28:
289:. Burke criticized the guidelines offered by the majority as insufficient protection against possibly limitless liability. Burke viewed the limitations on liability inherent in the zone of danger rule as logical and necessary, and thought that such a pronounced change in liability rules should be adopted by the legislature and not the courts.
226:). The mother and daughter sued for emotional distress as a result of witnessing the accident. The trial court dismissed the claim under the prevailing zone of danger rule: the plaintiff needed to be in physical danger of the accident itself to recover for emotional distress.
187:
has been favorably cited and followed by at least twenty reported out-of-state appellate decisions, more than any other
California appellate decision in the period from 1940 to 2005. It was also favorably cited by the
265:
Using these criteria, the court determined that it was foreseeable that the negligent operation of an automobile could cause emotional distress to a mother witnessing the injury of her child in an accident.
214:
driver, David Luther Legg. Two-year-old Erin Dillon was fatally struck by Legg's vehicle while crossing
Bluegrass Road near its intersection with Clover Lane (near the Dillons' residence in the
696:
1181:
1377:
450:
1123:
829:
954:
901:
1329:
1413:
621:
1236:
822:
546:
676:
183:. To date, it is the most persuasive decision of the most persuasive state supreme court in the United States during the latter half of the 20th century:
1423:
1403:
1048:
180:
1174:
274:
In his dissenting opinion, Justice
Traynor asserted that the case should have been decided according to the zone of danger rule enunciated in the case
593:
443:
189:
1408:
614:
60:
1092:
1037:
808:
774:
436:
1356:
1085:
760:
508:
1349:
78:
A bystander that suffers damages by the conduct of a negligent tortfeasor can recover for negligent infliction of emotional distress.
1243:
371:
1215:
947:
961:
781:
1208:
908:
1288:
1141:
223:
210:
A mother, Margery M. Dillon, and her daughter Cheryl witnessed the death of her other child in a car accident caused by a
715:
1428:
1418:
1279:
982:
562:
172:
33:
1030:
767:
361:
1250:
933:
894:
515:
1370:
219:
1165:
867:
333:
285:
In dissent, Justice Burke asserted that the majority had adopted arguments that were previously rejected in
198:
1299:
1071:
459:
687:
607:
1308:
1201:
847:
586:
577:
258:
Whether the plaintiff suffered an emotional shock from contemporaneously observing the accident, and
989:
792:
215:
113:
1222:
1023:
860:
851:
641:
600:
121:
1192:
1078:
924:
920:
885:
836:
801:
753:
501:
487:
367:
299:
105:
423:
1363:
1340:
1322:
1315:
1156:
1057:
968:
940:
874:
815:
746:
659:
648:
632:
573:
555:
535:
526:
308:
91:
1257:
1016:
1007:
996:
975:
494:
478:
101:
1229:
669:
248:
240:
117:
1397:
193:
164:
737:
244:
109:
728:
707:
168:
211:
1107:
428:
474:
251:
to determine if foreseeability would create a duty to a bystander:
176:
432:
27:
360:
Meyer, Robert G.; Christopher M. Weaver (December 15, 2005).
697:
Redbox
Automated Retail LLC v. Universal City Studios LLLP
1182:
Indiana Harbor Belt
Railroad Co. v. American Cyanamid Co.
255:
Whether the plaintiff was near the scene of the accident,
243:
to establish whether or not a negligent defendant owed a
1378:
State Farm Mutual
Automobile Insurance Co. v. Campbell
261:
Whether the plaintiff is closely related to the victim
1124:
Spur
Industries, Inc. v. Del E. Webb Development Co.
424:
Edited text and audio of opinion at Audio Case Files
329:" Followed Rates" and Leading State Cases, 1940-2005
1339:
1298:
1278:
1271:
1191:
1164:
1155:
1133:
1115:
1106:
1047:
1006:
918:
884:
846:
830:
Tarasoff v. Regents of the
University of California
791:
736:
727:
706:
686:
658:
631:
572:
545:
525:
473:
466:
148:
140:
132:
127:
97:
87:
82:
72:
56:
46:
41:
20:
955:Seong Sil Kim v. New York City Transit Authority
902:Farwell v. Boston & Worcester Railroad Corp.
622:Sioux City & Pacific Railroad Co. v. Stout
444:
8:
1237:Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Thompson
823:Schloendorff v. Society of New York Hospital
547:intentional infliction of emotional distress
363:Law and mental health: a case-based approach
350:Aspen Publishers, New York, NY: 2007, p. 305
1330:American Motorcycle Ass'n v. Superior Court
1175:Alwin v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.
677:Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting Co.
