661:
302:, then executive director of the foundation, said that increasing diversity was about making the encyclopedia "as good as it could be". Factors the article cited as possibly discouraging women from editing included the "obsessive fact-loving realm", associations with the "hard-driving hacker crowd", and the necessity to be "open to very difficult, high-conflict people, even misogynists". In 2013, the results of the survey were adjusted for non-response bias by Hill and Shaw using a propensity score estimation technique to suggest upward corrections to the data from the survey and to recommend updates to the statistics being surveyed, giving 22.7% (17.8% unadjusted) for adult US female editors and 16.1% (12.7% unadjusted) for all US female editors.
582:
Knowledge are slightly more notable than men on
Knowledge, and proposed three possible explanations for future research: 1) that editors are more likely to write about their own gender, 2) that men are more likely to create articles about themselves, and 3) that external sources make women less visible. As for topical bias, biographies about women tend to focus more on family-, gender-, and relationship-related topics. This is especially true for biographies of women born before 1900. The authors also found structural differences in terms of meta-data and hyperlinks, which have consequences for information-seeking activities.
872:
436:
forums". Knowledge research fellow Sarah
Stierch acknowledged that it is "fairly common" for Knowledge contributors to remain gender-anonymous. A perceived unwelcoming culture and tolerance of violent and abusive language are also reasons put forth for the gender gap. According to a 2013 study, another cause of the gender gap in Knowledge is the failure to attract and retain female editors, resulting in a negative impact on Knowledge's coverage. As well, Knowledge "...editors that publicly identify as women face harassment" from other Knowledge editors.
415:
542:
likely to find themselves losing the many benefits female contributors can bring to the table". Criticism refers to women's unwillingness to edit someone else's work and to let their work be edited by someone else; confidence shows that women are often not too confident about their own expertise and ability in editing and contributing to a certain work. Knowledge's free to edit policy gives users an open platform, but researchers have suggested that its competitive and critical environment can limit women's incentives to participate.
676:, numerous write-ups mentioned that she did not previously have a Knowledge page. A draft had been submitted, but was rejected for not demonstrating "significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject". A 2024 study by Khandaker Tasnim Huq and Giovanni Luca Ciampaglia on English speaking Knowledge additionally showed that deletion nominations happen 34% faster after the creation of women biographies than after the creation of men biographies.
786:
406:
Matthew A. Vetter and Keon
Mandell Pettiway explain that the white, cis-gendered male dominance among Knowledge editors has led to the "erasure of non-normative gender and sexual identities", in addition to cis-gendered females. The "androcentric and heteronormative discourses" of Knowledge editing insufficiently allow "marginalized gender and sexual identities to take part in language use and the construction of knowledge".
6474:
33:
6462:
4505:
708:
Robert West and Martin
Gerlach showed that biographies of women are over-represented among orphan articles (articles that cannot be accessed via other articles): in English Knowledge, women represent 19% of the biographies, but also represent 29% of orphan biographies. Furthermore, the study shows that orphan articles are less visible than the others.
519:. link this culture due to a disparity in male-to-female centric topics represented and edited, the tendency for female users to be more active in the social and community aspects of Knowledge, an increased likelihood that edits by new female editors are reverted, and/or that articles with high proportions of female editors are more contentious.
364:...visible female editors on Knowledge and broader encouragement of the use of constructive feedback may begin to alleviate the Knowledge gender gap. Furthermore, the relatively high proportion of anonymous editors may exacerbate the Knowledge gender gap, as anonymity may often be perceived as male and more critical.
660:
315:, a professor of information science and linguistics, said that she was not surprised by the Knowledge contributors' gender gap. She said that the often contentious nature of Knowledge article "talk" pages, where article content is discussed, is unappealing to many women, "if not outright intimidating".
936:
Some users have tried to combat this male-dominated space by creating support groups for female
Knowledge users, a prominent one being the WikiWomen's User Group. This group is used not only to promote women editing and contributing on more pages, but to also add more pages about women who contribute
888:
has officially held the stance, since at least 2011 when
Gardner was executive director, that gender bias exists in the project. It has made some attempts to address it but Gardner has expressed frustration with the degree of success achieved. She has also noted that "in the very limited leisure time
764:
tend to have a higher percentage of their article devoted to the "Personal Life" section, which often focuses on the person's gender identity: "The implication that gender identity is a noteworthy trait for just these groups is possibly indicative of 'othering', where individuals are distinguished or
537:
After reviewing testimonies that ranged from microaggressions to direct attacks, the
Knowledge Board of Trustees voted in May 2020 to adopt a more formal moderation process to fight against harassment and to uphold Knowledge's community standards. The foundation has been tasked to finish the draft of
137:
Comparison of results for the proportion of
Knowledge readers and editors from the nationally representative Pew survey and the WMF/UNU-MERIT survey (UNU) for a series of dichotomous variables in both surveys. Adjusted numbers for editors assume that response bias for editors is identical to observed
88:
A 2021 study found that, in April 2017, 41% of biographies nominated for deletion were women despite only 17% of published biographies being women. The visibility and reachability of women on
Knowledge is limited, with a 2015 report finding that female pages generally "tend to be more linked to men".
2726:
Known as 'the encyclopedia anyone can edit,' Knowledge may seem like an easy place to contribute knowledge, but in reality
Cassell suggests that 'to have one's words listened to on Knowledge, often one must have to debate, defend, and insist that one's point of view is the only valid one' The heavy
929:
have been organized to increase the coverage of women's topics in Knowledge and to encourage more women to edit Knowledge. These events are supported by the Wikimedia Foundation, which sometimes provides mentors and technology to help guide newer editors through the process. Recent edit-a-thons have
581:
In 2016, Wagner et al. found that gender inequality manifests itself in Knowledge's biographical content in multiple ways, including unequal thresholds for including an article on the person, topical bias, linguistic bias, and structural inequalities. The authors found that women with biographies on
435:
pointed out that Knowledge's female participation rate may be in line with other "public thought-leadership forums". A 2010 study revealed a Knowledge female participation rate of 13 percent, observed to be close to the 15 percent overall female participation rate of other "public thought-leadership
388:
In their February 2018 article, "Pipeline of Online Participation Inequalities: The Case of Knowledge Editing", Shaw and Hargittai concluded from their studies that solving the problems of participation inequality including gender bias requires a broader focus on subjects other than inequality. They
3624:
Though early research found evidence of bias against women on Knowledge, more recent research has found a minimal amount of evidence of gender bias, and we find evidence of bias against men. While the peripheral contributors, who do most of the editing on Knowledge, initially "won" the gender bias
951:
was launched on the English-language version of Knowledge, focusing on the creation of new articles about notable women. Mainly through its monthly virtual editathons, Women in Red encourages editors to participate in extending Knowledge's coverage. Thanks in part to the efforts of this project, by
332:
A study published in 2014 found that there is also an "Internet skills gap" with regard to Knowledge editors. The authors found that the most likely Knowledge contributors are high-skilled men and that there is no gender gap among low-skilled editors, and concluded that the "skills gap" exacerbates
732:
A 2020 study of the coverage of Fortune 1000 CEOs found a gender bias in favour of women. The study investigated contributions from brand-new versus more established editors and found that new editors are more likely to introduce information biased against women, but that established users tend to
724:
of gender biases within Knowledge articles. The study found that articles about women contain more gender-specific phrases such as "female scientist" while men are referenced using more gender-neutral terms such as "scientist". The study concluded that overall gender bias is decreasing for science
319:
reacted similarly, saying that the combination of a "culture of hacker elitism", combined with the disproportionate effect of high-conflict members (a minority) on the community atmosphere, can make it unappealing. He said, "the ideology and rhetoric of freedom and openness can then be used (a) to
707:
A 2016 study led by Claudia Wagner showed that biographies of women on Knowledge in English are less visible than biographies of men and concluded that this difference is partly due to the fact that the community links articles about men better together. In 2023, a study conducted by Akhil Arora,
522:
In 2019, Schlomit Aharoni Lir described "the vicious circle" model, displaying how the five layers of negative reputation, anonymity, fear, alienation and rejection – enhance each other, in a manner that deters women from contributing to the website. In order for more women to join Knowledge, the
541:
Collier and Bear in 2012 summarized the reason for working barriers of women in Knowledge in three words: conflict, criticism and confidence. The authors suggested that "If a community tolerates a culture of conflict that males perceived to be simply 'competitive' or witty and sarcastic they are
405:
In 2014, Noopur Raval, a PhD candidate at UC Irvine, wrote in "The Encyclopedia Must Fail!– Notes on Queering Knowledge" that "making a platform open access does not automatically translate to equality of participation, ease of access, or cultural acceptance of the medium". In 2017, researchers
728:
A 2015 study found that, on the English Knowledge, the word "divorced" appears more than four times as often in biographical articles about women than men. According to the Wikimedia Foundation, "We don't fully know why, but it's likely a multitude of factors, including the widespread tendency
599:
concluded that the way women and men are described in articles demonstrates bias, with articles about women more likely to use more words relating to gender and family. The researchers believe that this is a sign Knowledge editors consider male the "null gender" (in other words, that "male" is
333:
the gender gap among editors. During 2010–14, women made up 61% of participants of the college courses arranged by the Wiki Education Foundation program that included editing Knowledge as part of the curriculum. Their contributions were found to shift the Knowledge content from pop-culture and
324:
said that although women are as knowledgeable as men, and as able to defend their point of view, "it is still the case in American society that debate, contention, and vigorous defense of one's position is often still seen as a male stance, and women's use of these speech styles can call forth
328:
In April 2011, the Wikimedia Foundation conducted its first semi-annual Knowledge survey. It suggested that 9% of Knowledge editors are women. It also reported, "Contrary to the perception of some, our data shows that very few women editors feel like they have been harassed, and very few feel
829:
called Knowledge's gender imbalance a "non-problem in search of a misguided solution". Mac Donald asserted, "The most straightforward explanation for the differing rates of participation in Knowledge—and the one that conforms to everyday experience—is that, on average, males and females have
553:
infrastructure of Knowledge". People who are equipped with this expertise and skill are considered more likely to reach positions with power in Knowledge. These are proposed to be predominantly men. Further, in examining Knowledge's detailed policy system, the researchers conclude that its
991:
how men remove Knowledge pages about women leaders. "I wrote a Knowledge article about a woman gallerist and the next day, I got a message saying it was deleted because she is not a 'noteworthy person', but someone in our community gave me advice on how to edit it to make the page stay".
572:
people. Those who identify as being part of the community are typically subjected to harassment if their identities are made public. For example, an administrator on a Knowledge page blocked an editor, merely because the person's username implied they were a part of the LGBT community.
3625:
tug-of-war, as evidenced by early reports of gender bias on Knowledge, efforts by the core to return to a state of neutrality pushed the community away from bias against women. Over time, central contributors have overcorrected to the point where bias against men is becoming an issue.
389:
recommended a focus on encouraging participants of all educational backgrounds, skill levels, and age groups will help Knowledge to improve. They recommended further that informing more women that Knowledge is free to edit and open to everyone is critical in eliminating gender bias.
1042:
artificial intelligence model that will be able to create Knowledge-style biographical rough drafts that "will one day help Knowledge editors create many thousands of accurate, compelling biography entries for important people who are currently not on the site", including women.
893:" In 2011, the Foundation set a target of having 25 percent of its contributors identifying as female by 2015. In August 2013, Gardner said, "I didn't solve it. We didn't solve it. The Wikimedia Foundation didn't solve it. The solution won't come from the Wikimedia Foundation."
