552:. Over time various areas of the country were designated areas of compulsory registration by order so in different parts of the country compulsory registration has been around longer than in others. The last order was made in 1990, so now virtually all transactions in land result in compulsory registration. One difference is land changing ownership after death, where land is gifted rather than sold; these became compulsorily registrable only in April 1998. Similarly it became compulsory to register land when a mortgage is created on it in 1998.
571:. Details of registrations are available to any person upon payment of the prescribed fees. Precautionary measures have been introduced in recent years to verify the identity of persons attempting to change records of title. No details will be on record for any land which has not had a relevant transaction recorded as will often occur if, for example, ownership was last transferred before the introduction of compulsory registration in a particular area.
218:. A contract for guarantee must also, at some stage, be evidenced in writing. As a matter of contract English law takes the approach that a gratuitous promise, as a matter of contract law, is not legally binding. While a gift that is delivered will transfer property irrevocably, and while someone may always bind themselves to a promise without anything in return to deliver a thing in future if they sign a
35:
199:
626:, the common law originally required that all contracts made by such a body had to be made under seal, whether they were deeds or not. This rule was gradually eroded away, for example being abolished in respect of companies by the Companies Acts in the first half of the twentieth century. For companies registered under the
505:
section 53(1)(b). This means, someone can first declare a trust of land without any writing or signature, so long as in the case of a dispute the declaration is evidenced in writing. Second, any "disposition" of an existing equitable interests also requires a signature under section 53(1)(c). Such a
638:
removed the requirement for a company to have a common seal at all, and made provision for those documents which had previously needed to be executed under seal, such as deeds, to instead be executed by officers of the company. However companies can still have and continue to use seals to execute
111:
The history of requirements of formality in
English law generally shows a gradual shift towards fewer and fewer instances of transaction needing form, as technology and recording of agreements has become more advanced. Originally a contract which was sealed ("made under seal", using a
102:
While contracts and trusts can be generally created without formality, some transactions are thought to require form either because it makes a person think carefully before they bind themselves to an agreement, or merely that it serves as clear evidence.
124:" was taken as secure. Originally, only a wax seal was accepted as a seal by the courts, but by the 19th century many jurisdictions had relaxed the definition to include an impression in the paper on which the instrument was printed, an
87:. In a limited number of cases, agreements and trusts will be unenforceable unless they meet a certain form prescribed by statute. The main kinds of formality that a statute can require are to put the transaction in writing, to make a
500:
Trusts can generally be made without formality, however three main, large and practically relevant exceptions exist. First, a trust of land requires a signature on a written document evidencing a declaration, under the
149:
By the 20th century a small circle of red adhesive paper affixed to the document in question was sufficient when an individual had to use a seal. This process was described in a report of the
639:
deeds if they wish, in which case the seal has to be engraved (i.e., a seal which leaves an impression on the page, not printed or a wafer facsimile) and to bear the name of the company.
214:
In contract law, formality is typically required for large engagements. This includes the sale of land, a lease of property over three years, a consumer credit agreement, and a
761:
169:
157:
as "a meaningless exercise". This was most common on a contract for the sale of land, although the courts also held that a circle containing the letters "L.S." was adequate.
827:
266:
1001:
630:
the relevant provision is now section 43 of the
Companies Act 2006. But until 1960 this remained in force for other corporations. It was abolished by the
982:
820:
544:. This voluntary national system proved ineffective and, following further attempts in 1875 and 1897, the present system was brought into force by the
495:
56:
43:
222:
that is witnessed, a simple promise to do something in future can be revoked. This is result is reached, with some complexity, through the
English
311:
642:
Some other corporations (which are not companies registered under the
Companies Acts) are still required to have and use seals. For example, the
860:
583:
959:
600:, an executive agency within the Department of Finance and Personnel for Northern Ireland. Prior to 1 Apr 2007 it was dealt with by the
259:
180:
and replaced seals with the requirements that the document had to explicitly state that it was being executed as a deed, and had to be
932:
173:
150:
1030:, Property Advisers to the Civil Estate Central Advice Unit Information Note 19/99, August 1999, Office of Government Commerce. Also
1023:
468:
895:
651:
634:. Normal contracts (i.e. not deeds) can now be made by a corporation in the same way as they can be made by an individual. The
721:
631:
824:
252:
738:
670:. Therefore, where a corporation sole has to execute a deed, it continues to have to do so by the use of an official seal.
