Film criticism - Knowledge (XXG)

393:

activities that humans participate in, and these activities cannot be substituted out for an objective list of morals to be utilized. Humans are restrained by the fact that criticisms cannot communicate messages for forms of artwork, and only the artworks can communicate their messages. The second way in how film critics are able to write criticisms that involve critical discussions containing rationality involves critics analyzing their reasons for not liking specific movies, and critics must discover if they dislike movies for the same criteria that caused them to initially dislike specific movies. That requires utilizing criticism that is analytical and thorough with detail. The third way in how film critics are able to write criticisms that involve critical discussions containing rationality involves critics making blatant statements that are scientific in regards to the workings of films, and how the films are able to affect people. In fact, viewers can watch films to see if they are affected by the movies in the same way that the film critics were affected by them. The fourth way in how film critics are able to write criticisms that involve critical discussions containing rationality involves critics being less arrogant when they want they perceptions of films to be talked about, and critics must be aware of criticisms that have been published. The critics who want to argue must base their arguments in criticisms that have been stated by other critics. The fourth way in how film critics are able to write criticisms that involve critical discussions containing rationality pertains to critics moving away from the idea that artwork such as a film shall have clear meanings. Instead, critics must view artwork such as films to be the results of working hard, many hours of thinking, and ideas being compromised for meanings to not be clear. This research concludes that film critics must repeatedly view films as a way of studying them, if they desire to write thorough reviews on those particular films. Secondly, film critics have the task of making sure that they are highly informed about the film and film critics are also responsible for initiating the discussions about the films. Film critics are also responsible for knowing the creators of the films. Thirdly, film critics must blatantly state their own biases and preferences without associating them with any theories. Fourthly, film critics must appreciate the films that are given positive criticisms and film critics must not be ungrateful towards those films. Finally, a film critic must enjoy the movies that they are criticizing. In this specific regard, a film critic must also want to make their reviews persuade other people watch the movies that the film critic has criticized.

675:

offices over a duration of eight weeks of time, which displays the fact that film critics are influential towards how well films perform in box offices. Film critics are able to influence the choices of people in the public who decide on whether or not they will view a film. Film critics frequently receive invitations to early viewings of movies before the movies are available to all of the moviegoers who aren't film critics, and viewing films at early points in time allows the film critics to write film reviews that are influential to other moviegoers. Film critics have access to information regarding the earliest phases of films, unlike the public, and the earliest phases of films are when film critics are the only reliable sources of information pertaining to the movies that will be in theaters. Research has also displayed the fact that film critics desire to give moviegoers encouragement towards viewing films that are worth viewing while they also display innovation, instead of viewing movies that are simplistic.

730:, Kate Kilkenny argued that women were better represented in film criticism before the rise of the Internet. In the past, when film was considered less prestigious than visual art and literature, it was easier for women to break into film criticism. In the year 1929, Iris Barry was a female film critic from Britain. When Barry lived in London, she earned money from being a writer for magazines, a newspaper, and periodical articles. Barry wrote film criticisms that discussed films that were made in Britain, films that were made in America, and Barry only wrote film criticisms on a selective amount of German movies. Barry also wrote film criticisms for French movies that were made as experiments. Barry wrote film criticisms with a critical amount of analysis. 179:

having vocabularies that were limited. During the 1930s, the jobs of critics weren't perceived to be great and critics did not earn high wages for their work. The next difficult challenge involves the fact that the industry related to film even attempted to use intimidation as a way of making movie critics cease with reviewing films. In the year of 1948, a critic named Eileen Arnot Robertson was forcibly removed from her job as a critic. Despite the fact that she filed a lawsuit against the film industry, the film industry said that Robertson's firing did not occur out of maliciousness. These difficult challenges led to the existences of movie critics who had respect for films, and those new film critics sought to make film criticism be a respected job.

115:

criticism, which is grounded in the media's effects being developed, and journalistic criticism resides in standard structures such as newspapers. Journal articles pertaining to films served as representatives for the film critics who desired to increase the amount of communication about movies to a high degree that ascended above content that was normally featured in popular publications. The critics who work in the media are normally commissionaires who affect culture, since the judgments and choices of critics have the effect of influencing what audience members perceive about objects that are supplied to them, and critics are also able to influence how the audience members choose to think about objects that are supplied to them.

402:

connection between film critics evaluating films and audience members having interests or no interests in viewing those films. Based in the perspective of an audience member, a review serves as more than an object that is useful for making decisions. Listening to a review from a critic, watching a critic's review, and reading a critic's review are all ways in which the review is useful to an audience member. The critic's review is able to be referenced in conversations where audience members communicate with other individuals, and audience members can communicate messages about the artistic film that was critically examined or connect the criticism to problems that occur in society.

519:

reviews that were posted at prior points in time also increases. This ends up making individuals experience increases in their desires to write movie reviews about films that are earning high quantities of money. When movies are given high ratings, those high ratings are able to persuade viewers of movies to watch other films that share aspects of the movies that viewers prefer to see. The explanations for why movies are given high ratings are able to reach online groups of people who watch movies, and the explanations for movies having high ratings are explained through the usage of reviews that are posted in those online groups.

66: 702:

created knowledge, which ended up appearing in areas that had been useful for writing film criticisms in a traditional style. Writing about academic films puts emphasis on generalized statements that can be verified. Writing academic films also involves film critics preferring to view films that are typical, instead of viewing films that are bizarre. That is because ordinary kinds of films can be reviewed with generalized statements that can be verified.

880: 515:, and have the same advantages and disadvantages; notably, there is no guarantee that they will be a representative sample of the film's audience. In some cases, online review sites have produced wildly differing results to scientific polling of audiences. Likewise, reviews and ratings for many movies can greatly differ between the different review sites, even though there are certain movies that are well-rated (or poorly-rated) across the board. 535:, academic critique explores cinema beyond journalistic film reviews. These film critics try to examine why film works, how it works aesthetically or politically, what it means, and what effects it has on people. Rather than write for mass-market publications their articles are usually published in scholarly journals and texts which tend to be affiliated with university presses; or sometimes in up-market magazines. 427:, which is a large data storage on the internet that stores interviews, reviews about movies, news, and other kinds of materials that pertain to specific films. These areas of storage are not intended to help people find specific films or movie content that has aired on television, but the storages are able to help people find reliable film criticisms that can be used as readings for students. 3894: 866: 471:

original statements online, but there are websites that will steal their ideas and not give credit to the author. Another challenge in film criticism pertains to film critics being pressured into writing reviews that are hasty, since users of the internet will give their attention to other topics if film critics do not post movie reviews quickly.

207:

Audience members changed how they behaved in movie theaters, since they would shush people as a way of communicating the messages related to telling other people that they needed to be silent. By keeping themselves in silence, audience members such as film critics were able to make all of their attention be on the movies that they were watching.

440:

placed alongside parts of other films for the sound effects or images from the other films to be used in criticizing the sounds or images that pertain to the YouTube clips that are being criticized. Film critics are also reviewers who are amateurs on websites such as IMDb. Also, many postings from amateur film critics are on IMDb.

119:

cultural type of criticism, which is also referred to as academic criticism, and academic criticism is able to primarily make interpretations of films from the viewpoint of directors while the interpretations place emphasis on parallels that films have with previous works that were deemed to be of high quality.

456:. Some online niche websites provide comprehensive coverage of the independent sector; usually adopting a style closer to print journalism. They tend to prohibit advertisement and offer uncompromising opinions free of any commercial interest. Their film critics normally have an academic film background. 738:

were two of the most influential film critics of the 1960s and 1970s. The Internet led to a decline in jobs at small newspapers where women were more likely to review films, whereas the more male-dominated jobs at major newspapers survived better. The Internet also encouraged a growth in niche review

518:

Research has found that moviegoers are inclined to leave reviews for films that are not available in movie theaters, and the amount of reviews will decrease as the films earn more money each week. When the amount of money that films earn in movie theaters is increasing, the expected quantity of movie

470:

Online film criticism has provided online film critics with challenges related to journalism's purpose changing on the internet. For example, critics must contend with the drawback of too many critics being online to the extent of preventing critics from writing original statements. Critics can write

443:

Some websites specialize in narrow aspects of film reviewing. For instance, there are sites that focus on specific content advisories for parents to judge a film's suitability for children. Others focus on a religious perspective (e.g. CAP Alert). Still others highlight more esoteric subjects such as

594:

Academic film criticism tackles many aspects of film making and production as well as distribution. These disciplines include camera work, digitalization, lighting, and sound. Narratives, dialogues, themes, and genres are among many other things that academic film critics take into consideration and

710:

There have been many complaints against the film-criticism industry for its underrepresentation of women. A study of the top critics on Rotten Tomatoes shows that 91 per cent of writers for movie or entertainment magazines and websites are men, as are 90 per cent of those for trade publications, 80

674:

Film critics are able to be influencers in the circumstances of persuading moviegoers to view or not view in the beginning weeks of movies being available for people to view them. Research has found that negative and positive film reviews are connected to the amounts of money that films earn in box

174:

were analyzing film for its merit and value, and as more than just entertainment. The growing popularity of the medium caused major newspapers to start hiring film critics. In the 1930s, the film industry saw audiences grow increasingly silent as films were now accompanied by sound. However, in the

762:

was fascinating. There's a subset of male critics that clearly see Nancy Meyers as code for chick flick and react with according bile. What's very interesting, though, is that I think female critics, working in an industry that is coded as very male, if not macho, often feel the need to go hard on

538:

Most academic criticism of film often follows a similar format. They usually include summaries of the plot of the film to either refresh the plot to the reader or reinforce an idea of repetition in the film's genre. After this, there tends to be discussions about the cultural context, major themes

479:

Community-driven review sites, that allow internet users to submit personal movie reviews, have allowed the common movie goer to express their opinion on films. Many of these sites allow users to rate films on a 0 to 10 scale, while some rely on the star rating system of 1–5, 0–5 or 0–4 stars. The

392:

Research says that there are ways in how film critics are able to write criticisms that involve critical discussions containing rationality. When critics are looking for film criticisms that are factual, they must not behave with excessive optimism or be too demanding. Creations and criticisms are

206:

The film industry also got the chance to see that sound was able to influence how people behaved in movie theaters. When people spoke or made other kinds of sounds, they would be causing disruptions that created difficulties for people to listen to the conversations that were occurring in films.

178:

In the decades of the 1930s and the 1940s, the type of criticism pertaining to films had to overcome some difficult challenges. The first difficult challenge involves how film criticism in the 1930s decade did not have any stable foundations to reside on, and film criticism also involved critics

701:

Research says that academic studies pertaining to films had a thorough histiography pertaining to films, which also included different styles of films throughout history. However, the academic studies almost made film criticism reach its end. The academic type of writing pertaining to films had

439:

where people can post their own content. That is because blogging has created new ways for people to make themselves engage with cinematic movies. People who engage themselves with movies choose to participate in various forms of film criticism by using video or DVD clips from YouTube that are

114:

Film criticism is also labeled as a type of writing that perceives films as possible achievements and wishes to convey their differences, as well as the films being made in a level of quality that is satisfactory or unsatisfactory. Film criticism is also associated with the journalistic type of

586:

Academic film criticism is associated with formalism, which involves visual aspects and the rules regarding how they are organized as if they were forms of artwork. Formalism also involves stages of development occurring in an orderly manner, such as learning easy instructions before learning

182:

In the 1940s, new forms of criticism emerged. Essays analyzing films were written with a distinctive charm and style, and sought to persuade the reader to accept the critic's argument. This trend brought film criticism into the mainstream, gaining the attention of many popular magazines; this

118:

In the current era of history, film criticism is rich in having digital devices that allow films to be analyzed through visual and auditory methods that involve critical strategies of creativity that allow people to become immersed in film criticism. Film criticism is also associated with the

401:

In the academic field of films and cinema, several studies involving research have discovered a positive connection between film critics evaluating films and how well the films perform with audience members. Also, studies involving research in the fields of films and cinema have discovered a

631:

The critics that participated in academic film criticism during the years between 2002 and 2006 had written reviews pertaining to the fact that they disapproved of modern films that were in the horror genre. In the year 2002, a critic named Reynold Humphries made his own discussion in

660:

Green film criticism is defined as eco-cinecriticism. This pertains to the specific film critics who are interested in environmental types of films. The cinematic counterpart to writings about nature is the creation of documentaries on nature and films that are about wild creatures.

647:

philosophy that segments of films are not artistic works on their own, and they are just unemotional aspects of reality. When those segments of films are sequenced in the form of a montage, then the films are artwork. The second film theory is that films are related to reality.

838:, and they are now assessing works in all disciplines in line with wider social justice criteria. Does the artwork highlight social justice issues? Does it adequately meet Equality and Diversity briefs? Is the artwork, in one of the words of the age, 575:

Historical, a form of criticism that doesn't look at the direct things being said, but the culture and surrounding environments of a given film. The historical critic will create meaning from something that is not explicitly stated or shown in the

587:

difficult ones. Stages of development in formalism also involved organized stages of development that are orderly, and one example involves people learning simple instructions before they have to follow instructions that involve complexity.

231:, and online publications mainly review new releases, although they also review older films. An important task for these reviews is to help readers decide whether they want to see a particular film. A film review will typically explain the 154:

wrote a manifesto proclaiming cinema to be the "Sixth Art" (later "Seventh Art"). For many decades after, film was still being accorded less prestige than longer-established art forms. In Sweden, serious film criticism was spearheaded by

245:). Film reviews are created with the purposes of making the characters, movie plots, and the directors be known in detailed descriptions to influence audience members into deciding if films need to be viewed or be ignored. 853:

As of 2013, American film critics earned about US$ 82,000 a year. Newspaper and magazine critics made $ 27,364-$ 49,574. Online movie critics earned $ 2-$ 200 per review. TV critics made up to $ 40,000-$ 60,000 per month.

590:

Academic film criticism is also associated with structuralism, which involves controlling a situation in an attempt to make it be coherent, and all the aspects of a situation are assumed to be in a structured order.

682:) are increasing the collective influence of film critics. The underperformance of several films in 2017 was blamed on their low scores on Rotten Tomatoes. This has led to studies such as one commissioned by 106:

and other popular mass-media outlets. Academic film criticism rarely takes the form of a review; instead it is more likely to analyse the film and its place in the history of its genre, the industry and

636:

reach its end when he said that the horror genre's films were not good, and Humphries also stated that films in the horror genre weren't enjoyable. A critic named Kendall Phillips wrote a book titled

919: 582:

Political and economic, which not only looks into how economics and politics are depicted directly inside the film, but also how it affects the film's creation, marketing, screening, and sale.

542:

Academic film criticism, or film studies can also be taught in academia, and is featured in many California colleges because they are located near the home of the United States film industry:

788:

was used evaluate the representation of women in 270 films. Johanson complied statistics for the year 2015 on how having a female protagonist affected a movie, with the following results:

384:, which became syndicated in the 1980s. Both critics had established their careers in print media, and continued to write reviews for newspapers during the run of their television show. 739:

websites that were even more male-dominated than older media. Kilkenny also suggested that the shortage of female critics was related to the shortage of female opinion columnists.

643:

Film theory is also part of academic film criticism, since two main film theories have been created. The first main film theory is the part-whole theory. This theory pertains to

423:

seek to improve the usefulness of film reviews by compiling them and assigning a score to each in order to gauge the general reception a film receives. Another aggregator is the

127:

Film was introduced in the late 19th century. The earliest artistic criticism of film emerged in the early 1900s. The first paper to serve as a critique of the film came out of

3522: 693:

Today, fan-run film analysis websites like Box Office Prophets, CineBee and Box Office Guru routinely factor more into the opinions of the general public on films produced.

183:

eventually made film reviews and critiques a staple among most print media. As the decades passed, some critics gained fame, and a few became household names, among them

2179:

Hantke, Steffen (2007). "Academic Film Criticism, the Rhetoric of Crisis, and the Current State of American Horror Cinema: Thoughts on Canonicity and Academic Anxiety".

3836: 175:

late 1930s audiences became influenced by print news sources reporting on movies and criticism became largely centered around audience reactions within the theaters.

1095: 640:, and ending the book during the year 2006 involved Phillips saying that American horror films had fallen into the cycle of being movies that had predictability. 2656: 1972: 565:

Academic criticism is typically divided and taught in the form of many different disciplines that tackle critique in different manors. These can include:

46: 3857: 2877: 777:

pointed out that "men tend to look much more favorably on films with more masculine themes, or male leading actors." On online review sites such as

572:

Structuralism, that examines the way that movies are sequenced, have a dedicated style, and the way that language and art itself can create meaning.

435:

Blogs are a good example to view in relation to how the internet has grown to where social networks and live chats exist alongside websites such as

3515: 3850: 511:

On these online review sites, users generally only have to register with the site in order to submit reviews. This means that they are a form of

1802:"The impact of peer-produced criticism on cultural evaluation: A multilevel analysis of discourse employment in online and offline film reviews" 3646: 2407:"Academic Film Criticism, the Rhetoric of Crisis, and the Current State of American Horror Cinema: Thoughts on Canonicity and Academic Anxiety" 2933: 2376: 2258: 980: 555: 3345: 150:

which have existed since ancient times. Early writing on film sought to argue that films could also be considered a form of art. In 1911,

1999: 941: 480:

votes are then converted into an overall rating and ranking for any particular film. Some of these community driven review sites include

3135: 903: 801:

Movies that represent women well are just as likely to be profitable as movies that do not, and are less risky as business propositions.

