master Settlement Agreement 1087:Goodstein, Laurie (27 June 2002). 1068:from the original on 20 March 2016 1015:from the original on 14 March 2016 25: 1107:from the original on 1 April 2016 951:, and Transportation, U.S. Senate 928:from the original on 16 June 2021 825:Erichson, Howard M. (2010–2011). 608:and defendants identified in the 1154:Lothes, Alison (December 2005). 710:Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 61:Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 890:Weier, Steven (27 April 2020). 677:, not court orders, except for 446:Notwithstanding verdict (JNOV) 1: 730:Catholic sexual abuse scandal 66:Doctrines of civil procedure 1281: 696: 201:Case Information Statement 36: 29: 699:Confidentiality agreement 436:As a matter of law (JMOL) 865:Encyclopaedia Britannica 333:Resolution without trial 1260:Civil law (common law) 1221:Cite journal requires 985:Cite journal requires 660:Specific jurisdictions 586:Structured settlements 325:Request for production 320:Request for admissions 638:settlement conference 582:collective settlement 358:Involuntary dismissal 32:Collective settlement 1009:apps.americanbar.org 501:Declaratory judgment 169:Forum non conveniens 52:in the United States 39:Compromise agreement 451:Motion to set aside 352:Voluntary dismissal 257:Indispensable party 231:affirmative defense 1093:The New York Times 861:"settlement (law)" 801:Pierringer release 302:Initial conference 287:Pretrial procedure 831:DePaul Law Review 759:England and Wales 753:England and Wales 717:protective orders 570: 569: 16:(Redirected from 1272: 1231: 1230: 1224: 1219: 1217: 1209: 1197: 1191: 1190: 1188: 1186: 1172:10.2307/25047592 1151: 1145: 1144: 1142: 1140: 1126: 1117: 1116: 1114: 1112: 1084: 1078: 1077: 1075: 1073: 1058: 1049: 1048: 1047:on 3 April 2016. 1046: 1039: 1031: 1025: 1024: 1022: 1020: 1001: 995: 994: 988: 983: 981: 973: 960: 954: 944: 938: 937: 935: 933: 918: 912: 911: 909: 907: 887: 881: 880: 878: 876: 857: 851: 850: 848: 846: 822: 734:Washington State 634:settlement offer 562: 555: 548: 359: 347:Summary judgment 342:Default judgment 92:Federal question 46: 21: 18:Court settlement 1280: 1279: 1275: 1274: 1273: 1271: 1270: 1269: 1265:Civil procedure 1250: 1249: 1240: 1235: 1234: 1220: 1210: 1199: 1198: 1194: 1184: 1182: 1153: 1152: 1148: 1138: 1136: 1134:americanbar.org 1128: 1127: 1120: 1110: 1108: 1086: 1085: 1081: 1071: 1069: 1060: 1059: 1052: 1044: 1037: 1033: 1032: 1028: 1018: 1016: 1003: 1002: 998: 984: 974: 962: 961: 957: 945: 941: 931: 929: 922:"questions.com" 920: 919: 915: 905: 903: 889: 888: 884: 874: 872: 859: 858: 854: 844: 842: 824: 823: 819: 814: 792: 783: 755: 726: 701: 695: 693:Confidentiality 687: 679:consent decrees 667: 662: 594: 566: 537: 506: 473: 464: 433: 424: 420:Burden of proof 368: 357: 316: 307:Interrogatories 281: 215: 196:Cause of action 193: 163:Change of venue 146: 122: 113: 101: 89: 51: 50:Civil procedure 42: 35: 