25:
447:
To a large extent, dividend imputation makes company tax irrelevant. This is because every dollar that a company pays in company tax can be claimed by the shareholder as franking credit, with no net revenue flowing to the government. (There are exceptions which include profits retained by the company
373:
For the holding period rule, parcels of shares bought and sold at different times are reckoned on a "first in, last out" basis. Each sale is taken to be of the most recently purchased shares. This prevents a taxpayer buying just before a dividend, selling just after, and asserting it was older shares
270:
An eligible shareholder receiving a franked dividend declares as income the cash received, plus the franking credit. The franking credit is then credited against the tax payable on their income. The effect is as if the tax office reversed the company tax by giving back the $ 30 to the shareholder and
430:
In the past it was permissible for corporations to direct the flow of franking credits preferentially to one type of shareholder over another so that each may benefit the most as fits their tax circumstances. For example, foreign shareholders cannot use franking credits (they can't be offset against
409:
companies can apply to join the
Australian dividend imputation system (from 2003). Doing so allows them to attach Australian franking credits to their dividends, for Australian tax they have paid. Those credits can then be used by shareholders who are Australian taxpayers, the same as dividends from
504:
In 1999 ACT was abolished. Shareholders receiving a dividend were still entitled to a tax credit to offset their tax liability, but the tax credit no longer necessarily represented tax paid by the company, and could not be refunded to the shareholder. The tax credit was abolished as of 6 April 2016
426:
A company is not obliged to attach franking credits to its dividends. But it costs the company nothing to do so, and the credits will benefit eligible shareholders, so it is usual to attach the maximum available. It's actually possible for a company to attach more than it has, but doing so attracts
329:
Franked dividends are often described as a "tax effective" form of income. The basis for this is that the cash $ 0.70 looks like it's taxed at a lower rate than other income. For example, for an individual on the top rate of 48.5% (for 2006) the calculation is $ 0.70 plus $ 0.30 credit is $ 1.00 on
479:
Malta has a dividend imputation system which is applicable to both resident and non-resident shareholders. The corporate tax rate is equivalent to the top tax bracket and the difference will be applied as a tax credit to the individual via imputation. Where the imputation credits exceed the actual
458:
for corporations. If a corporation was given a tax break then its incomes thus released from taxation would not generate franking credits precisely because no tax was paid. In turn, this meant that the shareholders received fewer credits along with their dividends, meaning in turn that they had to
397:
The company tax rate has changed a few times since the introduction of dividend imputation. In each case transitional rules have been made to maintain the principle of reversing the original tax paid, even if the tax rate has changed. This has been either by separate franking accounts for separate
462:
The net result is that each tax break a corporation itself got was countered by a matching increase in the tax burden of shareholders, leaving shareholders in exactly the same position had no tax break been received by the corporation. Thus, to the extent that corporate directors acted so as to
266:
The company now has $ 70 of retained profit to pay a dividend, either in the same year or later years. When it does so, it may attach a franking credit from its franking account, in proportion to the tax rate. If a $ 70 dividend is paid it could attach $ 30 of franking credits, and the franking
99:
to reduce the income tax payable on a distribution. In comparison to the classical system, it reduces or eliminates the tax disadvantages of distributing dividends to shareholders by only requiring them to pay the difference between the corporate rate and their marginal tax rate. The imputation
389:
A dividend received by a company shareholder is income of the receiving company, but the dividend income is not grossed-up for the franking credit nor is the receiving company entitled to claim the franking credit as a tax credit. Instead, the franking credit is added directly to the receiving
393:
This transfer of credits has made the previous "intercorporate rebates" allowances redundant. Those rebates had avoided double taxation on dividends paid from one company to another company. Those rebates were part of the original 1936 Taxation Act (section 46), meaning that the principle of
333:
There's nothing inherently wrong with the latter way of thinking about franked dividends, and it is frequently made to demonstrate how franking benefits the investor, but it can be argued a grossing-up like the former is better when comparing yields across different investment opportunities.
488:
New
Zealand introduced a dividend imputation system in 1989. It operates on similar principles to the Australian system. A shareholder receiving a dividend from a company is entitled to an "imputation credit", which represents tax paid by the company, and is used to reduce or eliminate the
154:
in a different way, by not taxing dividends in the hands of the shareholder and only at the company level. Under this arrangement the shareholders obtain a tax benefit even though the company may not have paid any tax at the corporate level, and it also benefits non-resident shareholders.
342:
There are restrictions on who can use franking credits. Those who cannot must simply declare as income the cash dividend amount they receive. The restrictions are designed to prevent the trading of franking credits between different taxpayers. An eligible shareholder is one who either
330:
which $ 0.485 tax is payable, but less the $ 0.30 credit makes $ 0.185 net tax, which is just 26.4% of the original $ 0.70. Conversely, an individual on the 20% marginal tax rate actually gets a $ 0.10 rebate. In this latter case, the rebate looks very much like negative tax.
