Knowledge (XXG)

Garza v. Idaho

Source 📝

31: 241:
In 2015, petitioner Gilberto Garza, Jr. signed two plea agreements which required him to waive his right to appeal. After sentencing, Garza informed his trial counsel of his wish to appeal. Due to the appeal waivers signed by Garza, counsel declined to file a notice of appeal. After the time period
292:
Justice Thomas, joined by Gorsuch and joined in part by Alito, filed a dissenting opinion which held that the defense acted reasonably by refusing to file an appeal. The dissent argued that the majority's opinion creates a "defendant-always-wins" rule that has no basis in previous case law or the
269:
presented oral argument for Garza before the Supreme Court, with Ken Jorgensen and Alon Kedem representing the State of Idaho and United States, respectively. The Court announced its judgment in favor of the petitioner on February 27, 2019, with the court reversing and remanding by a vote of 6–3.
1863: 284:, the Supreme Court held that a defendant claiming ineffective assistance of counsel must prove counsel's representation fell below an objective standard of reasonableness and such deficiency was prejudicial to the defense. 1858: 308: 449: 396: 79: 278:
The majority opinion, written by Sotomayor and joined by Roberts, Ginsburg, Breyer, Kagan, and Kavanaugh, held that Garza's trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance. In
534: 422: 230: 212: 1785: 1878: 1873: 1819: 525: 336: 1868: 367: 1626: 918: 1399: 830: 680: 35: 1585: 243: 1546: 1447: 414: 299:(1963, guaranteeing poor defendants a right to a lawyer in state criminal cases) was wrongly decided and should be overruled. 1260: 1097: 1062: 838: 1428: 518: 1284: 977: 854: 763: 1490: 803: 795: 1379: 1172: 950: 787: 699: 560: 1765: 1594: 1573: 1276: 1180: 942: 926: 902: 707: 576: 280: 1634: 1354: 1196: 1081: 1054: 1046: 886: 731: 511: 63: 1538: 1308: 1228: 894: 846: 664: 247: 1795: 1650: 1610: 1514: 870: 739: 453: 400: 328: 74: 266: 747: 1674: 1618: 1506: 1498: 1300: 1153: 878: 584: 295: 293:
Sixth Amendment. Part III of Thomas' dissent, joined by Gorsuch but not Alito, suggests the landmark
469: 1803: 1706: 1522: 1391: 1252: 1244: 1236: 985: 723: 672: 548: 251: 141: 242:
to file an appeal lapsed, Garza filed a petition for state post-conviction relief on the basis of
1827: 1773: 1698: 1666: 1554: 1407: 1268: 1132: 1017: 1009: 779: 771: 626: 496: 359: 1690: 1682: 1530: 1474: 1466: 1335: 1212: 1089: 1025: 1001: 993: 822: 1811: 1730: 1658: 1602: 1316: 1188: 934: 226: 478: 392: 1220: 1204: 1037: 862: 568: 177: 157: 133: 503: 460: 1722: 1714: 1482: 969: 755: 145: 329:"US Supreme Court sides with inmate on appeals case, overturning Idaho court's ruling" 1852: 1738: 1292: 910: 715: 1642: 618: 605: 233:
purposes applies regardless of whether a defendant has waived the right to appeal.
169: 153: 125: 165: 258:
does not apply when the defendant has agreed to waive the right to appeal.
487: 94: 110:
applies regardless of whether a defendant has waived the right to appeal.
1864:
United States Sixth Amendment ineffective assistance of counsel case law
254:
affirmed, concluding that the presumption of prejudice as recognized in
194:
Sotomayor, joined by Roberts, Ginsburg, Breyer, Kagan, Kavanaugh
1426: 1377: 1151: 1120: 645: 603: 546: 507: 225:, 586 U.S. ___, 139 S. Ct. 738 (2019), was a case in which the 30: 54:
Gilberto Garza Jr., Petitioner, v. State of Idaho, Respondent.
