655:, Hamlin has received significant coverage in multiple published primary and secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject. These include articles by Neal Hotelling and numerous primary sources, that demonstrate the works she created have become into noteworthy landmarks, leaving a lasting impact on the architectural landscape and historical heritage of Carmel-by-the-Sea.
77:
56:
87:
185:
167:
25:
195:
659:
Comment: I think notability is seriously under question. The article is primarily built around the Carmel Pine Cone, a hyper-local weekly tabloid from a township of several thousand where the sale/purchase of individual homes is considered newsworthy. Of Carmel Pine Cone based sourcing, the one that
390:
articles can be stripped out of intricate spurious details and consolidated into much fewer concise articles. If you've seen the articles in the walled garden, you'll see they're highly duplicative, for example, building articles boasting about people and their other projects, buildings, being next
719:
Please read my "Reply to AfC comments" I am trying to understand your comment regarding your reason the article does not show significant coverage. I think that Mary L. Hamlin was a notable figure in the development of Carmel-by-the-Sea, California and should be recognized as such. I would rather
644:
sources vary in quality and depth of coverage. Multiple sources have been provided to show Hamlin was an important figure and played a significant role in the early development of Carmel-by-the-Sea, before the city was incorporated. The period of historical significance is from 1908 through the
678:
Comment: If this is a biography, what is List of
Historic Buildings in Carmel-by-the-Sea doing at the foot the draft? If it is about the buildings, what is the details biography of Hamlin doing in the draft?, and why do they not have an article apiece. Potentially there are four drafts here. I
534:
We expect an AFC reviewer to accept any draft which, in their belief, has a better than 50% chance of surviving an immediate deletion process. We also expect any editor to have an opinion on the new mainspace article, and, where appropriate, to propose one of our three deletion processes.
266:
Why was this article moved to draft space? Your only comment was it reads like an advertisement. Usually, that is just a tag (template). What would you like to see done before it can be moved back to the article space? I would like to work with you on this but need some guidance.
779:. There is a passing mention from the San Francisco Examiner, and everything else is Carmel Pine Cone and primary source city government documents. Also, if this wasn't clear before, multiple works from the same publisher count as only one source for notability purposes.
542:
This means that I stand by my opinion that the might be multiple drafts spawned from this article. I am content that they may not be accepted. What I am advising the creating editor to do is to remove much or the clutter that the non biographical elements are causing,
795:
Disagreements should be discussed in talk page. I don't believe it's a good idea to repeatedly submit AfC review with specific intentions praying to come across more sympathetic reviewers and repeating it with minimal change until it makes it through.
756:
I agree with TRIS the sources do not meet GNG nor BASIC, including the additional ones you added. I caution against resubmitting it given you are on short rope and have received several messages about sourcing issues and wasting editor's time.
340:. She has a strong (verified) claim to notability. It is brief, and very tight. Three citations for one fact is a thing I deprecate, but they are there, added by another. Since I do not mother articles, I have ignored that. 🇺🇦
507:
I have suggested to the creating editor that there is potential material for individual articles on the person and on the various buildings. You have pointed out correctly that each item, person and buildings, must pass
606:
That works until article creator comes back, continue to introduce boat load of trivia, primary sources, news column sourced contents to fluff it up to create an appearance of notability which may influence new comers.
522:
should not be created for each. Creating a draft on any topic is allowed, whether that topic be notable or not, verified or not, verifiable or not. It is the migration of that draft to mainspace which triggers
720:
that the article be accepted and if necessary, go through a deletion nomination so others can vote than to be rejected by a single editor. I have provided 12 citations, which should easily satisfy
589:
To prevent timesinkery I feel that contributions at a deletion discussion should almost always be 'fire and forget', which holds true unless something exciting comes to light. 🇺🇦
454:
is passed. Anything else is not required. Indeed I suggest you cut, cut, and cut again, and then, assuming acceptance, sit on your hands and allow others to do as they see fit 🇺🇦
391:
door to other buildings or things associated with people. When you look in people associated with those articles, you'll then find extensive coverage on buildings and other people.
638:
Comment: Three of the sources are the same publication, Carmel Pine Cone which is a local source and only one has in-depth coverage about Hamlin. The others are not in-depth.
325:
Neither can I offer draft by draft, article by article handholding. However, I have left a comment on the draft page with my concerns, which remain even after you and
649:
Comment: This figure does not seem to meet WP:N. She is of antiquarian interest to those interested in local genealogy and businesses, and the sourcing reflects that.
829:
414:
149:
139:
512:
in its own right, on its own merits, to have an article. I believe I have interpreted your words correctly. If not I apologise and am open to correction.
834:
824:
674:
she co-founded. Other articles talk about how she played a pivotal role in founding two Carmel landmarks, the Monte Verde Inn and the
Sundial Lodge.
286:
on your talk page should give you a clue. I can't give you hand holding on article-by-article case-by-case occurrence. It should be pretty obvious.
839:
213:
115:
217:
547:
where they may give rise to a false feeling of notability for the biographical subject. Her notability must stand on its own merits. 🇺🇦
439:
be merit in an outing to mainspace for the current version, but further draftification from mainspace would not, I think, be appropriate.
