Knowledge

Florida v. Thomas

Source 📝

31: 297:, the Court dismissed the writ of certiorari for want of jurisdiction. Rehnquist wrote that the Florida Supreme Court's decision did not fit any of the categories where the Court "treated state-court judgments as final for jurisdictional purposes although there were further proceedings to take place in the state court." Thus, the Court concluded that the Florida Supreme Court's decision was not final. This was partly based on a doctrine from the 280:
did not apply because it is limited to situations where the officer initiates contact with a vehicle's occupant while that person remains in the vehicle. The Supreme Court granted review. It would only be a few months before the ultimate decision, where they would dismiss the case.
230:, concerning whether a person was in custody, a determination central to allowing evidence seized in an automobile search to be presented in trial. However, the Court unanimously dismissed the case because the decision of the Florida state courts was not "final". 272:, the U.S. Supreme Court established a "bright-line" rule permitting an officer who has made a lawful custodial arrest of a car's occupant to search the car's passenger compartment as an incident of the arrest. In reversing the intermediate court of appeals, the 520: 515: 430: 333: 72: 510: 495: 409: 397: 380: 361: 500: 318: 221: 35: 505: 246:
sales at his Florida home. While this was going on, Thomas drove up to his house in his car. An officer asked him for his name and
262:, which was subsequently granted by the trial judge. In reversing, an intermediate appellate court found the search valid under 298: 530: 110:
The writ of certiorari was improvidently granted as the Florida state courts have not made a 'reviewable final-judgement'.
525: 323: 224:
case decided in 2001. The case brought to the court concerned the extent of the Court's earlier decision in
141: 304:
which decided that certain decisions were not 'final' when the trial proceedings had not been completed.
434: 273: 64: 294: 239: 247: 169: 459: 450: 264: 226: 207: 133: 125: 254:. One officer proceeded to take him inside the house while another searched his car, finding 290: 255: 165: 153: 441: 468: 328: 177: 145: 489: 251: 250:. Thomas was arrested thereafter when a search on his license showed an outstanding 157: 67: 313: 259: 243: 79: 477: 242:, police officers went to Robert Thomas' home, investigating possible 97: 100:
1241 (Fla. 2d DCA, 1998); reversed, 761 So.2d 1010 (Fla., 2000)
30: 258:. He was indicted for possession. At his trial, he moved to 96:
Evidence suppressed during trial; suppression reversed, 711
521:
United States Supreme Court cases of the Rehnquist Court
334:
List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 532
54:
Florida, Petitioner v. Robert A. Thomas, Respondent.
201: 190: 185: 114: 104: 92: 87: 59: 49: 42: 23: 324:Motor vehicle exception in Fourth Amendment Law 8: 516:United States controlled substances case law 357: 355: 353: 351: 349: 376: 374: 372: 370: 20: 393: 391: 389: 511:United States Fourth Amendment case law 345: 18:2001 United States Supreme Court case 7: 319:Jurisdiction issues in American law 36:Supreme Court of the United States 14: 496:United States Supreme Court cases 437:774 (2001) is available from: 29: 501:2001 in United States case law 1: 220:, 532 U.S. 774 (2001), is a 222:United States Supreme Court 547: 478:Oyez (oral argument audio) 293:authored by Chief Justice 208:Ruling based on precedent 206: 119: 109: 28: 506:Legal history of Florida 