309:
2018 term opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States
415:"Precedent, Meet Clarence Thomas. You May Not Get Along" 1859:
United States Supreme Court cases of the Roberts Court
1784: 1757: 1584: 1565: 1458: 1439: 1346: 1327: 1164: 1073: 1036: 961: 814: 691: 656: 206: 198: 190: 185: 114: 100: 90: 69: 59: 49: 42: 23: 202:Thomas, joined by Gorsuch; Alito (Parts I and II) 106:The presumption of prejudice as recognized in 519: 8: 229:held that the presumption of prejudice for 1436: 1423: 1374: 1161: 1148: 1117: 653: 642: 600: 543: 526: 512: 504: 20: 1820:Martinez v. Court of Appeal of California 246:. The trial court denied relief and the 319: 1879:United States plea bargaining case law 425:from the original on October 16, 2019 370:from the original on October 24, 2019 339:from the original on October 31, 2020 327:Davlin, Melissa (February 28, 2019). 18:2019 United States Supreme Court case 7: 919:Southern Union Co. v. United States 1400:United States v. Valenzuela-Bernal 831:Almendarez-Torres v. United States 681:Blanton v. City of North Las Vegas 36:Supreme Court of the United States 14: 1874:United States Supreme Court cases 1347:Restrictions on cross-examination 456:___ (2019) is available from: 244:ineffective assistance of counsel 29: 1448:United States v. Gonzalez-Lopez 358:Neily, Clark; Schweikert, Jay. 1869:2019 in United States case law 1261:Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts 764:Rosales-Lopez v. United States 413:Liptak, Adam (March 4, 2019). 1: 535:United States Sixth Amendment 1429:Assistance of Counsel Clause 497:Supreme Court (slip opinion) 978:Rassmussen v. United States 227:United States Supreme Court 1895: 1328:Face-to-face confrontation 1098:Peña-Rodriguez v. Colorado 796:McDonnell v. United States 488:Oyez (oral argument audio) 1435: 1422: 1386: 1380:Compulsory Process Clause 1373: 1173:Reynolds v. United States 1160: 1147: 1127: 1116: 951:Erlinger v. United States 804:United States v. Tsarnaev 788:Skilling v. United States 700:Reynolds v. United States 652: 641: 613: 599: 561:Klopfer v. North Carolina 555: 542: 211: 119: 105: 45:Decided February 27, 2019 28: 1766:Massiah v. United States 1595:Strickland v. Washington 1574:Glasser v. United States 1547:Nichols v. United States 1277:Bullcoming v. New Mexico 1181:Dowdell v. United States 943:United States v. Haymond 927:Alleyne v. United States 903:Cunningham v. California 708:Glasser v. United States 577:Doggett v. United States 281:Strickland v. Washington 1635:Glover v. United States 1355:Chambers v. Mississippi 1197:Bruton v. United States 1165:Out-of-court statements 1082:Tanner v. United States 1074:Impeachment of verdicts 1055:Burton v. United States 1047:United States v. Dawson 887:United States v. Booker 855:Harris v. United States 732:Witherspoon v. Illinois 43:Argued October 30, 2018 1758:Uncounseled statements 1586:Ineffective assistance 1539:Pennsylvania v. Finley 1309:Samia v. United States 1229:Crawford v. Washington 1063:Smith v. United States 895:Washington v. Recuenco 847:Apprendi v. New Jersey 