3508: 3225: 913: 551: 2682: 1071: 908: 463:, an international professional association of Internet-based cinema reviewers, consists of writers from all over the world, while 1111:"The online place of popular music: Exploring the impact of geography and social media on pop artists' mainstream media attention" 763:

certain films for women, presumably because they worry that they'll be dismissed, critically speaking, if they praise a film like

3393: 547: 380: 3479: 3107: 3090: 1655: 3325: 2721: 2908: 3290: 3082: 2957: 1308: 996: 812: 464: 2223: 460: 91:, who study the composition of film theory and publish their findings and essays in books and journals, and general 3728: 3691: 3639: 3444: 3315: 2763: 678:

However, in recent years, there has been a growing belief in the film industry that critic aggregators (especially

1332:

Forslund, Bengt (2012). "Bengt Idestam-Almquist". Swedish Film Database (in Swedish). Retrieved 10 September 2020.

235:

of the film before discussing its merits or flaws. The verdict is often summarized using a rating system, such as

3878: 3843: 3793: 3738: 3252: 424: 329: 3398: 65: 3813: 3676: 3335: 3210: 2454: 1872: 1011: 3918: 3454: 3423: 3360: 3215: 3128: 241: 3708: 3686: 3596: 3545: 3330: 3310: 3280: 3230: 3220: 2687: 750: 744: 543: 497: 160: 156: 87:

and the film medium. In general, film criticism can be divided into two categories: Academic criticism by

31: 3060: 3871: 3701: 3632: 3587: 3570: 3368: 3242: 1908:

Porton, Richard; Kenigsberg, Ben; Klinger, Gabe; Koresky, Michael; Reardon, Kiva; Tracy, Andrew (2013).

2165: 579:

Psychoanalysis, that breaks down the unconscious that one can experience while observing a given film.

3713: 3577: 3418: 3373: 3340: 3320: 3285: 3275: 3270: 3235: 3027: 1221:"The Creation and Operation Strategy of Disney's Mulan: Cultural Appropriation and Cultural Discount" 898: 612: 607: 232: 2563:"How Critical Are Critical Reviews? The Box Office Effects of Film Critics, Star Power, and Budgets" 3723: 3671: 3350: 3300: 3295: 3265: 3260: 3065: 781:, this leads to skewed, imbalanced review results as 70 per cent of reviewers on the site are men. 559: 3681: 3560: 3439: 3388: 3158: 3121: 3095: 2858: 2850: 2788: 2637: 2598: 2590: 2534: 2482: 2426: 2347: 2308: 2204: 2196: 2147: 2139: 2089: 2081: 1973:"Did Audiences Enjoy 'Star Wars: The Last Jedi'? Deciphering Online User Reviews From Exit Polls" 1929: 1829: 1779: 1771: 1719: 1636: 1588: 1498: 1453: 1411: 1359: 1150: 1089: 1042: 990: 353: 285: 569:

Formalism, that analyzes the way that things are done and the appearance of their form or shape.

3783: 3582: 3449: 3383: 3378: 3305: 3173: 3103: 3086: 2842: 2741: 2629: 2582: 2526: 2474: 2418: 2382: 2372: 2264: 2254: 2131: 2073: 2023: 1921: 1821: 1763: 1711: 1663: 1628: 1580: 1445: 1403: 1351: 1242: 1201: 1142: 1077: 1067: 1034: 976: 949: 885: 830: 785: 644: 625: 1847: 3864: 3803: 3778: 3755: 3565: 3205: 2978: 2834: 2733: 2574: 2518: 2466: 2339: 2300: 2188: 2123: 2065: 1813: 1755: 1703: 1572: 1274: 1232: 1191: 1181: 1132: 1122: 1026: 893: 773: 683: 617: 512: 151: 3002: 1801: 3613: 3550: 2882: 713: 687: 679: 603: 501: 416: 228: 108: 1030: 3829: 3822: 3773: 3718: 3531: 3189: 649: 621: 599: 361: 321: 53: 1196: 686:

claiming that younger viewers give the website more credibility than the major studio

3912: 3788: 3750: 3733: 3592: 3163: 2862: 2208: 1783: 1046: 818: 337: 289: 261: 200: 188: 2602: 2093: 1833: 1154: 3798: 3655: 3070: 2952: 2151: 2054:"Are Consumers More Likely to Contribute Online Reviews for Hit or Niche Products?" 1312: 824: 795:

Critics are slightly more likely to rate a film highly if it represents women well.

748:, discussed the possible effects of this on the critical response to the 2015 film 735: 731: 726: 652:'s philosophy involves movies being connected to the real world, which is reality. 532: 305: 297: 277: 192: 88: 57: 1127: 1110: 378:

popularised the practice of reviewing films via a television program, in the show

1268: 1186: 1169: 3898: 3663: 2578: 871: 528: 375: 371: 345: 269: 236: 196: 70: 3100:

Movie Wars: How Hollywood and the Media Conspire to Limit What Films We Can See

2069: 1707: 3484: 2838: 2112:"Dynamic Effects among Movie Ratings, Movie Revenues, and Viewer Satisfaction" 861: 505: 493: 481: 420: 249: 184: 143: 92: 74: 2846: 2745: 2633: 2586: 2530: 2478: 2422: 2386: 2268: 2135: 2077: 1925: 1825: 1817: 1767: 1715: 1667: 1632: 1584: 1471: 1449: 1407: 1355: 1278: 1246: 1205: 1146: 1038: 3144: 2737: 1295:, Preface by Jean-Louis Leutrat, Fasano-Paris, Schena-Didier Érudition, 1999 1270:

Everyone's a Critic: Film Criticism Through History and Into the Digital Age

1081: 508:

aggregate both scores from accredited critics and those submitted by users.

489: 220: 99: 95: 798:

Mainstream moviegoers are not turned off by films with female protagonists.

17: 2522: 2366: 2248: 2192: 2127: 3474: 1061: 1012:"Features of interaction of factors of social and communication activity" 485: 453: 224: 147: 103: 2641: 2617: 2594: 2562: 2538: 2506: 2430: 2406: 2200: 2143: 2111: 2085: 2053: 1947: 1933: 1909: 1775: 1743: 1723: 1691: 1640: 1616: 1457: 1437: 1415: 1391: 1363: 1343: 2854: 2822: 2486: 2312: 1759: 1592: 1560: 1237: 1220: 445: 436: 2351: 2327: 2288: 2052:

DELLAROCAS, CHRYSANTHOS; GAO, GUODONG (GORDON); NARAYAN, RITU (2010).

1137: 850:

As of 2021, movie critics earned a yearly average salary of $ 63,474.

3489: 2878:"The Intern has been panned by film critics. Why am I not surprised?" 216: 171: 2470: 2304: 1576: 767:

as though they're only reviewing it favorably because they're women.

2657:"Rotten Tomatoes, Netflix And A Perfect Storm That Dooms Hollywood" 2343: 1880: 239:, academic-style grades, and pictograms (such as those used by the 139: 64: 39: 3500: 2789:"Male film critics greatly outnumber female critics, study finds" 778: 84: 3628: 3624: 3504: 3117: 2561:

Basuroy, Suman; Chatterjee, Subimal; Ravid, S. Abraham (2003).

1063:

It's only a movie! : films and critics in American culture

47:

Quentin Tarantino's unrealized projects § The Movie Critic

3057:

The Rhapsodes: How 1940s Critics Changed American Film Culture

1273:(Senior honors thesis). The College at Brockport. p. 32. 975:. 711 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017: Routledge. p. 1. 718: 3113: 2000:"You should ignore film ratings on IMDb and Rotten Tomatoes" 1499:"Research Guides: Film & Media: Reviews & Criticism" 1309:"How the Internet Led to the Decline of Female Film Critics" 920:

For the Love of Movies: The Story of American Film Criticism

628:. Godard, Truffaut and Eisenstein were also film directors. 539:

and repetitions, and details about the legacy of the film.

45:"Movie critic" redirects here. For the cancelled film, see 2823:"The Woman Film Critic: Newspapers, Cinema and Iris Barry" 2764:"The Curious Case of the Missing Women in Film Criticism" 717:, and 70 per cent of reviewers for radio formats such as 3079:

It's Only a Movie!: Film and Critics in American Culture

2253:. Chichester, West Sussex; Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. 2110:

Moon, Sangkil; Bergey, Paul K.; Iacobucci, Dawn (2010).

1392:"Search for Cinema: Film Criticism in the '30s and '40s" 816:, argued that "Previously engaging review sites such as 711:

per cent of critics for general interest magazines like

2683:"How Hollywood Came to Fear and Loathe Rotten Tomatoes" 2511:

Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature and Environment

2250:

An introduction to criticism: literature, film, culture

467:

members handle reviews in the New York tri-state area.