247:
Liberal
Government, with a $ 2,000 small shareholder exemption. In 1999 that exemption was raised to the present $ 5,000. In 2000, franking credits became fully refundable, not just reducing tax liability to zero. In 2002, preferential dividend streaming was banned. In 2003,
145:
of company profits, once at the corporate level and again on distribution as a dividend to shareholders. Other jurisdictions which do not have dividend imputation achieve a similar result by only taxing dividends at the shareholder level. For example,
417:
Note that it is only
Australian franking credits which can be used by an Australian taxpayer. New Zealand imputation credits on dividends paid to an Australian shareholder cannot be used against that shareholder's Australian taxes.
274:
Thus company profits distributed to eligible shareholders are taxed in their entirety at the shareholder's rate. Profits retained by the company or distributed to ineligible shareholders remain taxed at the corporate rate.
231:
Labor
Government. Prior to that a company would pay company tax on its profits and if it then paid a dividend, that dividend was taxed again as income for the shareholder, i.e. a part owner of the company, a form of
413:
There are certain anti-tax-avoidance rules to prevent New
Zealand companies deliberately streaming Australian franking credits towards their Australian shareholders; credits must be distributed on a pro-rata basis.
439:, became illegal in 2002, whereafter all dividends within a given time frame must now be franked to a similar (but need not be identical) degree irrespective of shareholder location or which class of shares held.
321:
from the tax office, but nonetheless it and the cash portion make up pre-tax income. Thus a franked dividend of $ 0.70 plus $ 0.30 credit is exactly equivalent to an unfranked dividend of $ 1.00, or to bank
505:
and replaced with a tax-free dividend allowance of £5,000 (2017/2018). The dividend allowance was reduced to £2,000 from 6 April 2018, and then to £1,000 for the April 2023 to April 2024 tax year.
309:
Prior to 1 July 2000 such excess franking credits were lost. For example, an individual at that time paying no tax would get nothing back, they merely kept the cash part of the dividend received.
363:
Has total franking credits for the tax year of less than $ 5000 (the "small shareholder exemption") and has not arranged to pass-on the benefits to someone else (the "related payments rule").
150:
has tax integration, and all applicable company profits are taxed only at the shareholder's tax rate, achieving a similar outcome to imputation. Others (Singapore, for example) eliminate
317:
The easiest way for an investor to value a franked dividend is to think of the franking credit as part of the income they receive. The investor doesn't get it in cash, only as a kind of
609:
370:
The small shareholder exemption is not a "first $ 5000", but rather once the $ 5000 threshold is passed the rule is inoperative and all one's shares are under the holding period rule.
260:
A shareholder's taxable income is grossed up to include the value of the company tax deemed to have been prepaid on the dividend. This value is also credited to the shareholder.
35:
738:
663:
501:(ACT) paid by a company when a distribution was made. A company could set off ACT against the company's annual corporation tax liability, subject to limitations.
367:
Thus franking credits are not available to short-term traders, only to longer term holders, but with small holders exempted provided it's for their own benefit.
263:
For example, if a company makes a profit of $ 100 and pays company tax of $ 30 (at 2006 rates) to the tax office, it records the $ 30 in the franking account.
302:. It is a form of tax paid, which can reduce a taxpayer's total tax liability, and any excess is refunded. For example, an individual with income below the
568:
727:
451:
When gross company tax is reported by
Treasury, it is unclear whether the number generally includes the effect of the corresponding franking credits.
772:
606:
164:
141:
The objective of the dividend imputation system is to collect tax on distributed income at the shareholder's tax rate, in order to eliminate
326:
of $ 1.00, or any other ordinary income of that amount. (It's exactly equivalent because franking is fully refundable, as described above.)
278:
Dividends may still be paid by a company when it has no franking credits (perhaps because it has been making tax losses), this is called an
678:
347:
Owns the shares for a continuous period of 45 days or more (not counting purchase and sale days); or 90 days in the case of certain
69:
767:
762:
127:
271:
had them treat the original $ 100 of profit as income, in the shareholder's hands, like the company was merely a conduit.
306:($ 18,200 since 2011/12) pays no tax at all and can get the franking credits back in full, after a tax return is lodged.
390:
company's franking account, and can be paid out in the same way as franking credits generated by the receiving company.
660:
757:
51:
398:
rates (e.g. class A 39%, class B 33%), or making an adjusting recalculation of the credits (e.g. into class C 30%).
