Knowledge (XXG)

Coattail effect

Source đź“ť

990:, which was only used once. This change was intended to give Fifth Republic presidents more power than they might have had under the original constitution. While still seen as the symbol and embodiment of the nation, the president also was given a popular mandate. Of course, the majority party of the National Assembly retained power as well, but since the popularly elected president appointed the prime minister (subject to the approval of the National Assembly), the former was seen as having the upper hand in any conflict between executive and legislature. Furthermore, the imbalance is further illustrated by the fact that the president can dissolve the Assembly at any time (but not more than once in a year), whereas the legislature has no powers of removal against the president. 36: 710: 113: 838:
in the late 19th century, voters cast their ballots by taking a ticket provided by a party worker and putting it in the ballot box. The party-column ballot listed all candidates of the party in a single column and allowed the voter to mark off the party box at the top, which encouraged straight-party
1056:
Singapore introduced the GRC system in 1988, where candidates for Parliament run and are elected on a slate of 3 to 6 candidates in some constituencies, with a minimum of one minority candidate on each slate. The purported aim was to ensure minority representation in Parliament. However, it resulted
799:
The "coattail effect" is not usually caused by popular candidates convincing swing voters to cast their ballots for their party, although this is not unheard of. Rather, the effect often stems from popular candidates driving voter turnout among their own party base, people who are likely to vote for
993:
However, even after direct presidential elections were introduced, the presidential term remained at seven years, while the National Assembly's term ran for five. The term imbalance could not guarantee that the President's preferred Prime Minister would enjoy a parliamentary majority, and a risk of
874:
There is also the "negative coattail" effect in which a controversial presidential candidate may hurt candidates on the party's ticket running for lower offices. Goldwater's poor showing in the presidential election of 1964 led to the defeat of dozens of Republicans in the House of Representatives,
842:
In modern times voting machines have replaced the party-column ballot with the office-column ballot: candidates are grouped by office rather than party. Often there is no way to cast a party-line vote, and each office must be voted on separately. The proportion of voters choosing House and
843:
presidential candidates of different parties increased from 13 percent in 1952 to more than 40 percent in the elections of 1972, 1980, and 1988. Consequently, Presidential coattails were virtually eliminated in those elections, and a number of Presidents, including
862:
won the White House with 40,831,881 votes, but Democratic candidates for the House that year received 41,749,411 votes. In 1992, almost all Democrats elected to Congress won more votes in their congressional districts than the party's presidential candidate,
825:
Presidential coattails is the ability of a presidential candidate to bring out supporters who then vote for his party's candidates for other offices. In effect, the other candidates are said to ride on the presidential candidate's coattails.
971:, the presidential term ran for seven years. While the Presidents of the Third and Fourth republics were ceremonial figureheads, the Fifth Republic's constitution brought together a president with considerable executive powers and a 887:
are the most recent elections in which the same party both won the White House and took control of the House from their opponents. Since 1952, control of the House has changed hands six times, all of which were in midterm elections
1005:
After the 2000 amendment, Presidential and national assembly elections were merely two months apart. This resulted in a noticeable coattail effect, where the President's party gains a majority in the National Assembly, even in
879:- when a President associated with unpopular policies is not up for re-election, the electorate will often respond by punishing Congressional candidates from the President's own party. The Presidential elections of 839:
voting and the coattails effect. Straight-party voting was the norm, and winners in presidential elections often had long coattails. They almost always began their term with majorities in the House and Senate.
998:- a situation of divided government where ideological rivals hold the Presidency and the Premiership - loomed. For this reason, a constitutional amendment to shorten the presidential term to five years 807:(GRCs) in Singapore, where candidates for Parliament run on a party slate of 3 to 6 candidates. This allows weak candidates to get elected "riding on the coattails" of strong candidates on their slate. 796:
This also refers to the phenomenon that same-party members of the U.S. Senate or House of Representatives are more likely to be voted for on a year of the presidential election than a midterm.
1221: 858:
Presidents may suffer from a "reverse coattail" effect in which their party's candidates for the House or Senate get more votes than the presidents themselves. In 1976, for example,
909: 905: 901: 897: 893: 889: 983:; the prime minister, similarly, was to "direct the work of government", providing a strong leadership to the legislative branch and to help overcome partisan squabbles. 774:
This theory is prevalent at all levels of government. Popular statewide candidates for governor or senator can also attract support for down ballot races of their party.