138:

Film is a relatively new form of art, in comparison to

1617:"The Role of Media Critics in the Cultural Industries" 1219:

Chen, Rui; Chen, Zhiyi; Yang, Yongzhong (2021-03-04).

942:"Reviews vs Criticism - Film & Television Studies" 1654:

Beam, Christopher; Singer-Vine, Jeremy (2011-06-06).

1744:"What Is Being Fought For by Today's Cinephilia(s)?" 30:"Film review" redirects here. For the magazine, see 3812: 3766: 3662: 3606: 3538: 3467: 3432: 3407: 3359: 3251: 3198: 3182: 3151: 946:

The University of Vermont Libraries Research Guides

562:, as well as many other colleges across the world. 3837:Historical Journal of Film, Radio and Television 2368:Film theory and criticism: introductory readings 1109:Verboord, Marc; Noord, Sharon van (2016-04-02). 388:Format for film critics to write film criticisms 1170:"Beyond Tautology? Audio-Visual Film Criticism" 2934:"Where Are the Women? : Data Spreadsheet" 1994: 1992: 1696:Academy of Management Learning & Education 3640: 3516: 3129: 3059:, University of Chicago Press, Chicago 2016, 2909:"Where Are the Women?: crunching the numbers" 1442:International Labor and Working-Class History 1348:International Labor and Working-Class History 792:22% of 2015's movies had female protagonists. 129:The Optical Lantern and Cinematograph Journal 8: 3022: 3020: 3018: 1692:"A Resource Review for Diversity Film Media" 971:Clayton, Alex; Klevan, Andrew, eds. (2011). 754:, which received mixed reviews from critics: 3068:to young, aspiring, would-be film critics ( 2902: 2900: 2332:The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 1873:"New York Film Critics Online - Who We Are" 1303: 1301: 598:Some notable academic film critics include 3647: 3633: 3625: 3523: 3509: 3501: 3429: 3136: 3122: 3114: 1848:"Our Bylaws – Online Film Critics Society" 1748:Framework: The Journal of Cinema and Media 1396:Journal of the University Film Association 1094:: CS1 maint: location missing publisher ( 3858:New Review of Film and Television Studies 2328:"Structuralism, Language, and Literature" 2058:Journal of Management Information Systems 1236: 1195: 1185: 1136: 1126: 248:Some well-known journalistic critics are 3851:Journal of Popular Film & Television 1621:International Journal of Arts Management 1281:– via SUNY Open Access Repository. 1010:Mitchuk, Olha; Haidur, Nataliia (2021). 973:The Language and Style of Film Criticism 3028:"How Much Money Do Movie Critics Make?" 1554: 1552: 1550: 1548: 1546: 1544: 1542: 1540: 1538: 1438:"American Movie Audiences of the 1930s" 1344:"American Movie Audiences of the 1930s" 1293:Ricciotto Canudo ou le cinéma comme art 933: 2816: 2814: 2812: 2810: 2808: 2715: 2713: 2711: 2709: 2707: 2705: 2556: 2554: 2552: 2550: 2548: 2507:"Green Film Criticism and Its Futures" 2500: 2498: 2496: 2448: 2446: 2444: 2442: 2440: 2282: 2280: 2278: 1536: 1534: 1532: 1530: 1528: 1526: 1524: 1522: 1520: 1518: 1431: 1429: 1427: 1425: 1385: 1383: 1381: 1379: 1377: 1375: 1373: 1087: 988: 448:in fiction films. One such example is 2757: 2755: 2722:"The Rise and Fall of Film Criticism" 2720:Nowell-Smith, Geoffrey (2008-09-01). 2400: 2398: 2396: 2371:. New York: Oxford University Press. 2365:Braudy, Leo; Cohen, Marshall (2009). 2222:Svetkey, Benjamin, ed. (2018-08-16). 2105: 2103: 2047: 2045: 2043: 1910:"Film Criticism: The Next Generation" 1903: 1901: 1899: 1897: 1795: 1793: 1737: 1735: 1733: 1685: 1683: 1610: 1608: 1606: 1604: 1602: 1561:"Towards an Objective Film Criticism" 1476:At the Movies with Margaret and David 690:, which undercuts its effectiveness. 556:University of California, Los Angeles 7: 1971:D'Alessandro, Anthony (2017-12-17). 1262: 1260: 1258: 1256: 595:evaluate when engaging in critique. 904:List of film journals and magazines 2876:Clem Bastow (September 30, 2015). 2618:"FILM: The Power of Movie Critics" 2224:"The Top 25 American Film Schools" 1656:"Slate's Hollywood Career-O-Matic" 948:. October 15, 2017. Archived from 914:List of films considered the worst 552:University of California, Berkeley 83:is the analysis and evaluation of 25: 2655:Mendelson, Scott (13 June 2017). 1800:Verboord, Marc (September 2014). 1168:Grant, Catherine (January 2016). 909:List of films considered the best 546:. Some of these colleges include 397:Film critics and audience members 3892: 2932:Johanson, MaryAnn (April 2016). 2907:Johanson, MaryAnn (2016-04-11). 878: 864: 836:The World Social Justice Website 450:Insultingly Stupid Movie Physics 381:Siskel & Ebert At the Movies 165:father of Swedish film criticism 98:that appears regularly in press 27:Analysis and evaluation of films 2453:Henderson, Brian (1971-04-01). 2326:Ames, Sanford Scribner (1973). 2289:"Formalism and Its Discontents" 1031:10.21272/Obraz.2021.3(37)-17-26 742:Clem Bastow, culture writer at 548:University of California, Davis 484:, Reviewer, Movie Attractions, 3480:Appraisal (discourse analysis) 2287:Feldman, Edmund Burke (1992). 1615:Debenedetti, Stéphane (2006). 1: 3003:"Pay Scale for Movie Critics" 2979:"Pay Scale for Movie Critics" 1267:Battaglia, James (May 2010). 1128:10.1080/15405702.2015.1019073 1060:Haberski, Raymond J. (2001). 3083:University Press of Kentucky 2951:Harris, James (2022-10-17). 2762:Adams, Thelma (2015-12-29). 1187:10.3998/fc.13761232.0040.113 465:New York Film Critics Online 3066:Peter Bradshaw gives advice 2787:Devan Coggan (2016-06-23). 2579:10.1509/jmkg.67.4.103.18692 2024:"Top 10 Movies of All Time" 461:Online Film Critics Society 34:. For the similar-sounding 3935: 3879:Television & New Media 3729:Psychoanalytic film theory 3102:, A Cappella Books, 2000. 2681:Lee, Chris (9 June 2017). 2455:"Two Types of Film Theory" 2070:10.2753/MIS0742-1222270204 1708:10.5465/amle.2008.37029279 1690:Tejeda, Manuel J. (2008). 1197:2027/spo.13761232.0040.113 810:James Harris, writing for 51: 44: 29: 3888: 3844:Journal of Film and Video 3739:Structuralist film theory 3077:Haberski, Raymond J. Jr. 2953:"Criticising the critics" 2839:10.2979/FIL.2006.18.2.154 1503:guides.library.queensu.ca 923:, a 2009 documentary film 758:The critical response to 425:Movie Review Query Engine 2616:FARBER, STEPHEN (1976). 