212:, an action for annulment is brought by a non-privileged applicant against a measure that has not been addressed to it, the requirement that the binding legal effects of the measure being challenged must be capable of affecting the interests of the applicant by bringing about a distinct change in his legal position overlaps with the conditions laid down in the fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU.
22:
169:
information after 1994. The
Commission said the information had to be given in 20 days. Deutsche Post and Germany brought an action for annulment and the Commission argued it was not an 'act', and this was upheld by the General Court. It said that an injunction for information had no sanction, so was not an 'act' open to challenge.
223:
53 Next, the case-law shows that an intermediate measure is also not capable of forming the subject-matter of an action if it is established that the illegality attaching to that measure can be relied on in support of an action against the final decision for which it represents a preparatory step. In
217:
45 It follows from the above that a decision taken pursuant to
Article 10(3) of Regulation No 659/1999 is intended to produce binding legal effects within the meaning of the case-law cited in paragraph 36 of this judgment, and therefore constitutes an act open to challenge for the purposes of Article
264:
74 Next, it must be noted that the information injunction refers to a procedure for examining a State aid measure from which
Deutsche Post is alleged to have benefited. The information concerned by the act at issue concern only Deutsche Post. The latter is thus individually concerned by that measure
185:
37 Where the action for annulment against an act adopted by an institution is brought by a natural or legal person, the Court of
Justice had repeatedly held that the action lies only if the binding legal effects of that act are capable of affecting the interests of the applicant by bringing about a
181:
36 According to consistent case-law, developed in the context of actions for annulment brought by Member States or institutions, any measures adopted by the institutions, whatever their form, which are intended to have binding legal effects are regarded as acts open to challenge, within the meaning
254:
71 As for whether
Deutsche Post is individually concerned by the act at issue, it should be recalled that, according to consistent case-law of the Court of Justice, persons other than those to whom a decision is addressed may claim to be individually concerned only if that decision affects them by
168:
article 108 required member states to notify the
Commission of plans to grant new aid, and to give all necessary information. In 2008 the Commission sent a questionnaire on DP's revenue and costs, and a reminder letter. Germany replied that it would be disproportionate in time and work to give the
245:
54 However, if that latter condition is not satisfied, it will be considered that the intermediate measure – independently of whether the latter expresses a provisional opinion of the institution concerned – produces independent legal effects and must therefore be capable of forming the
182:
of
Article 263 TFEU .... The case-law further shows that a Member State, such as the applicant in Case C‑475/10 P, may admissibly bring an action for annulment of a measure producing binding legal effects without having to demonstrate that it has an interest in bringing proceedings....
207:
38 It must, however, be emphasised that the case-law cited in the paragraph above was developed in the context of actions brought before the EU judicature by natural or legal persons against measures of which they were the addressees. Where, as in the case giving rise to the order in
260:
73 in that respect, it should be noted that the fact that the act at issue is not addressed to
Deutsche Post is irrelevant for assessing whether that undertaking is individually concerned by that measure, for the purposes of the fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU.
255:
reason of certain attributes which are peculiar to them or by reason of circumstances in which they are differentiated from all other persons and, by virtue of those factors, distinguishes them individually just as in the case of the person addressed.
137:
to mean that any official act on the part of any body, office or agency of the
European Union that produces binding legal effects affecting the interests of a natural or legal person is open to challenge before the Court of Justice. Overruling the
412:
Downie, Gordon (2012). "Scope for
Judicial Review of Information Injunctions in State Aid Cases: Annotation on the Judgement of the Court of 13 October 2011 in joined cases C 463/10 P and C 475/10 P,
535:
295:
134:
177:
The Third Chamber held that the Commission had done an act, and therefore an action for annulment could be brought. It produced independent legal effects.
288:
126:
346:
40:
249:
55 in this case, it must be held that an information under Article 10(3) of Regulation No 659/1999 produces independent legal effects.
358:
281:
58:
224:
such circumstances, the action brought against the decision terminating the procedure will provide sufficient judicial protection (
232:
145:
The pair of cases is part of a cluster of disputes sometimes referred to as the "Deutsche Post saga" in the academic community.
160:, which declared inadmissible their actions for annulment of a Commission decision to require Germany provide information on
157:
139:
370:
334:
133:
in information injunctions in state aid cases. The opinion, handed down 13 October 2011, interprets Article 263 of the
194:
84:
443:
Frattini, Alessandro (2019). "Extension of Formal Investigation Procedure and Obligation to State Reasons".
238:
200:
460:
393:
452:
425:
226:
188:
130:
104:
529:
464:
153:
142:, the opinion thus strengthens the right to judicial review of administrative acts.
429:
456:
161:
491:
265:
for the purposes of the case-law cited in paragraph 71 of this judgment.
382:
273:
31:
provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject
311:
165:
277:
15:
186:
distinct change in his legal position (see, in particular,
36:
98:
90:
80:
75:
156:and Germany claimed annulment of an order by the
536:Court of Justice of the European Union case law
179:
135:Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
246:subject-matter of an action for annulment....