333:
have to assert and verify true notability. I believe you can find material to create a well crafted, tightly written, brief stub on each.
307:
Thank you for moving this to draft space instead of marking it for deletion. I now have an opportunity to rewrite it to show notability.
221:
410:
212:, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Knowledge's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
100:
61:
504:
AFC comments have a habit of becoming malformed when folk review or comment using the AFC Helper script, so I will reply here.
208:
172:
586:
While you may be correct, the drafts may never get as far as mainspace. That does not mean that they should not be attempted.
406:
36:
729:
702:
539:
is likely inappropriate for an AFC acceptance. That editor may also decide to ignore and/or improve the new article.
476:
422:
362:
312:
272:
679:
suggest you do not submit this draft until you have split it into three buildings and one biog. Four separate drafts.
357:
Excellent advice! Your example is helpful. I like the idea of splitting the article into multiple drafts. Thank You!
747:
725:
698:
472:
446:
may I suggest you edit for total simplicity. I will not comment about notability, except to say that your
443:
418:
387:
358:
322:
308:
268:
685:. The buildings are mentioned as part of her biography to explain the places she owned and managed. The
681:
The list of
Historic Buildings in Carmel-by-the-Sea has been removed. This article is a biography about
632:
Comment: In addition to prior comments, the source from citation #6 has been challenged in good faith -
42:
738:
It has not been rejected. You are free to re-submit I will not review again, I do not think she passes
784:
682:
337:
801:
612:
573:
396:
291:
114:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
776:
743:
714:
667:
595:
566:
553:
536:
460:
346:
772:
92:
721:
641:
200:
780:
762:
663:
652:
383:
379:
797:
608:
583:
569:
497:
432:
392:
326:
302:
287:
261:
818:
739:
690:
671:
590:
548:
509:
455:
451:
373:
341:
283:
565:
Although as you know, AfD on Greg articles always get drawn out and they're a major
76:
55:
471:
Thanks for your suggestions. I appreciate them. I'll look at cutting what I can.
528:
524:
805:
788:
766:
751:
733:
706:
616:
601:
577:
559:
480:
466:
426:
400:
366:
352:
316:
295:
276:
184:
166:
758:
190:
110:
105:
82:
771:
I agree with both
Theroadislong and S0091. This draft has essentially been
686:
405:
Hamlin founded two historic buildings that are listed on the city's
329:
have simplified the draft. I think you are wasting material. Drafts
220:. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
435:
I will leave this draft to another reviewer. I believe that there
18:
670:. Neil Hotelling featured her in an article regarding the
104:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
411:
777:
no amount of editing can overcome a lack of notability
386:are quite relevant and a farm of Carmel-by-the-Sea
660:is used ten times is written by Neil Hotelling.
8:
415:California Register of Historical Resources
336:By way of example, may I suggest you read
161:
50:
413:document. Both have been nominaed to the
35:does not require a rating on Knowledge's
163:
52:
680:
661:
650:
639:
633:
7:
450:job in this draft is to prove that
41:It is of interest to the following
830:Low-importance California articles
24:
22:
14:
693:already have a seperate articles.
206:This page is within the scope of
98:This page is within the scope of
515:We are both correct in my view.
193:
183:
165:
124:Knowledge:WikiProject California
85:
75:
54:
23:
835:WikiProject California articles
825:Draft-Class California articles
666:, Hamlin was well known on the
518:There is nothing to say that a
500:, you replied to my AFC comment
407:Inventory of Historic Resources
230:Knowledge:WikiProject Biography
127:Template:WikiProject California
840:Draft-Class biography articles
233:Template:WikiProject Biography
1:
634:This source has been removed.
118:and see a list of open tasks.