839:Jones v. United States 665:Cheff v. Schnackenberg 248:Idaho Court of Appeals 1796:Faretta v. California 1651:Woodford v. Visciotti 1611:Kimmelman v. Morrison 1515:Argersinger v. Hamlin 871:Blakely v. Washington 740:Ham v. South Carolina 647:Impartial Jury Clause 213:U.S. Const. Amend. VI 1675:Wright v. Van Patten 1619:Lockhart v. Fretwell 1507:Anders v. California 1499:Gideon v. Wainwright 1301:Hemphill v. New York 1285:Williams v. Illinois 1154:Confrontation Clause 879:Schriro v. Summerlin 585:Betterman v. Montana 296:Gideon v. Wainwright 274:Opinion of the Court 256:Roe v. Flores-Ortega 108:Roe v. Flores-Ortega 1804:McKaskle v. Wiggins 1707:Padilla v. Kentucky 1523:Gagnon v. Scarpelli 1491:Hamilton v. Alabama 1392:Washington v. Texas 1253:Giles v. California 1245:Whorton v. Bockting 1237:Davis v. Washington 986:Williams v. Florida 724:Sheppard v. Maxwell 673:Duncan v. Louisiana 549:Speedy Trial Clause 252:Idaho Supreme Court 142:Ruth Bader Ginsburg 1828:Indiana v. Edwards 1774:Brewer v. Williams 1699:Porter v. McCollum 1667:Holland v. Jackson 1627:Williams v. Taylor 1555:Alabama v. Shelton 1408:Taylor v. Illinois 1269:Michigan v. Bryant 1133:Rabe v. Washington 1122:Information Clause 1018:Ramos v. Louisiana 1010:Burch v. Louisiana 962:Size and unanimity 780:Morgan v. Illinois 772:Wainwright v. Witt 627:Presley v. Georgia 419:The New York Times 130:Associate Justices 1846: 1845: 1842: 1841: 1838: 1837: 1691:Wong v. Belmontes 1683:Bobby v. Van Hook 1531:Scott v. Illinois 1475:Johnson v. Zerbst 1467:Powell v. Alabama 1418: 1417: 1369: 1368: 1365: 1364: 1336:Maryland v. Craig 1213:Illinois v. Allen 1143: 1142: 1112: 1111: 1108: 1107: 1090:Warger v. Shauers 1026:Edwards v. Vannoy 1002:Ballew v. Georgia 994:Apodaca v. Oregon 823:Walton v. Arizona 637: 636: 595: 594: 218: 217: 1886: 1812:Rock v. Arkansas 1731:Lafler v. Cooper 1659:Wiggins v. Smith 1603:Nix v. Whiteside 1437: 1424: 1375: 1317:Smith v. Arizona 1189:Pointer v. Texas 1162: 1149: 1118: 935:Hurst v. Florida 748:Ristaino v. Ross 654: 643: 601: 544: 528: 521: 514: 505: 501: 495: 492: 486: 483: 477: 474: 468: 465: 459: 435: 434: 432: 430: 410: 404: 386: 380: 379: 377: 375: 360:"Garza v. Idaho" 355: 349: 348: 346: 344: 324: 115:Court membership 33: 32: 21: 1894: 1893: 1889: 1888: 1887: 1885: 1884: 1883: 1849: 1848: 1847: 1834: 1780: 1753: 1580: 1561: 1454: 1431: 1414: 1382: 1361: 1342: 1323: 1221:Ohio v. Roberts 1205:Frazier v. Cupp 1156: 1139: 1123: 1104: 1069: 1038:Vicinage Clause 1032: 957: 863:Ring v. Arizona 810: 687: 648: 633: 609: 591: 569:Barker v. Wingo 551: 538: 532: 499: 493: 490: 484: 481: 475: 472: 466: 463: 457: 443: 438: 428: 426: 412: 411: 407: 403:___ (2018). 