1101:
1036:
1106:
116:) was treated differently from other written contracts (which were "made under hand"). It was predominantly a mark of
802:
556:
545:
541:
230:
998:
702:
48:
223:
790:
647:
502:
480:
457:
377:
592:
agency is responsible for maintaining both the
Register of Sasines and the new register. Land registration in
388:
142:
meaning "place of the seal"). If a seal was in place, common law courts regarded it as removing the need for
979:
560:
586:
introduced a new system which now records all changes of ownership of land and creation of new titles. The
579:
567:
to transfer and register property. The Land
Registry is connected to the European Land Information Service
815:
168:
made by a private individual had to be sealed to be validly executed was finally abolished in 1989 by the
210:, is a written order by one person to another (typically a bank) to pay a sum of money to a third person.
834:, holding that while this requirement may be undesirable, it could not be circumvented through estoppel.
659:
635:
588:
400:
237:
the contract, which a court can construe from all the circumstances, but will be strong evidence of it.
422:
446:
233:
section 1 to receive written particulars stating the contract from the employer. This may not in fact
564:
229:
A contract of employment requires no form to be effective, however an employee has a right under the
193:
80:
679:
510:
section 9 requires that the testator signs a written document and this is witnessed by two people.
857:
956:
925:
913:
881:
491:
352:
282:
84:
559:
leaves the 1925 system substantially in place but enables the future compulsory introduction of
434:
667:
537:
523:
340:
125:
655:
593:
549:
519:
215:
203:
92:
929:
1040:
1027:
1018:
1005:
986:
963:
936:
877:
864:
831:
725:
706:
96:
146:
to support the contract. It raised, at least, a rebuttable presumption of consideration.
536:) since 1709. but the first national system of land registration was first attempted in
356:
17:
623:
613:
533:
507:
411:
301:
117:
330:
1095:
909:
643:
627:
366:
297:
143:
113:
654:. Also, the changes relating to deeds which were introduced in 1989 do not apply to
316:
1086:
781:
Law of
Property Act 1925 ss 52 and 54(2) require that such leases are made by deed.
718:
165:
161:
130:
1031:
912:
as in force today (including any amendments) within the United
Kingdom, from
880:
as in force today (including any amendments) within the United
Kingdom, from
574:
Land registration commenced in
Scotland with the creation of the Register of
529:
1067:
P Critchley, 'Taking Formalities Seriously' in S Bright and J Dewar (eds),
34:
244:
286:
134:
made with a pen, or the printed words "Seal" or "L.S." (standing for the
1033:
The Execution of Deeds and Documents by or on behalf of Bodies Corporate
1062:
967:
952:
940:
699:
663:
619:
575:
326:
181:
207:
198:
568:
197:
135:
821:
Actionstrength Ltd v International Glass Engineering In.Gl.EN.SpA
506:
declaration actually requires form at the time. Third, under the
650:
requires the college to have a common seal, as does that of the
219:
121:
88:
1043:, Law Commission Report No 253 (1998), paragraphs 4.23 to 4.28.
248:
28:
928:, section 36A, as inserted by the Companies Act 1989, see
772:
Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989 s 2(1)
854:
A Short History of Land Registration in England and Wales
843:
Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989 s 1
91:, or to register it at a government registrar (such as
1083:
Transfer of Land: Formalities for Deeds and Escrows
762:
Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989
170:
Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989
155:
Transfer of Land: Formalities for Deeds and Escrows
172:. The Act implemented recommendations made by the
896:Wright & Son Ltd v Romford Borough Council
698:See L Fuller, āConsideration and Formā (1941)
260:
79:are required in some kinds of transaction by
8:
1061:L Fuller, āConsideration and Formā (1941)
957:text of the 1985 Act as originally enacted
939:. This provision has now been replaced by
267:
253:
245:
496:Creation of express trusts in English law
128:paper wafer affixed to an instrument, a
59:of all important aspects of the article.
691:
312:T Choithram International SA v Pagarani
980:Royal College of Nursing Royal Charter
528:A register operated for the county of
55:Please consider expanding the lead to
739:First National Securities Ltd v Jones
584:Land Registration (Scotland) Act 1979
7:
632:Corporate Bodies' Contracts Act 1960
174:Law Commission of England and Wales
1069:Land Law - Themes and Perspectives
1020:Contracts - Under Hand or by Deed?