274:Florida Supreme Court 260:suppress the evidence 194:Rehnquist, joined by 78:121 S. Ct. 1905; 150 43:Argued April 25, 2001 531:Polk County, Florida 295:William H. Rehnquist 285:Opinion of the Court 240:Polk County, Florida 45:Decided June 4, 2001 170:Ruth Bader Ginsburg 142:Sandra Day O'Connor 265:New York v. Belton 227:New York v. Belton 130:Associate Justices 427:Florida v. Thomas 291:unanimous opinion 217:Florida v. Thomas 213: 212: 126:William Rehnquist 24:Florida v. Thomas 538: 482: 476: 473: 467: 464: 458: 455: 449: 446: 440: 413: 407: 401: 395: 384: 378: 365: 359: 115:Court membership 33: 32: 21: 546: 545: 541: 540: 539: 537: 536: 535: 526:2001 in Florida 486: 485: 480: 474: 471: 465: 462: 456: 453: 447: 444: 438: 422: 417: 416: 408: 404: 396: 387: 379: 368: 360: 347: 342: 310: 287: 256:methamphetamine 236: 168: 166:Clarence Thomas 156: 154:Anthony Kennedy 144: 134:John P. Stevens 83: 44: 38: 19: 12: 11: 5: 544: 542: 534: 533: 528: 523: 518: 513: 508: 503: 498: 488: 487: 484: 483: 460:Google Scholar 421: 420:External links 418: 415: 414: 402: 385: 366: 344: 343: 341: 338: 337: 336: 331: 329:Probable cause 326: 321: 316: 309: 306: 286: 283: 248:identification 235: 232: 211: 210: 204: 203: 199: 198: 192: 188: 187: 183: 182: 181: 180: 178:Stephen Breyer 146:Antonin Scalia 131: 128: 123: 117: 116: 112: 111: 107: 106: 102: 101: 94: 90: 89: 85: 84: 77: 61: 57: 56: 51: 50:Full case name 47: 46: 40: 39: 34: 26: 25: 17: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 543: 532: 529: 527: 524: 522: 519: 517: 514: 512: 509: 507: 504: 502: 499: 497: 494: 493: 491: 479: 470: 461: 452: 451:CourtListener 443: 436: 432: 428: 424: 423: 419: 411: 406: 403: 399: 394: 392: 390: 386: 382: 377: 375: 373: 371: 367: 363: 358: 356: 354: 352: 350: 346: 339: 335: 332: 330: 327: 325: 322: 320: 317: 315: 312: 311: 307: 305: 303: 301: 296: 292: 284: 282: 279: 275: 271: 267: 266: 261: 257: 253: 249: 245: 241: 233: 231: 229: 228: 223: 219: 218: 209: 205: 200: 197: 193: 189: 184: 179: 175: 171: 167: 163: 159: 155: 151: 147: 143: 139: 135: 132: 129: 127: 124: 122:Chief Justice 121: 120: 118: 113: 108: 103: 99: 95: 91: 86: 81: 75: 74: 69: 66: 62: 58: 55: 52: 48: 41: 37: 27: 22: 16: 426: 405: 299: 288: 277: 269: 263: 237: 225: 216: 215: 214: 202:Laws applied 195: 186:Case opinion 173: 161: 158:David Souter 149: 137: 88:Case history 71: 53: 15: 364:at 776-777. 490:Categories 340:References 314:Certiorari 234:Background 244:marijuana 196:unanimous 80:L. Ed. 2d 60:Citations 425:Text of 410:420 U.S. 398:532 U.S. 381:532 U.S. 362:532 U.S. 308:See also 302:decision 191:Majority 442:Cornell 412:at 478. 400:at 781. 383:at 780. 252:warrant 105:Holding 481:  475:  472:  469:Justia 466:  463:  457:  454:  448:  445:  439:  278:Belton 270:Belton 176: 174:· 172:  164: 162:· 160:  152: 150:· 148:  140: 138:· 136:  433: 289:In a 276:held 268:. In 98:So.2d 93:Prior 435:U.S. 73:more 65:U.S. 63:532 431:532 300:Cox 238:In 68:774 492:: 429:, 388:^ 369:^ 348:^ 82:1 76:) 70:(

Index

Supreme Court of the United States
U.S.
774
more
L. Ed. 2d
So.2d
William Rehnquist
John P. Stevens
Sandra Day O'Connor
Antonin Scalia
Anthony Kennedy
David Souter
Clarence Thomas
Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Stephen Breyer
Ruling based on precedent
United States Supreme Court
New York v. Belton
Polk County, Florida
marijuana
identification
warrant
methamphetamine
suppress the evidence
New York v. Belton
Florida Supreme Court
unanimous opinion
William H. Rehnquist
Cox decision
Certiorari

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.