768:
In 2022 study, it was found that scholarly articles by men are more likely to be cited than those by women. Furthermore, publications with women as the main authors are significantly less likely to be referenced on Knowledge. An explanation for this offered by the authors is
426:
Some gender research literature suggests that the difference in contribution rates could be due to three factors: (1) the high levels of conflict in discussions, (2) dislike of critical environments, and (3) lack of confidence in editing other contributors' work.
380:
allows the gender analysis to be taken to a further level. It looks at three issues within the infrastructure: content policies, software, and the legalistic framework of operation. It suggests that progress can be made through altering that culture of
3544:
Schmahl, Katja Geertruida; Viering, Tom Julian; Makrodimitris, Stavros; Naseri Jahfari, Arman; Tax, David; Loog, Marco (2020). "Is Knowledge succeeding in reducing gender bias? Assessing changes in gender bias in Knowledge using word embeddings".
329:
Knowledge is a sexualized environment". However, an October 2011 paper at the International Symposium on Wikis and Open Collaboration found evidence that suggested that Knowledge may have "a culture that may be resistant to female participation".
590:
Of the 1,960,452 biographical articles on the English Knowledge in September 2023, only 385,236 or 19.65% were about women. The biographies that do exist are considerably more likely to be nominated for deletion than existing articles of men.
652:, which covers 50,479 biographies, has 5,999 of them about women, about 11.88%. The study compared the figure to the 18.22% of biographies across Wikimedia projects that were of women, citing 2021 data. A 2011 study by researchers from the
538:
this plan by the end of 2020, and it will include banning users who participate in gender harassment, providing support and communities for all gender identities, putting more resources into the Trust and Safety Team, and more.
656:
and three other universities found that articles edited by women, "which presumably were more likely to be of interest to women", were "significantly shorter" on average than those worked on by men or by both men and women.
6092:
5373:
65:
and article subjects (although the English Knowledge has almost 400,000 encyclopedic biographies about women, men have about four times that), as well as lesser coverage of and topics primarily of interest to women.
2451:"How Does Political Knowledge Stay Apolitical?: The seventh-most visited site is one of the first online listings for any elected official—but how does a site that stakes its reputation on neutrality walk that line"
972:
594:
In the English Knowledge and five other language editions that were studied by researchers, the ratio of articles about women to articles about men was higher than in three other databases. However, analysis with
510:
Though the proportion of female readership to male readership on Knowledge is roughly equal (47%), women are less likely to convert themselves to editors (16%). Several studies suggest that there may be a formed
554:
complexity and legal underpinnings grant some users substantial influence in content debates. This dominance can marginalize those not versed in these details, particularly deterring women and new participants.
3290:
3026:
664:
A side-by-side comparison of the portion of available biographies about women on Knowledge versus the portion of women biographies nominated for deletion from January 2017 to February 2020, Francesca Tripodi
564:
An example of a direct account of gender bias comes from Knowledge user Lightbreather, where she recounts having pornographic images linked to her username as a way to discredit her Knowledge contributions.
355:
A 2017 study found that women participating in an experiment by editing a Knowledge-like site tended to view other editors as male, and to view their responses as more critical than if the other editor was
1031:, explained that educational institutions can use Knowledge assignments such as encyclopedia's gender gap analysis and coverage of female topics to inspire students to alter the current gender imbalance.
845:
627:
published research by Reagle and Lauren Rhue that examined the coverage, gender representation, and article length of thousands of biographical subjects on the English-language Knowledge and the online
125:
The first study of world-wide presence in 2008 found that 13% of all editors were female, which, after a follow-up study in 2011, was reduced to 9% globally. In the United States, especially within the
648:
is more balanced in whom it neglects to cover than Knowledge. For both reference works, article length did not consistently differ by gender. A 2023 study using Wikidata to measure content found that
5391:
557:
Studies have also considered the gender bias in Knowledge from a historical perspective. Konieczny and Klein indicated that Knowledge is just a part of our biased society which has a long history of
2402:
1642:
889:
women had, they tended to be more involved in social activities instead of editing Knowledge. 'Women see technology more as a tool they use to accomplish tasks, rather than something fun in itself.
4165:
816:
Knowledge has been criticized by some academics and journalists for having primarily male contributors, and for having fewer and less extensive articles about women or topics important to women.
773:, which is the idea that people prefer other people or work similar to their own. This may explain the citation bias as Knowledge editors are mainly male, so they may prefer publications by men.
545:
Through examining the power infrastructure of Knowledge, Ford and Wajcman pointed out another cause that may reinforce Knowledge's gender bias. Editing on Knowledge requires "particular forms of
1396:
352:
which have similar biases. She agreed that Knowledge's editing process introduces biases of its own, especially as topics that are popular among its predominantly male editors draw more edits.
3804:
4002:
6082:
2347:
1360:
1673:
5396:
1704:
2462:
320:
suppress concerns about inappropriate or offensive speech as 'censorship' and (b) to rationalize low female participation as simply a matter of their personal preference and choice".
3111:
6384:
5421:
5108:
668:
According to a 2021 study by sociologist Francesca Tripodi, biographies on Knowledge about women are disproportionately nominated for deletion as non-notable. In October 2018, when
3352:
2304:
716:
While most attention falls on the gap between biographies of men and women on Knowledge, some research also focuses on linguistics and differences in topics covered. In 2020, the
523:
researcher offers the implantation of a "Virtuous Circle" that consists of nonymity, connection to social media, inclusionist policy, soft deletion and red-flagging harassments.
4253:
6160:
5416:
5401:
978:
Expanding beyond the male/female gender binary, Wikiproject LGBT creates a space for "re/writing the inclusion and representation of LGBTQ culture into Knowledge mainspace".
6203:
4770:
4082:
2212:
4222:
2820:
Konieczny, Piotr; Klein, Maximilian (December 2018). "Gender gap through time and space: A journey through Knowledge biographies via the Wikidata Human Gender Indicator".
3055:
376:
observes that research on the gender bias continues to frame the problem as a deficit in women. In contrast, their central argument states that infrastructure studies in
334:
5619:
3280:
1735:
133:
In 2009, a Wikimedia Foundation survey revealed that 6% of editors who made more than 500 edits were female, with the average male editor having twice as many edits.
4858:
6402:
3321:
1013:
In 2013, FemTechNet launched "Wikistorming" as a project that offers feminist scholarship and encourages Knowledge editing as part of school and college teaching.
632:(as at June 2010). They concluded that Knowledge provided better coverage and longer articles in general, that Knowledge typically has more articles on women than
3927:
6208:
1804:
Hargittai, Eszter; Shaw, Aaron (4 November 2014). "Mind the skills gap: the role of Internet know-how and gender in differentiated contributions to Knowledge".
944:
project was launched with the goal to provide a user-friendly environment for newcomers, with a particular goal of boosting women's participation in Knowledge.
3018:
2929:
Wagner, Claudia; Graells-Garrido, Eduardo; Garcia, David; Menczer, Filippo (1 March 2016). "Women through the glass ceiling: gender asymmetries in Knowledge".
1611:
5358:
4581:
398:
4933:
Wagner, Claudia; Garcia, David; Jadidi, Mohsen; Strohmaier, Markus (2015). "It's a Man's Knowledge? Assessing Gender Inequality in an Online Encyclopedia".
4057:
913:
Thanks to a Wikimedia Foundation grant, in March 2021 an alpha version of Humaniki was released, providing a wide variety of gender gap statistics based on
89:
Language that is considered sexist, loaded, or otherwise gendered has been identified in articles about women. Gender bias features among the most frequent
5263:
5138:
5103:
2394:
1840:
1634:
47:
6059:
5363:
5336:
4157:
2792:
2417:
841:'s plans for "doubling down" on the gender content gap at Knowledge. Wales said the Foundation would be open to more outreach and more software changes.
2315:
1386:
6352:
6147:
5661:
5614:
5113:
4984:
4804:
2991:
1531:
857:
717:
611:
138:
response bias for readers and, in the rightmost column, that bias is stable for editors outside the United States. Table reproduced from this source.
3794:
561:. As Knowledge records daily activities by individual editors, it serves as both "a reflection of the world" and "a tool used to produce our world".
6152:
3994:
733:
overcompensate when reacting to these edits. Articles written by a more diverse group of new and established editors were found to be most neutral.
6181:
6054:
5431:
2276:
6122:
2362:
1665:
1348:
3598:
Young, Amber; Wigdor, Ariel; Kane, Gerald (2020). "The Gender Bias Tug-of-War in a Co-creation Community: Core-Periphery Tension on Knowledge".
5411:
5368:
5228:
5168:
1451:
623:
3637:
Field, Anjalie; Park, Chan Young; Lin, Kevin Z.; Tsvetkov, Yulia (9 February 2022). "Controlled Analyses of Social Biases in Knowledge Bios".
1696:
6301:
6064:
4633:
3865:
3664:
3188:
2699:
2552:
2243:
1437:
5457:
3971:
2334:"Recent research — Napoleon, Michael Jackson and Srebrenica across cultures, 90% of Knowledge better than Britannica, WikiSym preview"
968:
756:
in 2015, when their self-declared pronouns were vandalized and reverted to their previous pronouns. A 2021 study found that articles about
4474:
1581:
385:
through encouraging alternate knowledge, reducing the technical barriers to editing, and addressing the complexity of Knowledge policies.
4191:
2509:
1787:
748:, they are commonly subjected to discrimination and their pronouns are then put up for debate. Notable examples of these debates include
6193:
5690:
5666:
5582:
5519:
3344:
3167:
Lam, Shyong (Tony) K.; Uduwage, Anuradha; Dong, Zhenhua; Sen, Shilad; Musicant, David R.; Terveen, Loren; Riedl, John (3 October 2011).
2653:
2450:
2301:
2178:
1418:
Lam, Shyong (Tony) K.; Uduwage, Anuradha; Dong, Zhenhua; Sen, Shilad; Musicant, David R.; Terveen, Loren; Riedl, John (3 October 2011).
1114:
2090:
6186:
4708:
4245:
3502:"Is Knowledge succeeding in reducing gender bias? Assessing changes in gender bias in Knowledge using word embeddings - ACL Anthology"
2974:
2023:
Shaw, Aaron; Hargittai, Eszter (1 February 2018). "The Pipeline of Online Participation Inequalities: The Case of Knowledge Editing".
1249:
1139:
3763:
3072:
1087:
1005:
has created more than 1,700 Knowledge entries on women scientists since 2017, as many women whose contributions have gone unnoticed.
5748:
5656:
5493:
1947:
4780:
4568:
4079:
2864:
1198:
2713:
2566:
2204:
6367:
6260:
5514:
5331:
5203:
5178:
4366:
4214:
6500:
6357:
6109:
4831:
3375:
3051:
610:
editorial, is that it has difficulty making judgments about "what matters". To illustrate this point they noted that the page
6515:
6127:
5956:
5639:
5406:
1057:
964:
853:
73:
projects, 90% of 3,734 respondents reported their gender as male, 8.8% as female, and 1% as other; among contributors to the
4337:
4623:
3941:
3731:
2116:
1883:
348:, argued that Knowledge's gender bias "reflects society as a whole". For example, she noted that Knowledge is dependent on
6275:
5644:
4977:
4866:
1062:
687:
essay about Knowledge entitled "Know It All". The Knowledge article about her was created the very same day. According to
6442:
6427:
5833:
5426:
5128:
5118:
4311:
3571:
3313:
2338:
1906:
3919:
3828:
2893:
2333:
699:
many years previous. Her essay and the article about her are now featured in the Wikiproject to counter systemic bias.
