146:, would be 200,000 gallons a year; however, the local council had made a decision regarding planning permission which meant that there would be no direct access from the main street and therefore fewer customers. The estimate provided by Esso did not take this into account despite their knowledge of the decision. Mr Mardon bought the petrol station and business did not go well. From 1964, Mr Mardon negotiated a lower rent with Esso but was still losing money. Esso then brought an action for possession against Mr Mardon, who counterclaimed for damages of Esso's breach of warranty or negligence under
174:
filling station. They knew the facts. They knew the traffic in the town. They knew the throughput of comparable stations. They had much experience and expertise at their disposal. They were in a much better position than Mr Mardon to make a forecast. It seems to me that if such a person makes a forecast, intending that the other should act upon it - and he does act upon it, it can well be interpreted as a warranty that the forecast is sound and reliable in the sense that they made it with reasonable care and skill. It is just as if Esso said to Mr. Mardon:
1170:
652:
221:
information or opinion is reliable.' Esso did profess special knowledge and had it. Their negligent misstatement was a 'fatal error... A professional man may give advice under a contract for reward; or without a contract, in pursuance of a voluntary assumption of responsibility, gratuitously without reward. In either case he is under one and the same duty to use reasonable care: see
1180:
33:
220:
if a man, who has or professes to have special knowledge or skill, makes a representation by virtue thereof to another… with the intention of inducing him to enter into a contract with him, he is under a duty to use reasonable care to see that the representation is correct, and that the advice,
173:
Now I would quite agree… it was not a warranty - in this sense - that it did not guarantee that the throughput would be 200,000 gallons. But, nevertheless, it was a forecast made by a party - Esso - who had special knowledge and skill. It was the yardstick… by which they measured the worth of a
192:
because each party was 'equally able to form an opinion.' The damages awarded were for the loss suffered, not the loss of a bargain. He went on and said, if there had been no warranty (which there was) there would still be negligent misrepresentation liability in
227:. In the one case it is by reason of a term implied by law. In the other, it is by reason of a duty imposed by law. For a breach of that duty, he is liable in damages; and those damages should be, and are, the same, whether he is sued in contract or in tort.
927:
914:
956:
334:
178:
Our forecast of throughput is 200,000 gallons. You can rely upon it as being a sound forecast of what the service station should do. The rent is calculated on that footing.
1219:
267:
533:
1204:
350:
1214:
213:. But these were old and the tort duty 'is comparable to the duty of reasonable care which is owed by a master to his servant, or vice versa'.
182:
If the forecast turned out to be an unsound forecast such as no person of skill or experience should have made, there is a breach of warranty.
938:
454:
260:
130:. It holds that the divide between a statement of opinion and fact becomes more factual if one holds himself out as having expert knowledge.
564:
296:
944:
158:
held there was no contractual warranty and damages for negligent misstatement were limited to losses before 1964. Mr Mardon appealed.
496:
480:
253:
206:
127:
847:
466:
1224:
616:
1078:
373:
887:
852:
413:
223:
457:
1209:
920:
749:
441:
1043:
1033:
978:
729:
427:
363:
166:
1058:
973:
950:
857:
1028:
983:
557:
142:
Petroleum Co Ltd. Esso told him they had estimated that the throughput of a petrol station in
Eastbank Street,
1063:
1053:
933:
909:
1134:
1129:
988:
781:
1183:
470:
1229:
1119:
1073:
1038:
892:
882:
867:
599:
996:
837:
739:
683:
491:
123:
1173:
1001:
801:
791:
550:
1155:
1139:
1048:
877:
744:
688:
188:
1068:
806:
786:
698:
105:
1124:
1103:
1009:
842:
811:
719:
862:
308:
202:
776:
771:
678:
417:
284:
197:. It was argued that when a contract resulted, there was no tort liability, relying on
403:
389:
119:
69:
1198:
1093:
816:
399:
1098:
1088:
821:
693:
637:
445:
431:
320:
231:
148:
89:
85:
340:
324:
796:
673:
155:
651:
1083:
872:
724:
703:
573:
235:
93:
621:
245:
143:
205:
said a negligent solicitor was not liable in tort, only contract, based on
32:
609:
734:
169:
held there was a contractual warranty and damages were not limited.