2505:Ivakhiv, Adrian (2008). 2405:Hantke, Steffen (2007). 2293:Studies in Art Education 2028:www.alltopeverything.com 1948:"Rotten Tomatoes: About" 1818:10.1177/1461444813495164 1436:Butsch, Richard (2001). 1342:Butsch, Richard (2001). 995:: CS1 maint: location ( 665:Issues and controversies 634:The American Horror Film 52:Not to be confused with 40:Revue § Film revues 3424:Criticism of technology 2821:Wasson, Haidee (2006). 2738:10.1525/fq.2008.62.1.10 1806:New Media & Society 1742:Shambu, Girish (2009). 1390:Lentz, Tony M. (1973). 523:Academic film criticism 242:San Francisco Chronicle 3687:Linguistic film theory 3546:Architecture criticism 2247:Ryan, Michael (2012). 2228:The Hollywood Reporter 2166:"Faculty publications" 1952:www.rottentomatoes.com 769: 745:The Guardian Australia 475:User-submitted reviews 211:Journalistic criticism 161:Swedish Film Institute 157:Bengt Idestam-Almquist 77: 73:(right) with director 32:Film Review (magazine) 3872:The Velvet Light Trap 3702:Formalist film theory 3677:Cognitive film theory 3588:Video game journalism 3571:Rockism and poptimism 3226:Intellectual property 2193:10.1353/lit.2007.0045 2128:10.1509/jmkg.74.1.108 1115:Popular Communication 756: 706:Female representation 406:Online film criticism 68: 3714:Feminist film theory 3593:Visual art criticism 3578:Television criticism 3419:Criticism of science 3408:Science, technology, 2622:The American Scholar 2567:Journal of Marketing 2116:Journal of Marketing 1559:Jarvie, Ian (1961). 899:List of film critics 656:Green film criticism 527:More often known as 350:Good Morning America 195:, and more recently 3724:Marxist film theory 3346:Walt Disney Company 3096:Rosenbaum, Jonathan 2913:FlickFilosopher.com 2523:10.1093/isle/15.2.1 1497:Gibson, Elizabeth. 560:Stanford University 498:Everyone's a Critic 431:Online film critics 237:5- or 4-star scales 3682:Historical poetics 3561:Literary criticism 3159:Literary criticism 2411:College Literature 2181:College Literature 1760:10.1353/frm.0.0038 1238:10.3390/su13052751 952:on October 6, 2017 354:Jonathan Rosenbaum 286:James Berardinelli 266:The New York Times 131:, followed by the 78: 3906: 3905: 3814:Academic journals 3784:Sergei Eisenstein 3622: 3621: 3583:Theatre criticism 3498: 3497: 3463: 3462: 3410:engineering, and 3174:Theatre criticism 2378:978-0-19-536562-7 2260:978-1-4051-8283-6 1291:Giovanni Dotoli, 1279:20.500.12648/6777 1066:. Lexington, Ky. 982:978-0-203-81731-5 886:Journalism portal 831:The Onion AV Club 786:Johanson analysis 771:Matt Reynolds of 626:Sergei Eisenstein 613:Cahiers du Cinéma 610:(all writers for 608:François Truffaut 444:the depiction of 415:Websites such as 342:The Village Voice 274:Chicago Sun-Times 16:(Redirected from 3926: 3897: 3896: 3895: 3804:Kristin Thompson 3779:Thomas Elsaesser 3756:Schreiber theory 3746:Critical methods 3649: 3642: 3635: 3626: 3566:Music journalism 3525: 3518: 3511: 3502: 3468:Similar concepts 3430: 3326:Paramount Global 3206:Social criticism 3138: 3131: 3124: 3115: 3055:Bordwell, Davd: 3042: 3041: 3039: 3038: 3024: 3013: 3012: 3010: 3009: 2999: 2993: 2992: 2990: 2989: 2983:Work - Chron.com 2975: 2969: 2968: 2966: 2965: 2948: 2942: 2941: 2929: 2923: 2922: 2920: 2919: 2904: 2895: 2894: 2892: 2890: 2873: 2867: 2866: 2818: 2803: 2802: 2800: 2799: 2784: 2778: 2777: 2775: 2774: 2759: 2750: 2749: 2717: 2700: 2699: 2697: 2695: 2678: 2672: 2671: 2669: 2667: 2652: 2646: 2645: 2613: 2607: 2606: 2558: 2543: 2542: 2502: 2491: 2490: 2450: 2435: 2434: 2402: 2391: 2390: 2362: 2356: 2355: 2323: 2317: 2316: 2284: 2273: 2272: 2244: 2238: 2237: 2235: 2234: 2219: 2213: 2212: 2176: 2170: 2169: 2162: 2156: 2155: 2107: 2098: 2097: 2049: 2038: 2037: 2035: 2034: 2020: 2014: 2013: 2011: 2010: 1996: 1987: 1986: 1984: 1983: 1968: 1962: 1961: 1959: 1958: 1944: 1938: 1937: 1905: 1892: 1891: 1889: 1888: 1879:. Archived from 1869: 1863: 1862: 1860: 1859: 1844: 1838: 1837: 1797: 1788: 1787: 1754:(1/2): 218–220. 1739: 1728: 1727: 1687: 1678: 1677: 1675: 1674: 1651: 1645: 1644: 1612: 1597: 1596: 1556: 1513: 1512: 1510: 1509: 1494: 1488: 1487: 1485: 1483: 1468: 1462: 1461: 1433: 1420: 1419: 1387: 1368: 1367: 1339: 1333: 1330: 1324: 1323: 1321: 1320: 1305: 1296: 1289: 1283: 1282: 1264: 1251: 1250: 1240: 1216: 1210: 1209: 1199: 1189: 1165: 1159: 1158: 1140: 1130: 1106: 1100: 1099: 1093: 1085: 1057: 1051: 1050: 1021:(in Ukrainian). 1016: 1007: 1001: 1000: 994: 986: 968: 962: 961: 959: 957: 938: 894:Prestige picture 888: 883: 882: 881: 874: 869: 868: 867: 834:have all become 684:20th Century Fox 618:Kristin Thompson 513:open access poll 366:What The Flick?! 330:Michael Phillips 310:The New Republic 152:Ricciotto Canudo 21: 3934: 3933: 3929: 3928: 3927: 3925: 3924: 3923: 3909: 3908: 3907: 3902: 3899:Film portal 3893: 3891: 3884: 3808: 3762: 3658: 3653: 3623: 3618: 3614:Arts journalism 3602: 3551:Dance criticism 3534: 3529: 3499: 3494: 3459: 3428: 3411: 3409: 3403: 3399:Knowledge (XXG) 3394:Washington Post 3355: 3291:Electronic Arts 3247: 3194: 3178: 3147: 3142: 3112: 3051: 3049:Further reading 3046: 3045: 3036: 3034: 3026: 3025: 3016: 3007: 3005: 3001: 3000: 2996: 2987: 2985: 2977: 2976: 2972: 2963: 2961: 2950: 2949: 2945: 2931: 2930: 2926: 2917: 2915: 2906: 2905: 2898: 2888: 2886: 2883:theguardian.com 2875: 2874: 2870: 2820: 2819: 2806: 2797: 2795: 2786: 2785: 2781: 2772: 2770: 2761: 2760: 2753: 2719: 2718: 2703: 2693: 2691: 2680: 2679: 2675: 2665: 2663: 2654: 2653: 2649: 2615: 2614: 2610: 2560: 2559: 2546: 2504: 2503: 2494: 2471:10.2307/1210090 2452: 2451: 2438: 2404: 2403: 2394: 2379: 2364: 2363: 2359: 2325: 2324: 2320: 2305:10.2307/1320360 2286: 2285: 2276: 2261: 2246: 2245: 2241: 2232: 2230: 2221: 2220: 2216: 2178: 2177: 2173: 2164: 2163: 2159: 2109: 2108: 2101: 2051: 2050: 2041: 2032: 2030: 2022: 2021: 2017: 2008: 2006: 1998: 1997: 1990: 1981: 1979: 1970: 1969: 1965: 1956: 1954: 1946: 1945: 1941: 1907: 1906: 1895: 1886: 1884: 1871: 1870: 1866: 1857: 1855: 1846: 1845: 1841: 1799: 1798: 1791: 1741: 1740: 1731: 1689: 1688: 1681: 1672: 1670: 1653: 1652: 1648: 1614: 1613: 1600: 1577:10.2307/1210064 1558: 1557: 1516: 1507: 1505: 1496: 1495: 1491: 1481: 1479: 1470: 1469: 1465: 1444:(59): 106–120. 