289:
8:
233:AKZO Chemie and AKZO Chemie UK v Commission
296:
282:
274:
72:
59:Learn how and when to remove this message
477:
404:
236:ECR 1965, paragraph 19; Case C-400/99
127:Court of Justice of the European Union
41:providing more context for the reader
7:
490:Essers, Maurice (21 January 2016).
14:
359:Kanatami v Parliament and Council
445:European State Aid Law Quarterly
418:European State Aid Law Quarterly
198:, paragraph 29; Case C‑322/09 P
117:is a 2011 pair of joined cases,
20:
195:Athinaïki Techniki v Commission
347:Unión de Pequeños Agricultores
335:Plaumann & Co v Commission
94:(2011) C-463/10P and C-475/10P
1:
371:Piraiki-Patraiki v Commission
496:Tijdschrift voor Staatssteun
242:ECR I 7303, paragraph 63).
230:, paragraph 12; Case 53/85
204:ECR I-0000, paragraph 45).
552:
414:Deutsche Post v Commission
323:Deutsche Post v Commission
210:Deutsche Post v Commission
114:Deutsche Post v Commission
76:Deutsche Post v Commission
430:10.21552/ESTAL/2012/4/317
379:
367:
355:
343:
331:
319:
309:
129:concerning the scope for
103:
85:European Court of Justice
457:10.21552/estal/2019/3/16
267:
451:(3): 372–376, 374.
424:(4): 821–824, 821.
37:improve the article
394:European Union law
304:EU judicial review
239:Italy v Commission
201:NDSHT v Commission
164:to Deutsche Post.
389:
388:
374:(1985) Case 11/82
338:(1963) Case 25/62
110:
109:
69:
68:
61:
543:
512:
511:
509:
507:
487:
481:
475:
469:
468:
440:
434:
433:
409:
350:(2002) C-50/00 P
326:(2011) C-463/10P
298:
291:
284:
275:
227:IBM v Commission
189:IBM v Commission
124:
120:
73:
64:
57:
53:
50:
44:
24:
23:
16:
551:
550:
546:
545:
544:
542:
541:
540:
526:
525:
520:
515:
505:
503:
489:
488:
484:
476:
472:
442:
441:
437:
411:
410:
406:
402:
390:
385:
375:
363:
362:(2013) C-583/11
351:
339:
327:
315:
305:
302:
272:
192:, paragraph 9;
175:
151:
131:judicial review
122:
118:
105:Judicial review
65:
54:
48:
45:
34:
25:
21:
12:
11:
5:
549:
547:
539:
538:
528:
527:
524:
523:
519:
516:
514:
513:
492:"Redactioneel"
482:
480:, p. 372.
470:
435:
403:
401:
398:
397:
396:
387:
386:
380:
377:
376:
368:
365:
364:
356:
353:
352:
344:
341:
340:
332:
329:
328:
320:
317:
316:
310:
307:
306:
303:
301:
300:
293:
286:
278:
271:
268:
174:
171:
150:
147:
108:
107:
101:
100:
96:
95:
92:
88:
87:
82:
78:
77:
67:
66:
28:
26:
19:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
548:
537:
534:
533:
531:
522:
521:
517:
501:
497:
493:
486:
483:
479:
478:Frattini 2019
474:
471:
466:
462:
458:
454:
450:
446:
439:
436:
431:
427:
423:
419:
415:
408:
405:
399:
395:
392:
391:
384:
378:
373:
372:
366:
361:
360:
354:
349:
348:
342:
337:
336:
330:
325:
324:
318:
313:
308:
299:
294:
292:
287:
285:
280:
279:
276:
269:
266:
262:
258:
256:
252:
250:
247:
243:
241:
240:
235:
234:
229:
228:
221:
219:
215:
213:
211:
205:
203:
202:
197:
196:
191:
190:
183:
178:
172:
170:
167:
163:
159:
158:General Court
155:
154:Deutsche Post
148:
146:
143:
141:
140:General Court
136:
132:
128:
125:, before the
116:
115:
106:
102:
97:
93:
89:
86:
83:
79:
74:
71:
63:
60:
52:
49:February 2020
42:
38:
32:
29:This article
27:
18:
17:
504:. Retrieved
499:
495:
485:
473:
448:
444:
438:
421:
417:
413:
407:
369:
357:
345:
333:
322:
321:
314:arts 263-267
263:
259:
257:
253:
251:
248:
244:
237:
231:
225:
222:
220:
216:
214:
209:
206:
199:
193:
187:
184:
180:
176:
152:
144:
113:
112:
111:
70:
55:
46:
35:Please help
30:
506:17 February
518:References
218:263 TFEU.
123:C 475/10 P
119:C 463/10 P
465:211395369
162:state aid
91:Citations
530:Category
270:See also
173:Judgment
99:Keywords
463:
383:EU law
461:S2CID
400:Notes
149:Facts
81:Court
508:2024
500:2015
381:See
312:TFEU
166:TFEU
121:and
502:(4)
453:doi
426:doi
416:".
39:by
532::
498:.
494:.
459:.
449:18
447:.
422:11
420:.
510:.
467:.
455::
432:.
428::
297:e
290:t
283:v
62:)
56:(
51:)
47:(
43:.
33:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.