31:
190:) against John Dewhurst which reached the Court by a convoluted process. The Court refused to hear the case: "This court will not take cognizance of any suit, or controversy not brought before them by regular process of law."
302:
240:
292:
232:
70:
207:
Curtis, Benjamin
Robbins; Dallas, Alexander James; Court, United States Supreme; Cranch, William; Wheaton, Henry; Peters, Richard; Howard, Benjamin Chew (1870).
297:
307:
183:
35:
77:
108:
Motion denied, held that the Court could not hear a case that was not brought before it by the regular process of law.
143:
265:
236:
62:
247:
123:
187:
131:
286:
256:
139:
151:
208:
65:
186:
case that initiated with a civil suit brought by Isaac
Coulthard (owner of
81:
274:
30:
210:
Reports of
Decisions in the Supreme Court of the United States
303:
United States
Supreme Court cases of the Ellsworth Court
159:
112:
102:
94:
89:
57:
47:
42:
23:
293:United States Supreme Court per curiam opinions
8:
166:
20:
243:) 409 (1799) is available from:
199:
182:, 3 U.S. (3 Dall.) 409 (1799), was a
18:1799 United States Supreme Court case
7:
98:Circuit Court of the N.Y. District
36:Supreme Court of the United States
14:
298:United States Supreme Court cases
52:John Dewhurst v. Isaac Coulthard
29:
308:1799 in United States case law
1:
184:United States Supreme Court
324:
164:
117:
107:
28:
167:
43:Decided February, 1799
229:Dewhurst v. Coulthard
179:Dewhurst v. Coulthard
24:Dewhurst v. Coulthard
266:Library of Congress
188:Coulthard's Brewery
128:Associate Justices
175:
174:
315:
279:
273:
270:
264:
261:
255:
252:
246:
215:
214:
213:. Little, Brown.
204:
170:
144:William Paterson
124:Oliver Ellsworth
113:Court membership
33:
32:
21:
323:
322:
318:
317:
316:
314:
313:
312:
283:
282:
277:
271:
268:
262:
259:
253:
250:
244:
224:
219:
218:
206:
205:
201:
196:
142:
132:William Cushing
85:
38:
19:
12:
11:
5:
321:
319:
311:
310:
305:
300:
295:
285:
284:
281:
280:
248:Google Scholar
223:
222:External links
220:
217:
216:
198:
197:
195:
192:
173:
172:
162:
161:
157:
156:
155:
154:
129:
126:
121:
115:
114:
110:
109:
105:
104:
100:
99:
96:
92:
91:
87:
86:
75:
59:
55:
54:
49:
48:Full case name
45:
44:
40:
39:
34:
26:
25:
17:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
320:
309:
306:
304:
301:
299:
296:
294:
291:
290:
288:
276:
267:
258:
249:
242:
238:
234:
230:
226:
225:
221:
212:
211:
203:
200:
193:
191:
189:
185:
181:
180:
171:
169:
163:
158:
153:
149:
145:
141:
140:James Iredell
137:
133:
130:
127:
125:
122:
120:Chief Justice
119:
118:
116:
111:
106:
101:
97:
93:
88:
83:
79:
73:
72:
67:
64:
60:
56:
53:
50:
46:
41:
37:
27:
22:
16:
228:
209:
202:
178:
177:
176:
165:
160:Case opinion
152:Samuel Chase
147:
135:
90:Case history
69:
51:
15:
287:Categories
275:OpenJurist
194:References
168:Per curiam
58:Citations
227:Text of
103:Holding
80:409; 1
278:
272:
269:
263:
260:
257:Justia
254:
251:
245:
150:
148:·
146:
138:
136:·
134:
82:L. Ed.
241:Dall.
235:
95:Prior
78:Dall.
237:U.S.
84:658;
71:more
63:U.S.
239:(3
66:409
289::
231:,
76:3
61:3
233:3
74:)
68:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.