Knowledge

Food Additives Amendment of 1958

Source ๐Ÿ“

35: 578: 207:" by scientific experts in the field, based on long history of use before 1958 or based on scientific studies. New food additives would be subject to testing including by the "Delaney clause". The Delaney clause was a provision in the amendment which said that if a substance were found to cause cancer in man or animal, then it could not be used as a 369:
The Delaney prohibition appears in three separate parts of the FFDCA: Section 409 on food additives; Section 512, relating to animal drugs in meat and poultry; and Section 721 on color additives. The Section 409 prohibition applied to many pesticide residues until enactment of the Food Quality
273:
than in the raw tomatoes used to make it. (It never applied to pesticides in raw foods.) When the law was passed, "neither advocates nor opponents of the policy, including FDA officials, believed it would have broad application, for only a handful of chemicals had then been shown to be animal
323:
became more powerful and able to detect smaller quantities of chemicals, and as chemicals became more widely used, regulatory agencies had an increasingly difficult time administering the Delaney Clause as it "recognizes no distinctions based on carcinogenic
233:(FFDCA) food additive tolerance requirements. The concept of food additives being "generally recognized as safe" was first described in the Food Additives Amendment of 1958, and all additives introduced after this time had to be evaluated by new standards. 452: 340:, declaring that if a carcinogenic food additive creates an excess lifetime cancer risk of less than 1 additional cancer case in every 1,000,000 exposed individuals, the risk is negligible. This standard became known as the " 544: 328:
and, at least in theory, it applies equally to additives used in large amounts and to those present at barely detectable levels. It thus takes no account of the actual risk a carcinogenic additive might pose."
45:
An Act to protect the public health by amending the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to prohibit the use in food of additives which have not been adequately tested to establish their safety.
450: 537: 203:. It was a response to concerns about the safety of new food additives. The amendment established an exemption from the "food additive" definition and requirements for substances " 618: 713: 530: 744: 312:, the announcement was referred to by many in the cranberry industry as "Black Monday" โˆ’ sales plummeted, even though many government officials attempted to defuse the 597: 592: 348: 269:, but only when the concentration of a residue of a cancer-causing pesticide increased during processing; for example when more of a pesticide was present in 286: 553: 316:
by declaring their intention to eat cranberries anyway. This episode is regarded as one of the first modern food scares based on a chemical additive.
664: 749: 669: 336:
to promote the growth of livestock used in meat production, which remained present in the meat. It addressed the issue by using quantitative
230: 200: 257:
shall not approve for use in food any chemical additive found to induce cancer in man, or, after tests, found to induce cancer in animals.
363: 146: 136: 123: 500:"Reaffirming the Delaney Anticancer Clause: The Legal and Policy Implications of an Administratively Created "De Minimis" Exception" 478: 352: 690: 183: 577: 695: 100: 92: 229:(FDA) designation that a chemical or substance added to food is considered safe by experts, and so is exempted from the usual 356: 254: 226: 220: 204: 351:
eased restrictions on several pesticides which posed a "de minimis" risk to humans. This change was challenged by the
62: 289:
issued a statement advising the public about the possible contamination of substantial quantities of cranberries in
648: 34: 643: 638: 623: 567: 370:
