Knowledge

Gabelli v. SEC

Source 📝

31: 323:, alleging the firm made secret agreements with Headstart Advisers Ltd concerning Headstart's investment in a mutual fund managed by Gabelli. Headstart realized large profits at the expense of Gabelli's remaining investors, and the SEC argued that Gabelli's actions violated the 327:. Gabelli and Alpert sought dismissal of the case, arguing the SEC lawsuit came after the five year statute of limitations expired. In response, the SEC argued that under the discovery rule, the statute had not expired when the case was filed. 344:
once the plaintiff becomes aware of the fraud, applies only to victims of the fraud itself. Government regulatory agencies are subject to the standard rule, which initiates the standard of limitations upon the perpetration of the
339:
ruled against the federal government's argument that the discovery rule determined the statute of limitations for filing the fraud lawsuit. Roberts' opinion explained that the discovery rule, which starts the
538: 362: 553: 468: 390: 350: 148: 79: 349:. Under this earlier threshold, the SEC missed the five-year deadline to file suit against Gabelli. The Supreme Court's decision reversed the earlier decision of the 533: 411: 548: 434: 316: 295: 277: 35: 543: 180:
The statute of limitations for filing civil penalty actions initiates when the offending act is committed. Reversed and remanded.
121: 515: 324: 341: 299: 472: 394: 152: 74: 488: 223: 438: 479: 302:
for filing civil penalty actions initiates when the offending act is committed or finished.
435:"Supreme Court Clarifies Federal Statute of Limitations And Restricts Civil Penalty Actions" 239: 215: 211: 102: 497: 397: 227: 203: 63: 527: 320: 336: 235: 195: 136: 281: 412:"Opinion analysis: That which does not kill the SEC may make the agency stronger" 247: 167: 144: 90: 86: 506: 129: 140: 125: 346: 133: 30: 363:
2012 term opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States
539:
United States Supreme Court cases of the Roberts Court
319:
filed suit against Bruce Alpert and Marc Gabelli of
54:
Gabelli et al. v. Securities and Exchange Commission
271: 260: 255: 184: 174: 159: 113: 108: 98: 69: 59: 49: 42: 23: 554:U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission litigation 353:, and the case was remanded to the lower courts. 8: 20: 382: 380: 378: 516:Supreme Court (slip opinion) (archived) 374: 335:In a unanimous decision, Chief Justice 298:case in which the Court ruled that the 410:Macey, Jonathan (February 28, 2013). 18:2013 United States Supreme Court case 7: 317:Securities and Exchange Commission 36:Supreme Court of the United States 14: 534:United States Supreme Court cases 475:442 (2013) is available from: 437:. Ice Miller LLP. Archived from 29: 549:2013 in United States case law 132:Mar. 17, 2010); reversed, 653 1: 294:, 568 U.S. 442 (2013), was a 296:United States Supreme Court 570: 507:Oyez (oral argument audio) 276: 189: 179: 45:Decided February 27, 2013 28: 544:Statutes of limitations 325:Investment Advisers Act 342:statute of limitations 300:statute of limitations 93:1861; 81 U.S.L.W. 4142 43:Argued January 8, 2013 85:133 S. Ct. 1216; 185 441:on October 20, 2013 264:Roberts, joined by 224:Ruth Bader Ginsburg 321:Gabelli Funds, LLC 200:Associate Justices 287: 286: 170:32 (2d Cir. 2013) 122:No. 1:08-cv-03868 561: 520: 514: 511: 505: 502: 496: 493: 487: 484: 478: 451: 450: 448: 446: 433:Dimond, Thomas. 