28: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 1278: 1276: 1268: 1267: 1262: 1252: 1251: 1248: 1247: 1239: 1238:External links 1236: 1233: 1232: 1223:|journal= 1192: 1146: 1118: 1079: 1050: 1026: 996: 987:|journal= 955: 939: 913: 882: 852: 816: 815: 813: 810: 809: 808: 803: 798: 791: 788: 782: 779: 754: 751: 725: 722: 694: 691: 686: 683: 666: 663: 661: 658: 593: 590: 568: 567: 565: 564: 557: 550: 542: 539: 538: 536: 535: 528: 520: 517: 516: 510: 509: 508: 507: 505: 504: 498: 492: 486:Attorney's fee 483: 478: 467: 465: 463: 462: 453: 448: 443: 438: 427: 423: 422: 417: 405: 398: 397: 396: 391: 380: 377: 376: 370: 369: 367: 366: 361: 354: 349: 344: 338: 335: 334: 330: 329: 328: 327: 322: 315: 314: 309: 304: 299: 293: 290: 289: 283: 282: 280: 279: 274: 269: 264: 259: 254: 249: 244: 239: 234: 224: 218: 217: 216: 214: 213: 203: 198: 187: 182: 181: 175: 174: 173: 172: 165: 157: 156: 150: 149: 148: 147: 145: 144: 136: 129: 116: 114: 112: 111: 105: 99: 94: 87:Subject-matter 83: 78: 77: 71: 70: 69: 68: 63: 55: 54: 26: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1277: 1266: 1263: 1261: 1258: 1257: 1255: 1246: 1242: 1241: 1237: 1228: 1215: 1207: 1203: 1196: 1193: 1181: 1177: 1173: 1169: 1165: 1161: 1157: 1150: 1147: 1135: 1131: 1125: 1123: 1119: 1106: 1102: 1098: 1094: 1090: 1083: 1080: 1067: 1063: 1057: 1055: 1051: 1043: 1036: 1030: 1027: 1014: 1010: 1006: 1000: 997: 992: 979: 971: 967: 959: 956: 952: 948: 943: 940: 927: 923: 917: 914: 901: 897: 893: 886: 883: 870: 866: 862: 856: 853: 840: 836: 832: 828: 821: 818: 811: 807: 804: 802: 799: 797: 794: 793: 789: 787: 780: 778: 775: 771: 766: 764: 763:consent order 760: 752: 750: 747: 743: 739: 735: 731: 723: 721: 718: 713: 711: 707: 700: 692: 690: 684: 682: 680: 676: 672: 665:United States 664: 659: 657: 655: 651: 645: 641: 639: 635: 629: 626: 621: 617: 615: 611: 607: 603: 600: 591: 589: 587: 583: 579: 575: 563: 558: 556: 551: 549: 544: 543: 541: 540: 534: 533: 529: 527: 526: 522: 521: 519: 518: 515: 511: 502: 499: 496: 493: 491: 490:American rule 487: 484: 482: 479: 477: 472: 469: 468: 466: 460: 458: 454: 452: 449: 447: 444: 442: 439: 437: 432: 429: 428: 426: 425: 421: 418: 415: 414: 409: 406: 404: 403: 399: 395: 392: 390: 387: 386: 385: 382: 381: 379: 378: 375: 371: 365: 362: 360: 355: 353: 350: 348: 345: 343: 340: 339: 337: 336: 331: 326: 323: 321: 318: 317: 313: 310: 308: 305: 303: 300: 298: 295: 294: 292: 291: 288: 284: 278: 277:Other motions 275: 273: 270: 268: 265: 263: 260: 258: 255: 253: 250: 248: 245: 243: 240: 238: 235: 232: 228: 225: 223: 220: 219: 211: 207: 204: 202: 199: 197: 192: 189: 188: 186: 185: 184: 183: 180: 176: 171: 170: 166: 164: 161: 160: 159: 158: 155: 151: 142: 141: 137: 135: 134: 130: 128: 127: 121: 118: 117: 115: 109: 106: 104: 100: 98: 95: 93: 88: 85: 84: 82: 81: 80: 79: 76: 72: 67: 64: 62: 59: 58: 57: 56: 53: 47: 44: 40: 33: 19: 1214:cite journal 1195: 1183:. Retrieved 1163: 1159: 1149: 1137:. Retrieved 1133: 