464:, Jones, who never writes a favourable review. So it is surprising when we receive an exception: a favourable review by Jones of a novel by an unknown author. Then it is discovered that the novel is his own, written under a pseudonym. The exception tested ('proved') the rule and found that it needed to be understood a little more precisely - namely, that Jones will never write a favourable review, except of his own work. The previous evaluation of Jones's ill-nature toward others is re-affirmed by discovering the manner in which the exception falls outside the rule.
408:"The exception that proves the rule" is often used to describe a case (the exception) which serves to highlight or confirm (prove) a rule to which the exception itself is apparently contrary. Fowler describes two versions of this use, one being the "loose rhetorical sense" and the other "serious nonsense"; other writers connect these uses together insofar as they represent what Holton calls a "drift" from the legal meaning. In its more
339:
25:
180:
121:
66:
412:
sense, this variant of the phrase describes an exception which reveals a tendency that might have otherwise gone unnoticed. In other words, the presence of the exception serves to remind and perhaps reveal to us the rule that otherwise applies; the word 'proof' here is thus not to be taken literally.
421:
to which it runs contrary is. For example: a rural village is "always" quiet. A local farmer rents his fields to a rock festival, which disturbs the quiet. In this example, saying "the exception proves the rule" is in a literal sense incorrect, as the exception shows (first) that the belief is not a
280:
the rule". Most contemporary uses of the phrase emerge from this origin, although often in a way which is closer to the idea that all rules have their exceptions. The alternative origin given is that the word "prove" is used in the archaic sense of "test", a reading advocated, for example, by a 1918
392:
In other words, under this meaning of the phrase, the exception proves that the rule exists on other occasions. This meaning of the phrase, outside of a legal setting, can describe inferences taken from signs, statements or other information. For example, the inference in a shop from a sign saying
471:
In any case, the phrase can be interpreted as a jocular expression of the correct insight that a single counterexample, while sufficient to disprove a strictly logical statement, does not disprove statistical statements which may correctly express a general trend notwithstanding the also commonly
426:
and in so doing establishes the general accuracy of the rule. In what Fowler describes as the "most objectionable" variation of the phrase, this sort of use comes closest to meaning "there is an exception to every rule", or even that the presence of an exception makes a rule more true; these uses
467:
Holton argues that this origin involves a "once-heard etymology" which "makes no sense of the way in which the expression is used". Others agree that most uses of the term do not correspond to this format. Nonetheless, it does for Fowler pass the test of making grammatical sense and it is also
484:
nonsense". He presents the exchange: 'If there is one virtue I can claim, it is punctuality.' 'Were you in time for breakfast this morning?' 'Well, well, the exception that proves the rule.' In this case, the speakers are aware that the phrase does not correctly apply, but are appealing to it
381:
Special leave is given for men to be out of barracks tonight till 11.00 p.m.; "The exception proves the rule" means that this special leave implies a rule requiring men, except when an exception is made, to be in earlier. The value of this in interpreting statutes is
416:
In many uses of the phrase, however, the existence of an exception is taken to more definitively 'prove' a rule to which the exception does not fit. Under this sense it is "the unusualness of the exception" which proves how prevalent the tendency or
350:, prohibiting parking during certain times. If a driver is unsure about whether parking is allowed in a certain location, such a sign helps demonstrate the existence of a general rule that parking is allowed outside the times listed.
313:
In this sense, the phrase does not mean that an exception demonstrates a rule to be true or to exist, but that it tests the rule, thereby proving its value. There is little evidence of the phrase being used in this second way.
448:, in which he writes: "We may except one solitary instance (an exception which eminently proves the rule)." Here, the existence of an exception seems to strengthen the belief of the prevalence of the rule.
322:
Fowler's typology of uses stretches from what he sees as the "original, simple use" through to the use which is both the "most objectionable" and "unfortunately the commonest". Fowler, following a
368:. This argument states if an exception exists or has to be stated, then this exception proves that there must be some rule to which the case is an exception. The second part of Cicero's phrase, "
265:
identifies five ways in which the phrase has been used, and each use makes some sort of reference to the role that a particular case or event takes in relation to a more general rule.
