110:. They appointed a committee which allotted 100 shares to him. The company secretary wrote back telling Mr Harris, and that 10% interest would be payable for the price of the shares not yet paid up. Before the letter arrived with Mr Harris, he had sent another letter saying actually, he did not want to accept any shares.
128:
Moreover, where it is expressly or impliedly stated in the offer that you may accept the offer by posting a letter, the moment you post the letter the offer is accepted. You are bound from the moment you post the letter, not, as it is put here, from the moment you make up your mind on the subject.
149:
125:
to the extraordinary and mischievous consequences which would follow if it were held that an offer might be revoked at any time until the letter accepting it had been actually received.
198:
142:
227:
232:
222:
118:
The court held that a contract was complete when the secretary posted the letter accepting the application for shares.
217:
157:
103:
77:
102:, posted a letter applying for shares in the company. It was received by the directors in their
164:
86:
184:
211:
122:
81:
17:
107:
99:
150:
69:
In re
Imperial Land Company of Marseilles, ex parte Harris
32:
In re
Imperial Land Company of Marseilles, ex parte Harris
57:
52:
44:
36:
31:
72:(1872) Law Rep. 7 Ch. App. 587, also known as
8:
28:
199:Brogden v. Metropolitan Railway Company
176:
143:Brogden v. Metropolitan Railway Company
98:Mr Lewis Harris, of 19 Suffolk Street,
7:
185:Byrne v van Tienhoven and Co: 1880
25:
196:See also, per Lord Blackburn,
1:
132:Sir W. M. James concurred.
61:Mellish LJ, Sir W. M. James
249:
228:English agreement case law
187:, accessed 4 February 2021
80:case. It reconfirmed the
158:Reporoa Stores v Treloar
121:Mellish LJ ascribed the
233:Court of Chancery cases
48:Law Rep. 7 Ch. App. 587
78:English contract law
223:1872 in British law
65:
64:
16:(Redirected from
240:
218:1872 in case law
202:
194:
188:
181:
165:Meeting of minds
87:Adams v Lindsell
53:Court membership
29:
21:
248:
247:
243:
242:
241:
239:
238:
237:
208:
207:
206:
205:
195:
191:
182:
178:
173:
138:
116:
96:
23:
22:
18:Ex parte Harris
15:
12:
11:
5:
246:
244:
236:
235:
230:
225:
220:
210:
209:
204:
203:
189:
183:Lindley J. in
175:
174:
172:
169:
168:
167:
162:
154:
146:
137:
134:
115:
112:
104:Lombard Street
95:
92:
63:
62:
59:
58:Judges sitting
55:
54:
50:
49:
46:
42:
41:
38:
34:
33:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
245:
234:
231:
229:
226:
224:
221:
219:
216:
215:
213:
201:
200:
193:
190:
186:
180:
177:
170:
166:
163:
160:
159:
155:
152:
151:
147:
145:
144:
140:
139:
135:
133:
130:
126:
124:
119:
113:
111:
109:
105:
101:
93:
91:
89:
88:
83:
79:
75:
74:Harris's case
71:
70:
60:
56:
51:
47:
43:
39:
35:
30:
27:
19:
197:
192:
179:
156:
148:
141:
131:
127:
120:
117:
97:
85:
73:
68:
67:
66:
26:
123:postal rule
82:postal rule
212:Categories
171:References
106:office in
161:NZLR 177
136:See also
114:Judgment
90:(1818).
76:, is an
45:Citation
153:2 AC 34
37:Decided
108:London
100:Dublin
94:Facts
40:1872
84:of
214::
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.