239:
in one or more of the patents each owns. Usually, this type of agreement happens between two parties in order to avoid litigation or to settle an infringement dispute. Very often, the patents that each party owns covers different essential aspects of a given commercial product. Thus by cross
255:
entered into a cross license agreement in
January 2008. Each party, therefore, is able to practice the inventions covered by the patents included in the agreement. This benefits competition by allowing each more freedom to design products covered by the other's patents without provoking a
324:
can also be cross-licensed. For example, a literary work and an anthology that includes that literary work may be cross-licensed between two publishers. A cross-license for computer software may involve a combination of patent, copyright, and trademark licensing.
297:. The primary business of a patent holding company is to license patents in exchange for a monetary royalty. Thus, they have no need for rights to practice other companies' patents. These companies are often referred to pejoratively as
278:
Some companies file patent applications primarily to be able to cross license the resulting patents, as opposed to trying to stop a competitor from bringing a product to market. In the early 1990s, for example,
268:
214:
334:
290:, rapidly increased their patent filings after their US competitors brought patent infringement lawsuits against them. They used the patents to cross license.
240:
licensing, each party maintains their freedom to bring the commercial product to market. The term "cross licensing" implies that neither party pays monetary
109:
485:
467:
359:
267:
laws and regulations. This can easily become a complex issue, involving (as far as the
European Union is concerned) Art. 101 and 102 of the
436:
497:
Galasso, A. (2012), Broad Cross-License
Negotiations, Journal of Economics & Management Strategy Volume 21, Issue 4, pages 873–911.
518:
207:
399:
387:
131:
349:
235:
is an agreement according to which two or more parties grant a license to each other for the exploitation of the subject-matter
304:
The economics literature has shown that firms with high capital intensities are more likely to strike a cross-licensing deal.
354:
200:
410:
383:
538:
283:
136:
498:
294:
99:
177:
344:
313:
104:
36:
481:
543:
339:
257:
146:
513:
384:
Shapiro, Carl, “Navigating the Patent
Thicket: Cross Licenses, Patent Pools, and Standard Setting”
443:
400:
Statement of
Jeffery Fromm, Hewlett-Packard Company, "Patent Pools and Cross Licensing", 2002, p8
89:
533:
461:
161:
156:
73:
364:
236:
275:, (abuse of dominant position, etc.) as well as licensing directives, cartels, etc.
527:
298:
263:
Parties that enter into cross-licensing agreements must be careful not to violate
151:
228:
190:
141:
115:
17:
499:
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1530-9134.2012.00348.x/abstract
426:
The agreement does not necessarily include all of the patents that each owns
321:
317:
293:
One of the limitations of cross licensing is that it is ineffective against
272:
264:
248:
241:
32:
287:
68:
50:
414:
280:
186:
54:
482:
Mark
Nowotarski, “Introducing Patents into a Major Service Industry”
35:
between two or more parties where each party grants rights to their
252:
411:
Ed Oswald, “Microsoft, JVC agree to cross-license patents”
519:
Microsoft having issues with Amazon over cross-licensing
244:to the other party, although this may be the case.
269:Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
335:Copyright protection for fictional characters
208:
8:
514:Example of patent cross-licensing agreement
360:Licensing Executives Society International
215:
201:
46:
271:(TFEU), previously Art. 81 and 82 of the
110:Fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory
376:
169:
123:
81:
60:
49:
466:: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (
459:
7:
25:
388:Innovation Policy and the Economy
350:Category:Intercompany crossovers
355:Licensing (strategic alliance)
1:
390:, MIT Press2001, p119 et seq.
284:original design manufacturers
137:Defensive patent aggregation
560:
170:Clauses in patent licenses
417:January 16, 2008, 2:29 PM
233:cross-licensing agreement
295:patent holding companies
100:Defensive Patent License
178:Field-of-use limitation
39:to the other parties.
