Knowledge

Exigent circumstance

Source 📝

625: 158:
George Carroll and John Kiro were indicted and convicted for carrying "spirituous liquor" in contravention of the National Prohibition Act. Police officers had followed the defendants after their car passed their patrol car and after they caught up with them, they stopped them. After requiring them
104:
Exigency may be determined by degree of urgency involved, amount of time needed to get a search warrant, whether evidence is about to be removed or destroyed, danger at the site, knowledge of the suspect that police are on the trail, and/or ready destructibility of the evidence. In determining the
171:
provided further support for the categorical application of the automotive exemption. Dombrowski, a police officer, was stopped and arrested while driving drunk. Wondering about the location of Dombrowski's service firearm, which he was meant to carry with him at all times, another police officer
87:
Those circumstances that would cause a reasonable person to believe that entry (or other relevant prompt action) was necessary to prevent physical harm to the officers or other persons, the destruction of relevant evidence, the escape of a suspect, or some other consequence improperly frustrating
96:
exists. The existence of exigent circumstances is a mixed question of law and fact. There is no absolute test for determining if exigent circumstances exist, but general factors have been identified, which include clear evidence of probable cause; the seriousness of the offense and likelihood of
163:
upheld the categorical application of the automobile exception as it applied to a car that had been searched when impounded. The court upheld the constitutionality of the search on the grounds that at the time the car was stopped, there was probable cause to conduct a search.
143:, allowing warrantless entry to premises if exigent circumstances make it necessary. A number of exceptions are classified under the general heading of criminal enforcement: where evidence of a suspected crime is in danger of being lost; where the police officers are in 159:
to pull over, the police officers then conducted a search of the vehicle. In finding that the search was legal, the court compared stopping and searching motor vehicles to the way that the Coast Guard are able to stop and search vessels at sea. The 1970 case of
147:; where there is a probability that a suspect will flee before a warrant can be obtained; where a person is in need of assistance; where entry is required to prevent harm to a person. In deciding whether such entry was legal, courts will consider whether a 198:(2019) U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that in the event a driver is unconscious and therefore can't be given a breath test as an alternative to testing blood, exigent circumstances allow for the drawing of blood without a warrant. 105:
time necessary to obtain a warrant, a telephonic warrant should be considered. As electronic data may be altered or eradicated in seconds, in a factually compelling case, the doctrine of exigent circumstances will support a warrantless seizure.
334: (Supreme Court of New Jersey April 5, 2006) ("In sum, the police officers' emergency aid response trumps application of Miranda and its protection of defendant's privilege against self-incrimination."), 186:(2013) The United States Supreme Court ruled that police must generally obtain a warrant before subjecting a drunken-driving suspect to a blood test, and that the natural metabolism of blood alcohol does not establish a 77:
An emergency situation requiring swift action to prevent imminent danger to life or serious damage to property, or to forestall the imminent escape of a suspect, or destruction of evidence. There is no ready
503: 172:
conducted a search of the car. In doing so, he uncovered bloodstained items, which eventually led to Dombrowski’s arrest and later conviction for murder. This evidence was admissible.
140: 884: 496: 53:" warrant, allows them to enter without knocking and waiting for the owner's permission to enter. It must be a situation where people are in imminent danger, 489: 218: 353: 82:
for determining whether such circumstances exist, and in each case the extraordinary situation must be measured by the facts known by officials.
757: 65:
applies, allowing the seizure of any evidence or contraband discovered in the course of actions consequent upon the exigent circumstances.
101:; limitations on the search to minimize the intrusion only to preventing destruction of evidence; and clear indications of exigency. 815: 108:
Even in exigent circumstances, while a warrantless seizure may be permitted, a subsequent warrant to search may still be necessary.
838: 784: 124: 368: 716: 315: 853: 889: 131:
ize a suspect, even in the face of ambiguous or equivocal assertions of the right to legal representation.
858: 726: 521: 390: 382: 212: 664: 194: 238: 833: 704: 669: 581: 721: 201: 182: 62: 335: 649: 641: 591: 561: 551: 512: 206: 50: 31: 311: 848: 800: 674: 659: 596: 586: 769: 763: 571: 566: 286:, 154 F. 3d 1225 (10th Cir, 1998) cert. denied 119 S. Ct. 2048 (1999) (citations omitted) 349: 282: 810: 710: 601: 576: 546: 541: 456: 404: 266: 148: 98: 93: 54: 46: 430: 878: 693: 481: 252: 38: 45:
allows law enforcement (under certain circumstances) to enter a structure without a
805: 779: 221:
which describes similar police powers in the UK to enter property without a warrant
17: 79: 820: 747: 742: 682: 624: 144: 863: 752: 699: 687: 630: 620: 611: 73:
In the criminal procedure context, exigent circumstance means the following:
843: 296: 606: 530: 58: 92:
Exigent circumstances may make a warrantless search constitutional if
536: 461: 435: 409: 256:, 728 F. 2d 1195, 1199 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 824 (1984) 151:
would have considered there was need to make an immediate entry.
774: 654: 485: 300:, 935 F. 2d 641 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 960 (1991). 34: 127:
held that the emergency aid doctrine overrode the need to
190:
exigency that would justify a blood draw without consent.
271:. 6th ed. Columbia College of Missouri. Pearson, 2010. 383:"Amendment 4.6.3: Exigent Circumstances and Warrants" 793: 735: 640: 520: 61:'s escape is imminent. Once entry is obtained, the 405:"Carroll v. United States, 267 U.S. 132 (1925)" 369:"What Are Exigent Circumstances in California?" 85: 75: 139:Emergency aid doctrine is an exception to the 497: 8: 504: 490: 482: 457:"Cady v. Dombrowski, 413 U.S. 433 (1973)" 431:"Chambers v. Maroney, 399 U.S. 42 (1970)" 371:. Law Offices of Kerry L. Armstrong APLC. 219:Powers of the police in England and Wales 354:Federal Law Enforcement Training Centers 27:US law covering police entry to property 885:United States Fourth Amendment case law 231: 269:Investigation: The Art and the Science 367:Armstrong, Kerry (October 21, 2022). 7: 88:legitimate law enforcement efforts. 319:, 756 F. Supp. 1385 (D. Nev. 1991) 25: 816:Evidence law in the United States 57:faces imminent destruction, or a 623: 242:, 545 P.2d 1333,1341 (Cal. 1976) 156:Carroll et al. v. United States, 348:Miller, Tim; Solari, Jennifer. 154:In the 1925 Supreme Court case 670:Deferred prosecution agreement 1: 350:"Exigent Circumstances (MP3)" 267:Lyman, D., Micheal. Criminal 149:reasonable and prudent person 125:Supreme Court of New Jersey 906: 829: 785:Presentence investigation 618: 284:United States v. Anderson 254:United States v. McConney 727:Statute of limitations 522:Criminal investigation 391:United States Congress 387:Constitution Annotated 317:United States v. David 213:Brigham City v. Stuart 135:Emergency aid doctrine 121:New Jersey v. Boretsky 90: 84: 665:Criminal jurisdiction 298:United States v. Reed 195:Mitchell v. Wisconsin 167:In 1973, the case of 49:, or if they have a " 705:Inquisitorial system 642:Criminal prosecution 582:Reasonable suspicion 557:Exigent circumstance 43:exigent circumstance 722:Preliminary hearing 312:Grosenheider, supra 202:Plain view doctrine 183:Missouri v. McNeely 161:Chambers v. Maroney 63:plain view doctrine 18:Emergency exception 650:Adversarial system 592:Search and seizure 562:Knock-and-announce 513:Criminal procedure 207:Search and seizure 169:Cady v. Dombrowski 69:Criminal procedure 51:knock and announce 32:criminal procedure 872: 871: 854:Wikimedia Commons 801:Criminal defenses 736:Charges and pleas 660:Bill of attainder 597:Search of persons 331:STATE v. BORETSKY 16:(Redirected from 897: 633: 628: 627: 587:Right to silence 506: 499: 492: 483: 473: 472: 470: 469: 453: 447: 446: 444: 443: 427: 421: 420: 418: 417: 401: 395: 394: 379: 373: 372: 364: 358: 357: 345: 339: 333: 327: 321: 308: 302: 294: 288: 280: 274: 264: 258: 250: 244: 236: 141:Fourth Amendment 21: 905: 904: 900: 899: 898: 896: 895: 894: 875: 874: 873: 868: 825: 789: 770:Peremptory plea 764:Nolo contendere 731: 636: 629: 622: 616: 572:Pretextual stop 567:Miranda warning 516: 515:(investigation) 510: 479: 477: 476: 467: 465: 455: 454: 450: 441: 439: 429: 428: 424: 415: 413: 403: 402: 398: 381: 380: 376: 366: 365: 361: 347: 