6396:
6198:
5991:
5700:
5544:
4413:
4388:
2995:
1930:
1017:
960:
4672:"Knowledge's shame: Sexism isn't the problem at the online encyclopedia. The real corruption is the lust for revenge"
4414:"NSF Award Search: Award # 1322934 - Collaborative Research: Knowledge and the Democratization of Academic Knowledge"
4389:"NSF Award Search: Award # 1322971 - Collaborative Research: Knowledge and the Democratization of Academic Knowledge"
4748:
1603:
5549:
5326:
5173:
1067:
933:
An early-2015 initiative to create a "women-only" space for Knowledge editors was strongly opposed by Wikipedians.
636:
in absolute terms, but Knowledge articles on women were more likely to be missing than articles on men relative to
94:
4047:
871:
6265:
5685:
2289:...the considerable and often-noted gender gap among Knowledge editors; in 2011, less than 15 percent were women.
596:
283:
85:
of Wikimedia Foundation, said her team's working assumption was that women make up 15–20% of total contributors.
4560:
4134:
1850:
6505:
5887:
5874:
5738:
5695:
5649:
5498:
4970:
4811:
4024:
3140:
1538:
1052:
104:
announced that the encyclopedia had failed to reach its goal to retain 25% female editorship. Programs such as
4520:
2745:
2424:
3112:"Nor da nor Lur Hiztegi Entziklopedikoan? Euskarazko lehenengo entziklopediaren demografia digital alderatua"
2006:
1718:
5792:
5609:
5575:
5452:
5218:
5093:
4651:
4602:
765:
labeled as not fitting a societal norm, which often occurs in the context of gender or sexual orientation".
653:
311:
followed up with a series of opinions on the subject under the banner, "Where Are the Women in Knowledge?".
3451:
5787:
5714:
5626:
5386:
5321:
5193:
5163:
3736:
3433:
1473:"The Knowledge Gender Gap Revisited: Characterizing Survey Response Bias with Propensity Score Estimation"
982:
673:
530:
as a significant challenge in being an editor on Knowledge. In the study, community health was defined as
480:
414:
377:
90:
3480:
Akhil Arora; Robert West; Martin Gerlach (6 June 2023). "Orphan Articles: The Dark Matter of Knowledge".
1926:"Examining potential mechanisms underlying the Knowledge gender gap through a collaborative editing task"
1326:
Wagner, Claudia (2015). "It's a Man's Knowledge? Assessing Gender Inequality in an Online Encyclopedia".
1024:
5911:
5238:
4688:
4532:
Edwards, Jennifer C. (2015). "Wiki Women: Bringing Women into Knowledge through Activism and Pedagogy".
4438:
Edwards, Jennifer C. (2015). "Wiki Women: Bringing Women into Knowledge through Activism and Pedagogy".
3853:
3386:
3145:
2268:
849:
692:
615:
546:
4728:
852:
notes that many Knowledge pages that refer to men's teams or occupations are listed as gender neutral (
2372:
930:
given specific focus to topics such as Australian female neuroscientists and women in Jewish history.
6417:
6270:
6142:
6117:
6044:
6020:
6006:
5864:
5823:
5599:
5243:
5183:
3576:
1484:
1039:
897:
885:
838:
382:
345:
295:
70:
3881:
Qaiser, Farah; Zaringhalam, Maryam; Bernardi, Francesca; Wade, Jess; Pinckney, Emily (23 May 2022).
6390:
6347:
6280:
5896:
5859:
5724:
5539:
5300:
5123:
4052:
444:
77:, 84.7% identified as male, 13.6% as female, and 1.7% as other (total of 88 respondents). In 2019,
3547:
Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Natural Language Processing and Computational Social Science
900:
put a funding of $ 500,000 in building a more encouraging environment for diversity on Knowledge.
6478:
6466:
6432:
6422:
6241:
6234:
6137:
6132:
5986:
5926:
5775:
5568:
5447:
5223:
5188:
5098:
4934:
4919:
4906:
4541:
4455:
3709:
3670:
3642:
3615:
3519:
3481:
3262:
3194:
2956:
2938:
2845:
2784:
2705:
2609:
2558:
2332:
Yasseri, Taha; Liao, Han-Teng; Konieczny, Piotr; Morgan, Jonathan; Bayer, Tilman (31 July 2013).
2249:
2082:
1998:
1845:
1821:
1443:
1327:
1305:
941:
826:
500:
476:
431:
307:
38:
1573:
4883:
5981:
5946:
5931:
5901:
5268:
5148:
5057:
4629:
4447:
4292:
4284:
4187:
3861:
3660:
3254:
3184:
2901:
2837:
2776:
2768:
2727:
levels of conflict within Knowledge may lead to a gender contribution gap for several reasons.
2695:
2548:
2496:
2312:
2239:
2132:
2040:
1990:
1512:
1433:
1257:
1167:
1028:
761:
558:
452:
127:
74:
2166:
2059:
1159:
959:
are committed to promoting editors' contribution on gender and women studies, which include "
422:
provided nine reasons, offered by female Knowledge editors, "Why Women Don't Edit Knowledge".
112:
have been developed to encourage female editors and increase the coverage of women's topics.
6412:
6228:
5921:
5869:
5854:
5674:
5253:
5198:
4898:
3890:
3799:
3701:
3652:
3607:
3550:
3509:
3414:
3244:
3176:
3119:
2948:
2829:
2760:
2687:
2601:
2540:
2231:
2124:
2074:
2032:
1982:
1939:
1878:
1813:
1779:
1502:
1492:
1425:
1295:
821:
669:
527:
393:
349:
3213:
2627:
298:
collaboration, which indicated that fewer than 13% of contributors to Knowledge are women.
6510:
6407:
5936:
5706:
5072:
5052:
4993:
4086:
3832:
3771:
3399:
3285:
3088:
3059:
2319:
2308:
1391:
1223:
1199:"The Knowledge wars: does it matter if our biggest source of knowledge is written by men?"
996:
749:
644:
in biographical coverage, but more so when it comes to men. Similarly, one might say that
550:
534:, a general lack of support for gender equity work and a lack of diversity in leadership.
506:
Fewer opportunities for social relationships and a welcoming tone compared to other sites.
470:
341:
321:
78:
3314:"Nobel physics prize winners include first female laureate for 55 years – as it happened"
1925:
729:
throughout history to describe the lives of women through their relationships with men".
4622:
Kloppenburg, Julia; Buchem, Ilona; Ducki, Antje; Khayati, Sarah; Weichert, Nils (2014).
4510:
2228:
Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work - CSCW '12
1488:
17:
6316:
6285:
6049:
5971:
5961:
5951:
5758:
5378:
5305:
5295:
1507:
1472:
1035:
753:
721:
696:
456:
357:
4362:
4338:"I've Made More Than 1,700 Knowledge Entries on Women Scientists and I'm Not Yet Done"
3214:"Canadian Nobel scientist's deletion from Knowledge points to wider bias, study finds"
2952:
2679:
2532:
785:
6494:
6447:
6165:
5996:
5966:
5941:
5916:
5753:
5233:
5047:
4910:
3727:
3713:
3674:
3619:
3523:
3501:
3266:
3175:. WikiSym '11. New York, NY, US: Association for Computing Machinery. pp. 1–10.
2746:"'Anyone can edit', not everyone does: Knowledge's infrastructure and the gender gap"
2613:
2492:
2488:
2367:
2086:
1825:
1769:
1765:
1761:
1419:
1309:
856:), while pages for similar teams or occupations for women are specifically gendered (
316:
312:
4918:
Vitulli, Marie A. (20 October 2017). "Writing Women in Mathematics into Knowledge".
4838:
4671:
4141:. Proc. CSCW '13, 23–27 February 2013, San Antonio, Texas, USA. 2013. Archived from
3506:
ACL Member Portal | The Association for Computational Linguistics Member Portal
3198:
2849:
2788:
2709:
2562:
2253:
2002:
1447:
1020:
announced that it would spend $ 200,000 to study systemic gender bias on Knowledge.
910:-style editing on Knowledge, is said to be aimed in part at closing the gender gap.
32:
6069:
5976:
5802:
5781:
5258:
5133:
4775:
4091:
3555:
3549:. Stroudsburg, PA, US: Association for Computational Linguistics. pp. 94–103.
3514:
3019:"Computational Linguistics Reveals How Knowledge Articles Are Biased Against Women"
2960:
2487:
Lam, Shyong K.; Uduwage, Anuradha; Dong, Zhenhua; Sen, Shilad; Musicant, David R.;
2458:
1760:
Lam, Shyong K.; Uduwage, Anuradha; Dong, Zhenhua; Sen, Shilad; Musicant, David R.;
1356:
987:
948:
903:
688:
680:
606:
601:
443:
cited nine reasons why women do not edit Knowledge, culled from comments by female
373:
369:
109:
3611:
1873:
1349:"This physicist has written over 500 biographies of women scientists on Knowledge"
725:
and family oriented articles, while increasing for artistic and creative content.
3963:
1817:
1497:
863:
In 2022, Knowledge was seen as "reflecting the biases of its community editors."
526:
In Wikimedia's Gender Equity Report in 2018, 14% of interviewees identified poor
6001:
5906:
5828:
5818:
5797:
5208:
5067:
5062:
5026:
3949:
3840:
3741:
2140:
956:
926:
834:
757:
745:
440:
419:
299:
105:
101:
62:
4902:
3894:
3124:
3110:
Gonzalez Larrañaga, Galder; Perez de Viñaspre Garralda, Olatz (16 March 2023).
6437:
6321:
5770:
5022:
3249:
3232:
3173:
Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Wikis and Open Collaboration
2894:"Knowledge Isn't Officially a Social Network. But the Harassment Can Get Ugly"
1943:
1300:
1283:
741:
531:
43:
4451:
4288:
3882:
3825:
3258:
2905:
2841:
2833:
2772:
2764:
2684:
Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work
2605:
2537:
Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work
2226:
Collier, Benjamin; Bear, Julia (2012). "Conflict, criticism, or confidence".
2136:
2044:
1986:
1261:
1171:
290:
jointly presented an overview of the results of a global Knowledge survey. A
5838:
5743:
5680:
5591:
4296:
3690:"Gender and country biases in Knowledge citations to scholarly publications"
3656:
3180:
2691:
2590:"Strangers in a seemingly open-to-all website: the gender bias in Knowledge"
2544:
2343:
2235:
1783:
1730:
1429:
1387:"This is why I've written 500 biographies of female scientists on Knowledge"
1382:
1002:
917:. The stats are automatically updated as new information is made available.
770:
737:
463:
287:
58:
4312:"Knowledge's forgotten women: inside the editing marathon to fix imbalance"
3345:"Female Nobel prize winner deemed not important enough for Knowledge entry"
2780:
2167:"Hacking Hetero/Normative Logics: Queer Feminist Media Praxis in Knowledge"
1994:
1516:
952:
June 2018 some 17,000 new women's biographies had been added to Knowledge.
499:
Being addressed as male is off-putting to women whose primary language has
69:
In a 2018 survey covering 12 language versions of Knowledge and some other
3281:"The Nobel prize winning scientist who wasn't famous enough for Knowledge"
3168:
6326:
6074:
4135:"Tea & Sympathy: Crafting Positive New User Experiences on Knowledge"
2418:"Tea & Sympathy: Crafting Positive New User Experiences on Knowledge"
2036:
914:
490:
486:
Belief that their contributions are too likely to be reverted or deleted.
4545:
4459:
6342:
6311:
6306:
6037:
4158:"Women in science on Knowledge: will we ever fill the information gap?"
4109:
907:
875:
Attendees at the 2013 Women in the Arts edit-a-thon in Washington, D.C.
512:
402:, "The percentage of women editors on Knowledge remains dismally low".