1435: 1434: 1423: 1389: 1388: 1371: 1350:(59): 106–120. 1341: 1340: 1336: 1331: 1327: 1318: 1316: 1307: 1306: 1299: 1290: 1286: 1266: 1265: 1254: 1218: 1217: 1213: 1167: 1166: 1162: 1108: 1107: 1103: 1086: 1074: 1059: 1058: 1054: 1014: 1009: 1008: 1004: 987: 983: 970: 969: 965: 955: 953: 940: 939: 935: 930: 884: 879: 877: 870: 865: 863: 860: 848: 808: 708: 699: 680:Rotten Tomatoes 672: 667: 658: 638:Projected Fears 604:Jean-Luc Godard 525: 502:Rotten Tomatoes 477: 433: 417:Rotten Tomatoes 413: 408: 399: 390: 334:Chicago Tribune 229:broadcast media 213: 163:has called the 125: 69:Chicago critic 61: 50: 43: 28: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 3932: 3930: 3922: 3921: 3919:Film criticism 3911: 3910: 3904: 3903: 3889: 3886: 3885: 3883: 3882: 3875: 3868: 3861: 3854: 3847: 3840: 3833: 3830:Film Quarterly 3826: 3823:Cinema Journal 3818: 3816: 3810: 3809: 3807: 3806: 3801: 3796: 3794:Christian Metz 3791: 3786: 3781: 3776: 3774:David Bordwell 3770: 3768: 3764: 3763: 3761: 3760: 3759: 3758: 3753: 3743: 3742: 3741: 3736: 3731: 3726: 3721: 3719:Film semiotics 3716: 3706: 3705: 3704: 3696: 3695: 3694: 3689: 3684: 3679: 3668: 3666: 3660: 3659: 3654: 3652: 3651: 3644: 3637: 3629: 3620: 3619: 3617: 3616: 3610: 3608: 3604: 3603: 3601: 3600: 3590: 3585: 3580: 3575: 3574: 3573: 3563: 3558: 3556:Film criticism 3553: 3548: 3542: 3540: 3536: 3535: 3532:Arts criticism 3530: 3528: 3527: 3520: 3513: 3505: 3496: 3495: 3493: 3492: 3487: 3482: 3477: 3471: 3469: 3465: 3464: 3461: 3460: 3458: 3457: 3452: 3447: 3442: 3436: 3434: 3427: 3426: 3421: 3415: 3413: 3405: 3404: 3402: 3401: 3396: 3391: 3386: 3381: 3376: 3371: 3365: 3363: 3357: 3356: 3354: 3353: 3348: 3343: 3338: 3333: 3328: 3323: 3318: 3313: 3308: 3303: 3298: 3293: 3288: 3283: 3278: 3273: 3268: 3263: 3257: 3255: 3249: 3248: 3246: 3245: 3240: 3239: 3238: 3233: 3223: 3218: 3213: 3208: 3202: 3200: 3199:Social systems 3196: 3195: 3193: 3192: 3190:Self-criticism 3186: 3184: 3183:Human behavior 3180: 3179: 3177: 3176: 3171: 3169:Film criticism 3166: 3161: 3155: 3153: 3149: 3148: 3143: 3141: 3140: 3133: 3126: 3118: 3111: 3110: 3093: 3075: 3074:, 8 July 2008) 3063: 3052: 3050: 3047: 3044: 3043: 3014: 2994: 2970: 2943: 2924: 2896: 2868: 2833:(2): 154–162. 2804: 2779: 2751: 2726:Film Quarterly 2701: 2673: 2647: 2628:(3): 419–423. 2608: 2573:(4): 103–117. 2544: 2492: 2459:Film Quarterly 2436: 2417:(4): 191–202. 2392: 2377: 2357: 2344:10.2307/428706 2318: 2299:(2): 122–126. 2274: 2259: 2239: 2214: 2187:(4): 191–202. 2171: 2157: 2122:(1): 108–121. 2099: 2064:(2): 127–157. 2039: 2015: 1988: 1963: 1939: 1893: 1864: 1839: 1812:(6): 921–940. 1789: 1729: 1702:(3): 434–439. 1679: 1646: 1598: 1565:Film Quarterly 1514: 1489: 1463: 1421: 1369: 1334: 1325: 1297: 1284: 1252: 1225:Sustainability 1211: 1174:Film Criticism 1160: 1101: 1072: 1052: 1002: 981: 963: 932: 931: 929: 926: 925: 924: 916: 911: 906: 901: 896: 890: 889: 875: 859: 856: 847: 844: 807: 804: 803: 802: 799: 796: 793: 784:A study using 707: 704: 698: 695: 671: 668: 666: 663: 657: 654: 622:David Bordwell 584: 583: 580: 577: 573: 570: 524: 521: 476: 473: 432: 429: 412: 409: 407: 404: 398: 395: 389: 386: 362:Christy Lemire 358:Chicago Reader 322:Peter Bradshaw 302:The New Yorker 212: 209: 170:By the 1920s, 124: 121: 81:Film criticism 54:cinematography 26: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3931: 3920: 3917: 3916: 3914: 3901: 3900: 3887: 3881: 3880: 3876: 3874: 3873: 3869: 3867: 3866: 3862: 3860: 3859: 3855: 3853: 3852: 3848: 3846: 3845: 3841: 3839: 3838: 3834: 3832: 3831: 3827: 3825: 3824: 3820: 3819: 3817: 3815: 3811: 3805: 3802: 3800: 3797: 3795: 3792: 3790: 3789:Colin MacCabe 3787: 3785: 3782: 3780: 3777: 3775: 3772: 3771: 3769: 3765: 3757: 3754: 3752: 3751:Auteur theory 3749: 3748: 3747: 3744: 3740: 3737: 3735: 3734:Screen theory 3732: 3730: 3727: 3725: 3722: 3720: 3717: 3715: 3712: 3711: 3710: 3707: 3703: 3700: 3699: 3697: 3693: 3690: 3688: 3685: 3683: 3680: 3678: 3675: 3674: 3673: 3670: 3669: 3667: 3665: 3661: 3657: 3650: 3645: 3643: 3638: 3636: 3631: 3630: 3627: 3615: 3612: 3611: 3609: 3605: 3598: 3594: 3591: 3589: 3586: 3584: 3581: 3579: 3576: 3572: 3569: 3568: 3567: 3564: 3562: 3559: 3557: 3554: 3552: 3549: 3547: 3544: 3543: 3541: 3537: 3533: 3526: 3521: 3519: 3514: 3512: 3507: 3506: 3503: 3491: 3488: 3486: 3483: 3481: 3478: 3476: 3473: 3472: 3470: 3466: 3456: 3453: 3451: 3448: 3446: 3445:Desktop Linux 3443: 3441: 3438: 3437: 3435: 3431: 3425: 3422: 3420: 3417: 3416: 3414: 3406: 3400: 3397: 3395: 3392: 3390: 3387: 3385: 3382: 3380: 3377: 3375: 3372: 3370: 3367: 3366: 3364: 3362: 3358: 3352: 3349: 3347: 3344: 3342: 3339: 3337: 3334: 3332: 3329: 3327: 3324: 3322: 3319: 3317: 3314: 3312: 3309: 3307: 3304: 3302: 3299: 3297: 3294: 3292: 3289: 3287: 3284: 3282: 3279: 3277: 3274: 3272: 3269: 3267: 3264: 3262: 3259: 3258: 3256: 3254: 3250: 3244: 3241: 3237: 3234: 3232: 3229: 3228: 3227: 3224: 3222: 3219: 3217: 3214: 3212: 3209: 3207: 3204: 3203: 3201: 3197: 3191: 3188: 3187: 3185: 3181: 3175: 3172: 3170: 3167: 3165: 3164:Art criticism 3162: 3160: 3157: 3156: 3154: 3150: 3146: 3139: 3134: 3132: 3127: 3125: 3120: 3119: 3116: 3109: 3105: 3101: 3097: 3094: 3092: 3088: 3084: 3080: 3076: 3073: 3072: 3067: 3064: 3062: 3058: 3054: 3053: 3048: 3033: 3029: 3023: 3021: 3019: 3015: 3004: 2998: 2995: 2984: 2980: 2974: 2971: 2960: 2959: 2954: 2947: 2944: 2939: 2935: 2928: 2925: 2914: 2910: 2903: 2901: 2897: 2885: 2884: 2879: 2872: 2869: 2864: 2860: 2856: 2852: 2848: 2844: 2840: 2836: 2832: 2828: 2824: 2817: 2815: 2813: 2811: 2809: 2805: 2794: 2790: 2783: 2780: 2769: 2765: 2758: 2756: 2752: 2747: 2743: 2739: 2735: 2731: 2727: 2723: 2716: 2714: 2712: 2710: 2708: 2706: 2702: 2690: 2689: 2684: 2677: 2674: 2662: 2658: 2651: 2648: 2643: 2639: 2635: 2631: 2627: 2623: 2619: 2612: 2609: 2604: 2600: 2596: 2592: 2588: 2584: 2580: 2576: 2572: 2568: 2564: 2557: 2555: 2553: 2551: 2549: 2545: 2540: 2536: 2532: 2528: 2524: 2520: 2516: 2512: 2508: 2501: 2499: 2497: 2493: 2488: 2484: 2480: 2476: 2472: 2468: 2464: 2460: 2456: 2449: 2447: 2445: 2443: 2441: 2437: 2432: 2428: 2424: 2420: 2416: 2412: 2408: 2401: 2399: 2397: 2393: 2388: 2384: 2380: 2374: 2370: 2369: 2361: 2358: 2353: 2349: 2345: 2341: 2337: 2333: 2329: 2322: 2319: 2314: 2310: 2306: 2302: 2298: 2294: 2290: 2283: 2281: 2279: 2275: 2270: 2266: 2262: 2256: 2252: 2251: 2243: 2240: 2229: 2225: 2218: 2215: 2210: 2206: 2202: 2198: 2194: 2190: 2186: 2182: 2175: 2172: 2167: 2161: 2158: 2153: 2149: 2145: 2141: 2137: 2133: 2129: 2125: 2121: 2117: 2113: 2106: 2104: 2100: 2095: 2091: 2087: 2083: 2079: 2075: 2071: 2067: 2063: 2059: 2055: 2048: 2046: 2044: 2040: 2029: 2025: 2019: 2016: 2005: 2001: 1995: 1993: 1989: 1978: 1974: 1967: 1964: 1953: 1949: 1943: 1940: 1935: 1931: 1927: 1923: 1919: 1915: 1911: 1904: 1902: 1900: 1898: 1894: 1883:on 2015-12-05 1882: 1878: 1877:www.nyfco.net 1874: 1868: 1865: 1854:. 