111:(1415), was written in good faith, although its author may have intended to lend it greater credibility by copying it into the generally much older cartulary. Internal evidence also suggests that the historian was a learned man of the fifteenth, not the twelfth, century. He gives the correct etymology (inconceivable in the twelfth century) of
205:
in Madrid, under Est. 35, grada 4., no. 67. It was compiled in the second half of the twelfth century (perhaps copied largely from a late eleventh-century cartulary), its latest document dating from 1121, though documents of the thirteenth century were added at some point. It contains 126 folios,
89:
is written in a hand of the early fifteenth century. Whoever copied it into the cartulary left only one blank page (folio 104r), which was not sufficient for the whole text, even though the last paragraphs are written in very small letters. The conclusion of the
94:
had to be placed on the bottom half of the previous page (folio 103v), leading José de la Canal to incorrectly begin his edition with the text from folio 103v (which begins
269:
37:
128:
259:
40:, but at least one places its main composition towards 1154. It was first edited and published under the current description by
119:, above mount Arbe) and notes correctly that Ribagorza was called Barbitania in ancient times. He incorrectly asserts that
202:
107:
264:
136:
78:
169:
Ribagorza: noticias y documentos históricos del condado hasta la muerte de Sancho Garcés III (año 1035)
131:. His chronology of the counts of Ribagorza indicates that he had access to the archives of Alaón and
46:
140:
41:
33:
61:
was found is preserved a marginal notice, in a thirteenth-century hand, indicating that a certain
124:
74:
66:
224:
120:
36:. According to most scholars, it was written in the early fifteenth century by a monk of
167:, its date, provenance, authorship, sources, and accuracy see M. Serrano y Sanz (1912),
171:(Madrid: Editorial MAXTOR), 53–56; for an edited text of the Fragmentum, see pp. 56–62.
70:
253:
240:
65:(presbyter and monk) named Domingo wrote this codex during the episcopate of
54:
29:
112:
132:
22:("historical fragment from the cartulary of Alaón"), also called the
135:, and he notifies the reader that the act of consecration of bishop
143:. In his dependence on archival material the anonymous historian
123:
passed on the kingdom of
Sobrarbe and Ribagorza to his son
235:
by the Romans (cf. inscriptions published by P. Fita,
184:(Madrid: Marcial Pons Historia), 84. Its revision, or
28:("revised chronicle of Alaón"), is a short, anonymous
221:
182:Sancho III el Mayor: Rey de Pamplona, Rex Ibericus
239:, IV:214–15), which name is preserved in today's
85:and the first historian of Ribagorza, though the
231:, XV:283–84). Before this the region was called
223:found in the cartulary of Roda (published by
8:
81:inferred that Domingo was the author of the
19:Fragmentum historicum ex cartulario Alaonis
237:Boletín de la Real Academia de la Historia
156:
147:was writing on the cusp of modernity.
73:from 1078 to 1094, during the reign of
206:with one missing between 114 and 115.
7:
139:can be found in the archives of the
188:, may be dated considerably later.
14:
219:was used as late as 1080 in the
108:Canónica de San Pedro de Taberna
105:, unlike the near-contemporary
180:Gonzalo Martínez Díez (2007),
1:
203:Real Academia de la Historia
270:15th-century books in Latin
286:
25:Crónica de Alaón renovada
197:The cartulary of Alaón (
79:Joaquín Traggia Uribarri
260:Medieval texts in Latin
163:For an analysis of the
127:, while in fact it was
201:) is preserved in the
63:presbiter vel monacus
53:On folio 106r of the
199:cartulario de Alaón
141:Cathedral of Urgell
34:County of Ribagorza
96:Adhuc de Episcopis
67:Raimundo Dalmacio
277:
244:
225:Jaime Villanueva
213:
207:
195:
189:
178:
172:
161:
121:Sancho the Great
42:José de la Canal
285:
284:
280:
279:
278:
276:
275:
274:
265:Anonymous works
250:
249:
248:
247:
229:Viage literario
214:
210:
196:
192:
179:
175:
162:
158:
153:
12:
11:
5:
283:
281:
273:
272:
267:
262:
252:
251:
246:
245:
208:
190:
173:
155:
154:
152:
149:
75:Sancho Ramírez
71:Bishop of Roda
50:(46:323–29).
47:España Sagrada
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
282:
271:
268:
266:
263:
261:
258:
257:
255:
242:
238:
234:
230:
226:
222:
218:
212:
209:
204:
200:
194:
191:
187:
183:
177:
174:
170:
166:
160:
157:
150:
148:
146:
142:
138:
134:
130:
126:
122:
118:
114:
110:
109:
104:
99:
97:
93:
88:
84:
80:
77:. From this,
76:
72:
68:
64:
60:
57:in which the
56:
51:
49:
48:
43:
39:
35:
31:
27:
26:
21:
20:
236:
232:
228:
220:
216:
211:
198:
193:
185:
181:
176:
168:
164:
159:
144:
116:
106:
102:
100:
95:
91:
86:
82:
62:
58:
52:
45:
24:
23:
18:
17:
15:
117:super Arbem
254:Categories
186:renovación
165:Fragmentum
151:References
145:Fragmentum
103:Fragmentum
92:Fragmentum
87:Fragmentum
83:Fragmentum
59:Fragmentum
233:Boletania
217:Barbutana
215:The name
55:cartulary
30:chronicle
125:Ramiro I
113:Sobrarbe
241:Boltaña
137:Borrell
129:Gonzalo
32:of the
133:Obarra
115:(from
38:Alaón
101:The
98:).
16:The
44:in
256::
227:,
69:,
243:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.