3705:
5763:
5248:
5042:
4924:
4689:"Does Knowledge's sexism problem really prove that the system works?"
4142:
3964:"2016-2017 Fundraising Report - Wikimedia Foundation Governance Wiki"
2128:
2078:
830:
different interests and preferred ways of spending their free time".
691:, she was apparently not notable by Knowledge standards, despite the
4582:"Sexism on Knowledge Is Not the Work of 'a Single Misguided Editor'"
3883:"How academic institutions can help to close Knowledge's gender gap"
3689:
2589:
1971:"'Anyone can edit', not everyone does: Knowledge and the gender gap"
1115:"Knowledge Monument in SĹ‚ubice, Poland Celebrates First Anniversary"
4939:
4625:
Charting Diversity: Working Together Towards Diversity in Knowledge
4215:"Knowledge editing marathons add women's voices to online resource"
3647:
3486:
2992:"Why it's so hard for biographies about women to stay on Knowledge"
2943:
1924:
Shane-Simpson, Christina; Gillespie-Lynch, Kristen (January 2017).
1332:
6362:
6032:
5008:
4962:
4955:
4561:"A Growing Army of Women Are Taking on Knowledge's Sexism Problem"
3233:"Ms. Categorized: Gender, notability, and inequality on Knowledge"
2686:. CSCW '12. Seattle, Washington, US: ACM Press. pp. 383–392.
2539:. CSCW '12. Seattle, Washington, US: ACM Press. pp. 383–392.
2300:
Statistics based on Wikimedia Foundation Knowledge editor surveys
1970:
1284:"Ms. Categorized: Gender, notability, and inequality on Knowledge"
870:
659:
413:
31:
4832:"Monitoring the Gender Gap with Wikidata Human Gender Indicators"
4652:"Chipping away at Knowledge's gender bias, one article at a time"
3694:
Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
2977:
19.650% - 1,960,452 biogs, 385,236 women, as at 18 September 2023
2654:"Wikimedia is writing new policies to fight Knowledge harassment"
2505:
2416:
Jonathan T. Morgan; Siko Bouterse; Sarah Stierch; Heather Walls.
2205:"Nine Reasons Why Women Don't Edit Knowledge, In Their Own Words"
1775:
1471:
Hill, Benjamin Mako; Shaw, Aaron; Sánchez, Angel (26 June 2013).
5077:
5017:
569:
5564:
4966:
4803:
Glott, Ruediger; Schmidt, Philipp; Ghosh, Rishab (March 2010).
3858:
Invisible Women: Exposing Data Bias in a World Designed for Men
3374:
Khandaker Tasnim Huq; Giovanni Luca Ciampaglia (20 June 2024).
1530:
Glott, Ruediger; Schmidt, Philipp; Ghosh, Rishab (March 2010).
906:, a project funded by the Wikimedia Foundation that allows for
846:
Invisible Women: Exposing Data Bias in a World Designed for Men
5461:
5013:
5004:
3836:
780:
736:
Gender bias harassment also goes beyond those who identify as
82:
4275:
Kennedy, K. (2017). "Why women should be editing Knowledge".
3688:
Zheng, Xiang; Chen, Jiajing; Yan, Erjia; Ni, Chaoqun (2023).
2363:"The women of Knowledge: Closing the site's giant gender gap"
1138:
As of June 2024. For up-to-date exact numbers, see para 2 at
5560:
4475:"Meta researcher using AI to address Knowledge's gender gap"
3795:"Knowledge Is Male-Dominated. That Doesn't Mean It's Sexist"
3087:. Joseph Reagle & Lauren Rhue: 1138–1158. Archived from
2498:
WP:Clubhouse? An Exploration of Knowledge's Gender Imbalance
1771:
WP:Clubhouse? An Exploration of Knowledge's Gender Imbalance
1421:
WP:Clubhouse? An Exploration of Knowledge's Gender Imbalance
515:
in Knowledge that discourages women from participating. Lam
2117:"The Encyclopedia Must Fail! – Notes on Queering Knowledge"
4859:"How to Edit Knowledge: Lessons from a Female Contributor"
3995:"Kate Middleton's wedding gown and Knowledge's gender gap"
1874:"Meet the Editors Fighting Racism and Sexism on Knowledge"
973:
WikiProject countering systemic bias/gender gap task force
496:
Knowledge culture is sexual in ways they find off-putting.
130:, a 2015 study found that 15% of contributors were women.
4884:"Gender Inequality in New Media: Evidence from Knowledge"
1574:"Define Gender Gap? Look Up Knowledge's Contributor List"
604:). Another critique of Knowledge's approach, from a 2014
549:
expertise and authority that constitute the knowledge or
4729:"Sexism on Knowledge: Why the #YesAllWomen Edits Matter"
61:, particularly the overrepresentation of men among both
4025:"Humaniki March Update: Public Launch of Alpha Release"
3732:""Free as in sexist?": Free culture and the gender gap"
797:
6385:
The Iraq War: A Historiography of Knowledge Changelogs
5109:
Gender neutrality in languages with grammatical gender
2395:"In UK, rising chorus of outrage over online misogyny"
1250:"Making the edit: why we need more women in Knowledge"
93:, sometimes as part of a more general criticism about
27:
Gender gap problem in Knowledge and Wikimedia projects
3826:
Knowledge 'completely failed' to fix gender imbalance
2628:"Gender equity report 2018/Barriers to equity - Meta"
3572:"Knowledge is a mirror of the world's gender biases"
3376:"Gender Gap in Knowledge: Are Women Vanishing Soon?"
2165:
Matthew, Vetter; Pettiway, Keon (20 November 2018).
1907:"Knowledge is a mirror of the world's gender biases"
1224:"Community Insights/2018 Report/Contributors - Meta"
6376:
6335:
6294:
6251:
6221:
6174:
6108:
6019:
5883:
5847:
5811:
5723:
5598:
5532:
5507:
5486:
5479:
5440:
5349:
5314:
5288:
5281:
5156:
5147:
5086:
5035:
4830:Klein, Maximilian; et al. (10 February 2015).
2121:
Ada: A Journal of Gender, New Media, and Technology
4246:"Why we need to close Knowledge's gender page gap"
2973:The figures are updated weekly (from WikiData) at
600:assumed unless otherwise specified, an example of
5337:International Center for Research on Women (ICRW)
3764:"Joseph Reagle on the gender gap in geek culture"
3452:"Knowledge:WikiProject Countering systemic bias"
3052:"The Guardian view on Knowledge: evolving truth"
2990:Adams, Kimberly; Alvardo, Jesus (27 July 2021).
2198:
2196:
4891:Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization
2482:
2480:
479:and an unwillingness to participate in lengthy
439:Former Wikimedia Foundation executive director
418:Former Wikimedia Foundation executive director
362:
57:includes various gender-related disparities on
4190:. Royal Society of Chemistry. 21 August 2017.
4048:"Closing Knowledge's Gender Gap – Reluctantly"
3913:
3911:
1567:
1565:
1563:
1561:
1559:
5576:
4978:
4563:. Business insider. Retrieved 29 August 2022.
3116:Uztaro. Giza Eta Gizarte-zientzien Aldizkaria
2060:"Writing Women in Mathematics into Knowledge"
344:, Gardner's successor as the director of the
46:, features both male and female editors. The
8:
4837:. Cornell University Library. Archived from
2744:Ford, Heather; Wajcman, Judy (August 2017).
2067:Notices of the American Mathematical Society
825:in 2011, conservative political commentator
740:on Knowledge. For example, when celebrities
399:Notices of the American Mathematical Society
5139:Gender-specific and gender-neutral pronouns
5104:Gender-specific and gender-neutral pronouns
4765:- Introduction and links to eight opinions.
4569:"Knowledge's Sexism Toward Women Novelists"
6461:
6025:
5731:
5583:
5569:
5561:
5483:
5437:
5285:
5278:
5153:
4985:
4971:
4963:
3639:Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2022
1088:"Knowledge monument to be built in Poland"
135:
5458:Equality and Human Rights Commission (UK)
5114:Gender neutrality in genderless languages
4938:
4923:
3646:
3600:Journal of Management Information Systems
3554:
3513:
3485:
3248:
3123:
2942:
1506:
1496:
1331:
1299:
981:In 2018, one edit-a-thon organizer named
718:Association for Computational Linguistics
3843:, 8 August 2014; starting at 45 seconds.
1841:"Knowledge grows up on college campuses"
1806:Information, Communication & Society
1635:"Communication Styles Make a Difference"
1153:
1151:
1149:
1147:
1001:magazine detailed how British scientist
337:towards social sciences and humanities.
6403:People imprisoned for editing Knowledge
6161:United States congressional staff edits
4188:"Improving gender balance on Knowledge"
3793:Mac Donald, Heather (9 February 2011).
2985:
2983:
2678:Collier, Benjamin; Bear, Julia (2012).
2531:Collier, Benjamin; Bear, Julia (2012).
1719:"Knowledge Editors Study: Results From
1466:
1464:
1079:
947:In the summer of 2015, the WikiProject
5229:Gender inequality in the United States
3920:"Knowledge fails to bridge gender gap"
3395:
3384:
3212:Selvarajah, Manjula (19 August 2021).
3081:International Journal of Communication
3029:from the original on 27 September 2017
2887:
2885:
2815:
2813:
2798:from the original on 19 September 2018
2526:
2524:
2522:
2423:. Wikimedia Foundation. Archived from
2018:
2016:
2009:from the original on 28 December 2016.
1707:from the original on 27 February 2017.
1113:Ronson, Jacqueline (22 October 2015).
858:England women's national football team
624:International Journal of Communication
6065:Hillsborough disaster Knowledge posts
4363:"feminist wiki-storming – FemTechNet"
4060:from the original on 2 September 2014
3930:from the original on 15 January 2016.
3475:
3473:
3324:from the original on 26 February 2019
3071:Reagle, Joseph; Rhue, Lauren (2011).
2924:
2922:
2739:
2737:
2735:
2515:from the original on 29 October 2013.
2449:Montellaro, Zach (18 November 2015).
2160:
2158:
1969:Ford, Heather; Wajcman, Judy (2017).
1886:from the original on 14 November 2015
1793:from the original on 29 October 2013.
1741:from the original on 26 December 2014
1664:Reagle, Joseph M. (4 February 2011).
1633:Herring, Susan C. (4 February 2011).
1160:"Why Do So Few Women Edit Knowledge?"
1034:In 2022, Angela Fan, a researcher at
833:In August 2014, Knowledge co-founder
568:Harassment, however, also exists for
7:
6123:Carlos Bandeirense MirandĂłpolis hoax
6093:on the Arabic and Persian Wikipedias
4805:"Knowledge Survey: Overview Results"
4580:Filipacchi, Amanda (30 April 2013).
4567:Filipacchi, Amanda (24 April 2013).
4194:from the original on 12 October 2017
4168:from the original on 8 November 2017
4005:from the original on 3 December 2014
3570:Maher, Katherine (18 October 2018).
3017:Emerging Technology from the arXiv.
2680:"Conflict, criticism, or confidence"
2533:"Conflict, criticism, or confidence"
2181:from the original on 14 October 2019
1950:from the original on 4 November 2018
1905:Maher, Katherine (18 October 2018).
1695:Cassell, Justine (4 February 2011).
1584:from the original on 3 February 2011
1532:"Knowledge Survey: Overview Results"
1321:
1319:
1192:
1190:
1188:
1027:, history department chairperson at
50:for the sculpture featured only men.
4771:"How Knowledge Is Hostile to Women"
4749:"Where Are the Women in Knowledge?"
