30:
143:, where it was called the "Spanish Mantle". These occurrences, along with the observations of one 19th-century historian, who noted that no mention of the punishment was made in any local documentation, including the Newcastle Corporation accounts, prompted William Andrews to suppose in 1899 that the Drunkard's Cloak was a custom imported from the Continent, and that its use in England was confined to Newcastle.
22:
106:
men drove up and down the streets, with a great tub, or barrel, opened in the sides, with a hole in one end, to put through their heads, and to cover their shoulders and bodies, down to the small of their legs, and then close the same, called the new fashioned cloak, and so make them march to the
146:
Further afield, instances of its use are found in the US; a paper described in 1862 how a "wretched delinquent was gratuitously framed in oak, his head being thrust through a hole cut in one end of a barrel, the other end of which had been removed, and the poor fellow loafed about in the most
57:
The drunkard's cloak was actually a barrel, into the top of which a hole was made for the head to pass through. Two smaller holes in the sides were cut for the arms. Once suitably attired, the miscreant was paraded through the town, effectively
74:, or "An Act for Keepers of Ale-houses to be bound by Recognisances". According to Ian Hornsey, the drunkard's cloak, sometimes called the "Newcastle cloak", became a common method of punishing recidivists, especially during the
185:
Until 1552, English ale-house keepers could run their business without a licence. The new act forced ale-house keepers to obtain a licence, which was granted by two justices at a
189:. Potential landlords who failed to comply with the new legislation could be sent to prison. The Act also gave justices discretionary powers to close unlicensed ale-houses.
417:
412:
377:
124:
29:
422:
407:
112:
75:
427:
99:
71:
328:
373:
338:
156:
348:
119:, accompanied by an early illustration of a drunkard's cloak. A similar device was used in
79:
342:
186:
401:
161:
132:
387:
367:
356:
107:
view of all beholders; and this is their punishment for drunkards, or the like.
21:
147:
disconsolate manner, looking for all the world like a half-hatched chicken."
136:
94:
An early description of the drunkard's cloak appears in Ralph
Gardiner's
83:
140:
120:
59:
46:
98:, first published in 1655. A John Willis claimed to have travelled to
128:
34:
28:
20:
358:
England's
Grievance Discovered, in Relation to the Coal Trade
70:
Drunkenness was first made a civil offence in
England by the
282:
280:
139:
in 1660. One author also recorded its existence in 1784 in
86:
areas, and the authorities made regular use of the cloak.
207:
205:
82:
suppressed many of
England's alehouses, particularly in
49:
used in various jurisdictions to punish miscreants.
235:
25:18th-century depiction of the "drunkard's cloak"
104:
111:Gardiner's account was reproduced in 1789 in
8:
386:Hutchinson, William; Randal, Thomas (1778),
392:, W Charnley and Messrs Vesey and Whitfield
16:Type of pillory, a barrel worn as clothes
347:, H. S. Stone & company – via
271:
286:
259:
247:
223:
211:
201:
178:
310:
298:
7:
344:Curious Punishments of Bygone Days
14:
418:Medieval instruments of torture
413:History of Newcastle upon Tyne
372:, Royal Society of Chemistry,
96:England's Grievance Discovered
1:
369:A History of Beer and Brewing
366:Hornsey, Ian Spencer (2003),
236:Hutchinson & Randal 1778
117:History of Newcastle-on-Tyne
444:
361:, R. Ibbitson and P. Stent
333:, William Andrews & Co
355:Gardiner, Ralph (1796) ,
327:Andrews, William (1899),
389:A View of Northumberland
76:Commonwealth of England
109:
38:
26:
32:
24:
37:and drunkard's cloak
289:, pp. 201–208.
226:, pp. 336–337.
72:Ale Houses Act 1551
423:Physical restraint
408:American Civil War
339:Earle, Alice Morse
330:Bygone Punishments
39:
27:
157:Bankruptcy barrel
127:noted its use in
435:
393:
382:
362:
351:
349:Internet Archive
334:
314:
308:
302:
296:
290:
284:
275:
269:
263:
257:
251:
245:
239:
233:
227:
221:
215:
209:
190:
183:
131:in 1634, as did
125:William Brereton
43:drunkard's cloak
33:Illustration of
443:
442:
438:
437:
436:
434:
433:
432:
398:
397:
396:
385:
380:
365:
354:
337:
326:
322:
317:
309:
305:
297:
293:
285:
278:
270:
266:
258:
254:
246:
242:
234:
230:
222:
218:
210:
203:
199:
194:
193:
184:
180:
175:
170:
153:
92:
80:Oliver Cromwell
68:
55:
17:
12:
11:
5:
441:
439:
431:
430:
425:
420:
415:
410:
400:
399:
395:
394:
383:
378:
363:
352:
335:
323:
321:
318:
316:
315:
313:, p. 134.
303:
301:, p. 136.
291:
276:
274:, p. 117.
264:
262:, p. 201.
252:
250:, p. 381.
240:
238:, p. 415.
228:
216:
214:, p. 337.
200:
198:
195:
192:
191:
187:Sessions Court
177:
176:
174:
171:
169:
166:
165:
164:
159:
152:
149:
91:
88:
67:
64:
54:
51:
45:was a type of
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
440:
429:
426:
424:
421:
419:
416:
414:
411:
409:
406:
405:
403:
391:
390:
384:
381:
379:0-85404-630-5
375:
371:
370:
364:
360:
359:
353:
350:
346:
345:
340:
336:
332:
331:
325:
324:
319:
312:
307:
304:
300:
295:
292:
288:
283:
281:
277:
273:
272:Gardiner 1796
268:
265:
261:
256:
253:
249:
244:
241:
237:
232:
229:
225:
220:
217:
213:
208:
206:
202:
196:
188:
182:
179:
172:
167:
163:
160:
158:
155:
154:
150:
148:
144:
142:
138:
134:
130:
126:
122:
118:
114:
108:
103:
101:
97:
89:
87:
85:
81:
78:. From 1655
77:
73:
65:
63:
61:
52:
50:
48:
44:
36:
31:
23:
19:
388:
368:
357:
343:
329:
320:Bibliography
306:
294:
287:Andrews 1899
267:
260:Andrews 1899
255:
248:Hornsey 2003
243:
231:
224:Hornsey 2003
219:
212:Hornsey 2003
181:
162:Schandmantel
145:
133:Samuel Pepys
116:
110:
105:
95:
93:
69:
56:
42:
40:
18:
53:Description
428:Punishment
402:Categories
311:Earle 1896
299:Earle 1896
113:John Brand
197:Citations
173:Footnotes
137:The Hague
102:and seen
100:Newcastle
60:pilloried
341:(1896),
151:See also
90:Accounts
84:Royalist
66:Offences
141:Denmark
121:Holland
47:pillory
376:
168:Notes
129:Delft
35:brank
374:ISBN
135:at
115:'s
404::
279:^
204:^
123:;
62:.
41:A
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