345:Defensive termination
314:intellectual property
105:Defensive termination
37:intellectual property
90:Compulsory licensing
539:Strategic alliances
340:Crossover (fiction)
258:patent infringement
147:Patent monetization
472:| Patent Flooding
312:Other non-patent
225:
224:
132:Catch and release
16:(Redirected from
551:
501:
495:
489:
479:
473:
471:
465:
457:
455:
454:
448:
442:. Archived from
441:
433:
427:
424:
418:
408:
402:
397:
391:
381:
217:
210:
203:
184:Higher category:
47:
21:
559:
558:
554:
553:
552:
550:
549:
548:
524:
523:
510:
505:
504:
496:
492:
480:
476:
458:
452:
450:
446:
439:
437:"Archived copy"
435:
434:
430:
425:
421:
409:
405:
398:
394:
382:
378:
373:
331:
310:
221:
182:
162:Patent trolling
157:Stick licensing
95:Cross-licensing
45:
31:agreement is a
29:cross-licensing
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
557:
555:
547:
546:
541:
536:
526:
525:
522:
521:
516:
509:
508:External links
506:
503:
502:
490:
474:
428:
419:
403:
392:
375:
374:
372:
369:
368:
367:
365:Patent thicket
362:
357:
352:
347:
342:
337:
330:
327:
309:
308:Non patent law
306:
223:
222:
220:
219:
212:
205:
197:
194:
193:
181:
180:
172:
171:
167:
166:
165:
164:
159:
154:
149:
144:
139:
134:
126:
125:
121:
120:
119:
118:
113:
107:
102:
97:
92:
84:
83:
79:
78:
77:
76:
71:
63:
62:
58:
57:
44:
41:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
556:
545:
542:
540:
537:
535:
532:
531:
529:
520:
517:
515:
512:
511:
507:
500:
494:
491:
488:, March 2003
487:
486:les Nouvelles
483:
478:
475:
469:
463:
449:on 2006-09-01
445:
438:
432:
429:
423:
420:
416:
412:
407:
404:
401:
396:
393:
389:
385:
380:
377:
370:
366:
363:
361:
358:
356:
353:
351:
348:
346:
343:
341:
338:
336:
333:
332:
328:
326:
323:
319:
315:
307:
305:
302:
300:
299:patent trolls
296:
291:
289:
285:
282:
276:
274:
270:
266:
261:
259:
254:
250:
247:For example,
245:
243:
238:
234:
230:
218:
213:
211:
206:
204:
199:
198:
196:
195:
192:
188:
185:
179:
176:
175:
174:
173:
168:
163:
160:
158:
155:
153:
150:
148:
145:
143:
140:
138:
135:
133:
130:
129:
128:
127:
122:
117:
114:
112:(FRAND, RAND)
111:
108:
106:
103:
101:
98:
96:
93:
91:
88:
87:
86:
85:
80:
75:
72:
70:
67:
66:
65:
64:
59:
56:
52:
48:
42:
40:
38:
34:
30:
19:
18:Cross-license
493:
477:
451:. Retrieved
444:the original
431:
422:
406:
395:
379:
311:
303:
292:
277:
262:
246:
232:
226:
183:
94:
28:
26:
260:lawsuit.
152:Patent pool
544:Patent law
528:Categories
453:2006-09-15
371:References
286:, such as
229:patent law
191:Patent law
142:Patentleft
124:Strategies
116:Shop right
43:Patent law
322:trademark
318:copyright
281:Taiwanese
273:EC Treaty
265:antitrust
249:Microsoft
242:royalties
74:Royalties
69:Licensing
61:Overviews
51:Licensing
534:Licenses
462:cite web
415:BetaNews
329:See also
316:such as
33:contract
288:Hon Hai
237:claimed
187:Patents
55:patents
447:(PDF)
440:(PDF)
82:Types
468:link
320:and
251:and
231:, a
484:,
253:JVC
227:In
53:of
530::
464:}}
460:{{
413:,
386:,
301:.
189:,
27:A
470:)
456:.
216:e
209:t
202:v
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.