604:
594:
194:
139:
546:
249:
542:
928:
Exxon Corp. v Exxon
Insurance Consultants International Ltd
915:
Accusations of ExxonMobil human rights violations in Aceh
52:
Esso
Petroleum Company Limited v Philip Lionel Mardon
336:
Hedley Byrne & Co Ltd v Heller & Partners Ltd
957:
People of the State of New York v. Exxon Mobil Corp.
138:
Mr Mardon was buying a petrol station franchised by
1148:
1112:
1021:
966:
902:
830:
764:
712:
666:
659:
630:
587:
580:
99:
81:
76:
65:
57:
47:
39:
23:
218:
171:
558:
261:
8:
534:Lister v Romford Ice and Cold Storage Co Ltd
352:Car and Universal Finance Co Ltd v Caldwell
663:
584:
565:
551:
543:
268:
254:
246:
31:
20:
1220:Court of Appeal (England and Wales) cases
216:There is a duty to negotiate with care,
507:
939:ExxonMobil climate change controversy
455:Unfair Commercial Practices Directive
7:
1179:
297:Erlanger v New Sombrero Phosphate Co
1205:English misrepresentation case law
945:Kivalina v. ExxonMobil Corporation
14:
934:Longford, Victoria gas plant fire
1178:
1169:
1168:
650:
497:Misrepresentation in English law
481:Misrepresentation in English law
1215:1976 in United Kingdom case law
467:Unfair Trading Regulations 2008
537:AC 555, 587 per Lord Radcliffe
386:Esso Petroleum Co Ltd v Mardon
186:Lord Denning MR distinguished
116:Esso Petroleum Co Ltd v Mardon
25:Esso Petroleum Co Ltd v Mardon
1:
1079:Sable Offshore Energy Project
374:Lambert v Co-op Insurance Ltd
888:Trans-Alaska Pipeline System
414:Royscot Trust Ltd v Rogerson
224:Cassidy v Ministry of Health
921:Allison v. ExxonMobil Corp.
442:Shogun Finance Ltd v Hudson
1246:
1044:Hebron-Ben Nevis oil field
1034:East-Prinovozemelsky field
979:2010 Port Arthur oil spill
730:Magnolia Petroleum Company
428:Saamco v York Montague Ltd
364:Misrepresentation Act 1967
1164:
1059:Kizomba deepwater project
974:2010 ExxonMobil oil spill
951:Oil Pollution Act of 1990
910:Overview of controversies
858:Exxon Building (New York)
648:
478:
464:
452:
438:
424:
410:
396:
382:
370:
361:
347:
331:
317:
305:
293:
281:
276:Misrepresentation sources
104:
30:
16:English contract law case
1029:Colony Shale Oil Project
984:2013 Mayflower oil spill
1054:Kearl Oil Sands Project
1135:Mobil Showcase Network
1130:ExxonMobil Electrofrac
229:
184:
180:
72:, QB 801, EWCA Civ 4
1225:ExxonMobil litigation
1120:History of ExxonMobil
1074:Prudhoe Bay Oil Field
1039:Goose Creek Oil Field
893:Upper Zakum oil field
883:Port Stanvac Refinery
868:Imperial Oil Building
300:(1878) 3 App Cas 1218
207:Sir Wilfrid Greene MR
176:
1022:Oil & gas fields
997:Greenpoint oil spill
838:Baton Rouge Refinery
740:Superior Oil Company
684:ExxonMobil Australia
492:English contract law
124:English contract law
802:John D. Rockefeller
792:Samuel J. Palmisano
750:Standard Vacuum Oil
199:Clark v Kirby-Smith
90:Lord Justice Ormrod
1210:Lord Denning cases
1156:Universe of Energy
1049:Hibernia oil field
878:Nanticoke Refinery
745:Vacuum Oil Company
689:ExxonMobil Nigeria
288:(1766) 3 Burr 1905
189:Bisset v Wilkinson
1192:
1191:
1069:Pembina oil field
848:Billings Refinery
807:Walter V. Shipley
787:James R. Houghton
782:William W. George
760:
759:
699:SeaRiver Maritime
646:
645:
487:
486:
377:2 Lloyd's Rep 485
128:misrepresentation
126:case, concerning
112:
111:
106:Misrepresentation
94:Lord Justice Shaw
1237:
1182:
1181:
1172:
1171:
1125:Esso Motor Hotel
1104:West Qurna Field
1004:Atlantic Empress
843:Baytown Refinery
812:Walter C. Teagle
720:Creole Petroleum
664:
654:
585:
567:
560:
553:
544:
538:
530:
524:
521:
515:
512:
353:
337:
312:(1881) 20 Ch D 1
270:
263:
256:
247:
77:Court membership
35:
21:
1245:
1244:
1240:
1239:
1238:
1236:
1235:
1234:
1195:
1194:
1193:
1188:
1160:
1144:
1108:
1017:
962:
898:
863:Fawley Refinery
826:
756:
708:
655:
642:
626:
576:
571:
541:
531:
527:
522:
518:
513:
509:
505:
488:
483:
474:
460:
448:
434:
420:
406:
392:
378:
366:
357:
351:
343:
335:
327:
313:
309:Redgrave v Hurd
301:
289:
277:
274:
244:
238:LJJ concurred.