351:. This is the "holding period rule". Shares must be "at risk" for the necessary period, i.e. not with an offsetting
731:
719:
381:. For capital gains the shareholder can nominate what parcel was sold from among those bought at different times.
497:
From 1973 to 1999, the UK operated an imputation system, with shareholders able to claim a tax credit reflecting
464:
394:
eliminating double taxation has been present to some degree in
Australian income tax law for a very long time.
101:
47:
203:
payable by the shareholders is calculated, and the franking credits are applied to offset the tax payable. In
565:
498:
188:
115:
92:
589:
352:
199:
dividend amount (being the total of the dividend payable plus the associated franking credits). The
468:
131:
777:
752:
519:
303:
135:
378:
566:
How the government loses 48 per cent of company tax: Dividend imputation and franking credits
667:
613:
572:
432:
348:
287:
233:
212:
151:
142:
635:
244:
746:
514:
480:
tax payable on the grossed up income, the revenues office will refund the remainder.
88:
525:
228:
182:
223:
Dividend imputation was introduced in 1987, one of a number of tax reforms by the
530:
406:
249:
240:
208:
91:
system in which some or all of the tax paid by a company may be attributed, or
455:
318:
299:
200:
96:
448:
that are never paid as dividends, and payments to international investors.)
224:
204:
178:
107:
551:
298:
A franking credit on dividends received after 1 July 2000 is a refundable
169:
The
Australian tax system allows companies to determine the proportion of
323:
174:
252:
companies could elect to join the system for
Australian tax they paid.
703:
690:
590:
Australian Financial System – Final Report of the Committee of Inquiry
192:
119:
679:
HM Revenue & Customs Policy paper: Dividend Allowance factsheet
282:. It may pay a franked portion and an unfranked portion, known as
147:
123:
111:
18:
454:
One effect is that this has reduced the effectiveness of tax
239:
In 1997 the eligibility rules (below) were introduced by the
181:
using dividend imputation. Franking credits are passed on to
435:) but Australian shareholders can. This practice, known as
377:
This "first in, last out" reckoning may be contrasted with
177:
paid. A franking credit is a nominal unit of tax paid by
443:
Effective elimination of company tax and thus incentives
104:
company profit at the shareholders' average tax rates.
43:
286:. An unfranked dividend (or the unfranked portion) is
427:tax penalties that mean this is not worthwhile.
134:had a dividend imputation system until 2000 and
583:
581:
374:sold (to try to fulfill the holding period).
32:The examples and perspective in this article
8:
70:Learn how and when to remove this message
607:International Tax: Chile Highlights 2019
543:
522:, on buying shares to access dividends
467:, tax incentives would not influence
165:Australian dividend imputation system
7:
588:Campbell, J. K. (1 September 1981).
489:shareholder's income tax liability.
130:have a partial imputation system.
95:, to the shareholders by way of a
14:
290:in the hands of the shareholder.
211:the result is the elimination of
736:Trans-Tasman Imputation Overview
189:Australian-resident shareholders
23:
661:NZ Inland Revenue booklet IR274
636:"The Maltese Tax Refund System"
773:Taxation in the United Kingdom
554:. Legal Library of Malta Laws.
1:
267:account is debited by $ 30.
191:include in their assessable
465:increase shareholder wealth
46:, discuss the issue on the
794:
732:Australian Taxation Office
726:, product NAT 2632-6.2005
720:Australian Taxation Office
162:
564:The Australia Institute,
118:have imputation systems.
100:system effectively taxes
724:You and Your Shares 2005
768:Taxation in New Zealand
612:2 December 2020 at the
571:20 October 2016 at the
499:advance corporation tax
410:an Australian company.
402:Trans-Tasman Imputation
706:, accessed 15 May 2023
693:, accessed 26 May 2021
595:(Report). p. 216.
355:position for instance.
185:along with dividends.
763:Taxation in Australia
422:Abuses of the system
385:Company shareholders
215:of company profits.
52:create a new article
44:improve this article
34:may not represent a
16:Corporate tax system
666:15 May 2010 at the
575:by David Richardson
552:"Tax Laws of Malta"
469:corporate behaviour
85:Dividend imputation
758:Corporate taxation
625:Act No. 59 of 1987
520:Dividend stripping
437:dividend streaming
304:tax-free threshold
280:unfranked dividend
616:by Joseph Courand
379:capital gains tax
349:preference shares
173:to attach to the
80:
79:
72:
54:, as appropriate.
