31:
297:, and appealed the denial. Dillon claimed that the Eighteenth Amendment, which Title 2 of the act was adopted to enforce, was invalid, because the Congress, in declaring that it should be inoperative unless ratified within seven years, had acted outside its constitutional authority; and, secondly, that, in any event, the law he was charged with violating, and under which he was arrested, had not gone into effect at the time of the asserted violation nor at the time of his arrest on January 17, 1920.
430:
333:
As the
Eighteenth Amendment, by its own terms, was to go into effect one year after being ratified, §§ 3 and 26, Title II, of the National Prohibition Act, which, by § 21, Title III, were to be in force from and after the effective date of the Amendment, were in force on January 16, 1920. P. 256 U.
115:
A Constitutional amendment becomes a part of the
Constitution upon being ratified by three-fourths of the states; thus, the Eighteenth Amendment became a part of the Constitution on January 16, 1919, and the federal legislation enacted to carry out its intent entered into force on January 16,
321:
The
Eighteenth Amendment became a part of the Constitution on January 16, 1919, when, as the Court notices judicially, its ratification in the state legislatures was consummated, not on January 29, 1919, when the ratification was
273:
that the
Eighteenth Amendment became a part of the Constitution on January 16, 1919, when its ratification in the state legislatures was consummated, held that the National Prohibition Act, known informally as the
529:
534:
306:
Article V of the
Constitution implies that amendments submitted thereunder must be ratified, if at all, within some reasonable time after their proposal. This was modified in 1939 by
266:
445:
405:
380:
354:
72:
544:
265:, may fix a definite period for its ratification, and further, that the reasonableness of the seven-year period, fixed by Congress in the resolution proposing the
258:
215:
524:
539:
519:
290:
Dillon had been arrested pursuant to the
National Prohibition Act, title 2, § 3, and was in custody under § 26. He was denied his petition for a
112:
Congress may, if it chooses to, fix a reasonable time for ratification of a constitutional amendment, and a period of seven years is reasonable.
246:
35:
262:
327:
434:
250:
312:, which ruled that proposed amendments with no specified expiration pend ratification before the States indefinitely.
318:
The period of seven years, fixed by
Congress in the resolution proposing the Eighteenth Amendment was reasonable.
149:
254:
501:
173:
449:
409:
384:
133:
64:
315:
Under
Article V, Congress, in proposing an amendment, may fix a reasonable time for its ratification.
483:
161:
185:
492:
465:
400:
348:
308:
279:
230:
474:
270:
456:
412:
387:
177:
153:
141:
513:
291:
165:
323:
275:
67:
429:
83:
79:
30:
269:
is beyond question. Additionally, the Court, upon taking
355:
List of United States
Supreme Court cases, volume 256
530:
United States
Supreme Court cases of the White Court
209:
198:
193:
122:
104:
96:
91:
59:
49:
42:
23:
535:United States Constitution Article Five case law
245:, 256 U.S. 368 (1921), was a case in which the
8:
545:United States Eighteenth Amendment case law
20:
366:
372:
370:
338:The lower court's ruling was upheld.
18:1921 United States Supreme Court case
7:
257:under the authority given to it by
247:Supreme Court of the United States
36:Supreme Court of the United States
14:
525:United States Supreme Court cases
452:368 (1921) is available from:
54:Dillon v. Gloss, Deputy Collector
540:Prohibition in the United States
428:
29:
520:1921 in United States case law
1:
216:Article V of the Constitution
561:
228:
221:
214:
127:
109:
28:
255:constitutional amendment
202:Van Devanter, joined by
282:on January 16, 1920.
43:Argued March 22, 1921
267:Eighteenth Amendment
150:Oliver W. Holmes Jr.