28 May 2012 1853: 1849: 1843: 1840: 1835: 1831: 1827: 1823: 1819: 1815: 1811: 1807: 1803: 1796: 1794: 1790: 1785: 1781: 1777: 1773: 1769: 1765: 1761: 1757: 1753: 1749: 1745: 1738: 1736: 1734: 1730: 1725: 1721: 1717: 1713: 1709: 1705: 1701: 1697: 1693: 1686: 1684: 1680: 1669: 1665: 1661: 1657: 1650: 1647: 1642: 1638: 1634: 1630: 1626: 1622: 1618: 1611: 1609: 1607: 1605: 1603: 1599: 1594: 1590: 1586: 1582: 1578: 1574: 1570: 1566: 1562: 1555: 1553: 1551: 1549: 1547: 1545: 1543: 1541: 1539: 1537: 1535: 1533: 1531: 1529: 1527: 1525: 1523: 1521: 1519: 1515: 1504: 1500: 1493: 1490: 1477: 1473: 1472:"The Classic" 1467: 1464: 1459: 1455: 1451: 1447: 1443: 1439: 1432: 1430: 1428: 1426: 1422: 1417: 1413: 1409: 1405: 1401: 1397: 1393: 1386: 1384: 1382: 1380: 1378: 1376: 1374: 1370: 1365: 1361: 1357: 1353: 1349: 1345: 1338: 1335: 1329: 1326: 1314: 1310: 1304: 1302: 1298: 1294: 1288: 1285: 1280: 1276: 1272: 1271: 1263: 1261: 1259: 1257: 1253: 1248: 1244: 1239: 1234: 1230: 1226: 1222: 1215: 1212: 1207: 1203: 1198: 1193: 1188: 1183: 1179: 1175: 1171: 1164: 1161: 1156: 1152: 1148: 1144: 1139: 1134: 1129: 1124: 1120: 1116: 1112: 1105: 1102: 1097: 1091: 1083: 1079: 1075: 1073:0-8131-2193-0 1069: 1065: 1064: 1056: 1053: 1048: 1044: 1040: 1036: 1032: 1028: 1024: 1020: 1013: 1006: 1003: 998: 992: 984: 978: 974: 967: 964: 951: 947: 943: 937: 934: 927: 922: 921: 917: 915: 912: 910: 907: 905: 902: 900: 897: 895: 892: 891: 887: 876: 873: 862: 857: 855: 851: 845: 843: 841: 837: 833: 832: 827: 826: 821: 820: 815: 814: 805: 800: 797: 794: 791: 790: 789: 787: 782: 780: 776: 775: 768: 766: 761: 755: 753: 752: 747: 746: 740: 737: 733: 729: 728: 722: 720: 716: 715: 705: 703: 697:Controversies 696: 694: 691: 689: 685: 681: 676: 669: 664: 662: 655: 653: 651: 646: 641: 639: 635: 629: 627: 623: 619: 615: 614: 609: 605: 601: 596: 592: 588: 581: 578: 574: 571: 568: 567: 566: 563: 561: 557: 553: 549: 545: 540: 536: 534: 530: 522: 520: 516: 514: 509: 507: 503: 499: 495: 491: 487: 483: 474: 472: 468: 466: 462: 457: 455: 451: 447: 441: 438: 430: 428: 426: 422: 418: 410: 405: 403: 396: 394: 387: 385: 383: 382: 377: 373: 369: 367: 363: 359: 355: 351: 347: 343: 339: 338:Andrew Sarris 335: 331: 327: 323: 319: 315: 311: 307: 303: 299: 295: 291: 290:Philip French 287: 283: 279: 275: 271: 267: 263: 262:Vincent Canby 259: 255: 251: 246: 244: 243: 238: 234: 230: 226: 222: 218: 210: 208: 204: 202: 201:Peter Travers 198: 194: 190: 189:Andrew Sarris 186: 180: 176: 173: 168: 166: 162: 158: 153: 149: 145: 141: 136: 134: 130: 122: 120: 116: 112: 110: 105: 101: 97: 94: 90: 89:film scholars 86: 82: 76: 72: 67: 63: 59: 55: 48: 41: 37: 33: 19: 3890: 3877: 3870: 3863: 3856: 3849: 3842: 3835: 3828: 3821: 3799:Laura Mulvey 3745: 3692:Neoformalism 3656:Film studies 3555: 3253:Corporations 3168: 3099: 3078: 3071:The Guardian 3069: 3056: 3035:. Retrieved 3031: 3006:. Retrieved 2997: 2986:. Retrieved 2982: 2973: 2962:. Retrieved 2956: 2946: 2937: 2927: 2916:. Retrieved 2912: 2889:December 15, 2887:. Retrieved 2881: 2871: 2830: 2827:Film History 2826: 2796:. Retrieved 2792: 2782: 2771:. Retrieved 2767: 2732:(1): 10–11. 2729: 2725: 2692:. Retrieved 2686: 2676: 2664:. Retrieved 2660: 2650: 2625: 2621: 2611: 2570: 2566: 2514: 2510: 2465:(3): 33–42. 2462: 2458: 2414: 2410: 2367: 2360: 2338:(1): 89–94. 2335: 2331: 2321: 2296: 2292: 2249: 2242: 2231:. Retrieved 2227: 2217: 2184: 2180: 2174: 2160: 2119: 2115: 2061: 2057: 2031:. Retrieved 2027: 2018: 2007:. Retrieved 2003: 1980:. Retrieved 1976: 1966: 1955:. Retrieved 1951: 1942: 1920:(2): 35–40. 1917: 1913: 1885:. Retrieved 1881:the original 1876: 1867: 1856:. Retrieved 1851: 1842: 1809: 1805: 1751: 1747: 1699: 1695: 1671:. Retrieved 1659: 1649: 1627:(3): 30–42. 1624: 1620: 1571:(3): 19–23. 1568: 1564: 1506:. Retrieved 1502: 1492: 1480:. Retrieved 1478:. ABC.net.au 1475: 1466: 1441: 1402:(4): 69–84. 1399: 1395: 1347: 1337: 1328: 1317:. Retrieved 1315:. 2015-12-27 1313:The Atlantic 1292: 1287: 1269: 1228: 1224: 1214: 1177: 1173: 1163: 1121:(2): 59–72. 1118: 1114: 1104: 1062: 1055: 1025:(3): 17–26. 1022: 1018: 1005: 972: 966: 954:. Retrieved 950:the original 945: 936: 918: 852: 849: 839: 835: 829: 825:The Guardian 823: 817: 811: 809: 783: 772: 770: 764: 759: 757: 749: 743: 741: 736:Pauline Kael 732:Judith Crist 727:The Atlantic 725: 724:Writing for 723: 712: 709: 700: 692: 677: 673: 659: 645:Eisenstein's 642: 637: 633: 630: 611: 597: 593: 589: 585: 564: 541: 537: 533:film studies 526: 517: 510: 478: 469: 458: 449: 442: 434: 414: 400: 391: 379: 370: 365: 357: 349: 341: 333: 326:The Guardian 325: 317: 313: 309: 306:Manny Farber 301: 298:Pauline Kael 294:The Observer 293: 282:The Observer 281: 278:Mark Kermode 273: 265: 257: 253: 247: 240: 219:working for 214: 205: 193:Pauline Kael 181: 177: 169: 164: 137: 132: 128: 126: 117: 113: 111:as a whole. 109:film history 93:journalistic 80: 79: 62: 58:film studies 35: 3709:Continental 3412:mathematics 3336:Tesla, Inc. 3211:Advertising 2938:Google Docs 2688:Vanity Fair 2517:(2): 1–28. 1231:(5): 2751. 