89:
133:(DSB) was then asked to establish a Task Force on Satellite Reconnaissance (the so-called "Hermann Panel") to review all major aspects of such small satellite systems for defence. In its January 1998 report, the Task Force recommended that a modified STARLITE program be initiated, as a "Military Space Radar Surveillance Program," in an effort to achieve broad-area, all-weather, near-continuous radar access that could be integrated with military operations. In February 1998 DARPA, the Air Force and the NRO established a joint program to undertake a "Space-based Radar Risk Reduction and Demonstration Program".
32:
126:'s Small Satellite Review Panel concluded that: "...now is an appropriate time to make a qualitative change in the systems architecture of the nation's reconnaissance assets... We see the opportunity to move towards an operational capability for the country, at least for imagery systems, that consists of an array of smaller, cheaper spacecraft in larger numbers which is at least as useful as those currently planned and to transport them to space with substantially smaller and less costly launch vehicles."
144:(GMTI) radar systems. Each satellite was envisioned to cost approximately $ 100 million. The constellation would allow for a very rapid revisit rate (about 15 minutes) to most areas of the earth for near-continuous surveillance of terrestrial and maritime vehicles, and could produce
167:
Defense
Systems Division. After a study phase, the project planned to launch two experimental satellites for demonstration and risk reduction. The project apparently suffered difficulties, and was canceled by Congress in 2000.
186:"Precision Radar Surveillance and Mapping with Discoverer II", J. Koss, S. Pohleg, M. Trichel, W. Jeffrey, AIAA Space Technology Conference and Exposition, September 28–30, 1999.
610:
605:
189:
241:
145:
53:
88:
75:
123:
436:
251:
108:
195:
234:
376:
46:
40:
325:
57:
148:
images for high-resolution terrain mapping. When needed, constellation tasking could be directed by a deployed
141:
137:
330:
227:
579:
543:
130:
207:
491:
463:
390:
371:
180:, Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, United States House of Representatives, June 27, 1996.
496:
455:
415:
219:
473:
468:
410:
405:
279:
519:
431:
366:
346:
116:
569:
201:
483:
149:
192:, Michael W. Roth, Johns Hopkins APL Technical Digest, vol. 20, no. 3, pages 297–304, 1999.
506:
156:
112:
136:
The
Discoverer II constellation was envisioned to be 24 satellites, each configured with
160:
599:
299:
309:
304:
289:
20:
294:
284:
213:
183:"Discoverer II Program summary", D. Whelan, Radar Conference, February 2000.
190:
High-Resolution
Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar for Discoverer II"
177:
164:
584:
574:
514:
548:
214:"Radar love: the tortured history of American space radar programs"
155:
On
February 22, 1999, three contractor teams were selected, led by
446:
119:. The project began in 1998 but was canceled by Congress in 2000.
104:
87:
196:"NRO chief presses for system similar to cancelled Discoverer II"
564:
223:
25:
122:
The
Discoverer II concept dates back to June 1996, when the
216:, Dwayne A. Day, The Space Review, January 22, 2007.
557:
536:
505:
482:
454:
445:
424:
398:
389:
359:
339:
318:
272:
265:
258:
178:Report by the DCI's Small Satellite Review Panel
235:
8:
92:Discoverer II System Parameters, DARPA, 1998
451:
395:
269:
262:
242:
228:
220:
611:National Reconnaissance Office satellites
76:Learn how and when to remove this message
39:This article includes a list of general
606:Lockheed Martin satellites and probes
198:, Aerospace Daily, September 7, 2000.
7:
45:it lacks sufficient corresponding
16:Canceled space-based radar project
14:
124:Director of Central Intelligence
30:
142:Ground Moving Target Indication
252:National Reconnaissance Office
111:project to build and launch a
109:National Reconnaissance Office
1:
627:
18:
138:Synthetic Aperture Radar
115:(LEO) constellation for
19:Not to be confused with
60:more precise citations.
93:
208:Discoverer II history
131:Defense Science Board
91:
152:tactical commander.