387: 383: 373: 371: 357: 356: 352: 342: 340: 333:Idaho Statesman 326: 325: 321: 317: 305: 290: 276: 264: 239: 231:Sixth Amendment 178:Brett Kavanaugh 168: 158:Sonia Sotomayor 156: 144: 134:Clarence Thomas 86: 44: 38: 19: 12: 11: 5: 1892: 1890: 1882: 1881: 1876: 1871: 1866: 1861: 1851: 1850: 1844: 1843: 1840: 1839: 1836: 1835: 1833: 1832: 1824: 1816: 1808: 1800: 1791: 1789: 1788:representation 1782: 1781: 1779: 1778: 1770: 1761: 1759: 1755: 1754: 1752: 1751: 1747:Garza v. Idaho 1743: 1735: 1727: 1723:Premo v. Moore 1719: 1715:Sears v. Upton 1711: 1703: 1695: 1687: 1679: 1671: 1663: 1655: 1647: 1639: 1631: 1623: 1615: 1607: 1599: 1590: 1588: 1582: 1581: 1579: 1578: 1569: 1567: 1563: 1562: 1560: 1559: 1551: 1543: 1535: 1527: 1519: 1511: 1503: 1495: 1487: 1483:Betts v. Brady 1479: 1471: 1462: 1460: 1456: 1455: 1453: 1452: 1443: 1441: 1433: 1432: 1427: 1420: 1419: 1416: 1415: 1413: 1412: 1404: 1396: 1387: 1384: 1383: 1378: 1371: 1370: 1367: 1366: 1363: 1362: 1360: 1359: 1350: 1348: 1344: 1343: 1341: 1340: 1331: 1329: 1325: 1324: 1322: 1321: 1313: 1305: 1297: 1289: 1281: 1273: 1265: 1257: 1249: 1241: 1233: 1225: 1217: 1209: 1201: 1193: 1185: 1177: 1168: 1166: 1158: 1157: 1152: 1145: 1144: 1141: 1140: 1138: 1137: 1128: 1125: 1124: 1121: 1114: 1113: 1110: 1109: 1106: 1105: 1103: 1102: 1094: 1086: 1077: 1075: 1071: 1070: 1068: 1067: 1059: 1051: 1042: 1040: 1034: 1033: 1031: 1030: 1022: 1014: 1006: 998: 990: 982: 974: 970:Maxwell v. Dow 965: 963: 959: 958: 956: 955: 947: 939: 931: 923: 915: 907: 899: 891: 883: 875: 867: 859: 851: 843: 835: 827: 818: 816: 812: 811: 809: 808: 800: 792: 784: 776: 768: 760: 756:Adams v. Texas 752: 744: 736: 728: 720: 712: 704: 695: 693: 689: 688: 686: 685: 677: 669: 660: 658: 650: 649: 646: 639: 638: 635: 634: 632: 631: 623: 614: 611: 610: 604: 597: 596: 593: 592: 590: 589: 581: 573: 565: 556: 553: 552: 547: 540: 539: 533: 531: 530: 523: 516: 508: 470:Google Scholar 447:Garza v. Idaho 442: 441:External links 439: 437: 436: 405: 389:Garza v. Idaho 381: 364:Cato Institute 350: 318: 316: 313: 312: 311: 304: 301: 289: 286: 275: 272: 263: 260: 250:affirmed. The 238: 235: 222:Garza v. Idaho 216: 215: 209: 208: 204: 203: 200: 196: 195: 192: 188: 187: 183: 182: 181: 180: 146:Stephen Breyer 131: 128: 123: 117: 116: 112: 111: 103: 102: 98: 97: 92: 88: 87: 85:139 S. Ct. 738 84: 71: 67: 66: 61: 57: 56: 51: 50:Full case name 47: 46: 40: 39: 34: 26: 25: 24:Garza v. Idaho 17: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1891: 1880: 1877: 1875: 1872: 1870: 1867: 1865: 1862: 1860: 1857: 1856: 1854: 1830: 1829: 1825: 1822: 1821: 1817: 1814: 1813: 1809: 1806: 1805: 1801: 1798: 1797: 1793: 1792: 1790: 1787: 1783: 1776: 1775: 1771: 1768: 1767: 1763: 1762: 1760: 1756: 1749: 1748: 1744: 1741: 1740: 1739:Buck v. Davis 1736: 1733: 1732: 1728: 1725: 1724: 1720: 1717: 1716: 1712: 1709: 1708: 1704: 1701: 1700: 1696: 1693: 1692: 1688: 1685: 1684: 1680: 1677: 1676: 1672: 1669: 1668: 1664: 1661: 1660: 1656: 1653: 1652: 1648: 1645: 1644: 1640: 1637: 1636: 1632: 1629: 1628: 1624: 1621: 1620: 1616: 1613: 1612: 1608: 1605: 1604: 1600: 1597: 1596: 1592: 1591: 1589: 1587: 1583: 1576: 1575: 1571: 1570: 1568: 1566:Conflict-free 1564: 1557: 1556: 1552: 1549: 1548: 1544: 1541: 1540: 1536: 1533: 1532: 1528: 1525: 1524: 1520: 1517: 1516: 1512: 1509: 1508: 1504: 1501: 1500: 1496: 1493: 1492: 1488: 1485: 1484: 1480: 1477: 1476: 1472: 1469: 1468: 1464: 1463: 1461: 1457: 1450: 1449: 1445: 1444: 1442: 1438: 1434: 1430: 