38:
456:
Under this version of the phrase, the word 'proof' is to be understood in its archaic form to mean the word 'test' (this use can be seen in the phrase
397:
required for other objects. In this case, the exception of refrigerators proves the existence of a rule that pre-paid delivery is not required.
511:
260:
268:
Two original meanings of the phrase are usually cited. The first, preferred by Fowler, is that the presence of an exception applying to a
143:
44:
354:
This meaning of the phrase, which for Fowler is the original and clearest meaning, is thought to have emerged from the legal phrase "
238:
220:
161:
102:
84:
76:
52:
962:
937:
822:
365:
202:
374:" ("in cases not excepted"), is almost always missing from modern uses of the statement that "the exception proves the rule".
795:
765:
977:
688:
972:
432:
198:
194:
543:
323:
139:
842:
An Answer to a Paper
Importing a Petition of the Archbishop of Canterbury and Six other Bishops to His Majesty
326:
approach, understood this typology as moving from a more correct to a less correct use. However under a more
343:
327:
840:
947:
967:
874:
400:
The
English phrase was used this way in early citations from the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries.
864:
644:
548:
538:
523:
256:
131:
735:
189:
may contain an excessive amount of intricate detail that may interest only a particular audience
553:
528:
495:
297:
is a phrase that arises from ignorance, though common to good writers. The original word was
870:
563:
558:
282:
422:
rule and (second) there is no 'proof' involved. However, the phrase draws attention to the
826:
441:
904:
615:
533:
518:
500:
347:
956:
819:
505:
418:
360:" ("the exception proves the rule in cases not excepted"), an argument attributed to
932:
338:
666:
393:"pre-paid delivery required for refrigerators" would be that pre-paid delivery is
891:; it seems therefore that the defendant should have been apprehended by a warrant
287:
942:
409:
201:
any relevant information, and removing excessive detail that may be against
879:
Some statutes give justices of the peace a power of proceeding on default,
276:
rule exists. A more explicit phrasing might be "the exception that proves
905:"The Proof of the Pudding is in the Eating: Meaning, Origin and Variants"
709:
481:
468:
referenced as a possible meaning within the Oxford
English Dictionary.
330:
approach, such distinctions in terms of accuracy would be less useful.
461:
361:
847:
A bishop ... is not bound to obey any
Mandate but the King's; which
337:
173:
114:
59:
18:
377:
Consider the following example of the original meaning:
866:
A Digest of
Adjudged Cases in the Court of King's Bench
851:, and that he is inexcusably oblig'd to obey the King's
515:"the express mention of one thing excludes all others"
472:
encountered existence of a few outliers to this trend.
621:(Second ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
869:. London: G. Kearsly and G. Robinson. p. 85.
614:
796:""The Exception That Proves the Rule" Explained"
436:includes this meaning in its entry for the word
608:
606:
604:
602:
600:
379:
357:exceptio probat regulam in casibus non exceptis
598:
596:
594:
592:
590:
588:
586:
584:
582:
580:
8:
938:Pertinent entry of the alt.english.usage FAQ
729:
727:
142:. There might be a discussion about this on
789:
787:
369:
355:
53:Learn how and when to remove these messages
255:" is a saying whose meaning is contested.
460:). Fowler's example is of a hypothetical
458:the proof of the pudding is in the eating
239:Learn how and when to remove this message
221:Learn how and when to remove this message
162:Learn how and when to remove this message
103:Learn how and when to remove this message
703:
701:
699:
638:
636:
634:
632:
630:
628:
863:"A Gentleman of Lincoln's Inn" (1775).
576:
427:Fowler attributes to misunderstanding.
404:Proving the validity of a rule of thumb
760:
758:
756:
645:"How Does an Exception Prove a Rule?"
512:Expressio unius est exclusio alterius
7:
903:Tregeur, Pascal (12 November 2017).
617:A Dictionary of Modern English Usage
845:. London: Henry Hills. p. 14.
794:Clairmont, Nicholas (2 July 2013).
643:Okrent, Arika (16 September 2013).