211:Groom v Crocker
167:Lord Denning MR
164:
136:
61:6 February 1976
43:Court of Appeal
17:
12:
11:
5:
1243:
1241:
1233:
1232:
1227:
1222:
1217:
1212:
1207:
1197:
1196:
1190:
1189:
1187:
1186:
1176:
1165:
1162:
1161:
1159:
1158:
1152:
1150:
1146:
1145:
1143:
1142:
1137:
1132:
1127:
1122:
1116:
1114:
1110:
1109:
1107:
1106:
1101:
1096:
1091:
1086:
1081:
1076:
1071:
1066:
1061:
1056:
1051:
1046:
1041:
1036:
1031:
1025:
1023:
1019:
1018:
1016:
1015:
1007:
999:
994:
986:
981:
976:
970:
968:
964:
963:
961:
960:
953:
948:
941:
936:
931:
924:
917:
912:
906:
904:
900:
899:
897:
896:
890:
885:
880:
875:
870:
865:
860:
855:
850:
845:
840:
834:
832:
828:
827:
825:
824:
819:
814:
809:
804:
799:
794:
789:
784:
779:
777:Larry Faulkner
774:
772:Michael Boskin
768:
766:
762:
761:
758:
757:
755:
754:
753:
752:
742:
737:
732:
727:
722:
716:
714:
710:
709:
707:
706:
701:
696:
691:
686:
681:
679:Exxon Neftegas
676:
670:
668:
661:
657:
656:
649:
647:
644:
643:
641:
640:
634:
632:
628:
627:
625:
624:
619:
614:
613:
612:
602:
597:
591:
589:
582:
578:
577:
572:
570:
569:
562:
555:
547:
540:
539:
525:
516:
506:
504:
501:
500:
499:
494:
485:
484:
479:
476:
475:
465:
462:
461:
453:
450:
449:
439:
436:
435:
425:
422:
421:
411:
408:
407:
397:
394:
393:
383:
380:
379:
371:
368:
367:
362:
359:
358:
348:
345:
344:
332:
329:
328:
318:
315:
314:
306:
303:
302:
294:
291:
290:
285:Carter v Boehm
282:
279:
278:
275:
273:
272:
265:
258:
250:
243:
240:
163:
160:
135:
132:
110:
109:
102:
101:
97:
96:
83:
82:Judges sitting
79:
78:
74:
73:
67:
63:
62:
59:
55:
54:
49:
48:Full case name
45:
44:
41:
37:
36:
28:
27:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1242:
1231:
1228:
1226:
1223:
1221:
1218:
1216:
1213:
1211:
1208:
1206:
1203:
1202:
1200:
1185:
1177:
1175:
1167:
1166:
1163:
1157:
1154:
1153:
1151:
1147:
1141:
1140:Power Players
1138:
1136:
1133:
1131:
1128:
1126:
1123:
1121:
1118:
1117:
1115:
1111:
1105:
1102:
1100:
1097:
1095:
1094:Tern oilfield
1092:
1090:
1087:
1085:
1082:
1080:
1077:
1075:
1072:
1070:
1067:
1065:
1062:
1060:
1057:
1055:
1052:
1050:
1047:
1045:
1042:
1040:
1037:
1035:
1032:
1030:
1027:
1026:
1024:
1020:
1014:
1013:
1012:Esso Brussels
1008:
1006:
1005:
1000:
998:
995:
993:
991:
987:
985:
982:
980:
977:
975:
972:
971:
969:
965:
959:
958:
954:
952:
949:
947:
946:
942:
940:
937:
935:
932:
930:
929:
925:
923:
922:
918:
916:
913:
911:
908:
907:
905:
903:Controversies
901:
894:
891:
889:
886:
884:
881:
879:
876:
874:
871:
869:
866:
864:
861:
859:
856:
854:
853:Milford Haven
851:
849:
846:
844:
841:
839:
836:
835:
833:
829:
823:
820:
818:
817:Rex Tillerson
815:
813:
810:
808:
805:
803:
800:
798:
795:
793:
790:
788:
785:
783:
780:
778:
775:
773:
770:
769:
767:
763:
751:
748:
747:
746:
743:
741:
738:
736:
733:
731:
728:
726:
723:
721:
718:
717:
715:
711:
705:
702:
700:
697:
695:
692:
690:
687:
685:
682:
680:
677:
675:
672:
671:
669:
665:
662:
658:
653:
639:
636:
635:
633:
629:
623:
620:
618:
615:
611:
608:
607:
606:
603:
601:
598:
596:
593:
592:
590:
586:
583:
579:
575:
568:
563:
561:
556:
554:
549:
548:
545:
536:
535:
529:
526:
523:1 KB 194, 206
520:
517:
511:
508:
502:
498:
495:
493:
490:
489:
482:
477:
472:
468:
463:
459:
456:
451:
447:
444:
443:
437:
433:
430:
429:
423:
419:
416:
415:
409:
405:
402:
401:
400:East v Maurer
395:
391:
388:
387:
381:
376:
375:
369:
365:
360:
355:
354:
346:
342:
339:
338:
330:
326:
323:
322:
316:
311:
310:
304:
299:
298:
292:
287:
286:
280:
271:
266:
264:
259:
257:
252:
251:
248:
241:
239:
237:
233:
228:
226:
225:
217:
214:
212:
208:
204:
200:
196:
191:
190:
183:
179:
175:
170:
168:
161:
159:
157:
153:
151:
150:
145:
141:
133:
131:
129:
125:
121:
118:
117:
107:
103:
98:
95:
91:
87:
84:
80:
75:
71:
68:
64:
60:
56:
53:
50:
46:
42:
38:
34:
29:
26:
22:
19:
1230:Standard Oil
1113:Other topics
1099:Tuapse field
1089:Tengiz Field
1011:
1003:
990:Exxon Valdez
989:
955:
943:
926:
919:
822:Darren Woods
694:Imperial Oil
660:Subsidiaries
532:
528:
519:
510:
471:SI 2008/1277
440:
426:
412:
398:
385:
384:
372:
349:
333:
321:Derry v Peek
319:
307:
295:
283:
230:
222:
219:
215:
210:
198:
187:
185:
181:
177:
172:
165:
154:
149:Hedley Byrne
147:
137:
115:
114:
113:
86:Lord Denning
51:
24:
18:
1149:Sponsorship
1064:Ormen Lange
797:Lee Raymond
674:Aera Energy
418:EWCA Civ 12
108:, expertise
1199:Categories
1084:Sakhalin-I
967:Oil spills
873:Mossmorran
831:Facilities
725:Humble Oil
704:XTO Energy
617:On the Run
574:ExxonMobil
458:2005/29/EC
404:EWCA Civ 6
390:EWCA Civ 4
120:EWCA Civ 4
70:EWCA Civ 4
992:oil spill
622:Speedpass
203:Plowman J
144:Southport
66:Citations
1174:Category
356:1 QB 525
242:See also
162:Judgment
156:Lawson J
100:Keywords
1184:Commons
667:Current
610:Mobil 1
588:Current
446:UKHL 62
432:UKHL 10
201:, when
58:Decided
765:People
735:Petron
713:Former
631:Former
581:Brands
514:Ch 506
341:UKHL 4
325:UKHL 1
232:Ormrod
122:is an
895:(28%)
605:Mobil
600:Exxon
503:Notes
134:Facts
40:Court
638:Enco
595:Esso
236:Shaw
234:and
195:tort
140:Esso
1010:SS
1002:SS
209:in
1201::
152:.
92:,
88:,
566:e
559:t
552:v
473:)
469:(
269:e
262:t
255:v
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