25:
33:
602:Land Registers Northern Ireland
47:may be too short to adequately
57:provide an accessible overview
1:
469:Re Vandervellās Trusts (No 2)
122:signed, sealed and delivered
164:rule which required that a
1123:
1063:41 Columbia Law Review 799
803:Bills of Exchange Act 1882
700:41 Columbia Law Review 799
611:
598:Land and Property Services
557:Land Registration Act 2002
546:Land Registration Act 1925
542:Land Registration Act 1862
517:
489:
231:Employment Rights Act 1996
191:
77:Formalities in English law
852:P Mayer and A Pemberton,
724:23 September 2015 at the
477:
465:
455:
443:
431:
419:
409:
397:
385:
375:
363:
349:
337:
323:
308:
294:
280:
224:doctrine of consideration
1039:24 December 2010 at the
863:18 November 2007 at the
791:Consumer Credit Act 1974
648:Royal College of Nursing
548:. It is operated by the
503:Law of Property Act 1925
481:Formality in English law
458:Law of Property Act 1925
389:Rochefoucauld v Boustead
378:Law of Property Act 1925
18:Formality in English law
962:8 December 2009 at the
935:8 February 2010 at the
561:electronic conveyancing
275:Trust formality sources
120:. A document that was "
1026:3 October 2009 at the
1004:8 January 2013 at the
816:Statute of Frauds 1677
426:(1855) 2 K & J 313
344:(1984) 50 P&CR 119
317:[2000] UKPC 46
211:
830:10 March 2012 at the
589:Registers of Scotland
580:Registration Act 1617
565:electronic signatures
401:Bannister v Bannister
201:
176:in their 1987 report
1102:English contract law
910:Text of the 1960 Act
878:Text of the 2006 Act
705:17 June 2019 at the
660:Government Ministers
194:English contract law
81:English contract law
1087:Working Paper No 93
719:Working Paper No 93
604:government agency.
370:(1874) LR 18 Eq 315
1107:English trusts law
985:6 May 2010 at the
930:Companies Act 1989
926:Companies Act 1985
914:legislation.gov.uk
882:legislation.gov.uk
856:(HM Land Registry
646:incorporating the
636:Companies Act 1989
492:English trusts law
380:s 53(1)(b) and (2)
353:Pennington v Waine
283:Companies Act 2006
212:
1008:, paragraph 47(2)
999:BBC Royal Charter
668:Church of England
656:corporations sole
538:England and Wales
524:Land registration
487:
486:
423:Wallgrave v Tebbs
341:Mascall v Mascall
206:, for instance a
178:Deeds and Escrows
74:
73:
16:(Redirected from
1114:
1081:Law Commission,
1071:(OUP 1998) ch 20
1044:
1015:
1009:
996:
990:
977:
971:
950:
944:
923:
917:
906:
900:
891:
885:
874:
868:
850:
844:
841:
835:
812:
806:
800:
794:
788:
782:
779:
773:
770:
764:
758:
752:
749:
743:
735:
729:
715:
709:
696:
624:corporate bodies
594:Northern Ireland
550:HM Land Registry
520:English land law
447:Ottaway v Norman
269:
262:
255:
246:
216:bill of exchange
204:bill of exchange
93:HM Land Registry
69:
66:
60:
37:
29:
21:
1122:
1121:
1117:
1116:
1115:
1113:
1112:
1111:
1092:
1091:
1053:
1048:
1047:
1041:Wayback Machine
1028:Wayback Machine
1016:
1012:
1006:Wayback Machine
997:
993:
987:Wayback Machine
978:
974:
964:Wayback Machine
951:
947:
937:Wayback Machine
924:
920:
908:
907:
903:
892:
888:
875:
871:
865:Wayback Machine
851:
847:
842:
838:
832:Wayback Machine
813:
809:
801:
797:
789:
785:
780:
776:
771:
767:
759:
755:
750:
746:
736:
732:
726:Wayback Machine
716:
712:
707:Wayback Machine
697:
693:
688:
676:
618:With regard to
616:
610:
596:is operated by
532:(excluding the
526:
518:Main articles:
516:
498:
490:Main articles:
488:
483:
473:
461:
451:
439:
427:
415:
405:
393:
381:
371:
359:
345:
333:
319:
304:
290:
276:
273:
243:
196:
190:
109:
97:Companies House
70:
64:
61:
54:
42:This article's
38:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
1120:
1118:
1110:
1109:
1104:
1094:
1093:
1090:
1089:
1078:
1077:
1073:
1072:
1065:
1058:
1057:
1052:
1049:
1046:
1045:
1010:
991:
989:, paragraph 14
972:
945:
918:
901:
886:
869:
845:
836:
807:
795:
783:
774:
765:
753:
751:Law Com No 163
744:
730:
710:
690:
689:
687:
684:
683:
682:
675:
672:
628:Companies Acts
614:UK company law
612:Main article:
609:
606:
534:City of London
515:
512:
508:Wills Act 1837
485:
484:
478:
475:
474:
466:
463:
462:
456:
453:
452:
444:
441:
440:
432:
429:
428:
420:
417:
416:
412:Wills Act 1837
410:
407:
406:
398:
395:
394:
386:
383:
382:
376:
373:
372:
364:
361:
360:
350:
347:
346:
338:
335:
334:
324:
321:
320:
309:
306:
305:
295:
292:
291:
281:
278:
277:
274:
272:
271:
264:
257:
249:
242:
239:
192:Main article:
189:
186:
151:Law Commission
118:authentication
108:
105:
72:
71:
51:the key points
41:
39:
32:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1119:
1108:
1105:
1103:
1100:
1099:
1097:
1088:
1084:
1080:
1079:
1075:
1074:
1070:
1066:
1064:
1060:
1059:
1055:
1054:
1050:
1042:
1038:
1035:
1034:
1029:
1025:
1022:
1021:
1014:
1011:
1007:
1003:
1000:
995:
992:
988:
984:
981:
976:
973:
969:
965:
961:
958:
954:
949:
946:
942:
938:
934:
931:
927:
922:
919:
915:
911:
905:
902:
898:
897:
890:
887:
883:
879:
873:
870:
866:
862:
859:
855:
849:
846:
840:
837:
833:
829:
826:
823:
822:
817:
811:
808:
804:
799:
796:
792:
787:
784:
778:
775:
769:
766:
763:
760:Section 1 of
757:
754:
748:
745:
741:
740:
734:
731:
727:
723:
720:
714:
711:
708:
704:
701:
695:
692:
685:
681:
678:
677:
673:
671:
669:
665:
661:
657:
653:
649:
645:
644:royal charter
640:
637:
633:
629:
625:
621:
615:
607:
605:
603:
599:
595:
591:
590:
585:
581:
577:
572:
570:
566:
562:
558:
553:
551:
547:
543:
539:
535:
531:
525:
521:
513:
511:
509:
504:
497:
493:
482:
476:
471:
470:
464:
459:
454:
449:
448:
442:
437:
436:
430:
425:
424:
418:
413:
408:
403:
402:
396:
391:
390:
384:
379:
374:
369:
368:
367:Strong v Bird
362:
358:
355:
354:
348:
343:
342:
336:
332:
329:
328:
322:
318:
314:
313:
307:
303:
300:
299:
298:Milroy v Lord
293:
288:
284:
279:
270:
265:
263:
258:
256:
251:
250:
247:
240:
238:
236:
232:
227:
225:
221:
217:
209:
205:
200:
195:
187:
185:
183:
179:
175:
171:
167:
163:
158:
156:
152:
147:
145:
144:consideration
141:
140:locus sigilli
137:
133:
132:
127:
123:
119:
115:
106:
104:
100:
98:
94:
90:
86:
82:
78:
68:
58:
52:
50:
45:
40:
36:
31:
30:
27:
19:
1082:
1068:
1032:
1019:
1013:
994:
975:
948:
921:
904:
894:
889:
872:
853:
848:
839:
819:
810:
798:
793:ss 60 and 61
786:
777:
768:
756:
747:
737:
733:
713:
694:
641:
617:
601:
597:
587:
573:
554:
527:
499:
467:
445:
433:
421:
404:2 All ER 133
399:
387:
365:
357:EWCA Civ 227
351:
339:
325:
310:
296:
234:
228:
213:
177:
159:
154:
148:
139:
129:
110:
101:
76:
75:
62:
46:
44:lead section
26:
955:s 350 (see
302:EWHC Ch J78
1096:Categories
1051:References
728:, para 4.2
622:and other
540:under the
460:s 53(1)(c)
435:Re Snowden
331:EWCA Civ 4
285:s 113 and
162:common law
85:trusts law
65:April 2017
620:companies
608:Companies
530:Middlesex
188:Contracts
182:witnessed
49:summarize
1056:Articles
1037:Archived
1024:Archived
1002:Archived
983:Archived
960:Archived
943:ss 44-45
933:Archived
899:1 QB 431
861:Archived
828:Archived
818:s 4 and
722:Archived
703:Archived
674:See also
658:such as
450:2 WLR 50
438:1 Ch 700
392:1 Ch 196
287:LRA 2002
126:embossed
114:wax seal
1085:(1985)
1076:Reports
968:CA 2006
953:CA 1985
941:CA 2006
825:UKHL 17
717:(1985)
666:of the
664:bishops
578:by the
576:Sasines
327:Re Rose
107:History
966:, now
805:s 3(1)
742:Ch 109
582:. The
563:using
472:Ch 269
241:Trusts
208:cheque
131:scroll
970:s 45)
893:e.g.
686:Notes
569:EULIS
315:
138:term
136:Latin
1017:See
876:See
858:2000
814:See
680:seal
555:The
522:and
514:Land
494:and
479:see
220:deed
166:deed
160:The
89:deed
83:and
867:) 6
662:or
652:BBC
414:s 9
289:s 4
99:).
95:or
1098::
916:.
884:.
235:be
226:.
202:A
184:.
153:,
268:e
261:t
254:v
67:)
63:(
53:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
