31:
308:, also filed a dissent, writing that the majority's decision "again expanded the scope of the FAA, further degrading the rights of consumers and further insulating already powerful economic entities from liability for unlawful acts".
486:
327:
263:
285:
arbitration waiver between DIRECTV and its customers was unenforceable. However, the
Supreme Court of the United States held that the California Court of Appeal's interpretation was
425:
353:
79:
322:
506:
481:
317:
491:
251:
35:
277:
and its customers. The
California Court had ruled that the arbitration agreement was unenforceable because, under applicable
463:
300:
filed a dissent, restating his view that the
Federal Arbitration Act does not apply to proceedings in state courts. Justice
501:
270:
290:
259:
237:
429:
357:
74:
436:
301:
170:
293:, and the California Court of Appeal was therefore required to enforce the arbitration agreement.
286:
124:
98:
496:
445:
349:
305:
297:
186:
162:
158:
266:
174:
150:
63:
475:
113:
On Writ of
Certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District
282:
182:
142:
127:
by the
Federal Arbitration Act, that court must enforce the arbitration agreement.
255:
194:
278:
86:
454:
274:
30:
328:
List of United States
Supreme Court cases by the Roberts Court
123:
Because the
California Court of Appeal’s interpretation is
273:
that refused to enforce an arbitration agreement between
211:
Breyer, joined by
Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, Alito, Kagan
487:
United States
Supreme Court cases of the Roberts Court
323:
Lists of United States
Supreme Court cases by volume
231:
223:
215:
207:
202:
131:
117:
109:
104:
94:
69:
59:
49:
42:
23:
54:DIRECTV, Inc., Petitioner v. Amy Imburgia, et al.
250:, 577 U.S. ___ (2015), was a case in which the
8:
408:, slip op. at 14 (Ginsburg, J., dissenting).
258:provisions in contracts are governed by the
20:
396:, slip op. at 1 (Thomas, J., dissenting).
318:List of United States Supreme Court cases
464:Supreme Court (slip opinion) (archived)
338:
269:, the Court reversed a decision by the
18:2015 United States Supreme Court case
7:
507:United States arbitration case law
252:Supreme Court of the United States
36:Supreme Court of the United States
14:
482:United States Supreme Court cases
432:___ (2015) is available from:
29:
492:2015 in United States case law
360:___, slip op. at 1, 11 (2015).
262:. In a 6–3 opinion written by
1:
227:Ginsburg, joined by Sotomayor
523:
455:Oyez (oral argument audio)
271:California Court of Appeal
422:DIRECTV, Inc. v. Imburgia
346:DIRECTV, Inc. v. Imburgia
247:DIRECTV, Inc. v. Imburgia
236:
136:
122:
45:Decided December 14, 2015
28:
24:DIRECTV, Inc. v. Imburgia
291:Federal Arbitration Act
260:Federal Arbitration Act
238:Federal Arbitration Act
43:Argued October 6, 2015
384:, slip op. at 5, 11.
304:, joined by Justice
99:Opinion announcement
95:Opinion announcement
85:136 S. Ct. 463; 193
502:AT&T litigation
302:Ruth Bader Ginsburg
171:Ruth Bader Ginsburg
372:, slip op. at 3–4.
147:Associate Justices
243:
242:
514:
468:
462:
459:
453:
450:
444:
441:
435:
409:
403:
397:
391:
385:
379:
373:
367:
361:
343:
132:Court membership
33:
32:
21:
522:
521:
517:
516:
515:
513:
512:
511:
472:
471:
466:
460:
457:
451:
448:
442:
439:
433:
417:
412:
404:
400:
392:
388:
380:
376:
368:
364:
344:
340:
336:
314:
306:Sonia Sotomayor
298:Clarence Thomas
254:clarified when
187:Sonia Sotomayor
185:
173:
163:Clarence Thomas
161:
159:Anthony Kennedy
90:
44:
38:
19:
12:
11:
5:
520:
518:
510:
509:
504:
499:
494:
489:
484:
474:
473:
470:
469:
437:Google Scholar
416:
415:External links
413:
411:
410:
398:
386:
374:
362:
337:
335:
332:
331:
330:
325:
320:
313:
310:
267:Stephen Breyer
241:
240:
234:
233:
229:
228:
225:
221:
220:
217:
213:
212:
209:
205:
204:
200:
199:
198:
197:
175:Stephen Breyer
151:Antonin Scalia
148:
145:
140:
134:
133:
129:
128:
120:
119:
115:
114:
111:
107:
106:
102:
101:
96:
92:
91:
84:
71:
67:
66:
61:
57:
56:
51:
50:Full case name
47:
46:
40:
39:
34:
26:
25:
17:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
519:
508:
505:
503:
500:
498:
495:
493:
490:
488:
485:
483:
480:
479:
477:
465:
456:
447:
438:
431:
427:
423:
419:
418:
414:
407:
402:
399:
395:
390:
387:
383:
378:
375:
371:
366:
363:
359:
355:
351:
347:
342:
339:
333:
329:
326:
324:
321:
319:
316:
315:
311:
309:
307:
303:
299:
294:
292:
288:
284:
280:
276:
272:
268:
265:
261:
257:
253:
249:
248:
239:
235:
230:
226:
222:
218:
214:
210:
206:
203:Case opinions
201:
196:
192:
188:
184:
180:
176:
172:
168:
164:
160:
156:
152:
149:
146:
144:
141:
139:Chief Justice
138:
137:
135:
130:
126:
121:
116:
112:
108:
103:
100:
97:
93:
88:
82:
81:
76:
72:
68:
65:
62:
58:
55:
52:
48:
41:
37:
27:
22:
16:
421:
405:
401:
393:
389:
381:
377:
369:
365:
345:
341:
295:
283:class action
246:
245:
244:
232:Laws applied
190:
183:Samuel Alito
178:
166:
154:
143:John Roberts
105:Case history
78:
53:
15:
256:arbitration
195:Elena Kagan
476:Categories
348:, No.
334:References
279:California
60:Docket no.
287:preempted
125:preempted
87:L. Ed. 2d
70:Citations
420:Text of
312:See also
296:Justice
208:Majority
497:DirecTV
406:DIRECTV
394:DIRECTV
382:DIRECTV
370:DIRECTV
289:by the
281:law, a
275:DIRECTV
264:Justice
224:Dissent
216:Dissent
118:Holding
467:
461:
458:
452:
449:
446:Justia
443:
440:
434:
352:,
350:14-462
219:Thomas
193:
191:·
189:
181:
179:·
177:
169:
167:·
165:
157:
155:·
153:
64:14-462
428:
356:
110:Prior
77:___ (
430:U.S.
358:U.S.
80:more
75:U.S.
73:577
426:577
354:577
89:365
478::
424:,
83:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.