45:Decided May 16, 1921
502:Library of Congress
253:, when proposing a
174:James C. McReynolds
162:Willis Van Devanter
328:Secretary of State
138:Associate Justices
78:41 S. Ct. 510; 65
433:Works related to
401:Coleman v. Miller
349:Coleman v. Miller
309:Coleman v. Miller
238:
237:
231:Coleman v. Miller
552:
506:
500:
497:
491:
488:
482:
479:
473:
470:
464:
461:
455:
432:
416:
397:
391:
374:
234:(1939) (in part)
123:Court membership
33:
32:
21:
560:
559:
555:
554:
553:
551:
550:
549:
510:
509:
504:
498:
495:
489:
486:
480:
477:
471:
468:
462:
459:
453:
442:Dillon v. Gloss
435:Dillon v. Gloss
425:
420:
419:
398:
394:
377:Dillon v. Gloss
375:
368:
363:
344:
303:
288:
278:, entered into
271:judicial notice
242:Dillon v. Gloss
224:
176:
164:
152:
134:Edward D. White
87:
44:
38:
24:Dillon v. Gloss
19:
12:
11:
5:
558:
556:
548:
547:
542:
537:
532:
527:
522:
512:
511:
508:
507:
484:Google Scholar
438:
424:
423:External links
421:
418:
417:
392:
365:
364:
362:
359:
358:
357:
352:
343:
340:
336:
335:
331:
319:
316:
313:
302:
299:
287:
284:
236:
235:
226:
225:
222:
219:
218:
212:
211:
207:
206:
200:
196:
195:
191:
190:
189:
188:
186:John H. Clarke
178:Louis Brandeis
154:William R. Day
142:Joseph McKenna
139:
136:
131:
125:
124:
120:
119:
118:
117:
113:
107:
106:
102:
101:
98:
94:
93:
89:
88:
77:
61:
57:
56:
51:
50:Full case name
47:
46:
40:
39:
34:
26:
25:
17:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
557:
546:
543:
541:
538:
536:
533:
531:
528:
526:
523:
521:
518:
517:
515:
503:
494:
485:
476:
467:
466:CourtListener
458:
451:
447:
443:
439:
437:at Wikisource
436:
431:
427:
426:
422:
414:
411:
407:
403:
402:
396:
393:
389:
386:
382:
378:
373:
371:
367:
360:
356:
353:
351:
350:
346:
345:
341:
339:
332:
329:
325:
320:
317:
314:
311:
310:
305:
304:
300:
298:
296:
295:
294:habeas corpus
285:
283:
281:
277:
272:
268:
264:
260:
256:
252:
248:
244:
243:
233:
232:
227:
220:
217:
213:
208:
205:
201:
197:
192:
187:
183:
179:
175:
171:
167:
166:Mahlon Pitney
163:
159:
155:
151:
147:
143:
140:
137:
135:
132:
130:Chief Justice
129:
128:
126:
121:
114:
111:
110:
108:
103:
99:
95:
90:
85:
81:
75:
74:
69:
66:
62:
58:
55:
52:
48:
41:
37:
27:
22:
16:
441:
399:
395:
376:
347:
337:
307:
293:
289:
276:Volstead Act
263:Constitution
241:
240:
239:
229:
223:Overruled by
210:Laws applied
203:
194:Case opinion
181:
169:
157:
145:
100:262 Fed. 563
92:Case history
71:
53:
15:
415: (1939)
390: (1921)
514:Categories
361:References
324:proclaimed
286:Background
249:held that
84:U.S. LEXIS
82:994; 1921
259:Article V
204:unanimous
60:Citations
440:Text of
342:See also
301:Syllabus
292:writ of
251:Congress
199:Majority
475:Findlaw
457:Cornell
334:S. 376.
326:by the
261:of the
105:Holding
505:
499:
496:
493:Justia
490:
487:
481:
478:
472:
469:
463:
460:
454:
404:,
379:,
184:
182:·
180:
172:
170:·
168:
160:
158:·
156:
148:
146:·
144:
80:L. Ed.
448:
408:
383:
280:force
116:1920.
97:Prior
450:U.S.
410:U.S.
385:U.S.
86:1612
73:more
65:U.S.
63:256
446:256
413:433
406:307
388:368
381:256
68:368
516::
444:,
369:^
330:.
76:)
70:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.