1275:
1161:
1112:
1049:Negligent infliction of emotional distress
733:
470:
451:
437:
429:
181:negligent infliction of emotional distress
136:Tobriner, joined by Peters, Mosk, Sullivan
17:
594:CompuServe Inc. v. Cyber Promotions, Inc.
276:Amaya v. Home Ice, Fuel & Supply Co.
249:case-by-case analysis of several factors
615:United Zinc & Chemical Co. v. Britt
320:
51:Margery M. Dillon v. David Luther Legg
1093:Molien v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals
1038:Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc.
809:Union Pacific Railway Co. v. Botsford
7:
1414:Supreme Court of California case law
775:Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co.
1086:Miller v. National Broadcasting Co.
761:Jablonski by Pahls v. United States
509:Picard v. Barry Pontiac-Buick, Inc.
348:The Torts Process, Seventh Edition.
1350:BMW of North America, Inc. v. Gore
247:to a bystander. The court urged a
14:
1424:History of Sacramento, California
1404:United States negligence case law
1357:Liebeck v. McDonald's Restaurants
1244:Geier v. American Honda Motor Co.
1216:Friend v. Childs Dining Hall Co.
948:United States v. GlaxoSmithKline
327:Jake Dear and Edward W. Jessen,
26:
962:United States v. Johnson (1987)
782:Mexicali Rose v. Superior Court
1409:1968 in United States case law
1209:Sindell v. Abbott Laboratories
909:Vance v. Ball State University
386:Henderson, J.A. et al., p. 307
334:41 U.C. Davis L. Rev. 683, 694
1:
1289:Walt Disney World Co. v. Wood
1142:Boomer v. Atlantic Cement Co.
716:United States defamation law
1280:Joint and several liability
983:Yount v. City of Sacramento
563:Hustler Magazine v. Falwell
398:, 68 Cal.2d 728, 748 (1968)
173:Supreme Court of California
34:Supreme Court of California
1445:
1031:Ultramares Corp. v. Touche
768:Kerans v. Porter Paint Co.
1251:Chysky v. Drake Bros. Co.
934:Boub v. Township of Wayne
895:Albro v. Agawam Canal Co.
516:Sheridan v. United States
77:
25:
1371:Honda Motor Co. v. Oberg
346:Henderson, J.A. et al.
192:in an important case on
1166:Ultrahazardous activity
868:Hitaffer v. Argonne Co.
280:
269:
152:Burke, joined by McComb
1300:Comparative negligence
1072:Archibald v. Braverman
460:United States tort law
688:Tortious interference
608:Intel Corp. v. Hamidi
410:, 68 Cal.2d at 749-52
303:(1989) - transformed
175:that established the
42:Decided June 21, 1968
1309:Li v. Yellow Cab Co.
1202:Thomas v. Winchester
587:Rowland v. Christian
578:Trespass to chattels
239:The court relied on
199:McLoughlin v O'Brian
990:Pearson v. Callahan
793:Medical malpractice
307:test into a strict
216:unincorporated area
114:Raymond L. Sullivan
1429:Traffic collisions
1419:1968 in California
1223:Loop v. Litchfield
1024:Ybarra v. Spangard
919:Public Authority,
861:Cahoon v. Cummings
852:Loss of consortium
662:, Publicity rights
642:Haslem v. Lockwood
601:Dougherty v. Stepp
366:. Guilford Press.
122:Marshall F. McComb
98:Associate Justices
1391:
1390:
1387:
1386:
1267:
1266:
1193:Product liability
1151:
1150:
1102:
1101:
1079:Thing v. La Chusa
925:Negligence per se
886:Common employment
837:Scott v. Bradford
802:Landeros v. Flood
754:Trimarco v. Klein
723:
722:
502:Vosburg v. Putney
488:Garratt v. Dailey
467:Intentional Torts
300:Thing v. La Chusa
270:Traynor's dissent
224:Sacramento County
156:
155:
106:Raymond E. Peters
1436:
1364:Pearson v. Chung
1341:Punitive damages