1057:
in a "coattail effect" where unpopular and even unknown candidates are elected because they ran together with popular candidates (usually Ministers) on the same slate.
46: 1067:
that it was used to recruit able people to join politics, particularly since the GRC system reduced the losses of the ruling party. In Singapore, the ruling
430: 884: 880: 395: 425: 264: 759:
is the tendency for a popular political party leader to attract votes for other candidates of the same party in an election. For example, in the
367: 999: 1099: 570: 1301: 1136: 1051: 1031: 1019: 804: 80: 1027: 1007: 738: 1366: 764: 415: 915:
Since the end of World War II, there have been a total of five American presidential elections that had coattail effects:
952: 944: 936: 928: 920: 692: 352: 1361: 343: 817:
that refers to one who achieves some level of success or notability primarily through association with someone else.
62: 979:. The president's task was primarily to end deadlock and act decisively to avoid the stagnation prevalent under the 372: 309: 995: 565: 324: 972: 875:
leaving Johnson a large Democratic majority to pass his agenda. The negative coattail effect is also common in
400: 1068: 386: 1075:
with the GRC system. As of 2015, there were only 6 fully elected Opposition MPs in the 89-seat Parliament.
1246: 1094: 980: 768: 580: 481: 362: 1177:
Calvert, Randall L.; Ferejohn, John A. (June 1983). "Coattail Voting in Recent Presidential Elections".
968: 435: 420: 319: 1089: 976: 924: 790: 731: 58: 1251: 1084: 964: 855:, have begun their terms with one or both chambers of Congress controlled by the opposition party. 476: 1337: 1272: 1264: 1202: 1194: 1125:
Magleby, David B.; O'Brien, David M.; Light, Paul C.; Cronin, Thomas E.; Peltason, J. W. (2007).
687: 646: 236: 221: 175: 170: 143: 810: 1237:
Campbell, James E.; Sumners, Joe A. (June 1990). "Presidential Coattails in Senate Elections".
1297: 1132: 1023: 987: 932: 852: 771:
as well; these Members of Congress are voted into office "on the coattails" of the president.
656: 636: 575: 524: 405: 357: 291: 216: 206: 185: 180: 97: 1329: 1256: 1186: 876: 867:; that may have had to do with the presence of a strong third-party presidential candidate, 786: 590: 519: 471: 314: 300: 27:
The tendency for a popular candidate to attract votes for other candidates of the same party
1035: 916: 724: 714: 641: 624: 486: 440: 138: 1061: 1015: 778: 585: 529: 334: 329: 274: 269: 709: 1355: 1341: 1333: 1317: 1206: 1152: 1064: 1011: 940: 848: 844: 835: 760: 682: 600: 595: 255: 231: 226: 148: 1276: 948: 864: 859: 677: 661: 609: 500: 491: 466: 246: 211: 17: 1291: 1126: 803:
The "coattail effect" has also been used to derogatorily describe the effect of
651: 534: 514: 241: 986:
Since 1962, French presidents have been elected by popular vote, replacing the
1104: 1072: 1039: 868: 509: 377: 201: 161: 1320:(December 2008). "Singapore's Electoral System: Government by the People?". 912:) and all of which were at the expense of the incumbent President's party. 157: 789:. People have a tendency to vote based on a political party instead of the 814: 410: 1268: 1198: 112: 782: 129: 104: 1260: 1190: 1060:
Despite the official reason cited, it was later stated by former
1022:
resulting in a landslide for Chirac against far-right candidate
29: 45:
deal primarily with the United States and do not represent a
1014:, favored to win in a run-off between him and incumbent 54: 1042:- formed in 2016 - instead of an established party). 1293:
Pre-Election Polling: Sources of Accuracy and Error
1296:. Russell Sage Foundation. p. 124, 178–180. 1128:Government by the People, National, State, Local 1223:States Matter - Gerrymandering & Pipelines 732: 43:The examples and perspective in this article 8: 1018:, was placed third in the first round, with 441:Parallel voting (Mixed member majoritarian) 739: 725: 630: 554: 460: 406:Mixed single vote (positive vote transfer) 344:Proportional and semi-proportional systems 296: 125: 92: 1250: 81:Learn how and when to remove this message 1117: 767:candidate will often win many seats in 669: 608: 499: 385: 342: 299: 254: 193: 156: 128: 103: 1239:The American Political Science Review 1179:The American Political Science Review 800:down-ballot party candidates anyway. 7: 1071:maintains almost total dominance in 1131:. Prentice Hall. pp. 319–323. 1046:Group representation constituencies 805:Group Representation Constituencies 301:Plurality and majoritarian systems 25: 1290:Crespi, Irving (23 August 1988). 1153:"Ride Coattails idiom definition" 1052:Group representation constituency 411:Scorporo (negative vote transfer) 1334:10.1111/j.1748-121X.2008.00106.x 1010:(where the Socialist candidate, 708: 111: 34: 834:Before the introduction of the 1220:Daley, David (24 April 2018). 416:Mixed ballot transferable vote 1: 967:was re-established under the 959:In the French Fifth Republic 763:, the party of a victorious 693:End-to-end verifiable voting 353:Single non-transferable vote 551:Voting patterns and effects 57:, discuss the issue on the 1383: 1049: 1038:, ran under the banner of 373:Single transferable voting 310:First-past-the-post voting 813:can be used as a generic 777:This is prevalent in the 566:Voting advice application 396:Mixed-member proportional 325:Plurality-at-large voting 431:Rural–urban proportional 426:Dual-member proportional 401:Additional member system 1095:Straight-ticket voting 981:French Fourth Republic 821:Presidential coattails 581:Passive electioneering 482:Straight-ticket voting 1367:Political terminology 1069:People's Action Party 975:, responsible before 436:Majority bonus system 421:Alternative Vote Plus 320:Instant-runoff voting 1105:Lead-in and lead-out 963:Since the office of 830:In the United States 811:Riding the coattails 387:Mixed-member systems 63:create a new article 55:improve this article 1157:The Free Dictionary 1085:Government trifecta 1032:presidential race's 1000:was adopted in 2000 965:President of France 715:Politics portal 477:Split-ticket voting 1362:Political theories 1226:. Sister District. 1090:Reagan's coattails 1020:the actual run-off 757:down-ballot effect 688:Voter registration 647:Voter intimidation 171:Write-in candidate 144:Provisional ballot 18:Down-ballot effect 1107:(in broadcasting) 1024:Jean-Marie Le Pen 988:electoral college 925:Dwight Eisenhower 877:midterm elections 853:George H. W. Bush 749: 748: 700: 699: 657:Voter suppression 637:Ballot harvesting 615: 614: 576:Paradox of voting 542: 541: 525:None of the above 457:Voting strategies 448: 447: 358:Cumulative voting 292:Electoral systems 282: 281: 217:Electronic voting 207:Compulsory voting 91: 90: 83: 65:, as appropriate. 