272:case establishes ("proves") that a
766:"Oxford English Dictionary Online:
690:The Style Book of The Detroit News
253:The exception that proves the rule
75:tone or style may not reflect the
14:
334:Proving the existence of the rule
34:This article has multiple issues.
178:
119:
85:guide to writing better articles
64:
23:
710:"The Exception Proves the Rule"
42:or discuss these issues on the
480:Fowler describes this use as "
1:
885:the exception proves the rule
820:The exception proves the rule
295:The exception proves the rule
203:Knowledge's inclusion policy
994:
687:Weeks, Albert Loren, ed.,
667:"Full Definition of PROVE"
440:, citing the example from
889:in the thing not excepted
849:Exception proves the Rule
772:. Oxford University Press
433:Oxford English Dictionary
544:The proof of the pudding
424:rarity of the exception,
963:English-language idioms
875:2027/osu.32437121673418
829:, alt-usage-english.org
371:in casibus non exceptis
366:Lucius Cornelius Balbus
344:Controlled Parking Zone
613:Fowler, Henry (1965).
390:
370:
356:
351:
311:
341:
301:, which did not mean
292:
549:All models are wrong
539:Reductio ad absurdum
524:Moving the goalposts
262:Modern English Usage
132:confusing or unclear
257:Henry Watson Fowler
140:clarify the article
978:Political concepts
933:The Straight Dope
825:2008-04-05 at the
736:"The English Wars"
364:in his defence of
352:
973:Cognitive inertia
948:The Phrase Finder
708:Holton, Richard.
669:. Merriam-webster
554:Elephant in Cairo
529:Out of left field
496:Bending the rules
346:sign used in the
249:
248:
241:
231:
230:
223:
172:
171:
164:
113:
112:
105:
79:used on Knowledge
77:encyclopedic tone
57:
985:
943:World Wide Words
920:
919:
917:
915:
900:
894:
893:
860:
854:
853:
836:
830:
817:
811:
810:
808:
806:
791:
782:
781:
779:
777:
762:
751:
750:
748:
746:
734:Acocella, Joan.
731:
722:
721:
719:
717:
705:
694:
685:
679:
678:
676:
674:
663:
657:
656:
654:
652:
640:
623:
622:
620:
610:
559:No true Scotsman
452:Scientific sense
388:
373:
359:
278:the existence of
244:
237:
226:
219:
215:
212:
206:
182:
181:
174:
167:
160:
156:
153:
147:
123:
122:
115:
108:
101:
97:
94:
88:
87:for suggestions.
83:See Knowledge's
68:
67:
60:
49:
27:
26:
19:
16:Figure of speech
993:
992:
988:
987:
986:
984:
983:
982:
953:
952:
929:
924:
923:
913:
911:
902:
901:
897:
862:
861:
857:
838:
837:
833:
827:Wayback Machine
818:
814:
804:
802:
793:
792:
785:
775:
773:
764:
763:
754:
744:
742:
733:
732:
725:
715:
713:
707:
706:
697:
686:
682:
672:
670:
665:
664:
660:
650:
648:
642:
641:
626:
612:
611:
578:
573:
568:
491:
478:
454:
442:Benjamin Jowett
406:
389:
386:
336:
320:
318:Uses in English
245:
234:
233:
232:
227:
216:
210:
207:
193:Please help by
192:
183:
179:
168:
157:
151:
148:
137:
124:
120:
109:
98:
92:
89:
82:
73:This article's
69:
65:
28:
24:
17:
12:
11:
5:
991:
989:
981:
980:
975:
970:
965:
955:
954:
951:
950:
945:
940:
935:
928:
927:External links
925:
922:
921:
909:Word Histories
895:
855:
831:
812:
783:
752:
740:The New Yorker
723:
695:
680:
658:
647:. Mental Floss
624:
575:
574:
572:
569:
567:
566:
561:
556:
551:
546:
541:
536:
534:Presupposition