4256:from the original on 16 August 2018
4225:from the original on 16 August 2018
3807:from the original on 7 January 2015
3355:from the original on 3 October 2018
3293:from the original on 3 October 2018
2465:from the original on 21 August 2017
1604:"Where Are the Women in Knowledge?"
1457:from the original on 18 April 2015.
614:was better organized than the page
121:Efforts to measure gender disparity
4213:Gordon, Maggie (9 November 2017).
3770:. 26 February 2013. Archived from
3432:Noah, Timothy (24 February 2007).
2975:Knowledge:WikiProject Women in Red
2716:from the original on 25 March 2019
2569:from the original on 25 March 2019
2350:from the original on 17 June 2015.
2215:from the original on 18 July 2015.
1839:Bruce Maiman (23 September 2014).
1363:from the original on 4 August 2019
1248:Balch, Oliver (28 November 2019).
1140:Knowledge:WikiProject Women in Red
25:
4727:Zevallos, Zuleyka (8 June 2014).
4670:Leonard, Andrew (29 April 2013).
4650:Knibbs, Kate (10 February 2014).
4628:. Berlin: Wikimedia Deutschland.
4369:from the original on 1 April 2019
4080:How Knowledge Is Hostile to Women
3974:from the original on 1 April 2019
3139:Simonite, Tom (22 October 2013).
2594:Equality, Diversity and Inclusion
2405:from the original on 4 July 2015.
2279:from the original on 21 June 2015
2203:Gardner, Sue (19 February 2011).
2096:from the original on 3 March 2018
1676:from the original on 15 July 2014
1666:"'Open' Doesn't Include Everyone"
1645:from the original on 24 July 2014
1614:from the original on 15 July 2014
837:announced in a BBC interview the
489:Some find its overall atmosphere
6473:
6472:
6460:
5691:Predictions of the project's end
5332:Gender-related Development Index
5179:Diversity, equity, and inclusion
4769:Paling, Emma (21 October 2015).
4503:
4336:Khan, Arman (18 November 2022).
3343:Leyland Cecco (3 October 2018).
3312:Davis, Nicola (2 October 2018).
2865:"Knowledge's Hostility to Women"
2863:Paling, Emma (21 October 2015).
2361:Sampson, Tim (24 January 2013).
2058:Vitulli, Marie A. (March 2018).
1697:"Editing Wars Behind the Scenes"
1399:from the original on 20 May 2019
784:
6148:Seigenthaler biography incident
4707:Zandt, Deanna (26 April 2013).
4601:Gleick, James (29 April 2013).
4559:Bort, Julie (15 February 2014)
4156:Redden, Molly (19 March 2016).
4110:"WikiWomen's User Group - Meta"
3918:Huang, Keira (11 August 2013).
2953:10.1140/epjds/s13688-016-0066-4
1572:Cohen, Noam (30 January 2011).
640:. That is, Knowledge dominated
4882:Hinnosaar, Marit (July 2019).
4310:Sayej, Nadja (15 March 2018).
3413:Schiff, Stacy (24 July 2006).
3073:"Gender Bias in Knowledge and
2892:Jacobs, Julia (8 April 2019).
2652:Robertson, Adi (25 May 2020).
2588:Lir, Scholmit Aharoni (2019).
1197:Kleeman, Jenny (26 May 2016).
1158:Torres, Nicole (2 June 2016).
1058:Geographical bias on Knowledge
867:Efforts to address gender bias
854:England national football team
612:listing pornographic actresses
100:In 2015, Knowledge co-founder
1:
6079:Wikimedia Foundation actions
4046:Stoeffel (11 February 2014).
3993:Bosch, Torie (13 July 2012).
3612:10.1080/07421222.2020.1831773
2399:The Christian Science Monitor
1721:The Editor Survey, April 2011
1063:Second-generation gender bias
586:Article creation and deletion
392:In March 2018, mathematician
6443:List of online encyclopedias
6428:Knowledge for World Heritage
6204:Israeli–Palestinian conflict
5834:WikiConference North America
5662:deletionism and inclusionism
5615:Conflict-of-interest editing
5129:Gender marking in job titles
5119:Gender neutrality in English
4687:Morris, Kevin (1 May 2013).
4473:Fried, Ina (30 March 2022).
4244:Khan, Sadiq (12 June 2018).
3556:10.18653/v1/2020.nlpcss-1.11
3515:10.18653/v1/2020.nlpcss-1.11
3508:: 94–103. 11 February 2021.
1818:10.1080/1369118X.2014.957711
1498:10.1371/journal.pone.0065782
360:. The study concluded that:
116:Gender bias in participation
6397:Magna Carta (An Embroidery)
6209:Russian invasion of Ukraine
5992:Rosie Stephenson-Goodknight
5620:political editing incidents
5545:Gender in Bible translation
4603:"Knowledge's Women Problem"
3948:. Fall 2013. Archived from
3231:Tripodi, Francesca (2021).
2311:(Nov. 2010-April 2011) and
2267:Andrew Lih (20 June 2015).
1931:Computers in Human Behavior
1282:Tripodi, Francesca (2021).
1018:National Science Foundation
6532:
5550:God and gender in Hinduism
5432:United States (employment)
5327:Gender Empowerment Measure
5174:Causes of mental disorders
4903:10.1016/j.jebo.2019.04.020
4709:"Yes, Knowledge is Sexist"
4027:. Wikimedia. 15 March 2021
3895:10.1038/d41586-022-01456-x
3141:"The Decline of Knowledge"
3125:10.26876/uztaro.124.2023.2
1068:Systemic bias in Knowledge
969:WikiProject gender studies
95:systemic bias in Knowledge
6456:
6055:Internet Watch Foundation
6028:
5734:
5441:Promotion and enforcement
5000:
3250:10.1177/14614448211023772
2753:Social Studies of Science
1975:Social Studies of Science
1944:10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.043
1301:10.1177/14614448211023772
597:computational linguistics
284:United Nations University
257:
234:
211:
188:
165:
160:
157:
154:
151:
148:
145:
142:
6083:on the Chinese Knowledge
5520:Women's studies journals
5499:Suicide among LGBT youth
5494:Gender studies academics
5214:Gender bias on Knowledge
4607:New York Review of Books
4588:. Atlantic Monthly Group
4521:Gender bias on Knowledge
3968:foundation.wikimedia.org
3924:South China Morning Post
3831:29 December 2016 at the
3434:"Evicted from Knowledge"
3058:12 November 2016 at the
2834:10.1177/1461444818779080
2765:10.1177/0306312717692172
2606:10.1108/EDI-10-2018-0198
2269:"Can Knowledge Survive?"
2025:Journal of Communication
1987:10.1177/0306312717692172
1053:Racial bias on Knowledge
55:Gender bias on Knowledge
18:Gender Bias on Knowledge
6154:Star Trek Into Darkness
5793:Wikipedian in residence
5515:Gender studies journals
5453:Anti-discrimination law
5219:Gender-equality paradox
5204:Gender-related violence
5094:Gender-neutral language
4277:Women's Studies Journal
4097:(subscription required)
4085:21 October 2015 at the
3657:10.1145/3485447.3512134
3237:New Media & Society
3181:10.1145/2038558.2038560
2822:New Media & Society
2692:10.1145/2145204.2145265
2545:10.1145/2145204.2145265
2236:10.1145/2145204.2145265
1784:10.1145/2038558.2038560
1430:10.1145/2038558.2038560
1288:New Media & Society
1164:Harvard Business Review
995:In 2022, an article in
654:University of Minnesota
630:Encyclopædia Britannica
325:negative evaluations".
91:criticisms of Knowledge
6501:Criticism of Knowledge
5788:Wikimedian of the Year
5322:Gender and development
5194:Educational inequality
3860:. Abrams. p. 13.
3854:Perez, Caroline Criado
3641:. pp. 2624–2635.
3394:Cite journal requires
2322:(April – October 2011)
2115:Noopur, Raval (2014).
876:
674:Nobel Prize in Physics
665:
577:Gender bias in content
423:
378:feminist technoscience
366:
63:volunteer contributors
51:
6516:Knowledge reliability
5749:Arbitration Committee
5239:List of global issues
4857:Tripp, Dawn Leonard.
3146:MIT Technology Review
3023:MIT Technology Review
1347:Curtis, Cara (2019).
937:to society at large.
874:
850:Caroline Criado Perez
693:Guggenheim fellowship
663:
616:listing women writers
417:
35:
6418:Wikimedia Foundation
6353:Google and Knowledge
6118:Alan MacMasters hoax
5824:WikiConference India
5657:Deletion of articles
5244:Political repression
5184:Diversity (politics)
4863:Anita Borg Institute
4733:othersociologist.com
3577:Wikimedia Foundation
1911:Wikimedia Foundation
1853:on 23 September 2014
1385:(11 February 2019).
1203:www.newstatesman.com
1040:open-source software
983:Sarah Osborne Bender
965:WikiProject feminism
898:Wikimedia Foundation
886:Wikimedia Foundation
880:Wikimedia Foundation
839:Wikimedia Foundation
477:Aversion to conflict
383:knowledge production
346:Wikimedia Foundation
296:Wikimedia Foundation
71:Wikimedia Foundation
6391:LGBTQ and Knowledge
6368:Science information
6348:Depths of Knowledge
6281:Listen to Knowledge
5540:Gender and religion
5374:European Parliament
5301:Economic inequality
5124:Genderless language
4844:on 19 November 2018
4797:Research and advice
4674:. Salon Media Group
4534:The History Teacher
4440:The History Teacher
4145:on 9 February 2015.
3774:on 17 November 2015
2318:5 June 2016 at the
2307:2 July 2017 at the
1610:. 2 February 2011.
1489:2013PLoSO...865782H
1025:Jennifer C. Edwards
294:article cited this
139:
6433:Knowledge in India
6423:Wikimedia movement
6358:Health information
6242:Knowledge Monument
6235:Viola angustifolia
6138:Henryk Batuta hoax
6133:Essjay controversy
5987:Lisa Seitz-Gruwell
5927:Dariusz Jemielniak
5776:List of Wikipedias
5448:Affirmative action
5224:Gender empowerment
5189:Diversity training
5099:Grammatical gender
5087:Gender in language
4956:"Wiki Loves Women"
4869:on 9 February 2015
4783:on 21 October 2015
4753:The New York Times
4735:. Zuleyka Zevallos
4573:The New York Times
4114:meta.wikimedia.org
4095:, 21 October 2015
3289:. 3 October 2018.
3050:, 2014, (London),
2898:The New York Times
2632:meta.wikimedia.org
2430:on 5 November 2014
2143:on 14 October 2019
2037:10.1093/joc/jqx003
1846:The Sacramento Bee
1701:The New York Times
1670:The New York Times
1639:The New York Times
1608:The New York Times
1578:The New York Times
1228:meta.wikimedia.org
1016:In July 2014, the
942:Knowledge Teahouse
877:
827:Heather Mac Donald
796:. You can help by
703:Article visibility
666:
501:grammatical gender
462:Not having enough
432:The New York Times
424:
308:The New York Times
305:In February 2011,
136:
52:
39:Knowledge Monument
6488:
6487:
6217:
6216:
6194:COVID-19 pandemic
6182:American politics
6143:Jar'Edo Wens hoax
6015:
6014:
5947:Ira Brad Matetsky
5932:Rebecca MacKinnon
5902:Florence Devouard
5558:
5557:
5528:
5527:
5475:
5474:
5471:
5470:
5345:
5344:
5277:
5276:
5269:Women empowerment
5149:Gender inequality
5058:Gender neutrality
4755:. 2 February 2011
4635:978-3-9816799-0-8
4219:Houston Chronicle
3867:978-1-4197-2907-2
3768:Surprisingly Free
3706:10.1002/asi.24723
3666:978-1-4503-9096-5
3458:. 4 February 2021
3190:978-1-4503-0909-7
2828:(12): 4608–4633.