617:13:09, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
602:10:33, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
578:09:58, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
560:09:25, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
481:01:39, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
467:01:29, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
427:19:38, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
401:19:14, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
218:contribute to the discussion
144:This page has been rated as
367:16:48, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
353:13:27, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
317:17:47, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
296:23:57, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
277:23:26, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
856:
806:21:55, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
789:22:01, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
767:20:55, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
752:20:46, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
734:20:39, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
707:16:57, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
150:project's importance scale
178:
143:
70:
49:
255:Article moved to draft
101:WikiProject California
627:Reply to AfC comments
209:WikiProject Biography
683:Draft:Mary L. Hamlin
338:Elsie Reasoner Ralph
130:California articles
668:Monterey Peninsula
236:biography articles
37:content assessment
444:Greghenderson2006
323:Greghenderson2006
282:Comments left by
252:
251:
248:
247:
244:
243:
160:
159:
156:
155:
93:California portal
847:
718:
598:
593:
556:
551:
463:
458:
377:
349:
344:
306:
265:
238:
237:
234:
231:
228:
214:join the project
203:
201:Biography portal
198:
197:
196:
187:
180:
179:
169:
162:
132:
131:
128:
125:
122:
95:
90:
89:
88:
79:
72:
71:
66:
58:
51:
28:
27:
26:
19:
855:
854:
850:
849:
848:
846:
845:
844:
815:
814:
712:
629:
596:
591:
554:
549:
502:
461:
456:
388:WP:WALLEDGARDEN
371:
347:
342:
300:
259:
257:
235:
232:
229:
226:
225:
199:
194:
192:
129:
126:
123:
120:
119:
91:
86:
84:
64:
12:
11:
5:
853:
851:
843:
842:
837:
832:
827:
817:
816:
813:
812:
811:
810:
809:
808:
793:
792:
791:
726:Greg Henderson
699:Greg Henderson
696:
695:
676:
657:
647:
636:
628:
625:
624:
623:
622:
621:
620:
619:
587:
501:
495:
494:
493:
492:
491:
490:
489:
488:
487:
486:
485:
484:
483:
473:Greg Henderson
440:
429:
419:Greg Henderson
409:and one is on
369:
359:Greg Henderson
334:
309:Greg Henderson
269:Greg Henderson
256:
253:
250:
249:
246:
245:
242:
241:
239:
205:
204:
188:
176:
175:
170:
158:
157:
154:
153:
146:Low-importance
142:
136:
135:
133:
116:the discussion
97:
96:
80:
68:
67:
65:Low‑importance
59:
47:
46:
40:
29:
16:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
852:
841:
838:
836:
833:
831:
828:
826:
823:
822:
820:
807:
803:
799:
794:
790:
786:
782:
778:
774:
770:
769:
768:
764:
760:
755:
754:
753:
749:
745:
744:Theroadislong
741:
737:
736:
735:
731:
727:
723:
716:
715:Theroadislong
711:
710:
709:
708:
704:
700:
694:
692:
691:Sundial Lodge
688:
684:
677:
675:
673:
672:Sundial Lodge
669:
665:
658:
656:
654:
648:
646:
643:
637:
635:
631:
630:
626:
618:
614:
610:
605:
604:
603:
599:
594:
588:
585:
581:
580:
579:
575:
571:
568:
564:
563:
562:
561:
557:
552:
546:
540:
538:
532:
530:
526:
521:
516:
513:
511:
505:
499:
496:
482:
478:
474:
470:
469:
468:
464:
459:
453:
449:
445:
441:
438:
434:
430:
428:
424:
420:
416:
412:
408:
404:
403:
402:
398:
394:
389:
385:
381:
375:
370:
368:
364:
360:
356:
355:
354:
350:
345:
339:
335:
332:
328:
324:
320:
319:
318:
314:
310:
304:
299:
298:
297:
293:
289:
285:
281:
280:
279:
278:
274:
270:
263:
254:
240:
223:
222:documentation
219:
215:
211:
210:
202:
191:
189:
186:
182:
181:
177:
174:
171:
168:
164:
151:
147:
141:
138:
137:
134:
117:
113:
112:
107:
103:
102:
94:
83:
81:
78:
74:
73:
69:
63:
60:
57:
53:
48:
44:
38:
34:
30:
21:
20:
17:
697:
544:
541:
533:
519:
517:
514:
506:
503:
447:
436:
330:
258:
207:
145:
109:
99:
43:WikiProjects
32:
15:
567:WP:TIMESINK
537:WP:DRAFTIFY
819:Categories
781:Left guide
545:especially
378:, I think
121:California
111:California
106:U.S. state
62:California
798:Graywalls
773:refbombed
722:WP:SIGCOV
642:WP:SIGCOV
609:Graywalls
584:Graywalls
570:Graywalls
498:Graywalls
433:Graywalls
393:Graywalls
327:Graywalls
303:Graywalls
288:Graywalls
262:Graywalls
227:Biography
173:Biography
689:and the
687:Pine Inn
664:WP:BASIC
653:WP:BASIC
384:WP:FAILN
380:WP:MERGE
374:Timtrent
284:Timtrent
148:on the
775:, and
740:WP:GNG
597:Faddle
592:Fiddle
555:Faddle
550:Fiddle
510:WP:GNG
462:Faddle
457:Fiddle
452:WP:BIO
348:Faddle
343:Fiddle
39:scale.
759:S0091
645:1930s
600:🇺🇦
558:🇺🇦
520:Draft
465:🇺🇦
437:might
351:🇺🇦
33:draft
31:This
802:talk
785:talk
763:talk
748:talk
730:talk
703:talk
662:Per
651:Per
640:Per
613:talk
574:talk
529:WP:V
527:and
525:WP:N
477:talk
448:only
423:talk
397:talk
363:talk
331:only
313:talk
292:talk
273:talk
216:and
531:.
140:Low
108:of
821::
804:)
787:)
765:)
750:)
742:.
732:)
724:.
705:)
615:)
576:)
479:)
425:)
417:.
399:)
382:,
365:)
315:)
294:)
275:)
800:(
783:(
761:(
746:(
728:(
717::
713:@
701:(
611:(
582:@
572:(
475:(
442:@
431:@
421:(
395:(
376::
372:@
361:(
321:@
311:(
305::
301:@
290:(
271:(
264::
260:@
224:.
152:.
45::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
