72:. In order to deal with the possibility of the supreme court making a mistake, extraordinary appeal was introduced as a remedy to correct any finalized court decisions. Although there are no limits regarding how many extraordinary appeals can be filed per case, it does not imply that defendants get infinite chances of appeal. To reflect this, extraordinary appeals are subject to strict conditions, such as only allowed to be filed by the
138:
Extraordinary Appeal in Taiwan is established in part 6 of the Code of
Criminal Procedure, which was mostly inspired by the Japanese Code of Criminal Procedure. The application for an extraordinary appeal is an exclusive authority of the Prosecutor General of the
143:. Thus, if any defendant or subordinate prosecutor considers a final court decision to be illegal, they must contact the Prosecutor General for approval. The motion for an extraordinary appeal itself does not halt any punishment sentenced by the original ruling.
84:
i.e. any extraordinary appeal shall be based upon the facts recognized by the original court and the supreme court shall only examine whether the correct law is properly applied to the recognized facts, but not the facts themselves.
195:
If the original court decision is favorable to the defendant, the
Supreme Court should declare the court decision in question illegal (but not reversed), thus has no effect on the defendant.
199:
The
Extraordinary Appeal procedure in Taiwan is, indeed as its name, an extraordinary means of relief, but not the last resort for criminal procedure; a case can still be appealed to the
265:
36:. Typically it can only be filed under circumstances where the final court decision in question is unfavorable to the defendant, and the defendant might be eligible for
187:
the court decision in question. However, the receiving lower court must not issue a higher sentence than the old one in the reversed judgement, if still deemed guilty.
286:
73:
345:
161:
204:
239:
102:
98:
32:, and unifying the interpretation of statutes and regulations. As a general rule, it is designed for the benefit of the
94:
290:
157:
140:
377:
190:
The violation of law is purely legal procedure error: Reverse the original decision and resentence the defendant.
392:
184:
25:
130:
Extraordinary Appeal in South Korea is established in chapter 2, part 4 of the
Criminal Procedure Act.
382:
29:
358:
93:
Extraordinary Appeal originates from the "Cassation in the
Interest of the Public" clause in the
81:
387:
332:
243:
224:
122:
Extraordinary Appeal in Japan is established in part 5 of the Code of
Criminal Procedure.
69:
21:
371:
200:
65:
361:, Laws and Regulations Database of the Republic of China (Taiwan), 15 January 2020.
312:
37:
77:
237:
Article 27, Chapter V "Of the
Judicial Power", Title III "OF PUBLIC POWERS",
97:. The clause was later established with a wider scope of application in the
57:
33:
105:. Inspired by France, an "extraordinary appeal" clause was included in the
183:
The violation of laws is within evidence acquisition and interpretation:
172:
The appeal is rejected, and the original court decision is not affected.
203:
if related laws or the ruling itself is considered in violation of the
61:
53:
180:
If the original court decision is unfavorable to the defendant, and:
41:
106:
146:
A legal extraordinary appeal must fit the following conditions:
153:
The court decision in question is in contravention of laws, and
68:, there would be absolutely no relief due to the lack of a
76:
of a judicial system, the appeal itself does not halt the
168:
If the extraordinary appeal is found to be unreasonable:
80:, and the applicant is only allowed to dispute errors in
227:. The Supreme Prosecutors Office of the R.O.C. (Taiwan).
176:
If the extraordinary appeal is found to be reasonable:
348:, Korean Law Information Center, 9 December 2021.
64:. Therefore, if the verdict in question is from a
52:Normally, no matter how obvious an error is in a
28:Systems, with an aim to correct judicial errors,
156:Must be filed by the Prosecutor General of the
150:The court decision in question must be final,
60:, it cannot be corrected unless either party
8:
335:, Japanese Law Translation, 25 May 2022.
225:"Outline of Extraordinary Appeal System"
266:"CODE D'INSTRUCTION CRIMINELLE DE 1808"
216:
7:
109:Code of Criminal Procedure of 1880.
99:Code of Criminal Procedure of 1808
40:or sentence reduction due to such
14:
313:"法令全書. 明治１３年 - 国立国会図書館デジタルコレクション"
287:"Code of Criminal Procedure (EN)"
24:procedure established in several
1:
95:French Constitution of 1791
409:
359:Code of Criminal Procedure
333:Code of Criminal Procedure
240:"The Constitution of 1791"
158:Supreme Prosecutors Office
141:Supreme Prosecutors Office
310:明治13年太政官布告第37号，治罪法第435條
346:Criminal Procedure Act
284:Article 620 and 621,
263:Article 441 and 442,
201:Constitutional Court
30:wrongful convictions
18:Extraordinary Appeal
357:Article 441 - 448,
344:Article 441 - 447,
331:Article 454 - 460,
185:reverse and remand
74:Prosecutor General
22:relief litigation
400:
378:Appellate review
362:
355:
349:
342:
336:
329:
323:
322:
320:
319:
308:
302:
301:
299:
298:
289:. Archived from
282:
276:
275:
273:
272:
261:
255:
254:
252:
251:
242:. Archived from
235:
229:
228:
221:
82:legal procedures
408:
407:
403:
402:
401:
399:
398:
397:
393:Legal procedure
368:
367:
366:
365:
356:
352:
343:
339:
330:
326:
317:
315:
311:
309:
305:
296:
294:
285:
283:
279:
270:
268:
264:
262:
258:
249:
247:
238:
236:
232:
223:
222:
218:
213:
136:
128:
120:
115:
91:
50:
12:
11:
5:
406:
404:
396:
395:
390:
385:
380:
370:
369:
364:
363:
350:
337:
324:
303:
277:
256:
230:
215:
214:
212:
209:
197:
196:
193:
192:
191:
188:
174:
173:
166:
165:
154:
151:
135:
132:
127:
124:
119:
116:
114:
111:
90:
87:
70:superior court
49:
46:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
405:
394:
391:
389:
386:
384:
381:
379:
376:
375:
373:
360:
354:
351:
347:
341:
338:
334:
328:
325:
314:
307:
304:
293:on 2022-07-01
292:
288:
281:
278:
267:
260:
257:
246:on 2011-12-17
245:
241:
234:
231:
226:
220:
217:
210:
208:
206:
202:
194:
189:
186:
182:
181:
179:
178:
177:
171:
170:
169:
163:
162:Supreme Court
159:
155:
152:
149:
148:
147:
144:
142:
133:
131:
125:
123:
117:
112:
110:
108:
104:
100:
96:
88:
86:
83:
79:
75:
71:
67:
66:supreme court
63:
59:
55:
47:
45:
43:
39:
35:
31:
27:
23:
20:is a special
19:
353:
340:
327:
316:. Retrieved
306:
295:. Retrieved
291:the original
280:
269:. Retrieved
259:
248:. Retrieved
244:the original
233:
219:
205:Constitution
198:
175:
167:
145:
137:
129:
121:
92:
51:
17:
15:
383:Judiciaries
126:South Korea
48:Explanation
38:exoneration
372:Categories
318:2022-07-05
297:2022-07-05
271:2022-07-05
250:2011-12-17
211:References
78:punishment
160:, to the
113:Countries
58:judgement
34:defendant
26:Civil Law
388:Lawsuits
107:Japanese
89:History
62:appeals
54:verdict
134:Taiwan
42:appeal
118:Japan
103:1959
101:and
56:or
16:An
374::
207:.
44:.
321:.
300:.
274:.
253:.
164:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.