16:(Redirected from 1374: 1346: 1345: 1314: 1308: 1307: 1287: 1281: 1280: 1254: 1234: 1228: 1227: 1217: 1211: 1210: 1174: 1168: 1167: 1165: 1163: 1149: 1143: 1142: 1122: 793:for their area. 787:general election 785:especially in a 741: 734: 727: 713: 712: 631: 591:Political apathy 555: 520:Election boycott 461: 315:Two-round system 297: 126: 115: 93: 86: 79: 75: 72: 66: 38: 37: 30: 21: 1382: 1381: 1377: 1376: 1375: 1373: 1372: 1371: 1352: 1351: 1350: 1349: 1316: 1315: 1311: 1304: 1289: 1288: 1284: 1261:10.2307/1963532 1252:10.1.1.421.3388 1236: 1235: 1231: 1219: 1218: 1214: 1191:10.2307/1958925 1176: 1175: 1171: 1161: 1159: 1151: 1150: 1146: 1139: 1124: 1123: 1119: 1114: 1081: 1054: 1048: 1036:Emmanuel Macron 961: 832: 823: 753:coattail effect 745: 707: 702: 701: 642:Ballot stuffing 628: 625:Electoral fraud 617: 616: 561:Coattail effect 552: 544: 543: 487:Tactical voting 458: 450: 449: 363:Binomial system 294: 284: 283: 162:Ballot measures 139:Absentee ballot 123: 98:Politics series 87: 76: 70: 67: 52: 39: 35: 28: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 1380: 1378: 1370: 1369: 1364: 1354: 1353: 1348: 1347: 1328:(4): 610–628. 1318:Tey, Tsun Hang 1309: 1302: 1282: 1245:(2): 513–524. 1229: 1212: 1185:(2): 407–419. 1169: 1144: 1137: 1116: 1115: 1113: 1110: 1109: 1108: 1102: 1097: 1092: 1087: 1080: 1077: 1062:Prime Minister 1050:Main article: 1047: 1044: 1016:Jacques Chirac 973:prime minister 969:Third Republic 960: 957: 933:Lyndon Johnson 831: 828: 822: 819: 779:United Kingdom 747: 746: 744: 743: 736: 729: 721: 718: 717: 704: 703: 698: 697: 696: 695: 690: 685: 680: 672: 671: 667: 666: 665: 664: 659: 654: 649: 644: 639: 629: 627:and prevention 623: 622: 619: 618: 613: 612: 606: 605: 604: 603: 598: 593: 588: 586:Vote splitting 583: 578: 573: 568: 563: 553: 550: 549: 546: 545: 540: 539: 538: 537: 532: 530:Refused ballot 527: 522: 517: 512: 504: 503: 497: 496: 495: 494: 489: 484: 479: 474: 469: 459: 456: 455: 452: 451: 446: 445: 444: 443: 438: 433: 428: 423: 418: 413: 408: 403: 398: 390: 389: 383: 382: 381: 380: 375: 370: 365: 360: 355: 347: 346: 340: 339: 338: 337: 335:Usual judgment 332: 330:General ticket 327: 322: 317: 312: 304: 303: 295: 290: 289: 286: 285: 280: 279: 278: 277: 275:Voting machine 272: 267: 259: 258: 252: 251: 250: 249: 244: 239: 234: 229: 224: 219: 214: 209: 204: 196: 195: 191: 190: 189: 188: 183: 178: 173: 165: 164: 154: 153: 152: 151: 146: 141: 133: 132: 124: 121: 120: 117: 116: 108: 107: 101: 100: 89: 88: 49:of the subject 47:worldwide view 42: 40: 33: 26: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1379: 1368: 1365: 1363: 1360: 1359: 1357: 1343: 1339: 1335: 1331: 1327: 1323: 1322:Legal Studies 1319: 1313: 1310: 1305: 1303:9781610441445 1299: 1295: 1294: 1286: 1283: 1278: 1274: 1270: 1266: 1262: 1258: 1253: 1248: 1244: 1240: 1233: 1230: 1225: 1224: 1216: 1213: 1208: 1204: 1200: 1196: 1192: 1188: 1184: 1180: 1173: 1170: 1158: 1154: 1148: 1145: 1140: 1138:9780132391498 1134: 1130: 1129: 1121: 1118: 1111: 1106: 1103: 1101: 1100:Wave election 1098: 1096: 1093: 1091: 1088: 1086: 1083: 1082: 1078: 1076: 1074: 1070: 1066: 1065:Goh Chok Tong 1063: 1058: 1053: 1045: 1043: 1041: 1037: 1033: 1029: 1025: 1021: 1017: 1013: 1012:Lionel Jospin 1009: 1003: 1001: 997: 991: 989: 984: 982: 978: 974: 970: 966: 958: 956: 954: 950: 946: 942: 941:Ronald Reagan 938: 934: 930: 926: 922: 918: 913: 911: 907: 903: 899: 895: 891: 886: 882: 878: 872: 870: 866: 861: 856: 854: 850: 849:Ronald Reagan 846: 845:Richard Nixon 840: 837: 836:secret ballot 829: 827: 820: 818: 816: 812: 808: 806: 801: 797: 794: 792: 788: 784: 780: 775: 772: 770: 766: 762: 761:United States 758: 754: 742: 737: 735: 730: 728: 723: 722: 720: 719: 716: 711: 706: 705: 694: 691: 689: 686: 684: 683:Secret ballot 681: 679: 676: 675: 674: 673: 668: 663: 660: 658: 655: 653: 650: 648: 645: 