Protection Act of 1996. This legislation removed pesticide residue tolerances from Delaney Clause constraints.
282: 385:. Even these substances are covered by the Delaney clause, so that, for example, safrole may not be added to 734: 418: 398: 305: 242: 325: 628: 320: 150: 140: 85: 511: 333: 294: 739: 674: 474: 179: 362:
Pesticide use was removed from the Delaney Clause in 1996 by an amendment to Title IV of the
633: 522: 246: 456: 337: 332:
The FDA was the first agency to have to confront this problem, with respect to the use of
17: 700: 613: 266: 728: 301: 208: 344:" exception to the Delaney Rule and was used throughout the FDA and other agencies. 313: 309: 459:
This source includes a useful historical survey of prior food safety regulation.
445:
Merrill, Richard A. "Food Safety Regulation: Reforming the Delaney Clause" in
341: 275: 386: 378: 298: 262: 373:
Many foods contain natural substances which are carcinogenic, for example
515: 499: 104: 374: 270: 290: 382: 526: 304:, which the FDA had recently determined was a carcinogen (see 683: 657: 619:
Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act
606: 585: 560: 160: 129: 119: 114: 91: 81: 76: 68: 57: 53:
Delaney clause (referring to part of the amendment)
49: 41: 598:United States Environmental Protection Agency 593:California Department of Pesticide Regulation 538: 473:. New York, N.Y: Marcel Dekker. p. 827. 349:United States Environmental Protection Agency 8: 281:The Delaney Clause was invoked in 1959 when 27: 510:(3). Food and Drug Law Institute: 393โ€“428. 287:Department of Health, Education and Welfare 545: 531: 523: 199:is a 1958 amendment to the United States' 554:Pesticide regulation in the United States 441: 439: 437: 435: 245:in the amendment named after Congressman 225:Generally recognized as safe (GRAS) is a 745:United States federal health legislation 665:Inter-Regional Research Project Number 4 410: 26: 670:National Pesticide Information Center 419:"Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS)" 201:Food, Drugs, and Cosmetic Act of 1938 7: 231:Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act 364:Food Quality Protection Act of 1996 25: 353:Natural Resources Defense Council 691:Industrial Bio-Test Laboratories 576: 504:Food, Drug, Cosmetic Law Journal 355:, and overturned in 1992 by the 197:Food Additives Amendment of 1958 33: 28:Food Additives Amendment of 1958 696:Pesticides in the United States 172:in the House as H.R. 13254 498:Strauss, Debra M (July 1987). 447:Annual Review of Public Health 357:Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals 261:The Delaney Clause applied to 215:"Generally recognized as safe" 1: 750:Food and Drug Administration 308:). Taking place the week of 255:Food and Drug Administration 227:Food and Drug Administration 221:Generally recognized as safe 205:generally recognized as safe 63:85th United States Congress 766: 649:Worker Protection Standard 366:(P.L. 104-170, Sec. 404). 218: 709: 574: 469:Fennema, Owen R. (1996). 165: 124:21 U.S.C.: Food and Drugs 32: 644:Toxicity category rating 639:Restricted use pesticide 624:Good laboratory practice 568:DDT in the United States 283:Arthur Sherwood Flemming 241:The Delaney Clause is a 18:Food Additives Amendment 399:Precautionary principle 306:Cranberry scare of 1959 285:, the Secretary of the 249:of New York. It said: 130:U.S.C. sections amended 389:in the United States. 259: 186:) on September 6, 1958 253:the Secretary of the 251: 321:analytical chemistry 151:ch. 9, subch. IV 141:ch. 9, subch. II 161:Legislative history 29: 455:2013-06-20 at the 449:, 1997, 18:313-40. 