1109:. Retrieved 1092: 1082: 1070:. Retrieved 1042:the original 1029: 1017:. Retrieved 1008: 999: 978:cite journal 958: 950: 946: 942: 930:. Retrieved 916: 906:18 September 904:. Retrieved 895: 885: 873:. Retrieved 864: 855: 845:21 September 843:. Retrieved 834: 830: 820: 784: 770:Tomlin Order 767: 756: 727: 714: 706:class action 702: 688: 685:Negotiations 668: 648:include the 646: 642: 630: 622: 618: 595: 581: 573: 571: 530: 523: 495:English rule 456: 441:Renewed JMOL 411: 400: 363: 272:Intervention 267:Interpleader 242:Counterclaim 206:Class action 167: 140:Quasi in rem 138: 131: 124: 103:Supplemental 75:Jurisdiction 43: 1243:Uri Weiss, 806:Strike suit 724:Limitations 625:stipulation 602:proceedings 459:(new trial) 312:Depositions 126:In personam 1254:Categories 1166:(2): 433. 812:References 697:See also: 606:plaintiffs 578:legal case 574:settlement 572:In law, a 532:Certiorari 476:Injunction 364:Settlement 247:Crossclaim 1101:0362-4331 896:Weier Law 746:Louisiana 675:contracts 413:voir dire 394:defendant 389:plaintiff 297:Discovery 262:Impleader 191:Complaint 179:Pleadings 97:Diversity 1185:20 March 1180:25047592 1139:20 March 1111:21 March 1105:Archived 1072:20 March 1066:Archived 1019:21 March 1013:Archived 932:19 April 926:Archived 900:Archived 875:23 April 869:Archived 839:Archived 796:Coercion 790:See also 742:Arkansas 525:Mandamus 431:Judgment 222:Demurrer 212:) ) 210:2005 Act 120:Personal 1206:2662678 970:2398550 949:Science 837:: 627. 644:issue. 610:lawsuit 481:Damages 461: ) 457:De novo 410: ( 384:Parties 252:Joinder 229: ( 208: ( 108:Removal 1204:  1178:  1099:  968:  781:Israel 774:stayed 744:, and 604:. The 514:Appeal 471:Remedy 402:Pro se 227:Answer 133:In rem 1176:JSTOR 1045:(PDF) 1038:(PDF) 738:Texas 671:torts 614:trial 599:civil 592:Basis 374:Trial 237:Reply 154:Venue 1227:help 1202:SSRN 1187:2016 1141:2016 1113:2016 1097:ISSN 1074:2016 1021:2016 991:help 966:SSRN 934:2016 908:2020 877:2014 847:2021 408:Jury 1168:doi 1164:154 757:In 1256:: 1218:: 1216:}} 1212:{{ 1174:. 1162:. 1158:. 1132:. 1121:^ 1103:. 1095:. 1091:. 1064:. 1053:^ 1011:. 1007:. 982:: 980:}} 976:{{ 924:. 898:. 894:. 867:. 863:. 835:60 833:. 829:. 740:, 736:, 656:. 616:. 1229:) 1225:( 1208:. 1189:. 1170:: 1143:. 1115:. 1076:. 1023:. 993:) 989:( 972:. 936:. 910:. 879:. 849:. 561:e 554:t 547:v 503:) 497:) 488:( 474:( 434:( 416:) 233:) 194:( 143:) 123:( 110:) 90:( 41:. 34:. 20:)

Index

Court settlement
Collective settlement
Compromise agreement
Civil procedure
in the United States

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
Doctrines of civil procedure
Jurisdiction
Subject-matter
Federal question
Diversity
Supplemental
Removal
Personal
In personam
In rem
Quasi in rem
Venue
Change of venue
Forum non conveniens
Pleadings
Complaint
Cause of action
Case Information Statement
Class action
2005 Act
Demurrer
Answer
affirmative defense
Reply
Counterclaim

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.