346: 342: 329: 328: 324: 309: 305: 295: 291: 281: 277: 265: 261: 251: 247: 240:People v. Ramey 237: 233: 228: 178: 137: 117: 97:destruction of 71: 28: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 903: 901: 893: 892: 890:Legal concepts 887: 877: 876: 870: 869: 867: 866: 861: 856: 851: 846: 841: 836: 830: 827: 826: 824: 823: 818: 813: 808: 803: 797: 795: 791: 790: 788: 787: 782: 777: 772: 767: 760: 755: 750: 745: 739: 737: 733: 732: 730: 729: 724: 719: 714: 711:Nolle prosequi 707: 702: 697: 690: 685: 680: 672: 667: 662: 657: 652: 646: 644: 638: 637: 635: 634: 619: 617: 615: 614: 609: 604: 602:Search warrant 599: 594: 589: 584: 579: 577:Probable cause 574: 569: 564: 559: 554: 549: 547:Consent search 544: 542:Arrest warrant 539: 534: 526: 524: 518: 517: 511: 509: 508: 501: 494: 486: 475: 474: 448: 422: 396: 374: 359: 340: 322: 303: 289: 275: 259: 245: 230: 229: 227: 224: 223: 222: 216: 209: 204: 199: 191: 177: 174: 136: 133: 116: 110: 94:probable cause 70: 67: 47:search warrant 26: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 902: 891: 888: 886: 883: 882: 880: 865: 862: 860: 857: 855: 852: 850: 847: 845: 842: 840: 837: 835: 832: 831: 828: 822: 819: 817: 814: 812: 809: 807: 804: 802: 799: 798: 796: 794:Related areas 792: 786: 783: 781: 778: 776: 773: 771: 768: 766: 765: 761: 759: 756: 754: 751: 749: 746: 744: 741: 740: 738: 734: 728: 725: 723: 720: 718: 715: 713: 712: 708: 706: 703: 701: 698: 696: 695: 694:Habeas corpus 691: 689: 686: 684: 681: 679: 677: 676:Ex post facto 673: 671: 668: 666: 663: 661: 658: 656: 653: 651: 648: 647: 645: 643: 639: 632: 626: 621: 613: 610: 608: 605: 603: 600: 598: 595: 593: 590: 588: 585: 583: 580: 578: 575: 573: 570: 568: 565: 563: 560: 558: 555: 553: 550: 548: 545: 543: 540: 538: 535: 533: 532: 528: 527: 525: 523: 519: 514: 507: 502: 500: 495: 493: 488: 487: 484: 480: 464: 463: 458: 452: 449: 438: 437: 432: 426: 423: 412: 411: 406: 400: 397: 392: 388: 384: 378: 375: 370: 363: 360: 355: 351: 344: 341: 337: 332: 326: 323: 320: 318: 313: 307: 304: 301: 299: 293: 290: 287: 285: 279: 276: 272: 270: 263: 260: 257: 255: 249: 246: 243: 241: 235: 232: 225: 220: 217: 215: 214: 210: 208: 205: 203: 200: 197: 196: 192: 189: 185: 184: 180: 179: 175: 173: 170: 165: 162: 157: 152: 150: 146: 142: 134: 132: 130: 126: 122: 114: 111: 109: 106: 102: 100: 95: 89: 83: 81: 74: 68: 66: 64: 60: 56: 52: 48: 44: 40: 39:United States 36: 33: 19: 806:Criminal law 780:Plea bargain 762: 717:Precognition 709: 692: 675: 556: 529: 478: 466:. Retrieved 460: 451: 440:. Retrieved 434: 425: 414:. Retrieved 408: 399: 386: 377: 362: 343: 330: 325: 316: 306: 297: 292: 283: 278: 268: 262: 253: 248: 239: 234: 211: 193: 187: 181: 168: 166: 160: 155: 153: 138: 128: 120: 118: 112: 107: 103: 91: 86: 76: 72: 42: 29: 864:Wikiversity 821:Legal abuse 758:Information 748:Arraignment 743:Alford plea 683:Extradition 145:hot pursuit 80:litmus test 879:Categories 849:WikiSource 834:Wiktionary 753:Indictment 700:Indictment 688:Grand jury 631:Law portal 612:Terry stop 468:2021-12-30 442:2021-12-01 416:2021-12-01 844:Wikiquote 839:Wikibooks 552:Detention 859:Wikinews 811:Evidence 176:See also 99:evidence 55:evidence 607:Suspect 531:Arguido 113:Miranda 59:suspect 37:of the 537:Arrest 462:Justia 436:Justia 410:Justia 188:per se 129:Mirand 123:, the 115:rights 226:Notes 41:, an 775:Plea 655:Bail 336:Text 314:and 310:See 273:p169 678:law 119:In 35:law 30:In 881:: 459:. 433:. 407:. 389:. 385:. 352:. 505:e 498:t 491:v 471:. 445:. 419:. 393:. 356:. 338:. 20:)

Index

Emergency exception
criminal procedure
law
United States
search warrant
knock and announce
evidence
suspect
plain view doctrine
litmus test
probable cause
evidence
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Fourth Amendment
hot pursuit
reasonable and prudent person
Missouri v. McNeely
Mitchell v. Wisconsin
Plain view doctrine
Search and seizure
Brigham City v. Stuart
Powers of the police in England and Wales
People v. Ramey, 545 P.2d 1333,1341 (Cal. 1976)
United States v. McConney, 728 F. 2d 1195, 1199 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 824 (1984)
Lyman, D., Micheal. Criminal Investigation: The Art and the Science. 6th ed. Columbia College of Missouri. Pearson, 2010.
United States v. Anderson, 154 F. 3d 1225 (10th Cir, 1998) cert. denied 119 S. Ct. 2048 (1999) (citations omitted)
United States v. Reed, 935 F. 2d 641 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 960 (1991).
Grosenheider, supra
United States v. David, 756 F. Supp. 1385 (D. Nev. 1991)
Text

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.