1425: 1421: 1410: 1409: 1405: 1402: 1401: 1397: 1394: 1393: 1389: 1388: 1385: 1381: 1376: 1372: 1357: 1356: 1352: 1351: 1349: 1345: 1338: 1337: 1333: 1332: 1330: 1326: 1319: 1318: 1314: 1311: 1310: 1306: 1303: 1302: 1298: 1295: 1294: 1293:Ohio v. Clark 1290: 1287: 1286: 1282: 1279: 1278: 1274: 1271: 1270: 1266: 1263: 1262: 1258: 1255: 1254: 1250: 1247: 1246: 1242: 1239: 1238: 1234: 1231: 1230: 1226: 1223: 1222: 1218: 1215: 1214: 1210: 1207: 1206: 1202: 1199: 1198: 1194: 1191: 1190: 1186: 1183: 1182: 1178: 1175: 1174: 1170: 1169: 1167: 1163: 1159: 1155: 1150: 1146: 1135: 1134: 1130: 1129: 1126: 1119: 1115: 1100: 1099: 1095: 1092: 1091: 1087: 1084: 1083: 1079: 1078: 1076: 1072: 1065: 1064: 1060: 1057: 1056: 1052: 1049: 1048: 1044: 1043: 1041: 1039: 1035: 1028: 1027: 1023: 1020: 1019: 1015: 1012: 1011: 1007: 1004: 1003: 999: 996: 995: 991: 988: 987: 983: 980: 979: 975: 972: 971: 967: 966: 964: 960: 953: 952: 948: 945: 944: 940: 937: 936: 932: 929: 928: 924: 921: 920: 916: 913: 912: 911:Oregon v. Ice 908: 905: 904: 900: 897: 896: 892: 889: 888: 884: 881: 880: 876: 873: 872: 868: 865: 864: 860: 857: 856: 852: 849: 848: 844: 841: 840: 836: 833: 832: 828: 825: 824: 820: 819: 817: 813: 806: 805: 801: 798: 797: 793: 790: 789: 785: 782: 781: 777: 774: 773: 769: 766: 765: 761: 758: 757: 753: 750: 749: 745: 742: 741: 737: 734: 733: 729: 726: 725: 721: 718: 717: 716:Irvin v. Dowd 713: 710: 709: 705: 702: 701: 697: 696: 694: 690: 683: 682: 678: 675: 674: 670: 667: 666: 662: 661: 659: 655: 651: 644: 640: 629: 628: 624: 621: 620: 616: 615: 612: 607: 602: 598: 587: 586: 582: 579: 578: 574: 571: 570: 566: 563: 562: 558: 557: 554: 550: 545: 541: 536: 529: 524: 522: 517: 515: 510: 509: 506: 502: 498: 489: 480: 471: 462: 455: 451: 448: 440: 424: 420: 416: 409: 406: 402: 398: 394: 390: 385: 382: 369: 365: 361: 354: 351: 338: 334: 330: 323: 320: 314: 310: 307: 306: 302: 300: 298: 297: 287: 285: 283: 282: 273: 271: 268: 261: 259: 257: 253: 249: 245: 236: 234: 232: 228: 224: 223: 214: 210: 205: 201: 197: 193: 189: 186:Case opinions 184: 179: 175: 171: 167: 163: 159: 155: 151: 147: 143: 139: 135: 132: 129: 127: 124: 122:Chief Justice 121: 120: 118: 113: 109: 104: 99: 96: 95:Oral argument 93: 89: 82: 81: 76: 72: 68: 65: 62: 58: 55: 52: 48: 41: 37: 27: 22: 16: 1826: 1818: 1810: 1802: 1794: 1772: 1764: 1746: 1745: 1737: 1729: 1721: 1713: 1705: 1697: 1689: 1681: 1673: 1665: 1657: 1649: 1643:Bell v. Cone 1641: 1633: 1625: 1617: 1609: 1601: 1593: 1572: 1553: 1545: 1537: 1529: 1521: 1513: 1505: 1497: 1489: 1481: 1473: 1465: 1446: 1406: 1398: 1390: 1353: 1334: 1315: 1307: 1299: 1291: 1283: 1275: 1267: 1259: 1251: 1243: 1235: 1227: 1219: 1211: 1203: 1195: 1187: 1179: 1171: 1131: 1096: 1088: 1080: 1061: 1058:(1905, 1906) 1053: 1045: 1024: 1016: 1008: 1000: 992: 984: 976: 968: 949: 941: 933: 925: 917: 909: 901: 893: 885: 877: 869: 861: 853: 845: 837: 829: 821: 802: 794: 786: 778: 770: 762: 754: 746: 738: 730: 722: 714: 706: 698: 692:Impartiality 679: 671: 663: 657:Availability 625: 619:In re Oliver 617: 606:Public Trial 583: 575: 567: 559: 446: 444: 