24:
124:
If someone approached me and asked for a letter sent to the police or a council about a constituent, I would tell them to go away. But there have been cases where the other body can be approached and things slip through the net. I want to make sure this cannot happen. The move would protect
140:
We feel strongly... that the measures contained the bill, which would protect the confidentiality of MPs correspondence on behalf of constituents, are worthy of support We hope you would agree that MPs correspondence on behalf of a constituent to a public authority should remain
131:
Although the government claimed it was neutral on the issue, private members bills rarely pass without government support, leading to claims the executive tacitly supported moves to water down freedom of information legislation. Members of the backbench committee of the
147:
The proposed changes complemented
Government proposals to change the way freedom of information requests are costed. Critics of the changes claimed the intention was to keep embarrassing information secret, rather than to save
331:
125:
constituents and MPs. If an MP writes to their chief constable trying to get off a driving ban - that is totally different. I am flagging up the issue but I expect nothing will happen.
159:
341:
88:
45:
279:
273:
267:
261:
249:
67:
236:
117:
226:
255:
126:
336:
113:
285:
38:
32:
133:
315:
49:
196:
169:
103:
286:
Email from the
Parliamentary Labour Party's Parliamentary Committee urging Labour MPs to support the Bill
162:
178:
106:
84:
91:
in 2007 which failed to become law after a sponsor for the Bill could not be found in the
231:
92:
173:
A full account of the
Parliamentary votes on 20 April 2007 and 18 May is available on
325:
309:
303:
297:
149:
142:
109:
174:
165:
280:
Jack Straw, Leader of the House of
Commons, indicates support for the Bill
158:
The bill was withdrawn after its first reading in the House of Lords.
161:
It seemed to have failed for lack of a sponsor in the House of Lords
112:
introduced the bill to ensure that MPs correspondence is exempt from
136:
had emailed colleagues in support of the bill. The email said:
17:
332:
Freedom of information legislation in the United
Kingdom
138:
122:
8:
81:The Freedom of Information (Amendment) Bill
197:"Freedom of Information (Amendment) Bill"
68:Learn how and when to remove this message
31:This article includes a list of general
188:
89:House of Commons of the United Kingdom
7:
342:Proposed laws of the United Kingdom
237:Campaign for Freedom of Information
37:it lacks sufficient corresponding
14:
310:Opponents fail to block info bill
239:(contains list of news articles).
304:MPs to debate info exemption bid
282:, Business Questions 10 May 2007
22:
298:Blair 'no comment' on info bill
118:Freedom of Information Act 2000
1:
120:. Maclean said of his Bill:
316:MPs approve information law
154:Progress through Parliament
114:freedom of information laws
358:
268:Prime Minister's Questions
134:Parliamentary Labour Party
306:, 27 April 2007, BBC News
300:, 25 April 2007, BBC News
164:and due to the action of
99:Background and rationale
318:, 18 May 2007, Epolitix
312:, 18 May 2007, BBC News
52:more precise citations.
256:Committee stage debate
232:Bill Committee website
145:
129:
250:Second reading debate
244:Parliamentary debates
107:Member of Parliament
85:private members bill
337:2007 in British law
274:Report stage debate
87:introduced to the
258:, 7 February 2007
252:, 19 January 2007
199:. 18 January 2007
78:
77:
70:
349:
209:
208:
206:
204:
193:
73:
66:
62:
59:
53:
48:this article by
39:inline citations
26:
25:
18:
357:
356:
352:
351:
350:
348:
347:
346:
322:
321:
294:
276:, 20 April 2007
270:, 25 April 2007
264:, 20 April 2007
246:
223:
218:
216:Further reading
213:
212:
202:
200:
195:
194:
190:
185:
156:
101:
74:
63:
57:
54:
44:Please help to
43:
27:
23:
12:
11:
5:
355:
353:
345:
344:
339:
334:
324:
323:
320:
319:
313:
307:
301:
293:
290:
289:
288:
283:
277:
271:
265:
262:Commons debate
259:
253:
245:
242:
241:
240:
234:
229:
222:
219:
217:
214:
211:
210:
187:
186:
184:
181:
155:
152:
100:
97:
93:House of Lords
76:
75:
30:
28:
21:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
354:
343:
340:
338:
335:
333:
330:
329:
327:
317:
314:
311:
308:
305:
302:
299:
296:
295:
292:News articles
291:
287:
284:
281:
278:
275:
272:
269:
266:
263:
260:
257:
254:
251:
248:
247:
243:
238:
235:
233:
230:
228:
225:
224:
220:
215:
198:
192:
189:
182:
180:
179:
176:
171:
170:
167:
163:
160:
153:
151:
150:
144:
143:
141:confidential.
137:
135:
128:
127:
121:
119:
115:
111:
110:David Maclean
108:
105:
98:
96:
94:
90:
86:
82:
72:
69:
61:
58:December 2018
51:
47:
41:
40:
34:
29:
20:
19:
16:
227:Bill tracker
201:. Retrieved
191:
172:
157:
146:
139:
130:
123:
116:such as the
104:Conservative
102:
80:
79:
64:
55:
36:
15:
203:10 February
175:Public Whip
50:introducing
326:Categories
183:References
166:Jack Straw
33:references
221:The bill
46:improve
148:money.
83:was a
35:, but
205:2015
328::
168:.
95:.
207:.
177:.
71:)
65:(
60:)
56:(
42:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.