531:
526:
521:
519:Falsifiability
516:
508:
503:
501:Counterexample
498:
492:
490:
487:
477:
474:
453:
450:
405:
402:
384:
348:United Kingdom
335:
332:
319:
316:
247:
246:
229:
228:
186:
184:
177:
170:
169:
127:
125:
118:
111:
110:
72:
70:
63:
58:
32:
31:
29:
22:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
990:
979:
976:
974:
971:
969:
966:
964:
961:
960:
958:
949:
946:
944:
941:
939:
936:
934:
931:
930:
926:
910:
906:
899:
896:
892:
890:
887:
886:
882:
876:
872:
868:
867:
859:
856:
852:
850:
844:
843:
835:
832:
828:
824:
821:
816:
813:
801:
797:
790:
788:
784:
771:
769:
761:
759:
757:
753:
741:
737:
730:
728:
724:
711:
704:
702:
700:
696:
693:
691:
684:
681:
668:
662:
659:
646:
639:
637:
635:
633:
631:
629:
625:
619:
618:
609:
607:
605:
603:
601:
599:
597:
595:
593:
591:
589:
587:
585:
583:
581:
577:
570:
565:
564:Occam's razor
562:
560:
557:
555:
552:
550:
547:
545:
542:
540:
537:
535:
532:
530:
527:
525:
522:
520:
517:
514:
513:
509:
507:
506:Extrapolation
504:
502:
499:
497:
494:
493:
488:
486:
483:
475:
473:
469:
465:
463:
459:
451:
449:
447:
444:'s 1855 book
443:
439:
435:
434:
428:
425:
420:
419:rule of thumb
414:
411:
403:
401:
398:
396:
383:
378:
375:
372:
367:
363:
358:
349:
345:
340:
333:
331:
329:
325:
317:
315:
310:
308:
304:
300:
296:
291:
289:
286:
285:
279:
275:
271:
266:
264:
263:
258:
254:
243:
240:
225:
222:
214:
211:November 2023
204:
200:
196:
190:
187:This article
185:
176:
175:
166:
163:
155:
152:November 2023
145:
144:the talk page
141:
135:
133:
128:This article
126:
117:
116:
107:
104:
96:
93:November 2023
86:
80:
78:
71:
62:
61:
56:
54:
47:
46:
41:
40:
35:
30:
21:
20:
968:Legal idioms
912:. Retrieved
908:
898:
888:
884:
883:
880:
878:
865:
858:
848:
846:
841:
834:
815:
803:. Retrieved
799:
774:. Retrieved
767:
743:. Retrieved
739:
714:. Retrieved
712:. Philpapers
689:
683:
671:. Retrieved
661:
649:. Retrieved
616:
510:
485:ironically.
479:
476:Humorous use
470:
466:
457:
455:
445:
437:
431:
429:
423:
415:
407:
399:
394:
391:
380:
376:
353:
324:prescriptive
321:
312:
306:
302:
298:
294:
293:
284:Detroit News
283:
277:
273:
269:
267:
261:
252:
250:
235:
217:
208:
195:spinning off
188:
158:
149:
138:Please help
129:
99:
90:
74:
50:
43:
37:
36:Please help
33:
328:descriptive
288:style guide
957:Categories
571:References
410:rhetorical
199:relocating
134:to readers
39:improve it
800:Big Think
768:Exception
438:exception
45:talk page
839:(1688).
823:Archived
489:See also
385:—
270:specific
692:, p.55.
673:17 June
482:jocular
299:preuves
274:general
130:may be
914:4 July
805:2 July
776:2 July
745:2 July
716:2 July
651:2 July
462:critic
446:Essays
387:Fowler
382:plain.
362:Cicero
303:proves
307:tests
916:2019
807:2019
778:2019
747:2019
718:2019
675:2015
653:2019
430:The
305:but
881:but
871:hdl
395:not
259:'s
197:or
959::
907:.
877:.
798:.
786:^
755:^
738:.
726:^
698:^
627:^
579:^
342:A
48:.
918:.
873::
809:.
780:.
770:"
749:.
720:.
677:.
655:.
309:.
290::
251:"
242:)
236:(
224:)
218:(
213:)
209:(
205:.
191:.
165:)
159:(
154:)
150:(
146:.
136:.
106:)
100:(
95:)
91:(
81:.
55:)
51:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