430: 424: 423: 421: 419: 407: 401: 384: 185:Court membership 33: 32: 21: 569: 568: 564: 563: 562: 560: 559: 558: 524: 523: 518: 512: 509: 503: 500: 494: 491: 485: 482: 476: 460: 455: 454: 444: 442: 432: 431: 427: 417: 415: 409: 408: 404: 385: 376: 371: 359: 333: 313: 308: 240:Sonia Sotomayor 238: 226: 216:Clarence Thomas 214: 212:Anthony Kennedy 155:968 (2012). 94: 44: 38: 19: 12: 11: 5: 567: 565: 557: 556: 551: 546: 541: 536: 526: 525: 522: 521: 489:Google Scholar 465:Gabelli v. SEC 459: 458:External links 456: 453: 452: 425: 402: 387:Gabelli v. SEC 373: 372: 370: 367: 366: 365: 358: 355: 351:Second Circuit 332: 329: 312: 309: 307: 304: 291:Gabelli v. SEC 285: 284: 278:28 U.S.C. 274: 273: 269: 268: 262: 258: 257: 253: 252: 251: 250: 228:Stephen Breyer 204:Antonin Scalia 201: 198: 193: 187: 186: 182: 181: 177: 176: 172: 171: 164:SEC v. Gabelli 161: 157: 156: 118:SEC v. Gabelli 115: 111: 110: 106: 105: 100: 96: 95: 84: 71: 67: 66: 61: 57: 56: 51: 50:Full case name 47: 46: 40: 39: 34: 26: 25: 24:Gabelli v. SEC 17: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 566: 555: 552: 550: 547: 545: 542: 540: 537: 535: 532: 531: 529: 517: 508: 499: 490: 481: 480:CourtListener 474: 470: 466: 462: 461: 457: 440: 436: 429: 426: 413: 406: 403: 399: 396: 392: 388: 383: 381: 379: 375: 368: 364: 361: 360: 356: 354: 352: 348: 343: 338: 330: 328: 326: 322: 318: 310: 305: 303: 301: 297: 293: 292: 283: 279: 275: 270: 267: 263: 259: 254: 249: 245: 241: 237: 233: 229: 225: 221: 217: 213: 209: 205: 202: 199: 197: 194: 192:Chief Justice 191: 190: 188: 183: 178: 173: 169: 165: 162: 158: 154: 150: 146: 142: 138: 135: 131: 127: 123: 119: 116: 112: 107: 104: 103:Oral argument 101: 97: 92: 88: 82: 81: 76: 72: 68: 65: 62: 58: 55: 52: 48: 41: 37: 27: 22: 16: 464: 443:. Retrieved 439:the original 428: 416:. Retrieved 414:. SCOTUSblog 405: 400: (2013). 386: 337:John Roberts 334: 314: 290: 289: 288: 272:Laws applied 265: 256:Case opinion 243: 236:Samuel Alito 231: 219: 207: 196:John Roberts 163: 117: 109:Case history 78: 53: 15: 445:October 19, 418:October 19, 282:§ 2462 248:Elena Kagan 147:. granted, 528:Categories 369:References 306:Court case 160:Subsequent 91:U.S. LEXIS 89:297; 2013 60:Docket no. 266:unanimous 128:1253603 ( 87:L. Ed. 2d 70:Citations 463:Text of 357:See also 261:Majority 168:F. App'x 130:S.D.N.Y. 99:Argument 175:Holding 143:2011); 141:2d Cir. 124:, 2010 64:11-1274 519:  513:  510:  504:  501:  498:Justia 495:  492:  486:  483:  477:  389:, 331:Ruling 280:  246: 244:· 242:  234: 232:· 230:  222: 220:· 218:  210: 208:· 206:  166:, 518 471: 393: 347:fraud 151: 114:Prior 77:442 ( 473:U.S. 447:2013 420:2013 395:U.S. 315:The 311:Suit 153:U.S. 145:cert 134:F.3d 80:more 75:U.S. 73:568 469:568 398:442 391:568 149:567 530:: 467:, 377:^ 137:49 126:WL 120:, 449:. 422:. 139:( 83:)

Index

Supreme Court of the United States
11-1274
U.S.
more
L. Ed. 2d
U.S. LEXIS
Oral argument
No. 1:08-cv-03868
WL
S.D.N.Y.
F.3d
49
2d Cir.
cert
567
U.S.
F. App'x
John Roberts
Antonin Scalia
Anthony Kennedy
Clarence Thomas
Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Stephen Breyer
Samuel Alito
Sonia Sotomayor
Elena Kagan
28 U.S.C.
§ 2462
United States Supreme Court
statute of limitations

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.