956:October 23, 872:Film portal 840:problematic 600:André Bazin 529:film theory 411:Aggregators 376:Gene Siskel 372:Roger Ebert 346:Joel Siegel 270:Roger Ebert 197:Roger Ebert 159:, whom the 71:Roger Ebert 18:Film review 3698:Classical 3664:Approaches 3485:Evaluation 3455:Windows 10 3361:Mass media 3216:Capitalism 3108:1556524544 3091:0813121930 3037:2018-05-02 3008:2018-05-02 2988:2021-11-03 2964:2023-06-25 2958:The Critic 2918:2020-07-16 2798:2017-10-25 2773:2017-10-24 2233:2021-11-04 2033:2019-11-30 2009:2019-11-30 1982:2017-12-18 1957:2017-10-25 1887:2017-10-25 1858:2017-10-25 1673:2017-10-25 1508:2022-10-12 1319:2018-06-21 1138:1765/87688 928:References 813:The Critic 765:The Intern 760:The Intern 751:The Intern 506:Metacritic 494:Flickchart 482:Letterboxd 421:Metacritic 318:The Nation 258:The Nation 250:James Agee 221:newspapers 185:James Agee 144:literature 100:newspapers 75:Russ Meyer 36:Film revue 3331:Starbucks 3316:McDonalds 3311:Microsoft 3281:Coca-Cola 3231:Copyright 3221:Democracy 3145:Criticism 3032:Bizfluent 2863:194069701 2847:0892-2160 2746:0015-1386 2634:0003-0937 2587:0022-2429 2531:1076-0962 2479:0015-1386 2423:0093-3139 2387:262430698 2269:752909880 2209:170518242 2136:0022-2429 2078:0742-1222 1926:0009-7004 1826:1461-4448 1784:191336566 1768:0306-7661 1716:1537-260X 1668:1091-2339 1633:1480-8986 1585:0015-1386 1450:0147-5479 1408:0041-9311 1356:0147-5479 1247:2071-1050 1206:2471-4364 1147:1540-5702 1090:cite book 1047:250471376 1039:2415-8496 991:cite book 688:marketing 670:Influence 544:Hollywood 490:FilmCrave 225:magazines 135:in 1908. 104:magazines 96:criticism 3913:Category 3767:Scholars 3672:Analytic 3607:See also 3597:Feminist 3475:Critique 3433:Software 3369:Fox News 3271:AT&T 3243:Religion 3152:The arts 3085:, 2001. 2642:41207394 2603:17913431 2595:30040552 2539:44086718 2431:25115464 2201:25115464 2144:20619083 2094:36573602 2086:29780173 2004:Wired UK 1977:Deadline 1934:43500817 1914:Cinéaste 1852:ofcs.org 1834:34276023 1776:41552556 1724:40214564 1641:41064885 1458:27672712 1416:20687223 1364:27672712 1155:54768350 1082:45230353 858:See also 806:Ideology 486:Flixster 454:Intuitor 148:painting 133:Bioscope 3341:Walmart 3321:Netflix 3286:Comcast 3276:Chevron 3236:Patents 3061:Details 2855:3815632 2768:Variety 2694:14 June 2666:14 June 2487:1210090 2313:1320360 2152:3914043 1593:1210064 446:science 437:YouTube 360:); and 233:premise 217:critics 172:critics 123:History 3865:Screen 3539:Topics 3490:Review 3351:Yahoo! 3301:Huawei 3296:Google 3266:Amazon 3261:Airbnb 3106: 3089: 2861: 2853: 2845: 2793:EW.com 2744: 2661:Forbes 2640: 2632: 2601: 2593: 2585: 2537: 2529: 2485: 2477: 2429: 2421: 2385: 2375: 2352:428706 2350: 2311: 2267: 2257: 2207: 2199: 2150: 2142: 2134: 2092: 2084: 2076: 1932: 1924: 1832: 1824: 1782: 1774: 1766: 1722: 1714: 1666: 1639: 1631: 1591: 1583: 1482:26 May 1456: 1448: 1414: 1406: 1362: 1354: 1245: 1204: 1153: 1145: 1080: 1070: 1045: 1037: 979: 846:Salary 624:, and 280:(BBC, 38:, see 3389:MSNBC 2859:S2CID 2851:JSTOR 2638:JSTOR 2599:S2CID 2591:JSTOR 2535:JSTOR 2483:JSTOR 2427:JSTOR 2348:JSTOR 2309:JSTOR 2205:S2CID 2197:JSTOR 2148:S2CID 2140:JSTOR 2090:S2CID 2082:JSTOR 1930:JSTOR 1830:S2CID 1780:S2CID 1772:JSTOR 1720:JSTOR 1660:Slate 1637:JSTOR 1589:JSTOR 1454:JSTOR 1412:JSTOR 1360:JSTOR 1180:(1). 1151:S2CID 1043:S2CID 1019:Obraz 1015:(PDF) 774:Wired 650:Bazin 576:film. 215:Film 140:music 85:films 3450:Java 3384:ESPN 3379:CNBC 3306:IKEA 3104:ISBN 3087:ISBN 2891:2015 2843:ISSN 2742:ISSN 2696:2017 2668:2017 2630:ISSN 2583:ISSN 2527:ISSN 2475:ISSN 2419:ISSN 2383:OCLC 2373:ISBN 2265:OCLC 2255:ISBN 2132:ISSN 2074:ISSN 1922:ISSN 1822:ISSN 1764:ISSN 1712:ISSN 1664:ISSN 1629:ISSN 1581:ISSN 1484:2014 1446:ISSN 1404:ISSN 1352:ISSN 1243:ISSN 1202:ISSN 1143:ISSN 1096:link 1078:OCLC 1068:ISBN 1035:ISSN 997:link 977:ISBN 958:2017 828:and 779:IMDb 734:and 714:Time 606:and 504:and 496:and 459:The 419:and 374:and 314:Time 254:Time 199:and 146:and 3440:C++ 3374:BBC 2835:doi 2734:doi 2575:doi 2519:doi 2467:doi 2340:doi 2301:doi 2189:doi 2124:doi 2066:doi 1814:doi 1756:doi 1704:doi 1573:doi 1275:hdl 1233:doi 1192:hdl 1182:doi 1133:hdl 1123:doi 1027:doi 842:?" 819:Vox 719:NPR 616:); 531:or 452:by 368:). 352:); 344:); 336:); 328:); 320:); 304:); 296:); 284:); 276:); 268:); 260:); 56:or 3915:: 3098:. 3081:, 3030:. 3017:^ 2981:. 2955:. 2936:. 2911:. 2899:^ 2880:. 2857:. 2849:. 2841:. 2831:18 2829:. 2825:. 2807:^ 2791:. 2766:. 2754:^ 2740:. 2730:62 2728:. 2724:. 2704:^ 2685:. 2659:. 2636:. 2626:45 2624:. 2620:. 2597:. 2589:. 2581:. 2571:67 2569:. 2565:. 2547:^ 2533:. 2525:. 2515:15 2513:. 2509:. 2495:^ 2481:. 2473:. 2463:24 2461:. 2457:. 2439:^ 2425:. 2415:34 2413:. 2409:. 2395:^ 2381:. 2346:. 2336:32 2334:. 2330:. 2307:. 2297:33 2295:. 2291:. 2277:^ 2263:. 2226:. 2203:. 2195:. 2185:34 2183:. 2146:. 2138:. 2130:. 2120:74 2118:. 2114:. 2102:^ 2088:. 2080:. 2072:. 2062:27 2060:. 2056:. 2042:^ 2026:. 2002:. 1991:^ 1975:. 1950:. 1928:. 1918:38 1916:. 1912:. 1896:^ 1875:. 1850:. 1828:. 1820:. 1810:16 1808:. 1804:. 1792:^ 1778:. 1770:. 1762:. 1752:50 1750:. 1746:. 1732:^ 1718:. 1710:. 1698:. 1694:. 1682:^ 1662:. 1658:. 1635:. 1623:. 1619:. 1601:^ 1587:. 1579:. 1569:14 1567:. 1563:. 1517:^ 1501:. 1474:. 1452:. 1440:. 1424:^ 1410:. 1400:25 1398:. 1394:. 1372:^ 1358:. 1346:. 1311:. 1300:^ 1255:^ 1241:. 1229:13 1227:. 1223:. 1200:. 1190:. 1178:40 1176:. 1172:. 1149:. 1141:. 1131:. 1119:14 1117:. 1113:. 1092:}} 1088:{{ 1076:. 1041:. 1033:. 1023:37 1017:. 993:}} 989:{{ 944:. 822:, 721:. 620:, 602:, 558:, 554:, 550:, 500:. 492:, 488:, 316:, 312:, 288:; 256:, 227:, 223:, 203:. 191:, 187:, 167:. 142:, 102:, 3648:e 3641:t 3634:v 3599:) 3595:( 3524:e 3517:t 3510:v 3137:e 3130:t 3123:v 3040:. 3011:. 2991:. 2967:. 2940:. 2921:. 2893:. 2865:. 2837:: 2801:. 2776:. 2748:. 2736:: 2698:. 2670:. 2644:. 2605:. 2577:: 2541:. 2521:: 2489:. 2469:: 2433:. 2389:. 2354:. 2342:: 2315:. 2303:: 2271:. 2236:. 2211:. 2191:: 2168:. 2154:. 2126:: 2096:. 2068:: 2036:. 2012:. 1985:. 1960:. 1936:. 1890:. 1861:. 1836:. 1816:: 1786:. 1758:: 1726:. 1706:: 1700:7 1676:. 1643:. 1625:8 1595:. 1575:: 1511:. 1486:. 1460:. 1418:. 1366:. 1322:. 1277:: 1249:. 1235:: 1208:. 1194:: 1184:: 1157:. 1135:: 1125:: 1098:) 1084:. 1049:. 1029:: 999:) 985:. 960:. 364:( 356:( 348:( 340:( 332:( 324:( 308:( 300:( 292:( 272:( 264:( 252:( 60:. 49:. 42:. 20:)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index