1323:Hoffman v. Jones
1316:Knight v. Jewett
1276:
1162:
1157:Strict liability
1113:
1058:Krouse v. Graham
969:Martin v. Herzog
941:Briscoe v. LaHue
875:Werling v. Sandy
816:Mohr v. Williams
747:Brown v. Kendall
734:
649:Popov v. Hayashi
574:Trespass to land
556:Snyder v. Phelps
536:Hartman v. Moore
527:Abuse of process
471:
453:
446:
439:
430:
411:
405:
399:
393:
387:
384:
378:
377:
357:
351:
344:
338:
336:
325:
309:bright-line rule
235:Majority opinion
92:Roger J. Traynor
83:Court membership
68:29 A.L.R.3d 1316
30:
29:
18:
1444:
1443:
1439:
1438:
1437:
1435:
1434:
1433:
1394:
1393:
1392:
1383:
1335:
1294:
1263:
1258:Devlin v. Smith
1187:
1147:
1129:
1098:
1043:
1017:Summers v. Tice
1002:
997:Saucier v. Katz
976:Tedla v. Ellman
914:
880:
842:
787:
719:
702:
682:
654:
627:
568:
541:
521:
495:Katko v. Briney
462:
457:
420:
415:
414:
406:
402:
394:
390:
385:
381:
374:
359:
358:
354:
345:
341:
332:
326:
322:
317:
295:
283:
281:Burke's dissent
272:
237:
232:
208:
171:decided by the
102:Mathew Tobriner
67:
66:69 Cal.Rptr. 72
65:
63:
37:
12:
11:
5:
1442:
1440:
1432:
1431:
1426:
1421:
1416:
1411:
1406:
1396:
1395:
1389:
1388:
1385:
1384:
1382:
1381:
1374:
1367:
1360:
1353:
1345:
1343:
1337:
1336:
1334:
1333:
1326:
1319:
1312:
1304:
1302:
1296:
1295:
1293:
1292:
1284:
1282:
1273:
1269:
1268:
1265:
1264:
1262:
1261:
1254:
1247:
1240:
1233:
1230:Losee v. Clute
1226:
1219:
1212:
1205:
1197:
1195:
1189:
1188:
1186:
1185:
1178:
1170:
1168:
1159:
1153:
1152:
1149:
1148:
1146:
1145:
1137:
1135:
1131:
1130:
1128:
1127:
1119:
1117:
1110:
1104:
1103:
1100:
1099:
1097:
1096:
1089:
1082:
1075:
1068:
1065:Dillon v. Legg
1061:
1053:
1051:
1045:
1044:
1042:
1041:
1034:
1027:
1020:
1012:
1010:
1004:
1003:
1001:
1000:
993:
986:
979:
972:
965:
958:
951:
944:
937:
929:
927:
921:Fireman's rule
916:
915:
913:
912:
905:
898:
890:
888:
882:
881:
879:
878:
871:
864:
856:
854:
848:Wrongful death
844:
843:
841:
840:
833:
826:
819:
812:
805:
797:
795:
789:
788:
786:
785:
778:
771:
764:
757:
750:
742:
740:
731:
725:
724:
721:
720:
712:
710:
704:
703:
701:
700:
692:
690:
684:
683:
681:
680:
673:
670:Taus v. Loftus
665:
663:
656:
655:
653:
652:
645:
637:
635:
629:
628:
626:
625:
618:
611:
604:
597:
590:
582:
580:
570:
569:
567:
566:
559:
551:
549:
543:
542:
540:
539:
531:
529:
523:
522:
520:
519:
512:
505:
498:
491:
483:
481:
468:
464:
463:
458:
456:
455:
448:
441:
433:
427:
426:
419:
418:External links
416:
413:
412:
400:
396:Dillon v. Legg
388:
379:
372:
352:
339:
319:
318:
316:
313:
312:
311:
294:
291:
282:
279:
271:
268:
263:
262:
259:
256:
241:foreseeability
236:
233:
231:
228:
207:
204:
190:House of Lords
167:(1968), was a
165:68 Cal. 2d 728
160:Dillon v. Legg
154:
153:
150:
146:
145:
142:
138:
137:
134:
130:
129:
125:
124:
118:Louis H. Burke
99:
95:
94:
89:
85:
84:
80:
79:
75:
74:
70:
69:
58:
54:
53:
48:
47:Full case name
44:
43:
39:
38:
31:
23:
22:
21:Dillon v. Legg
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1441:
1430:
1427:
1425:
1422:
1420:
1417:
1415:
1412:
1410:
1407:
1405:
1402:
1401:
1399:
1380:
1379:
1375:
1373:
1372:
1368:
1366:
1365:
1361:
1359:
1358:
1354:
1352:
1351:
1347:
1346:
1344:
1342:
1338:
1332:
1331:
1327:
1325:
1324:
1320:
1318:
1317:
1313:
1311:
1310:
1306:
1305:
1303:
1301:
1297:
1291:
1290:
1286:
1285:
1283:
1281:
1277:
1274:
1270:
1260:
1259:
1255:
1253:
1252:
1248:
1246:
1245:
1241:
1239:
1238:
1234:
1232:
1231:
1227:
1225:
1224:
1220:
1218:
1217:
1213:
1211:
1210:
1206:
1204:
1203:
1199:
1198:
1196:
1194:
1190:
1184:
1183:
1179:
1177:
1176:
1172:
1171:
1169:
1167:
1163:
1160:
1158:
1154:
1144:
1143:
1139:
1138:
1136:
1132:
1126:
1125:
1121:
1120:
1118:
1114:
1111:
1109:
1105:
1095:
1094:
1090:
1088:
1087:
1083:
1081:
1080:
1076:
1074:
1073:
1069:
1067:
1066:
1062:
1060:
1059:
1055:
1054:
1052:
1050:
1046:
1040:
1039:
1035:
1033:
1032:
1028:
1026:
1025:
1021:
1019:
1018:
1014:
1013:
1011:
1009:
1005:
999:
998:
994:
992:
991:
987:
985:
984:
980:
978:
977:
973:
971:
970:
966:
964:
963:
959:
957:
956:
952:
950:
949:
945:
943:
942:
938:
936:
935:
931:
930:
928:
926:
922:
917:
911:
910:
906:
904:
903:
899:
897:
896:
892:
891:
889:
887:
883:
877:
876:
872:
870:
869:
865:
863:
862:
858:
857:
855:
853:
849:
845:
839:
838:
834:
832:
831:
827:
825:
824:
820:
818:
817:
813:
811:
810:
806:
804:
803:
799:
798:
796:
794:
790:
784:
783:
779:
777:
776:
772:
770:
769:
765:
763:
762:
758:
756:
755:
751:
749:
748:
744:
743:
741:
739:
735:
732:
730:
726:
718:
717:
711:
709:
705:
699:
698:
694:
693:
691:
689:
685:
679:
678:
674:
672:
671:
667:
666:
664:
661:
657:
651:
650:
646:
644:
643:
639:
638:
636:
634:
630:
624:
623:
619:
617:
616:
612:
610:
609:
605:
603:
602:
598:
596:
595:
591:
589:
588:
584:
583:
581:
579:
575:
571:
565:
564:
560:
558:
557:
553:
552:
550:
548:
544:
538:
537:
533:
532:
530:
528:
524:
518:
517:
513:
511:
510:
506:
504:
503:
499:
497:
496:
492:
490:
489:
485:
484:
482:
480:
476:
472:
469:
465:
461:
454:
449:
447:
442:
440:
435:
434:
431:
425:
422:
421:
417:
409:
404:
401:
397:
392:
389:
383:
380:
375:
373:1-59385-221-5
369:
365:
364:
356:
353:
349:
343:
340:
335:
330:
324:
321:
314:
310:
306:
302:
301:
297:
296:
292:
290:
288:
278:
277:
267:
260:
257:
254:
253:
252:
250:
246:
242:
234:
229:
227:
225:
221:
217:
213:
205:
203:
201:
200:
195:
194:nervous shock
191:
186:
182:
178:
174:
170:
166:
162:
161:
151:
147:
143:
139:
135:
131:
128:Case opinions
126:
123:
119:
115:
111:
107:
103:
100:
96:
93:
90:
88:Chief Justice
86:
81:
76:
71:
62:
61:68 Cal.2d 728
59:
55:
52:
49:
45:
40:
36:
35:
24:
19:
16:
1376:
1369:
1362:
1355:
1348:
1328:
1321:
1314:
1307:
1287:
1256:
1249:
1242:
1235:
1228:
1221:
1214:
1207:
1200:
1180:
1173:
1140:
1122:
1091:
1084:
1077:
1070:
1064:
1063:
1056:
1036:
1029:
1022:
1015:
995:
988:
981:
974:
967:
960:
953:
946:
939:
932:
907:
900:
893:
873:
866:
859:
835:
828:
821:
814:
807:
800:
780:
773:
766:
759:
752:
745:
738:Duty of care
713:
695:
675:
668:
647:
640:
620:
613:
606:
599:
592:
585:
561:
554:
534:
514:
507:
500:
493:
486:
407:
403:
395:
391:
382:
362:
355:
347:
342:
328:
323:
304:
298:
286:
284:
275:
273:
264:
245:duty of care
238:
220:Arden-Arcade
209:
197:
184:
159:
158:
157:
110:Stanley Mosk
64:441 P.2d 912
50:
32:
15:
57:Citation(s)
1398:Categories
729:Negligence
708:Defamation
633:Conversion
315:References
206:Background
1008:Causation
212:negligent
1108:Nuisance
305:Dillon's
293:See also
230:Decision
133:Majority
1272:Damages
1134:Private
660:Privacy
479:Battery
475:Assault
337:(2007).
149:Dissent
144:Traynor
141:Dissent
73:Holding
1116:Public
576:&
477:&
408:Dillon
370:
185:Dillon
287:Amaya
714:See
368:ISBN
177:tort
169:case
222:in
218:of
179:of
1400::
923:,
850:,
331:,
202:.
196:,
163:,
120:,
116:,
112:,
108:,
104:,
452:e
445:t
438:v
376:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.