69:(2012) for example the Seventh Circuit, sitting en banc, decided by a vote of 7-3, that a school’s practice of holding graduation ceremonies in an evangelical church violated the First Amendment’s Establishment Clause. In this context the Seventh Circuit stated that “he three-pronged test set forth by the Supreme Court in
45:
The
Establishment Clause prohibits government from making adherence to a religion relevant in any way to a person's standing in the political community. Government can run afoul of that prohibition… endorsement or disapproval of religion. Endorsement sends a message to nonadherents that they are
105:
Some scholars understand the endorsement test as an addition to standards outlined in Lemon, while others view it as a minimal formulation of Lemon, i.e., that while endorsement may not be the only thing that violates the purpose and effects prongs of the Lemon test, it is the first and most
278:
73:, 403 U. S. 602 (1971), remains the prevailing analytical tool for the analysis of Establishment Clause claims.”. It then explained that the endorsement test has become “a legitimate part of Lemon’s second prong.”
76:
The endorsement test is often invoked in situations where the government is engaged in expressive activities, such as graduation prayers, religious signs on government property, or religion in the curriculum.
288:
46:
outsiders, not full members of the political community, and an accompanying message to adherents that they are insiders, favored members of the political community. The proper inquiry under
102:, he wrote "The proper application of both the endorsement and Lemon tests to the facts of this case makes it abundantly clear that the Board’s ID Policy violates the Establishment Clause."
38:. According to the test, a government action is invalid if it creates a perception in the mind of a reasonable observer that the government is either endorsing or disapproving of religion.
62:
253:"United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit case 10-2922 John Doe v. Elmbrock School District, 687 F. 3d, at 850 (internal quotation marks and citations omitted)"
227:"United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit case 10-2922 John Doe v. Elmbrock School District, 687 F. 3d, at 849 (internal quotation marks and citations omitted)"
335:
35:
314:
151:
86:
111:
131:
340:
200:
350:
252:
226:
21:
53:, I submit, is whether the government intends to convey a message of endorsement or disapproval of religion.
319:
155:
25:
34:
asks whether a particular government action amounts to an endorsement of religion, thus violating the
345:
283:
95:
125:
81:
70:
47:
30:
177:
329:
109:
The endorsement test was rejected as an "abandoned... offshoot" of the Lemon test in
58:
99:
251:
United States Court of
Appeals for the Seventh Circuit (July 23, 2012).
225:
United States Court of
Appeals for the Seventh Circuit (July 23, 2012).
91:
57:
O’Connor’s endorsement test has, on occasion, been subsumed into the
201:"7th Circuit Establishment Case: Doe v. Elmbrook School District"
152:"Religious liberty in public life: Establishment Clause overview"
315:
Religious liberty in public life: Establishment Clause overview
279:"Supreme Court Is Eroding the Wall Between Church and State"
258:. United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
232:. United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
106:
important evidence that such a violation has occurred.
94:teachers to read a statement to the students about
84:cited the endorsement test in his 2005 decision in
43:
322:on September 10, 2010. Retrieved May 28, 2020.
8:
90:. In a case where the school board required
36:Establishment Clause of the First Amendment
318:. First Amendment Center. Archived from
154:. First Amendment Center. Archived from
87:Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District
143:
7:
112:Kennedy v. Bremerton School District
336:Supreme Court of the United States
14:
132:With God, all things are possible
98:as an alternative explanation to
63:Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals
277:Feldman, Noah (June 27, 2022).
67:Doe v. Elmbrook School District
199:Masson, Doug (July 25, 2012).
1:
115:and is no longer applicable.
22:United States Supreme Court
367:
188:: 687–688 and 691. 1984.
55:
48:the purpose prong of
351:1984 in American law
158:on September 5, 2010
28:in the 1984 case of
341:Sandra Day O'Connor
284:The Washington Post
178:"Lynch v. Donnelly"
80:Pennsylvania Judge
26:Sandra Day O'Connor
96:intelligent design
126:Lemon v. Kurtzman
82:John E. Jones III
71:Lemon v. Kurtzman
31:Lynch v. Donnelly
358:
301:
300:
298:
296:
291:on June 30, 2022
287:. Archived from
274:
268:
267:
265:
263:
257:
248:
242:
241:
239:
237:
231:
222:
216:
215:
213:
211:
196:
190:
189:
174:
168:
167:
165:
163:
148:
41:O'Connor wrote:
18:endorsement test
366:
365:
361:
360:
359:
357:
356:
355:
326:
325:
310:
305:
304:
294:
292:
276:
275:
271:
261:
259:
255:
250:
249:
245:
235:
233:
229:
224:
223:
219:
209:
207:
198:
197:
193:
176:
175:
171:
161:
159:
150:
149:
145:
140:
121:
12:
11:
5:
364:
362:
354:
353:
348:
343:
338:
328:
327:
324:
323:
309:
308:External links
306:
303:
302:
269:
243:
217:
191:
169:
142:
141:
139:
136:
135:
134:
129:
120:
117:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
363:
352:
349:
347:
344:
342:
339:
337:
334:
333:
331:
321:
317:
316:
312:
311:
307:
290:
286:
285:
280:
273:
270:
254:
247:
244:
228:
221:
218:
206:
202:
195:
192:
187:
183:
179:
173:
170:
157:
153:
147:
144:
137:
133:
130:
128:
127:
123:
122:
118:
116:
114:
113:
107:
103:
101:
97:
93:
89:
88:
83:
78:
74:
72:
68:
64:
60:
54:
52:
51:
42:
39:
37:
33:
32:
27:
23:
19:
320:the original
313:
293:. Retrieved
289:the original
282:
272:
260:. Retrieved
246:
234:. Retrieved
220:
208:. Retrieved
204:
194:
185:
181:
172:
160:. Retrieved
156:the original
146:
124:
110:
108:
104:
85:
79:
75:
66:
56:
49:
44:
40:
29:
20:proposed by
17:
15:
346:Legal tests
330:Categories
138:References
59:Lemon test
205:masson.us
100:evolution
61:. In the
295:June 27,
210:June 23,
119:See also
24:Justice
262:23 June
236:23 June
162:May 28,
92:biology
256:(PDF)
230:(PDF)
65:case
50:Lemon
297:2022
264:2014
238:2014
212:2014
164:2020
16:The
186:465
182:U.S
332::
281:.
203:.
184:.
180:.
299:.
266:.
240:.
214:.
166:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.