Knowledge

Gazzi-Dickinson method

Source 📝

20: 99:. A minimum of 300 representative points (preferably 500 points) should be used to perform the count. On each randomly selected point that lands on a sand grain, the operator must determine the make-up of the area chosen, i.e. whether it is a 256:
Ingersoll, R.V., Bulard, T.F., Ford, R.L., Grimn, J.P., Pickle, J.P., Sares, S.W., 1984, "The effect of grain size on detrital modes: a test of the Gazzi-Dickinson Point Counting method": Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, 54,
170:
sand, when point counted with these two methods would yield drastically different results. A QFR-style count would be rich in rock fragments, whereas a Gazzi-Dickinson point count would show the sand rich in
228:
Dickinson, W.R., 1985, "Interpreting provenance relation from detrital modes of sandstones", in Zuffa, G.G. (ed.), Provenance of Arenites: NATO ASI Series, C 148, D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht,
247:
Graham, S.A., Dickinson, W.R., and Ingersoll, R.V., 1975, "Himalayan-Bengal Model for Flysch Dispersal in Appalachian-Ouachita system", Geological Society of America Bulletin, vol. 86, pp. 273–286.
179:. Proponents of the Indiana University method would say that information is lost by not counting rock fragments. Proponents of Gazzi-Dickinson point counting would say that small changes in 115:) grains are counted, or non-framework grains are counted and then excluded from percentages when using descriptive devices such as QFL triangles. This can create problems with 23:
A sand grain that could be used for the Gazzi-Dickinson method. Scale box in millimeters, plane-polarized light on top, cross-polarized light on bottom. Landing on the large
31:(center, clear in plane light, orange in cross-polarized light) would count as a mineral grain in the Gazzi-Dickinson method because it is sand-sized. Landing on the 210:
Gazzi, P., 1966, "Le Arenarie del Flysch Sopracretaceo dell'Appennino Modenese: Correlazioni con il Flysch di Monghidoro". Mineralogica e Petrografica Acta 12:69 97.
238:
Dickinson, W.R., Suczek, C.A., 1979, "Plate tectonics and sandstone compositions": American Association of Petroleum Geologist, 63, 2164–2182.
35:-rich groundmass surrounding the grain would count as a volcanic lithic fragment. It would count as a volcanic rock fragment in the 219:
Dickinson, W.R., 1970, 2Interpreting detrital modes of graywacke and arkose": Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, v. 40, p. 695–707.
159:
scheme), in which all grains that are connected are considered rock fragments, and the individual components are disregarded.
107:(e.g. a sand-sized piece of shale). These counts are then converted to percentages and used for compositional comparisons in 95:
from a sedimentary rock is needed, with a slide advance mechanism that will randomly select points on the slide with a
103:
grain that is sand sized (larger than 62.5 micrometers) or a finer-grained fragment of another rock type, called a
68: 104: 52: 132: 96: 162:
The best way to explain the differences in these two schools of thought is with an example: A sand rich in
266:
Folk, R.L., 1974, Petrology of Sedimentary Rocks: Austin, Texas, Hemphill Press, second edition, 182 p.
75:, regardless of what they are connected to. Gazzi-Dickinson point counting is used in the creation of 128: 131:, starting in 1970. Dickinson and his students (most notably Raymond Ingersoll, Steven Graham, and 192: 156: 136: 36: 119:, which are lithic grains that have been deformed and thus blend in with (or have become) matrix. 281: 144: 139:
in the 1970s established the method and its use to use the composition of sandstones to infer
112: 60: 163: 275: 152: 56: 116: 92: 80: 76: 143:
processes. This was in contrast to ideas presented by sedimentary geologists at
67:. The main focus (and most controversial) part of the technique is counting all 32: 91:
To perform a point count using the Gazzi-Dickinson method, a randomly selected
108: 24: 19: 127:
The Gazzi-Dickinson method came out of separate work by P. Gazzi in 1966 and
64: 43:
classification regardless of where the microscope landed in the point count.
28: 176: 167: 140: 180: 100: 172: 18: 72: 148: 40: 155:" method of Robert Folk (1974) (which later grew into the 183:
transport would change the composition of the sand.
8: 147:at the time, who used the more traditional " 111:studies. Typically, only framework (non- 16:Point-counting technique used in geology 203: 7: 14: 1: 55:technique used in geology to 59:measure the components of a 298: 97:petrographic microscope 71:components as separate 49:Gazzi-Dickinson method 44: 22: 129:William R. Dickinson 193:Folk classification 157:Folk classification 137:Stanford University 37:Folk Classification 145:Indiana University 45: 289: 267: 264: 258: 254: 248: 245: 239: 236: 230: 226: 220: 217: 211: 208: 77:ternary diagrams 61:sedimentary rock 297: 296: 292: 291: 290: 288: 287: 286: 272: 271: 270: 265: 261: 255: 251: 246: 242: 237: 233: 227: 223: 218: 214: 209: 205: 201: 189: 125: 105:lithic fragment 89: 17: 12: 11: 5: 295: 293: 285: 284: 274: 273: 269: 268: 259: 249: 240: 231: 221: 212: 202: 200: 197: 196: 195: 188: 185: 124: 121: 88: 85: 53:point-counting 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 294: 283: 280: 279: 277: 263: 260: 253: 250: 244: 241: 235: 232: 225: 222: 216: 213: 207: 204: 198: 194: 191: 190: 186: 184: 182: 178: 174: 169: 165: 160: 158: 154: 153:rock fragment 150: 146: 142: 138: 134: 130: 122: 120: 118: 114: 110: 106: 102: 98: 94: 86: 84: 82: 78: 74: 70: 66: 62: 58: 57:statistically 54: 50: 42: 38: 34: 30: 26: 21: 262: 252: 243: 234: 224: 215: 206: 161: 133:Chris Suczek 126: 117:pseudomatrix 93:thin section 90: 81:QFL diagrams 48: 46: 33:plagioclase 199:References 109:provenance 79:, such as 69:sand-sized 63:, chiefly 25:phenocryst 282:Petrology 181:erosional 87:Technique 65:sandstone 29:amphibole 276:Category 257:103-116. 229:333–363. 187:See also 177:feldspar 168:granitic 141:tectonic 166:, or a 123:History 101:mineral 173:quartz 151:" or " 113:matrix 73:grains 135:) at 51:is a 175:and 164:grus 47:The 149:QFR 41:QFR 27:of 278:: 83:. 39:/

Index


phenocryst
amphibole
plagioclase
Folk Classification
QFR
point-counting
statistically
sedimentary rock
sandstone
sand-sized
grains
ternary diagrams
QFL diagrams
thin section
petrographic microscope
mineral
lithic fragment
provenance
matrix
pseudomatrix
William R. Dickinson
Chris Suczek
Stanford University
tectonic
Indiana University
QFR
rock fragment
Folk classification
grus

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.