377:, which occurs in 334:diethylstilbestrol 722: 721: 714:Categorical index 675:SENSOR-Pesticides 193: 192: 180:Dwight Eisenhower 94:Statutes at Large 72:September 6, 1958 16:(Redirected from 757: 634:Pesticide misuse 580: 547: 540: 533: 524: 519: 485: 484: 466: 460: 443: 430: 429: 427: 426: 415: 95: 37: 30: 21: 765: 764: 760: 759: 758: 756: 755: 754: 725: 724: 723: 718: 705: 679: 653: 629:Maintenance fee 602: 581: 572: 556: 551: 497: 494: 489: 488: 481: 468: 467: 463: 457:Wayback Machine 444: 433: 424: 422: 417: 416: 412: 407: 395: 338:risk assessment 267:processed foods 239: 223: 217: 189: 176:Signed into law 156: 93: 58:Enacted by 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 763: 761: 753: 752: 747: 742: 737: 735:Food additives 727: 726: 720: 719: 717: 716: 710: 707: 706: 704: 703: 701:Toxicity class 698: 693: 687: 685: 684:Related topics 681: 680: 678: 677: 672: 667: 661: 659: 655: 654: 652: 651: 646: 641: 636: 631: 626: 621: 616: 614:Delaney clause 610: 608: 604: 603: 601: 600: 595: 589: 587: 583: 582: 575: 573: 571: 570: 564: 562: 558: 557: 552: 550: 549: 542: 535: 527: 521: 520: 493: 492:External links 490: 487: 486: 479: 471:Food chemistry 461: 431: 409: 408: 406: 403: 402: 401: 394: 391: 238: 237:Delaney Clause 235: 219:Main article: 216: 213: 191: 190: 188: 187: 173: 166: 163: 162: 158: 157: 155: 154: 144: 133: 131: 127: 126: 121: 120:Titles amended 117: 116: 112: 111: 97: 89: 88: 83: 79: 78: 74: 73: 70: 66: 65: 59: 55: 54: 51: 47: 46: 43: 39: 38: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 762: 751: 748: 746: 743: 741: 738: 736: 733: 732: 730: 715: 712: 711: 708: 702: 699: 697: 694: 692: 689: 688: 686: 682: 676: 673: 671: 668: 666: 663: 662: 660: 656: 650: 647: 645: 642: 640: 637: 635: 632: 630: 627: 625: 622: 620: 617: 615: 612: 611: 609: 605: 599: 596: 594: 591: 590: 588: 584: 579: 569: 566: 565: 563: 559: 555: 548: 543: 541: 536: 534: 529: 528: 525: 517: 513: 509: 505: 501: 496: 495: 491: 482: 480:0-8247-9691-8 476: 472: 465: 462: 458: 454: 451: 448: 442: 440: 438: 436: 432: 420: 414: 411: 404: 400: 397: 396: 392: 390: 388: 384: 380: 376: 371: 367: 365: 360: 358: 354: 350: 345: 343: 339: 335: 330: 327: 322: 317: 315: 311: 307: 303: 302:aminotriazole 300: 296: 292: 288: 284: 279: 277: 272: 268: 264: 258: 256: 250: 248: 247:James Delaney 244: 236: 234: 232: 228: 222: 214: 212: 210: 209:food additive 206: 202: 198: 185: 181: 178:by President 177: 174: 171: 168: 167: 164: 159: 153:ยง 341 et seq. 152: 148: 145: 142: 138: 135: 134: 132: 128: 125: 122: 118: 113: 110:72 Stat. 1786 109: 106: 102: 98: 96: 90: 87: 84: 80: 75: 71: 67: 64: 60: 56: 52: 48: 44: 40: 36: 31: 19: 507: 503: 470: 464: 446: 423:. Retrieved 413: 372: 368: 361: 347:In 1988 the 346: 331: 318: 310:Thanksgiving 280: 260: 252: 240: 224: 196: 194: 175: 169: 115:Codification 107: 607:Regulations 276:carcinogens 729:Categories 425:2013-03-17 405:References 381:and sweet 342:de minimis 295:Washington 263:pesticides 170:Introduced 82:Public law 42:Long title 421:. Fda.gov 387:root beer 379:sassafras 299:herbicide 297:with the 243:provision 147:21 U.S.C. 137:21 U.S.C. 77:Citations 69:Effective 50:Nicknames 740:Oncology 658:Programs 586:Agencies 516:26658519 453:Archived 393:See also 99:72  561:History 375:safrole 326:potency 271:ketchup 514:  477:  291:Oregon 103:  86:85-929 512:JSTOR 383:basil 314:scare 149: 143:ยง 321 139: 101:Stat. 475:ISBN 293:and 195:The 105:1784 61:the 319:As 278:." 265:in 108:aka 731:: 508:42 506:. 502:. 434:^ 359:. 211:. 546:e 539:t 532:v 518:. 483:. 428:. 184:R 182:( 20:)

Index

Food Additives Amendment
Great Seal of the United States
85th United States Congress
85-929
Statutes at Large
Stat.
1784
21 U.S.C.: Food and Drugs
21 U.S.C.
ch. 9, subch. II
21 U.S.C.
ch. 9, subch. IV
Dwight Eisenhower
R
Food, Drugs, and Cosmetic Act of 1938
generally recognized as safe
food additive
Generally recognized as safe
Food and Drug Administration
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
provision
James Delaney
Food and Drug Administration
pesticides
processed foods
ketchup
carcinogens
Arthur Sherwood Flemming
Department of Health, Education and Welfare
Oregon

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

โ†‘