430:
31:
260:, the Supreme Court held that judges may only look at the statutory elements of a crime, rather than the facts associated with that particular crime, "when the crime of which the defendant was convicted has a single, indivisible set of elements." In his review of the case for
490:
285:
114:
Under the Armed Career
Criminal Act, judges may not look at facts associated with a crime (the "modified categorical approach") when criminal statutes contain a single, indivisible set of elements
365:
307:
280:
79:
254:
264:, Daniel Richman opined that following the Court's decision, "hether or not a prior conviction is going to 'count' will have to be determined as mechanically as possible."
505:
510:
500:
495:
471:
437:
246:
35:
412:
273:
339:
464:
250:
232:
429:
376:
369:
311:
74:
457:
54:
Matthew Robert
Descamps, Petitioner v. United States Attorney- Dan B. Johnson, Spokane, Washington.
385:
157:
102:
441:
394:
173:
149:
145:
314:
161:
137:
63:
484:
169:
129:
257:
181:
261:
90:
86:
403:
249:
clarified standards for evaluating potential prior offenses under the
198:
Kagan, joined by
Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor
30:
286:
2012 term United States
Supreme Court opinions of Elena Kagan
445:
491:
United States
Supreme Court cases of the Roberts Court
281:
List of United States
Supreme Court cases, volume 570
341:
Opinion analysis: When is a burglary not a burglary?
226:
218:
210:
202:
194:
189:
118:
108:
98:
69:
59:
49:
42:
23:
245:, 570 U.S. 254 (2013), was a case in which the
465:
8:
472:
458:
20:
413:Supreme Court (slip opinion) (archived)
296:
253:(ACCA). In an 8–1 decision written by
18:2013 United States Supreme Court case
7:
426:
424:
506:Armed Career Criminal Act case law
444:. You can help Knowledge (XXG) by
438:Supreme Court of the United States
36:Supreme Court of the United States
14:
511:United States Supreme Court stubs
501:United States Supreme Court cases
372:254 (2013) is available from:
428:
29:
496:2013 in United States case law
1:
436:This article related to the
247:United States Supreme Court
527:
423:
404:Oyez (oral argument audio)
362:Descamps v. United States
304:Descamps v. United States
251:Armed Career Criminal Act
242:Descamps v. United States
233:Armed Career Criminal Act
231:
123:
113:
28:
24:Descamps v. United States
275:Taylor v. United States
93:4698, 81 U.S.L.W. 4490
43:Argued January 7, 2013
85:133 S. Ct. 2276; 186
45:Decided June 20, 2013
214:Thomas (in judgment)
103:Opinion announcement
99:Opinion announcement
158:Ruth Bader Ginsburg
134:Associate Justices
453:
452:
238:
237:
518:
474:
467:
460:
432:
425:
417:
411:
408:
402:
399:
393:
390:
384:
381:
375:
349:
348:(Jun. 20, 2013).
347:
338:Daniel Richman,
336:
330:
329:, slip op. at 2.
324:
318:
301:
119:Court membership
33:
32:
21:
526:
525:
521:
520:
519:
517:
516:
515:
481:
480:
479:
478:
421:
415:
409:
406:
400:
397:
391:
388:
382:
379:
373:
357:
352:
345:
337:
333:
325:
321:
302:
298:
294:
270:
174:Sonia Sotomayor
172:
160:
150:Clarence Thomas
148:
146:Anthony Kennedy
94:
44:
38:
19:
12:
11:
5:
524:
522:
514:
513:
508:
503:
498:
493:
483:
482:
477:
476:
469:
462:
454:
451:
450:
433:
419:
418:
386:Google Scholar
356:
355:External links
353:
351:
350:
331:
319:
295:
293:
290:
289:
288:
283:
278:
269:
266:
236:
235:
229:
228:
224:
223:
220:
216:
215:
212:
208:
207:
204:
200:
199:
196:
192:
191:
187:
186:
185:
184:
162:Stephen Breyer
138:Antonin Scalia
135:
132:
127:
121:
120:
116:
115:
111:
110:
106:
105:
100:
96:
95:
84:
71:
67:
66:
61:
57:
56:
51:
50:Full case name
47:
46:
40:
39:
34:
26:
25:
17:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
523:
512:
509:
507:
504:
502:
499:
497:
494:
492:
489:
488:
486:
475:
470:
468:
463:
461:
456:
455:
449:
447:
443:
439:
434:
431:
427:
422:
414:
405:
396:
387:
378:
377:CourtListener
371:
367:
363:
359:
358:
354:
343:
342:
335:
332:
328:
323:
320:
316:
313:
309:
305:
300:
297:
291:
287:
284:
282:
279:
277:
276:
272:
271:
267:
265:
263:
259:
256:
252:
248:
244:
243:
234:
230:
225:
221:
217:
213:
209:
205:
201:
197:
193:
190:Case opinions
188:
183:
179:
175:
171:
167:
163:
159:
155:
151:
147:
143:
139:
136:
133:
131:
128:
126:Chief Justice
125:
124:
122:
117:
112:
107:
104:
101:
97:
92:
88:
82:
81:
76:
72:
68:
65:
62:
58:
55:
52:
48:
41:
37:
27:
22:
16:
446:expanding it
435:
420:
361:
340:
334:
326:
322:
317: (2013).
303:
299:
274:
241:
240:
239:
227:Laws applied
177:
170:Samuel Alito
165:
153:
141:
130:John Roberts
78:
53:
15:
258:Elena Kagan
211:Concurrence
203:Concurrence
182:Elena Kagan
485:Categories
346:SCOTUSblog
292:References
262:SCOTUSblog
91:U.S. LEXIS
89:438; 2013
60:Docket no.
87:L. Ed. 2d
70:Citations
360:Text of
327:Descamps
268:See also
195:Majority
255:Justice
219:Dissent
206:Kennedy
109:Holding
64:11-9540
416:
410:
407:
401:
398:
395:Justia
392:
389:
383:
380:
374:
306:,
180:
178:·
176:
168:
166:·
164:
156:
154:·
152:
144:
142:·
140:
440:is a
368:
310:
222:Alito
77:254 (
442:stub
370:U.S.
312:U.S.
80:more
75:U.S.
73:570
366:570
315:254
308:570
487::
364:,
344:,
473:e
466:t
459:v
448:.
83:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.