785:
707:
704:Tax on dividends
700:
694:
691:Tax on dividends
687:
681:
676:
670:
658:
652:
651:
649:
647:
642:. 2 October 2012
632:
626:
623:
617:
603:
597:
596:
594:
585:
576:
562:
556:
555:
548:
171:franking credits
75:
68:
64:
61:
55:
27:
26:
19:
793:
792:
788:
787:
786:
784:
783:
782:
743:
742:
716:
711:
710:
702:UK Government,
701:
697:
689:UK Government,
688:
684:
677:
673:
668:Wayback Machine
659:
655:
645:
643:
634:
633:
629:
624:
620:
614:Wayback Machine
604:
600:
592:
587:
586:
579:
573:Wayback Machine
563:
559:
550:
549:
545:
540:
531:fr:Avoir fiscal
511:
495:
486:
477:
445:
433:withholding tax
424:
404:
387:
340:
315:
296:
288:ordinary income
258:
234:double taxation
221:
213:double taxation
167:
161:
152:double taxation
143:double taxation
76:
65:
59:
56:
41:
28:
24:
17:
12:
11:
5:
791:
789:
781:
780:
775:
770:
765:
760:
755:
745:
744:
741:
740:
729:
715:
714:External links
712:
709:
708:
695:
682:
671:
653:
627:
618:
598:
577:
557:
542:
541:
539:
536:
535:
534:
528:
523:
517:
510:
507:
494:
493:United Kingdom
491:
485:
482:
476:
473:
459:pay more tax.
444:
441:
423:
420:
403:
400:
386:
383:
365:
364:
357:
356:
339:
336:
314:
311:
295:
292:
284:partly franked
257:
254:
220:
217:
163:Main article:
160:
157:
128:United Kingdom
78:
77:
38:of the subject
36:worldwide view
31:
29:
22:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
790:
779:
776:
774:
771:
769:
766:
764:
761:
759:
756:
754:
751:
750:
748:
739:
737:
733:
730:
728:
725:
721:
718:
717:
713:
705:
699:
696:
692:
686:
683:
680:
675:
672:
669:
665:
662:
657:
654:
641:
637:
631:
628:
622:
619:
615:
611:
608:
602:
599:
591:
584:
582:
578:
574:
570:
567:
561:
558:
553:
547:
544:
537:
532:
529:
527:
524:
521:
518:
516:
515:Corporate tax
513:
512:
508:
506:
502:
500:
492:
490:
483:
481:
474:
472:
470:
466:
460:
457:
452:
449:
442:
440:
438:
434:
428:
421:
419:
415:
411:
408:
401:
399:
395:
391:
384:
382:
380:
375:
371:
368:
362:
361:
360:
354:
350:
346:
345:
344:
337:
335:
331:
327:
325:
320:
312:
310:
307:
305:
301:
293:
291:
289:
285:
281:
276:
272:
268:
264:
261:
255:
253:
251:
246:
242:
237:
235:
230:
226:
218:
216:
214:
210:
206:
202:
198:
194:
190:
186:
184:
180:
176:
172:
166:
158:
156:
153:
149:
144:
139:
137:
133:
129:
125:
121:
117:
113:
109:
105:
103:
98:
94:
90:
89:corporate tax
86:
82:
74:
71:
63:
60:December 2010
53:
49:
45:
39:
37:
30:
21:
20:
735:
723:
698:
685:
674:
656:
644:. Retrieved
639:
630:
621:
601:
560:
546:
526:Dividend tax
503:
496:
487:
478:
461:
453:
450:
446:
436:
429:
425:
416:
412:
405:
396:
392:
388:
376:
372:
369:
366:
358:
341:
332:
328:
316:
308:
297:
283:
279:
277:
273:
269:
265:
262:
259:
238:
222:
196:
187:
183:shareholders
170:
168:
140:
138:until 2004.
106:
84:
83:
81:
66:
57:
33:
734:fact sheet
533:(in French)
484:New Zealand
407:New Zealand
353:derivatives
338:Eligibility
250:New Zealand
209:New Zealand
116:New Zealand
102:distributed
747:Categories
646:30 January
605:Deloitte,
538:References
456:incentives
300:tax credit
201:income tax
197:grossed-up
97:tax credit
778:Tax terms
753:Dividends
640:MGI Malta
313:Investors
256:Operation
205:Australia
179:companies
175:dividends
159:Australia
108:Australia
48:talk page
664:Archived
610:Archived
569:Archived
509:See also
324:interest
245:Costello
126:and the
42:You may
359:Or who
229:Keating
219:History
132:Germany
93:imputed
722:guide
294:Refund
241:Howard
193:income
136:France
120:Canada
593:(PDF)
475:Malta
225:Hawke
148:Chile
124:Korea
112:Malta
87:is a
50:, or
648:2020
207:and
195:the
114:and
319:IOU
749::
638:.
580:^
471:.
236:.
122:,
110:,
650:.
243:–
227:–
73:)
67:(
62:)
58:(
40:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.