429:December 11, 427:. Retrieved 418: 408: 388: 384: 372:. Retrieved 363: 353: 341:. Retrieved 332: 322: 294: 291: 279: 277: 265: 255: 240: 221: 220: 219: 207:Laws applied 173: 170:Neil Gorsuch 161: 154:Samuel Alito 149: 137: 126:John Roberts 107: 78: 53: 15: 1459:Appointment 815:Facts found 374:October 24, 343:October 24, 166:Elena Kagan 1853:Categories 391:, No. 315:References 237:Background 60:Docket no. 70:Citations 537:case law 445:Text of 423:Archived 368:Archived 337:Archived 303:See also 267:Amir Ali 191:Majority 91:Argument 461:Cornell 393:17-1026 288:Dissent 262:Opinion 199:Dissent 101:Holding 64:17-1026 1831:(2008) 1823:(2000) 1815:(1987) 1807:(1984) 1799:(1975) 1786:Pro se 1777:(1977) 1769:(1963) 1750:(2019) 1742:(2017) 1734:(2012) 1726:(2011) 1718:(2010) 1710:(2010) 1702:(2009) 1694:(2009) 1686:(2009) 1678:(2008) 1670:(2004) 1662:(2003) 1654:(2002) 1646:(2002) 1638:(2001) 1630:(2000) 1622:(1993) 1614:(1986) 1606:(1986) 1598:(1984) 1577:(1942) 1558:(2002) 1550:(1994) 1542:(1987) 1534:(1979) 1526:(1973) 1518:(1972) 1510:(1967) 1502:(1963) 1494:(1961) 1486:(1942) 1478:(1938) 1470:(1932) 1451:(2006) 1440:Choice 1411:(1988) 1403:(1982) 1395:(1967) 1358:(1973) 1339:(1990) 1320:(2024) 1312:(2023) 1304:(2022) 1296:(2015) 1288:(2012) 1280:(2011) 1272:(2011) 1264:(2009) 1256:(2008) 1248:(2007) 1240:(2006) 1232:(2004) 1224:(1980) 1216:(1970) 1208:(1969) 1200:(1968) 1192:(1965) 1184:(1911) 1176:(1878) 1136:(1972) 1101:(2017) 1093:(2014) 1085:(1987) 1066:(2023) 1050:(1853) 1029:(2021) 1021:(2020) 1013:(1979) 1005:(1978) 997:(1972) 989:(1970) 981:(1905) 973:(1900) 954:(2024) 946:(2019) 938:(2016) 930:(2013) 922:(2012) 914:(2009) 906:(2007) 898:(2006) 890:(2005) 882:(2004) 874:(2004) 866:(2002) 858:(2002) 850:(2000) 842:(1999) 834:(1998) 826:(1990) 807:(2022) 799:(2016) 791:(2010) 783:(1992) 775:(1985) 767:(1981) 759:(1980) 751:(1976) 743:(1973) 735:(1968) 727:(1966) 719:(1961) 711:(1942) 703:(1878) 684:(1989) 676:(1968) 668:(1966) 630:(2010) 622:(1948) 608:Clause 588:(2016) 580:(1992) 572:(1972) 564:(1967) 500:  494:  491:  485:  482:  479:Justia 476:  473:  467:  464:  458:  395:, 176: 174:· 172:  164: 162:· 160:  152: 150:· 148:  140: 138:· 136:  452: 399: 77:___ ( 454:U.S. 431:2019 401:U.S. 376:2019 345:2019 80:more 75:U.S. 73:586 450:586 397:586 1855:: 421:. 417:. 366:. 362:. 335:. 331:. 527:e 520:t 513:v 433:. 378:. 347:. 83:)

Index

Supreme Court of the United States
17-1026
U.S.
more
Oral argument
John Roberts
Clarence Thomas
Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Stephen Breyer
Samuel Alito
Sonia Sotomayor
Elena Kagan
Neil Gorsuch
Brett Kavanaugh
U.S. Const. Amend. VI
United States Supreme Court
Sixth Amendment
ineffective assistance of counsel
Idaho Court of Appeals
Idaho Supreme Court
Amir Ali
Strickland v. Washington
Gideon v. Wainwright
2018 term opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States
"US Supreme Court sides with inmate on appeals case, overturning Idaho court's ruling"
Archived
"Garza v. Idaho"
Archived
17-1026
586

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.