643: 640: 638: 635: 634: 633: 632: 626: 621: 620: 611: 610:Protest votes 607: 602: 601:Voter turnout 599: 597: 596:Voter fatigue 594: 592: 589: 587: 584: 582: 579: 577: 574: 572: 569: 567: 564: 562: 559: 558: 557: 556: 548: 547: 536: 533: 531: 528: 526: 523: 521: 518: 516: 513: 511: 508: 507: 506: 505: 502: 501:Protest votes 498: 493: 490: 488: 485: 483: 480: 478: 475: 473: 472:Fusion voting 470: 468: 465: 464: 463: 462: 454: 453: 442: 439: 437: 434: 432: 429: 427: 424: 422: 419: 417: 414: 412: 409: 407: 404: 402: 399: 397: 394: 393: 392: 391: 388: 384: 379: 376: 374: 371: 369: 366: 364: 361: 359: 356: 354: 351: 350: 349: 348: 345: 341: 336: 333: 331: 328: 326: 323: 321: 318: 316: 313: 311: 308: 307: 306: 305: 302: 298: 293: 288: 287: 276: 273: 271: 268: 266: 263: 262: 261: 260: 257: 253: 248: 245: 243: 240: 238: 235: 233: 232:Postal voting 230: 228: 227:Polling place 225: 223: 220: 218: 215: 213: 210: 208: 205: 203: 200: 199: 198: 197: 192: 187: 184: 182: 179: 177: 174: 172: 169: 168: 167: 166: 163: 159: 155: 150: 149:Sample ballot 147: 145: 142: 140: 137: 136: 135: 134: 131: 127: 119: 118: 114: 110: 109: 106: 102: 99: 95: 94: 85: 82: 74: 64: 60: 56: 50: 48: 41: 32: 31: 19: 1325: 1321: 1312: 1292: 1285: 1242: 1238: 1232: 1222: 1215: 1182: 1178: 1172: 1160:. Retrieved 1156: 1147: 1127: 1120: 1059: 1055: 1004: 996:cohabitation 992: 985: 962: 949:Barack Obama 917:Harry Truman 914: 873: 865:Bill Clinton 860:Jimmy Carter 857: 841: 833: 824: 809: 802: 798: 795: 776: 773: 765:presidential 756: 752: 750: 678:Election ink 662:Voter caging 571:Likely voter 560: 492:Vote pairing 467:Issue voting 265:Popular vote 247:Voting booth 212:Early voting 96:Part of the 77: 71:January 2011 68: 44: 1030:(where the 652:Vote buying 535:Spoilt vote 515:Donkey vote 242:Vote center 222:Open ballot 1356:Categories 1112:References 1073:Parliament 1040:En Marche! 977:Parliament 869:Ross Perot 670:Prevention 510:Abstention 378:Spare vote 368:Party-list 202:Ballot box 194:Collection 176:Electorate 158:Candidates 1342:143965283 1247:CiteSeerX 1207:147474806 122:Balloting 59:talk page 1277:14987482 1162:19 March 1079:See also 1034:winner, 815:metaphor 769:Congress 256:Counting 237:Precinct 53:You may 1269:1963532 1199:1958925 130:Ballots 1340:  1300:  1275:  1267:  1249:  1205:  1197:  1135:  1026:) and 947:, and 851:, and 783:Canada 186:Ticket 105:Voting 1338:S2CID 1273:S2CID 1265:JSTOR 1203:S2CID 1195:JSTOR 270:Tally 181:Slate 61:, or 1298:ISBN 1164:2015 1133:ISBN 1028:2017 1008:2002 953:2008 945:1980 937:1964 929:1952 921:1948 910:2022 908:and 906:2018 902:2010 898:2006 894:1994 890:1954 885:1952 883:and 881:1948 781:and 751:The 160:and 1330:doi 1257:doi 1187:doi 951:in 943:in 935:in 927:in 919:in 755:or 1358:: 1336:. 1326:28 1324:. 1271:. 1263:. 1255:. 1243:84 1241:. 1201:. 1193:. 1183:77 1181:. 1155:. 1002:. 955:. 939:, 931:, 923:, 904:, 900:, 896:, 892:, 871:. 847:, 791:MP 1344:. 1332:: 1306:. 1279:. 1259:: 1209:. 1189:: 1166:. 1141:. 888:( 740:e 733:t 726:v 84:) 78:( 73:) 69:( 51:. 20:)

Index

Down-ballot effect
worldwide view
improve this article
talk page
create a new article
Learn how and when to remove this message
Politics series
Voting

Ballots
Absentee ballot
Provisional ballot
Sample ballot
Candidates
Ballot measures
Write-in candidate
Electorate
Slate
Ticket
Ballot box
Compulsory voting
Early voting
Electronic voting
Open ballot
Polling place
Postal voting
Precinct
Vote center
Voting booth
Counting

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