46:
616:
213:
and intention to damage and conspiracy to injure. However the only successful claims were for breach of confidence and for the breach of the Data
Protection Act. The High Court granted an injunction but this was reversed by the Court of Appeal. In the judgment Brooke LJ restated the three
158:
magazine. In order to ensure the exclusivity there was strict security of the event and no guests were allowed to take photographs, the event was closed to the media and guests were told to surrender any equipment which could be used to take photographs. However a freelance photographer
277:
The House of Lords agreed in a 3-2 judgment that the photographs of the wedding were confidential, that there were circumstances of confidence and that publication of the photographs had been to the detriment of
247:
and the
Douglases were successful in claiming for breach of confidence against Hello! Ltd. as the company producing Hello!, its Spanish mother Hola! SA, and their proprietor Eduardo Sanchez Junco.
346:
266:
magazine retained confidence in publishing photographs that the
Douglases agreed should be published but retained a right of privacy in remaining photographs. The only way in which
486:
809:
402:
537:
428:
650:
350:
372:
503:
454:
317:
560:
799:
701:
565:
195:
2 WLR 992 the
Douglases attempted to gain an injunction to prevent the publication of unauthorized photographs. The Douglases and
635:
804:
645:
167:, managed to secure access to the wedding and take photographs of the couple. This photographer then sold the images to
660:
630:
676:
640:
605:
530:
731:
210:
681:
123:
challenged the unauthorised use of photographs of their wedding in the
English courts. The case resulted in
585:
297:
510:
770:
590:
575:
570:
523:
202:
148:
magazine which would give the company exclusivity over their wedding which took place in 2000 at the
141:
120:
152:
in New York. According to the deal, the couple were to approve the selection of photographs used by
406:
206:
160:
432:
721:
655:
595:
480:
380:
45:
461:
321:
726:
711:
696:
580:
224:
The prospective claimants have to make clear that no photographic pictures are to be taken.
736:
600:
284:
137:
116:
28:
112:
74:
228:
Brooke LJ ruled that the couple could not expect privacy at a wedding with 250 guests.
793:
706:
164:
746:
716:
197:
154:
615:
262:
subsequently appealed to the Court of Appeal. The Court of Appeal ruled that the
756:
751:
546:
149:
17:
171:
magazine which had earlier attempted to bid for the photographs. The deal with
777:
741:
691:
686:
347:"Douglas v. Hello! - Case Watch Law Articles and News - Lawdit Reading Room"
511:
2007 UKHL 21 House of Lords appeal of the 2005 EWCA CIV 106 judgment
258:
The Judge (Lindsay J) upheld the
Douglases claim to confidence.
519:
515:
125:
214:
requirements for there to have been a breach of confidence.
669:
623:
553:
94:
86:
81:
70:
60:
52:
38:
341:
339:
27:For the final appeal in the House of Lords, see
65:Douglas and others v Hello Limited and others
274:was through a claim for breach of confidence.
531:
8:
218:There has to be an obligation of confidence;
538:
524:
516:
44:
35:
90:Lord Phillips MR, Clarke LJ Neuberger LJ
309:
270:magazine could recover damages against
163:, son of the former British politician
485:: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (
478:
7:
221:It arises only on private occasions;
129:magazine being awarded £1,033,156.
25:
614:
810:2007 in United Kingdom case law
175:Magazine was worth £1,000,000.
115:was a series of cases in which
1:
661:Courts of England and Wales
113:[2005] EWCA Civ 595
826:
26:
765:
612:
99:
43:
800:English privacy case law
211:Data Protection Act 1998
702:British Virgin Islands
429:"Personality Database"
403:"Personality Database"
318:"Personality Database"
298:Privacy in English law
100:Privacy, economic tort
241:Douglas v Hello! No 2
805:House of Lords cases
203:breach of confidence
193:Douglas v Hello No 1
142:Catherine Zeta-Jones
121:Catherine Zeta-Jones
108:Douglas v Hello! Ltd
39:Douglas v Hello! Ltd
207:invasion of privacy
144:agreed a deal with
566:Administrative law
383:on 31 October 2007
353:on 29 January 2013
787:
786:
104:
103:
16:(Redirected from
817:
682:Northern Ireland
624:Further subjects
618:
540:
533:
526:
517:
505:Douglas v Hello!
491:
490:
484:
476:
474:
472:
466:
460:. Archived from
459:
451:
445:
444:
442:
440:
431:. Archived from
425:
419:
418:
416:
414:
405:. Archived from
399:
393:
392:
390:
388:
379:. Archived from
377:- An OK! result"
375:Douglas v Hello!
369:
363:
362:
360:
358:
349:. Archived from
343:
334:
333:
331:
329:
320:. Archived from
314:
252:Douglas v Hello!
233:Douglas v Hello!
209:, breach of the
185:Douglas v Hello!
82:Court membership
48:
36:
21:
18:Douglas v Hello!