99:(initially known as
146:Interferometric SAR
250:Satellites of the
94:
593:
592:
532:
531:
528:
527:
464:Rhyolite/Aquacade
385:
384:
355:
354:
210:, Global Security
204:, Global Security
117:space-based radar
107:, Air Force, and
86:
85:
78:
618:
452:
396:
270:
263:
244:
237:
230:
221:
150:Joint Task Force
81:
74:
70:
67:
61:
56:this article by
47:inline citations
34:
33:
26:
626:
625:
621:
620:
619:
617:
616:
615:
596:
595:
594:
589:
553:
524:
501:
478:
441:
420:
381:
351:
335:
314:
254:
248:
174:
157:Lockheed Martin
113:low Earth orbit
82:
71:
65:
62:
52:Please help to
51:
35:
31:
24:
17:
12:
11:
5:
624:
622:
614:
613:
608:
598:
597:
591:
590:
588:
587:
582:
577:
572:
567:
561:
559:
555:
554:
552:
551:
546:
540:
538:
534:
533:
530:
529:
526:
525:
523:
522:
517:
511:
509:
503:
502:
500:
499:
494:
488:
486:
480:
479:
477:
476:
471:
466:
460:
458:
449:
443:
442:
440:
439:
434:
428:
426:
422:
421:
419:
418:
413:
408:
402:
400:
399:Radar location
393:
387:
386:
383:
382:
380:
379:
374:
369:
363:
361:
357:
356:
353:
352:
350:
349:
343:
341:
337:
336:
334:
333:
328:
322:
320:
316:
315:
313:
312:
310:Kennen/Crystal
307:
302:
297:
292:
287:
282:
276:
274:
267:
260:
256:
255:
249:
247:
246:
239:
232:
224:
218:
217:
211:
205:
199:
193:
187:
184:
181:
173:
170:
161:Spectrum Astro
159:Astronautics,
103:) was a joint
84:
83:
38:
36:
29:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
623:
612:
609:
607:
604:
603:
601:
586:
583:
581:
578:
576:
573:
571:
568:
566:
563:
562:
560:
556:
550:
547:
545:
542:
541:
539:
537:Communication
535:
521:
518:
516:
513:
512:
510:
508:
504:
498:
495:
493:
490:
489:
487:
485:
481:
475:
472:
470:
467:
465:
462:
461:
459:
457:
453:
450:
448:
444:
438:
435:
433:
430:
429:
427:
425:Ship location
423:
417:
414:
412:
411:Chalet/Vortex
409:
407:
404:
403:
401:
397:
394:
392:
388:
378:
375:
373:
372:Lacrosse/Onyx
370:
368:
365:
364:
362:
358:
348:
345:
344:
342:
338:
332:
329:
327:
324:
323:
321:
317:
311:
308:
306:
303:
301:
298:
296:
293:
291:
288:
286:
283:
281:
278:
277:
275:
271:
268:
264:
261:
257:
253:
245:
240:
238:
233:
231:
226:
225:
222:
215:
212:
209:
206:
203:
200:
197:
194:
191:
188:
185:
182:
179:
176:
175:
171:
169:
166:
162:
158:
153:
151:
147:
143:
139:
134:
132:
127:
125:
120:
118:
114:
110:
106:
102:
98:
97:Discoverer II
90:
80:
77:
69:
59:
55:
49:
48:
42:
37:
28:
27:
22:
469:Magnum/Orion
154:
135:
128:
121:
100:
96:
95:
72:
63:
44:
21:Discoverer 2
58:introducing
600:Categories
558:Technology
172:References
140:(SAR) and
41:references
66:June 2019
492:Jumpseat
300:Gambit 3
295:Gambit 1
202:Starlite
101:STARLITE
575:USA-193
570:GeoLITE
515:Samos-F
497:Trumpet
416:Mercury
305:Hexagon
290:Lanyard
273:Keyhole
266:Optical
259:Imaging
54:improve
580:Colony
549:SLDCOM
474:Mentor
406:Canyon
391:SIGINT
280:Corona
163:, and
43:, but
520:Poppy
447:ELINT
432:Poppy
377:FIA-R
367:Quill
360:Radar
347:Samos
340:Other
326:Misty
319:Misty
285:Argon
105:DARPA
565:STEX
437:NOSS
129:The
585:RPP
544:SDS
507:LEO
484:HEO
456:GEO
331:EIS
165:TRW
602::
243:e
236:t
229:v
79:)
73:(
68:)
64:(
50:.
23:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
