234:
already paid him. Dice responded by asserting that the railroad had him sign it under false pretenses and that he had not read it before signing it. After the jury found in favor of Dice, the trial court judge reverses the judgment notwithstanding the verdict because it ruled that Dice could not avoid the obligations created by signing the release. Ohio state law imposed a duty on him to read the document before signing it. However, federal law would have held that the railroad's fraud precluded the enforcement of the release, and so the state appellate court reversed on this basis, which was then again reversed by the state supreme court, thus Dice appealed to the
Supreme Court of the United States.
31:
243:
release valid if
Plaintiff was negligent in not reading it, would defeat the purpose of FELA of giving employees a right to recover damages against their employers. In addition, there is a federal policy of not allowing individuals to escape liability through fraudulently obtained releases. Plaintiff has a right under FELA and the Seventh Amendment to a trial by jury. This cannot be taken away by Ohio's law giving the judge permission to decide the issue of fraud in the context of a release.
233:
jumped the tracks, striking and injuring a railroad employee named Dice, he brought a negligence claim in Ohio state court under the
Federal Employers' Liability Act against the railroad. The railroad produced a document in which Dice purportedly released it from all liability beyond what they had
246:
The majority decision illustrates the supremacy of federal law in state court action when the action is brought pursuant to a federal right, such as under FELA. In the case at hand, the Ohio rule permitting state court judges to determine if fraud had occurred was a substantive rule which would
242:
The federal right given an individual under the
Federal Employers Liability Act and the parameters of such must be determined by federal law because under federal law, a release is not valid if it has been procured by false or misleading statements. Applying Ohio law, which would thus make the
220:
case in which the Court held that federal court rules apply when an action is brought pursuant to a federal right and where the substance of a state's rules would necessarily have an adverse effect on the protection of an individual's rights under federal law.
247:
necessarily affect the claim of the
Plaintiff based on federal law. Because the effect of the application of the state court rule regarding judicial finding of fraud is to preclude the Plaintiff's federal law claim, the state court rule may not be applied.
392:
322:
72:
203:
402:
387:
407:
397:
230:
412:
217:
35:
422:
199:
94:
427:
417:
369:
326:
64:
351:
128:
266:
152:
140:
144:
132:
342:
333:
360:
300:
286:
164:
112:
381:
256:
261:
156:
67:
120:
93:
State law does not apply to the validity of releases of liability under the
79:
301:"Dice v. Akron, Canton & Youngstown R. Co., 342 U.S. 359 (1952)"
287:"Dice v. Akron, Canton & Youngstown R. Co., 342 U.S. 359 (1952)"
30:
189:
Frankfurter (in judgment), joined by Reed, Jackson, Burton
393:
United States
Supreme Court cases of the Vinson Court
193:
185:
177:
172:
101:
87:
59:
49:
42:
23:
181:Black, joined by Vinson, Douglas, Clark, Minton
319:Dice v. Akron, Canton & Youngstown R. Co.
213:Dice v. Akron, Canton & Youngstown R. Co.
54:Dice v. Akron, Canton & Youngstown R. Co.
24:Dice v. Akron, Canton & Youngstown R. Co.
8:
20:
403:United States conflict of laws case law
278:
231:Akron, Canton & Youngstown R. Co.
18:1952 United States Supreme Court case
7:
36:Supreme Court of the United States
14:
388:United States Supreme Court cases
329:359 (1952) is available from:
29:
408:Diversity jurisdiction case law
200:Federal Employers Liability Act
95:Federal Employers Liability Act
398:1952 in United States case law
1:
229:After an engine owned by the
216:, 342 U.S. 359 (1952), was a
413:United States Erie Doctrine
218:United States Supreme Court
444:
198:
106:
92:
43:Argued December 3–4, 1951
28:
45:Decided February 4, 1952
423:1952 in rail transport
238:Decision of the Court
370:Library of Congress
267:U.S. Supreme Court
141:William O. Douglas
117:Associate Justices
78:72 S. Ct. 312; 96
209:
208:
204:Seventh Amendment
145:Robert H. Jackson
133:Felix Frankfurter
435:
428:Railway case law
418:1952 in case law
374:
368:
365:
359:
356:
350:
347:
341:
338:
332:
305:
304:
297:
291:
290:
283:
153:Harold H. Burton
102:Court membership
33:
32:
21:
443:
442:
438:
437:
436:
434:
433:
432:
378:
377:
372:
366:
363:
357:
354:
348:
345:
339:
336:
330:
314:
309:
308:
299:
298:
294:
285:
284:
280:
275:
253:
240:
227:
155:
143:
131:
129:Stanley F. Reed
83:
44:
38:
19:
12:
11:
5:
441:
439:
431:
430:
425:
420:
415:
410:
405:
400:
395:
390:
380:
379:
376:
375:
352:Google Scholar
313:
312:External links
310:
307:
306:
292:
277:
276:
274:
271:
270:
269:
264:
259:
252:
249:
239:
236:
226:
223:
207:
206:
196:
195:
191:
190:
187:
183:
182:
179:
175:
174:
170:
169:
168:
167:
165:Sherman Minton
118:
115:
113:Fred M. Vinson
110:
104:
103:
99:
98:
90:
89:
85:
84:
77:
61:
57:
56:
51:
50:Full case name
47:
46:
40:
39:
34:
26:
25:
17:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
440:
429:
426:
424:
421:
419:
416:
414:
411:
409:
406:
404:
401:
399:
396:
394:
391:
389:
386:
385:
383:
371:
362:
353:
344:
335:
328:
324:
320:
316:
315:
311:
302:
296:
293:
288:
282:
279:
272:
268:
265:
263:
260:
258:
257:Erie Doctrine
255:
254:
250:
248:
244:
237:
235:
232:
224:
222:
219:
215:
214:
205:
201:
197:
192:
188:
184:
180:
176:
173:Case opinions
171:
166:
162:
158:
154:
150:
146:
142:
138:
134:
130:
126:
122:
119:
116:
114:
111:
109:Chief Justice
108:
107:
105:
100:
96:
91:
86:
81:
75:
74:
69:
66:
62:
58:
55:
52:
48:
41:
37:
27:
22:
16:
318:
295:
281:
262:Jurisdiction
245:
241:
228:
212:
211:
210:
194:Laws applied
160:
157:Tom C. Clark
148:
136:
124:
71:
53:
15:
186:Concurrence
382:Categories
273:References
225:Background
121:Hugo Black
60:Citations
317:Text of
251:See also
178:Majority
343:Findlaw
334:Cornell
88:Holding
373:
367:
364:
361:Justia
358:
355:
349:
346:
340:
337:
331:
163:
161:·
159:
151:
149:·
147:
139:
137:·
135:
127:
125:·
123:
80:L. Ed.
325:
327:U.S.
73:more
65:U.S.
63:342
323:342
82:398
68:359
384::
321:,
202:;
303:.
289:.
97:.
76:)
70:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.