825:
824:
820:
819:
818:
816:
815:
814:
790:
789:
788:
783:
761:
737:Anglo-Saxon law
670:Related systems
665:
651:Civil procedure
636:Competition law
619:
610:
601:Retained EU law
561:UK Constitution
549:
544:
500:
495:
494:
477:
470:
468:
464:
457:
455:"Archived copy"
453:
452:
448:
438:
436:
427:
426:
422:
412:
410:
401:
400:
396:
386:
384:
371:
370:
366:
356:
354:
345:
344:
337:
327:
325:
316:
315:
311:
306:
294:
285:OBG Ltd v Allan
282:magazine. (See
256:
237:
189:
181:
138:Michael Douglas
135:
117:Michael Douglas
56:Court of Appeal
32:
29:OBG Ltd v Allan
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
823:
821:
813:
812:
807:
802:
792:
791:
785:
784:
782:
781:
774:
766:
763:
762:
760:
759:
754:
749:
744:
739:
734:
729:
724:
719:
714:
709:
704:
699:
694:
689:
684:
679:
673:
671:
667:
666:
664:
663:
658:
653:
648:
646:Commercial law
643:
638:
633:
627:
625:
621:
620:
613:
611:
609:
608:
603:
598:
593:
588:
583:
578:
573:
568:
563:
557:
555:
551:
550:
545:
543:
542:
535:
528:
520:
514:
513:
508:
499:
498:External links
496:
493:
492:
467:on 9 July 2007
446:
435:on 7 July 2009
420:
409:on 7 July 2009
394:
364:
335:
324:on 7 July 2009
308:
307:
305:
302:
301:
300:
293:
290:
255:
249:
243:EWHC 786 (Ch)
236:
230:
226:
225:
222:
219:
188:
182:
180:
177:
134:
131:
102:
101:
97:
96:
92:
91:
88:
87:Judges sitting
84:
83:
79:
78:
72:
68:
67:
62:
61:Full case name
58:
57:
54:
50:
49:
41:
40:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
822:
811:
808:
806:
803:
801:
798:
797:
795:
780:
779:
775:
773:
772:
768:
767:
764:
758:
755:
753:
750:
748:
745:
743:
740:
738:
735:
733:
732:United States
730:
728:
725:
723:
720:
718:
715:
713:
710:
708:
705:
703:
700:
698:
695:
693:
690:
688:
685:
683:
680:
678:
675:
674:
672:
668:
662:
659:
657:
654:
652:
649:
647:
644:
642:
639:
637:
634:
632:
629:
628:
626:
622:
617:
607:
604:
602:
599:
597:
594:
592:
589:
587:
584:
582:
579:
577:
574:
572:
569:
567:
564:
562:
559:
558:
556:
554:Core subjects
552:
548:
541:
536:
534:
529:
527:
522:
521:
518:
512:
509:
507:
506:
502:
501:
497:
488:
482:
463:
456:
450:
447:
434:
430:
424:
421:
408:
404:
398:
395:
382:
378:
376:
368:
365:
352:
348:
342:
340:
336:
323:
319:
313:
310:
303:
299:
296:
295:
291:
289:
287:
286:
281:
275:
273:
269:
265:
261:
253:
250:
248:
246:
242:
234:
231:
229:
223:
220:
217:
216:
215:
212:
208:
204:
200:
199:
194:
186:
183:
178:
176:
174:
170:
166:
165:Jeremy Thorpe
162:
161:Rupert Thorpe
157:
156:
151:
147:
143:
139:
132:
130:
128:
127:
122:
118:
114:
110:
109:
98:
93:
89:
85:
80:
76:
73:
69:
66:
63:
59:
55:
51:
47:
42:
37:
34:
30:
19:
776:
769:
591:Property law
576:Contract law
571:Criminal law
504:
469:. Retrieved
462:the original
449:
437:. Retrieved
433:the original
423:
411:. Retrieved
407:the original
397:
385:. Retrieved
381:the original
374:
367:
355:. Retrieved
351:the original
326:. Retrieved
322:the original
312:
283:
279:
276:
271:
267:
263:
259:
257:
251:
245:OK! Magazine
244:
240:
238:
232:
227:
201:claimed for
198:OK! Magazine
196:
192:
190:
184:
172:
168:
153:
145:
136:
124:
107:
106:
105:
75:EWCA Civ 595
64:
33:
757:Hue and cry
752:Bloody Code
722:New Zealand
631:Company law
547:English law
357:30 November
150:Plaza Hotel
794:Categories
742:Common law
656:Family law
641:Labour law
304:References
727:Singapore
712:Hong Kong
697:Australia
596:Trust law
179:Judgments
77:, QB 125
71:Citations
771:Category
687:Scotland
606:Case law
581:Tort law
481:cite web
292:See also
95:Keywords
677:UK-wide
586:Privacy
471:30 June
439:24 June
413:24 June
387:30 June
328:24 June
778:Portal
747:Equity
707:Canada
254:(2005)
235:(2003)
187:(2001)
717:India
692:Wales
465:(PDF)
458:(PDF)
272:Hello
260:Hello
169:Hello
133:Facts
111:
53:Court
487:link
473:2009
441:2009
415:2009
389:2009
359:2019
330:2009
140:and
119:and
288:).
280:OK!
268:OK!
264:OK!
239:In
191:In
173:OK!
155:OK!
146:OK!
126:OK!
796::
483:}}
479:{{
338:^
205:,
539:e
532:t
525:v
489:)
475:.
443:.
417:.
391:.
373:"
361:.
332:.
31:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