2701:978-1-4503-1086-4
2554:978-1-4503-1086-4
2245:978-1-4503-1086-4
1872:Lapowsky, Issie.
1439:978-1-4503-0909-7
1424:. pp. 1–10.
1094:. 10 October 2014
1029:Manhattan College
961:WikiProject women
814:
813:
762:non-binary people
758:transgender women
559:gender inequality
457:editing interface
453:user-friendliness
445:Knowledge editors
350:secondary sources
280:
279:
152:Editors US (UNU)
149:Readers US (UNU)
146:Readers US (Pew)
128:English Knowledge
75:English Knowledge
16:(Redirected from
6523:
6476:
6475:
6464:
6463:
6413:Wiki rabbit hole
6261:Academic studies
6229:274301 Knowledge
6026:
5922:Maryana Iskander
5897:Esra'a Al Shafei
5732:
5675:Ignore all rules
5585:
5578:
5571:
5562:
5484:
5438:
5381:(Mahnaz Afkhami)
5286:
5279:
5254:Social exclusion
5199:Gender apartheid
5154:
4987:
4980:
4973:
4964:
4959:
4944:
4942:
4929:
4927:
4914:
4888:
4878:
4876:
4874:
4865:. Archived from
4853:
4851:
4849:
4843:
4836:
4826:
4824:
4822:
4817:on 14 April 2010
4816:
4810:. Archived from
4809:
4792:
4790:
4788:
4779:. Archived from
4764:
4762:
4760:
4744:
4742:
4740:
4723:
4721:
4719:
4703:
4701:
4699:
4683:
4681:
4679:
4666:
4664:
4662:
4646:
4644:
4642:
4618:
4616:
4614:
4597:
4595:
4593:
4576:
4549:
4507:
4506:
4490:
4489:
4487:
4485:
4470:
4464:
4463:
4435:
4429:
4428:
4426:
4424:
4410:
4404:
4403:
4401:
4399:
4385:
4379:
4378:
4376:
4374:
4359:
4353:
4352:
4350:
4348:
4333:
4327:
4326:
4324:
4322:
4307:
4301:
4300:
4272:
4266:
4265:
4263:
4261:
4241:
4235:
4234:
4232:
4230:
4210:
4204:
4203:
4201:
4199:
4184:
4178:
4177:
4175:
4173:
4153:
4147:
4146:
4131:
4125:
4124:
4122:
4120:
4106:
4100:
4098:
4076:
4070:
4069:
4067:
4065:
4043:
4037:
4036:
4034:
4032:
4021:
4015:
4014:
4012:
4010:
3990:
3984:
3983:
3981:
3979:
3960:
3954:
3953:
3952:on 17 July 2015.
3938:
3932:
3931:
3915:
3906:
3905:
3903:
3901:
3878:
3872:
3871:
3850:
3844:
3823:
3817:
3816:
3814:
3812:
3790:
3784:
3783:
3781:
3779:
3760:
3754:
3753:
3751:
3749:
3740:. Archived from
3724:
3718:
3717:
3685:
3679:
3678:
3650:
3634:
3628:
3627:
3606:(4): 1047–1072.
3595:
3589:
3588:
3586:
3584:
3567:
3561:
3560:
3558:
3541:
3535:
3534:
3532:
3530:
3517:
3498:
3492:
3491:
3489:
3477:
3468:
3467:
3465:
3463:
3448:
3442:
3441:
3429:
3423:
3422:
3410:
3404:
3403:
3397:
3392:
3390:
3382:
3380:
3371:
3365:
3364:
3362:
3360:
3340:
3334:
3333:
3331:
3329:
3309:
3303:
3302:
3300:
3298:
3277:
3271:
3270:
3252:
3243:(7): 1687–1707.
3228:
3222:
3221:
3209:
3203:
3202:
3164:
3158:
3157:
3155:
3153:
3136:
3130:
3129:
3127:
3107:
3101:
3100:
3098:
3096:
3091:on 22 March 2016
3068:
3062:
3045:
3039:
3038:
3036:
3034:
3014:
3008:
3006:
3004:
3002:
2987:
2978:
2971:
2965:
2964:
2946:
2931:EPJ Data Science
2926:
2917:
2916:
2914:
2912:
2889:
2880:
2879:
2877:
2875:
2860:
2854:
2853:
2817:
2808:
2807:
2805:
2803:
2797:
2750:
2741:
2730:
2729:
2723:
2721:
2675:
2669:
2668:
2666:
2664:
2649:
2643:
2642:
2640:
2638:
2624:
2618:
2617:
2585:
2579:
2578:
2576:
2574:
2528:
2517:
2516:
2514:
2503:
2495:(October 2011).
2484:
2475:
2474:
2472:
2470:
2446:
2440:
2439:
2437:
2435:
2429:
2422:
2413:
2407:
2406:
2391:
2385:
2384:
2382:
2380:
2371:. Archived from
2358:
2352:
2351:
2329:
2323:
2298:
2292:
2291:
2286:
2284:
2264:
2258:
2257:
2223:
2217:
2216:
2200:
2191:
2190:
2188:
2186:
2162:
2153:
2152:
2150:
2148:
2139:. Archived from
2129:10.7264/N37W69GC
2112:
2106:
2105:
2103:
2101:
2095:
2079:10.1090/noti1650
2064:
2055:
2049:
2048:
2020:
2011:
2010:
1966:
1960:
1959:
1957:
1955:
1921:
1915:
1914:
1902:
1896:
1895:
1893:
1891:
1869:
1863:
1862:
1860:
1858:
1849:. Archived from
1836:
1830:
1829:
1801:
1795:
1794:
1792:
1768:(October 2011).
1757:
1751:
1750:
1748:
1746:
1740:
1727:
1715:
1709:
1708:
1692:
1686:
1685:
1683:
1681:
1661:
1655:
1654:
1652:
1650:
1630:
1624:
1623:
1621:
1619:
1600:
1594:
1593:
1591:
1589:
1569:
1554:
1553:
1551:
1549:
1544:on 14 April 2010
1543:
1537:. Archived from
1536:
1527:
1521:
1520:
1510:
1500:
1468:
1459:
1458:
1456:
1415:
1409:
1408:
1406:
1404:
1379:
1373:
1372:
1370:
1368:
1344:
1338:
1337:
1335:
1323:
1314:
1313:
1303:
1294:(7): 1687–1707.
1279:
1273:
1272:
1270:
1268:
1245:
1239:
1238:
1236:
1234:
1220:
1214:
1213:
1211:
1209:
1194:
1183:
1182:
1180:
1178:
1155:
1142:
1136:
1130:
1129:
1127:
1125:
1110:
1104:
1103:
1101:
1099:
1084:
921:User-led efforts
892:
809:
806:
788:
781:
722:textual analysis
670:Donna Strickland
528:community health
394:Marie A. Vitulli
368:A 2017 study by
317:Joseph M. Reagle
313:Susan C. Herring
155:Editors US Adj.
140:
21:
6531:
6530:
6526:
6525:
6524:
6522:
6521:
6520:
6506:Gender equality
6491:
6490:
6489:
6484:
6452:
6408:Print Knowledge
6372:
6331:
6290:
6253:
6247:
6213:
6170:
6104:
6011:
5937:Katherine Maher
5885:
5879:
5843:
5807:
5726:
5719:
5707:Citation needed
5601:
5594:
5589:
5559:
5554:
5524:
5503:
5467:
5436:
5351:
5341:
5310:
5273:
5143:
5082:
5073:Gender variance
5053:Gender identity
5031:
4996:
4994:Gender equality
4991:
4954:
4951:
4932:
4917:
4886:
4881:
4872:
4870:
4856:
4847:
4845:
4841:
4834:
4829:
4820:
4818:
4814:
4807:
4802:
4799:
4786:
4784:
4768:
4758:
4756:
4747:
4738:
4736:
4726:
4717:
4715:
4706:
4697:
4695:
4686:
4677:
4675:
4669:
4660:
4658:
4649:
4640:
4638:
4636:
4621:
4612:
4610:
4600:
4591:
4589:
4579:
4566:
4556:
4531:
4528:
4527:
4526:
4508:
4504:
4499:
4497:Further reading
4494:
4493:
4483:
4481:
4472:
4471:
4467:
4437:
4436:
4432:
4422:
4420:
4412:
4411:
4407:
4397:
4395:
4387:
4386:
4382:
4372:
4370:
4361:
4360:
4356:
4346:
4344:
4335:
4334:
4330:
4320:
4318:
4309:
4308:
4304:
4274:
4273:
4269:
4259:
4257:
4243:
4242:
4238:
4228:
4226:
4212:
4211:
4207:
4197:
4195:
4186:
4185:
4181:
4171:
4169:
4155:
4154:
4150:
4133:
4132:
4128:
4118:
4116:
4108:
4107:
4103:
4096:
4087:Wayback Machine
4078:Paling, Emma, "
4077:
4073:
4063:
4061:
4045:
4044:
4040:
4030:
4028:
4023:
4022:
4018:
4008:
4006:
3992:
3991:
3987:
3977:
3975:
3962:
3961:
3957:
3940:
3939:
3935:
3917:
3916:
3909:
3899:
3897:
3880:
3879:
3875:
3868:
3852:
3851:
3847:
3839:interview with
3833:Wayback Machine
3824:
3820:
3810:
3808:
3792:
3791:
3787:
3777:
3775:
3762:
3761:
3757:
3747:
3745:
3726:
3725:
3721:
3687:
3686:
3682:
3667:
3636:
3635:
3631:
3597:
3596:
3592:
3582:
3580:
3569:
3568:
3564:
3543:
3542:
3538:
3528:
3526:
3500:
3499:
3495:
3479:
3478:
3471:
3461:
3459:
3450:
3449:
3445:
3431:
3430:
3426:
3412:
3411:
3407:
3393:
3383:
3378:
3373:
3372:
3368:
3358:
3356:
3342:
3341:
3337:
3327:
3325:
3311:
3310:
3306:
3296:
3294:
3286:The Irish Times
3279:
3278:
3274:
3230:
3229:
3225:
3211:
3210:
3206:
3191:
3169:"WP:clubhouse?"
3166:
3165:
3161:
3151:
3149:
3138:
3137:
3133:
3109:
3108:
3104:
3094:
3092:
3070:
3069:
3065:
3060:Wayback Machine
3046:
3042:
3032:
3030:
3016:
3015:
3011:
3000:
2998:
2989:
2988:
2981:
2972:
2968:
2928:
2927:
2920:
2910:
2908:
2891:
2890:
2883:
2873:
2871:
2862:
2861:
2857:
2819:
2818:
2811:
2801:
2799:
2795:
2748:
2743:
2742:
2733:
2719:
2717:
2702:
2677:
2676:
2672:
2662:
2660:
2651:
2650:
2646:
2636:
2634:
2626:
2625:
2621:
2587:
2586:
2582:
2572:
2570:
2555:
2530:
2529:
2520:
2512:
2501:
2486:
2485:
2478:
2468:
2466:
2455:theatlantic.com
2448:
2447:
2443:
2433:
2431:
2427:
2420:
2415:
2414:
2410:
2401:. August 2013.
2393:
2392:
2388:
2378:
2376:
2360:
2359:
2355:
2331:
2330:
2326:
2320:Wayback Machine
2309:Wayback Machine
2299:
2295:
2282:
2280:
2273:www.nytimes.com
2266:
2265:
2261:
2246:
2230:. p. 383.
2225:
2224:
2220:
2202:
2201:
2194:
2184:
2182:
2164:
2163:
2156:
2146:
2144:
2114:
2113:
2109:
2099:
2097:
2093:
2062:
2057:
2056:
2052:
2022:
2021:
2014:
1968:
1967:
1963:
1953:
1951:
1923:
1922:
1918:
1904:
1903:
1899:
1889:
1887:
1871:
1870:
1866:
1856:
1854:
1838:
1837:
1833:
1803:
1802:
1798:
1790:
1759:
1758:
1754:
1744:
1742:
1738:
1725:
1717:
1716:
1712:
1694:
1693:
1689:
1679:
1677:
1663:
1662:
1658:
1648:
1646:
1632:
1631:
1627:
1617:
1615:
1602:
1601:
1597:
1587:
1585:
1571:
1570:
1557:
1547:
1545:
1541:
1534:
1529:
1528:
1524:
1470:
1469:
1462:
1454:
1440:
1417:
1416:
1412:
1402:
1400:
1392:The Independent
1381:
1380:
1376:
1366:
1364:
1346:
1345:
1341:
1325:
1324:
1317:
1281:
1280:
1276:
1266:
1264:
1247:
1246:
1242:
1232:
1230:
1222:
1221:
1217:
1207:
1205:
1196:
1195:
1186:
1176:
1174:
1157:
1156:
1145:
1137:
1133:
1123:
1121:
1112:
1111:
1107:
1097:
1095:
1092:The Independent
1086:
1085:
1081:
1076:
1049:
1038:, announced an
1011:
923:
890:
882:
869:
810:
804:
801:
794:needs expansion
779:
750:Chelsea Manning
714:
712:Article content
705:
588:
579:
551:epistemological
471:self-confidence
412:
342:Katherine Maher
322:Justine Cassell
123:
118:
79:Katherine Maher
44:SĹ‚ubice, Poland
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
6529:
6527:
6519:
6518:
6513:
6508:
6503:
6493:
6492:
6486:
6485:
6483:
6482:
6470:
6457:
6454:
6453:
6451:
6450:
6445:
6440:
6435:
6430:
6425:
6420:
6415:
6410:
6405:
6400:
6393:
6388:
6380:
6378:
6374:
6373:
6371:
6370:
6365:
6360:
6355:
6350:
6345:
6339:
6337:
6333:
6332:
6330:
6329:
6324:
6319:
6317:Knowledge Zero
6314:
6309:
6304:
6298:
6296:
6292:
6291:
6289:
6288:
6286:Wikipediocracy
6283:
6278:
6273:
6268:
6263:
6257:
6255:
6249:
6248:
6246:
6245:
6238:
6231:
6225:
6223:
6219:
6218:
6215:
6214:
6212:
6211:
6206:
6201:
6196:
6191:
6190:
6189:
6178:
6176:
6172:
6171:
6169:
6168:
6163:
6158:
6150:
6145:
6140:
6135:
6130:
6125:
6120:
6114:
6112:
6106:
6105:
6103:
6102:
6101:
6100:
6099:
6098:
6090:
6089:
6088:
6077:
6072:
6067:
6062:
6057:
6052:
6047:
6042:
6041:
6040:
6029:
6023:
6017:
6016:
6013:
6012:
6010:
6009:
6004:
5999:
5994:
5989:
5984:
5982:MarĂa Sefidari
5979:
5974:
5972:Annie Rauwerda
5969:
5964:
5962:Raju Narisetti
5959:
5954:
5949:
5944:
5939:
5934:
5929:
5924:
5919:
5914:
5909:
5904:
5899:
5893:
5891:
5881:
5880:
5878:
5877:
5872:
5867:
5862:
5857:
5851:
5849:
5845:
5844:
5842:
5841:
5836:
5831:
5826:
5821:
5815:
5813:
5809:
5808:
5806:
5805:
5800:
5795:
5790:
5785:
5778:
5773:
5768:
5767:
5766:
5756:
5751:
5746:
5741:
5739:Administrators
5735:
5729:
5721:
5720:
5718:
5717:
5712:
5711:
5710:
5703:
5693:
5688:
5683:
5678:
5671:
5670:
5669:
5664:
5654:
5653:
5652:
5647:
5642:
5637:
5629:
5624:
5623:
5622:
5612:
5606:
5604:
5596:
5595:
5590:
5588:
5587:
5580:
5573:
5565:
5556:
5555:
5553:
5552:
5547:
5542:
5536:
5534:
5530:
5529:
5526:
5525:
5523:
5522:
5517:
5511:
5509:
5505:
5504:
5502:
5501:
5496:
5490:
5488:
5481:
5477:
5476:
5473:
5472:
5469:
5468:
5466:
5465:
5455:
5450:
5444:
5442:
5435:
5434:
5429:
5427:United Kingdom
5424:
5419:
5414:
5409:
5404:
5399:
5394:
5389:
5384:
5376:
5371:
5366:
5361:
5355:
5353:
5347:
5346:
5343:
5342:
5340:
5339:
5334:
5329:
5324:
5318:
5316:
5312:
5311:
5309:
5308:
5306:Gender pay gap
5303:
5298:
5296:Economic abuse
5292:
5290:
5283:
5275:
5274:
5272:
5271:
5266:
5261:
5256:
5251:
5246:
5241:
5236:
5231:
5226:
5221:
5216:
5211:
5206:
5201:
5196:
5191:
5186:
5181:
5176:
5171:
5166:
5160:
5158:
5151:
5145:
5144:
5142:
5141:
5136:
5131:
5126:
5121:
5116:
5111:
5106:
5101:
5096:
5090:
5088:
5084:
5083:
5081:
5080:
5075:
5070:
5065:
5060:
5055:
5050:
5045:
5039:
5037:
5033:
5032:
5030:
5029:
5020:
5011:
5001:
4998:
4997:
4992:
4990:
4989:
4982:
4975:
4967:
4961:
4960:
4950:
4949:External links
4947:
4946:
4945:
4930:
4915:
4879:
4854:
4827:
4798:
4795:
4794:
4793:
4766:
4745:
4724:
4704:
4684:
4667:
4647:
4634:
4619:
4598:
4577:
4564:
4555:
4554:Media coverage
4552:
4551:
4550:
4540:(3): 409–436.
4509:
4502:
4501:
4500:
4498:
4495:
4492:
4491:
4465:
4446:(3): 409–436.
4430:
4405:
4380:
4354:
4328:
4302:
4267:
4236:
4205:
4179:
4148:
4139:washington.edu
4126:
4101:
4071:
4038:
4016:
3985:
3955:
3942:"Wikistorming"
3933:
3907:
3873:
3866:
3845:
3818:
3785:
3755:
3744:on 20 May 2015
3728:Reagle, Joseph
3719:
3700:(2): 219–233.
3680:
3665:
3629:
3590:
3562:
3536:
3493:
3469:
3443:
3424:
3419:The New Yorker
3405:
3396:|journal=
3366:
3335:
3304:
3272:
3223:
3204:
3189:
3159:
3131:
3118:(124): 25–49.
3102:
3063:
3040:
3009:
2979:
2966:
2918:
2881:
2855:
2809:
2759:(4): 511–527.
2731:
2700:
2670:
2644:
2619:
2600:(7): 801–818.
2580:
2553:
2518:
2489:Terveen, Loren
2476:
2441:
2408:
2386:
2375:on 3 July 2015
2353:
2324:
2293:
2275:. Washington.
2259:
2244:
2218:
2209:suegardner.org
2192:
2154:
2107:
2073:(3): 330–334.
2050:
2031:(1): 143–168.
2012:
1981:(4): 511–527.
1961:
1916:
1897:
1864:
1831:
1812:(4): 424–442.
1796:
1762:Terveen, Loren
1752:
1734:. April 2011.
1710:
1687:
1656:
1625:
1595:
1555:
1522:
1460:
1438:
1410:
1374:
1353:thenextweb.com
1339:
1315:
1274:
1240:
1215:
1184:
1143:
1131:
1105:
1078:
1077:
1075:
1072:
1071:
1070:
1065:
1060:
1055:
1048:
1045:
1036:Meta Platforms
1010:
1007:
922:
919:
881:
878:
868:
865:
812:
811:
791:
789:
778:
775:
754:Caitlyn Jenner
713:
710:
704:
701:
697:Pulitzer Prize
679:In July 2006,
587:
584:
578:
575:
547:sociotechnical
508:
507:
504:
497:
494:
487:
484:
474:
467:
460:
411:
408:
358:gender-neutral
292:New York Times
278:
277:
274:
271:
268:
265:
262:
259:
255:
254:
251:
248:
245:
242:
239:
236:
232:
231:
228:
225:
222:
219:
216:
213:
209:
208:
205:
202:
199:
196:
193:
190:
186:
185:
182:
179:
176:
173:
170:
167:
163:
162:
159:
158:Editors (UNU)
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
122:
119:
117:
114:
26:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
6528:
6517:
6514:
6512:
6509:
6507:
6504:
6502:
6499:
6498:
6496:
6481:
6480:
6471:
6469:
6468:
6459:
6458:
6455:
6449:
6448:List of wikis
6446:
6444:
6441:
6439:
6436:
6434:
6431:
6429:
6426:
6424:
6421:
6419:
6416:
6414:
6411:
6409:
6406:
6404:
6401:
6399:
6398:
6394:
6392:
6389:
6387:
6386:
6382:
6381:
6379:
6375:
6369:
6366:
6364:
6361:
6359:
6356:
6354:
6351:
6349:
6346:
6344:
6341:
6340:
6338:
6334:
6328:
6325:
6323:
6320:
6318:
6315:
6313:
6310:
6308:
6305:
6303:
6300:
6299:
6297:
6293:
6287:
6284:
6282:
6279:
6277:
6274:
6272:
6269:
6267:
6264:
6262:
6259:
6258:
6256:
6250:
6244:
6243:
6239:
6237:
6236:
6232:
6230:
6227:
6226:
6224:
6220:
6210:
6207:
6205:
6202:
6200:
6197:
6195:
6192:
6188:
6185:
6184:
6183:
6180:
6179:
6177:
6173:
6167:
6166:Zhemao hoaxes
6164:
6162:
6159:
6157:
6155:
6151:
6149:
6146:
6144:
6141:
6139:
6136:
6134:
6131:
6129:
6126:
6124:
6121:
6119:
6116:
6115:
6113:
6111:
6110:Controversies
6107:
6096:
6095:
6094:
6091:
6086:
6085:
6084:
6081:
6080:
6078:
6076:
6073:
6071:
6068:
6066:
6063:
6061:
6058:
6056:
6053:
6051:
6048:
6046:
6043:
6039:
6036:
6035:
6034:
6031:
6030:
6027:
6024:
6022:
6018:
6008:
6005:
6003:
6000:
5998:
5997:Lila Tretikov
5995:
5993:
5990:
5988:
5985:
5983:
5980:
5978:
5975:
5973:
5970:
5968:
5967:Steven Pruitt
5965:
5963:
5960:
5958:
5955:
5953:
5950:
5948:
5945:
5943:
5942:Magnus Manske
5940:
5938:
5935:
5933:
5930:
5928:
5925:
5923:
5920:
5918:
5917:James Heilman
5915:
5913:
5910:
5908:
5905:
5903:
5900:
5898:
5895:
5894:
5892:
5889:
5882:
5876:
5873:
5871:
5868:
5866:
5863:
5861:
5858:
5856:
5853:
5852:
5850:
5846:
5840:
5837:
5835:
5832:
5830:
5827:
5825:
5822:
5820:
5817:
5816:
5814:
5810:
5804:
5801:
5799:
5796:
5794:
5791:
5789:
5786:
5784:
5783:
5779:
5777:
5774:
5772:
5769:
5765:
5762:
5761:
5760:
5757:
5755:
5752:
5750:
5747:
5745:
5742:
5740:
5737:
5736:
5733:
5730:
5728:
5727:(Wikipedians)
5722:
5716:
5713:
5709:
5708:
5704:
5702:
5701:Fact-checking
5699:
5698:
5697:
5694:
5692:
5689:
5687:
5684:
5682:
5679:
5676:
5672:
5668:
5665:
5663:
5660:
5659:
5658:
5655:
5651:
5648:
5646:
5643:
5641:
5638:
5636:
5633:
5632:
5630:
5628:
5625:
5621:
5618:
5617:
5616:
5613:
5611:
5608:
5607:
5605:
5603:
5597:
5593:
5586:
5581:
5579:
5574:
5572:
5567:
5566:
5563:
5551:
5548:
5546:
5543:
5541:
5538:
5537:
5535:
5531:
5521:
5518:
5516:
5513:
5512:
5510:
5506:
5500:
5497:
5495:
5492:
5491:
5489:
5485:
5482:
5478:
5464:
5463:
5459:
5456:
5454:
5451:
5449:
5446:
5445:
5443:
5439:
5433:
5430:
5428:
5425:
5423:
5420:
5418:
5415:
5413:
5410:
5408:
5405:
5403:
5400:
5398:
5395:
5393:
5390:
5388:
5385:
5383:
5382:
5377:
5375:
5372:
5370:
5367:
5365:
5362:
5360:
5357:
5356:
5354:
5348:
5338:
5335:
5333:
5330:
5328:
5325:
5323:
5320:
5319:
5317:
5313:
5307:
5304:
5302:
5299:
5297:
5294:
5293:
5291:
5287:
5284:
5280:
5270:
5267:
5265:
5262:
5260:
5257:
5255:
5252:
5250:
5247:
5245:
5242:
5240:
5237:
5235:
5234:Glass ceiling
5232:
5230:
5227:
5225:
5222:
5220:
5217:
5215:
5212:
5210:
5207:
5205:
5202:
5200:
5197:
5195:
5192:
5190:
5187:
5185:
5182:
5180:
5177:
5175:
5172:
5170:
5169:Anti-intersex
5167:
5165:
5162:
5161:
5159:
5155:
5152:
5150:
5146:
5140:
5137:
5135:
5132:
5130:
5127:
5125:
5122:
5120:
5117:
5115:
5112:
5110:
5107:
5105:
5102:
5100:
5097:
5095:
5092:
5091:
5089:
5085:
5079:
5076:
5074:
5071:
5069:
5066:
5064:
5061:
5059:
5056:
5054:
5051:
5049:
5048:Gender binary
5046:
5044:
5041:
5040:
5038:
5034:
5028:
5024:
5021:
5019:
5015:
5012:
5010:
5006:
5003:
5002:
4999:
4995:
4988:
4983:
4981:
4976:
4974:
4969:
4968:
4965:
4957:
4953:
4952:
4948:
4941:
4936:
4931:
4926:
4921:
4916:
4912:
4908:
4904:
4900:
4896:
4892:
4885:
4880:
4868:
4864:
4860:
4855:
4840:
4833:
4828:
4813:
4806:
4801:
4800:
4796:
4782:
4778:
4777:
4772:
4767:
4754:
4750:
4746:
4734:
4730:
4725:
4714:
4710:
4705:
4694:
4693:The Daily Dot
4690:
4685:
4673:
4668:
4657:
4656:The Daily Dot
4653:
4648:
4637:
4631:
4627:
4626:
4620:
4608:
4604:
4599:
4587:
4583:
4578:
4574:
4570:
4565:
4562:
4558:
4557:
4553:
4547:
4543:
4539:
4535:
4530:
4529:
4524:
4523:
4522:
4516:
4512:
4496:
4480:
4476:
4469:
4466:
4461:
4457:
4453:
4449:
4445:
4441:
4434:
4431:
4419:
4415:
4409:
4406:
4394:
4390:
4384:
4381:
4368:
4364:
4358:
4355:
4343:
4339:
4332:
4329:
4317:
4313:
4306:
4303:
4298:
4294:
4290:
4286:
4282:
4278:
4271:
4268:
4255:
4251:
4250:The Telegraph
4247:
4240:
4237:
4224:
4220:
4216:
4209:
4206:
4193:
4189:
4183:
4180:
4167:
4163:
4159:
4152:
4149:
4144:
4140:
4136:
4130:
4127:
4115:
4111:
4105:
4102:
4094:
4093:
4088:
4084:
4081:
4075:
4072:
4059:
4055:
4054:
4049:
4042:
4039:
4026:
4020:
4017:
4004:
4000:
3996:
3989:
3986:
3973:
3969:
3965:
3959:
3956:
3951:
3947:
3943:
3937:
3934:
3929:
3925:
3921:
3914:
3912:
3908:
3896:
3892:
3888:
3884:
3877:
3874:
3869:
3863:
3859:
3855:
3849:
3846:
3842:
3838:
3834:
3830:
3827:
3822:
3819:
3806:
3802:
3801:
3796:
3789:
3786:
3773:
3769:
3765:
3759:
3756:
3743:
3739:
3738:
3733:
3729:
3723:
3720:
3715:
3711:
3707:
3703:
3699:
3695:
3691:
3684:
3681:
3676:
3672:
3668:
3662:
3658:
3654:
3649:
3644:
3640:
3633:
3630:
3626:
3621:
3617:
3613:
3609:
3605:
3601:
3594:
3591:
3579:
3578:
3573:
3566:
3563:
3557:
3552:
3548:
3540:
3537:
3525:
3521:
3516:
3511:
3507:
3503:
3497:
3494:
3488:
3483:
3476:
3474:
3470:
3457:
3453:
3447:
3444:
3439:
3435:
3428:
3425:
3420:
3416:
3415:"Know It All"
3409:
3406:
3401:
3388:
3377:
3370:
3367:
3354:
3350:
3346:
3339:
3336:
3323:
3319:
3315:
3308:
3305:
3292:
3288:
3287:
3282:
3276:
3273:
3268:
3264:
3260:
3256:
3251:
3246:
3242:
3238:
3234:
3227:
3224:
3219:
3215:
3208:
3205:
3200:
3196:
3192:
3186:
3182:
3178:
3174:
3170:
3163:
3160:
3148:
3147:
3142:
3135:
3132:
3126:
3121:
3117:
3113:
3106:
3103:
3090:
3086:
3082:
3078:
3076:
3067:
3064:
3061:
3057:
3053:
3049:
3044:
3041:
3028:
3024:
3020:
3013:
3010:
2997:
2993:
2986:
2984:
2980:
2976:
2970:
2967:
2962:
2958:
2954:
2950:
2945:
2940:
2936:
2932:
2925:
2923:
2919:
2907:
2903:
2899:
2895:
2888:
2886:
2882:
2870:
2866:
2859:
2856:
2851:
2847:
2843:
2839:
2835:
2831:
2827:
2823:
2816:
2814:
2810:
2794:
2790:
2786:
2782:
2778:
2774:
2770:
2766:
2762:
2758:
2754:
2747:
2740:
2738:
2736:
2732:
2728:
2715:
2711:
2707:
2703:
2697:
2693:
2689:
2685:
2681:
2674:
2671:
2659:
2655:
2648:
2645:
2633:
2629:
2623:
2620:
2615:
2611:
2607:
2603:
2599:
2595:
2591:
2584:
2581:
2568:
2564:
2560:
2556:
2550:
2546:
2542:
2538:
2534:
2527:
2525:
2523:
2519:
2511:
2507:
2500:
2499:
2494:
2490:
2483:
2481:
2477:
2464:
2460:
2456:
2452:
2445:
2442:
2426:
2419:
2412:
2409:
2404:
2400:
2396:
2390:
2387:
2374:
2370:
2369:
2368:The Daily Dot
2364:
2357:
2354:
2349:
2345:
2341:
2340:
2335:
2328:
2325:
2321:
2317:
2314:
2313:November 2011
2310:
2306:
2303:
2297:
2294:
2290:
2278:
2274:
2270:
2263:
2260:
2255:
2251:
2247:
2241:
2237:
2233:
2229:
2222:
2219:
2214:
2210:
2206:
2199:
2197:
2193:
2180:
2176:
2172:
2171:Technoculture
2168:
2161:
2159:
2155:
2142:
2138:
2134:
2130:
2126:
2122:
2118:
2111:
2108:
2092:
2088:
2084:
2080:
2076:
2072:
2068:
2061:
2054:
2051:
2046:
2042:
2038:
2034:
2030:
2026:
2019:
2017:
2013:
2008:
2004:
2000:
1996:
1992:
1988:
1984:
1980:
1976:
1972:
1965:
1962:
1949:
1945:
1941:
1937:
1933:
1932:
1927:
1920:
1917:
1912:
1908:
1901:
1898:
1885:
1881:
1880:
1875:
1868:
1865:
1852:
1848:
1847:
1842:
1835:
1832:
1827:
1823:
1819:
1815:
1811:
1807:
1800:
1797:
1789:
1785:
1781:
1777:
1773:
1772:
1767:
1763:
1756:
1753:
1737:
1733:
1732:
1724:
1722:
1714:
1711:
1706:
1702:
1698:
1691:
1688:
1675:
1671:
1667:
1660:
1657:
1644:
1640:
1636:
1629:
1626:
1613:
1609:
1605:
1599:
1596:
1583:
1579:
1575:
1568:
1566:
1564:
1562:
1560:
1556:
1540:
1533:
1526:
1523:
1518:
1514:
1509:
1504:
1499:
1494:
1490:
1486:
1483:(6): e65782.
1482:
1478:
1474:
1467:
1465:
1461:
1453:
1449:
1445:
1441:
1435:
1431:
1427:
1423:
1422:
1414:
1411:
1398:
1394:
1393:
1388:
1384:
1383:Wade, Jessica
1378:
1375:
1362:
1358:
1354:
1350:
1343:
1340:
1334:
1329:
1322:
1320:
1316:
1311:
1307:
1302:
1297:
1293:
1289:
1285:
1278:
1275:
1263:
1259:
1255:
1251:
1244:
1241:
1229:
1225:
1219:
1216:
1204:
1200:
1193:
1191:
1189:
1185:
1173:
1169:
1165:
1161:
1154:
1152:
1150:
1148:
1144:
1141:
1135:
1132:
1120:
1116:
1109:
1106:
1093:
1089:
1083:
1080:
1073:
1069:
1066:
1064:
1061:
1059:
1056:
1054:
1051:
1050:
1046:
1044:
1041:
1037:
1032:
1030:
1026:
1021:
1019:
1014:
1009:Third parties
1008:
1006:
1004:
1000:
999:
993:
990:
989:
985:explained to
984:
979:
976:
974:
970:
966:
962:
958:
953:
950:
945:
943:
938:
934:
931:
928:
920:
918:
916:
911:
909:
905:
901:
899:
894:
887:
879:
873:
866:
864:
861:
859:
855:
851:
847:
842:
840:
836:
831:
828:
824:
823:
817:
808:
799:
795:
792:This section
790:
787:
783:
782:
776:
774:
772:
766:
763:
759:
755:
751:
747:
743:
739:
734:
730:
726:
723:
719:
711:
709:
702:
700:
698:
694:
690:
686:
682:
677:
675:
671:
662:
658:
655:
651:
647:
643:
639:
635:
631:
626:
625:
619:
617:
613:
609:
608:
603:
598:
592:
585:
583:
576:
574:
571:
566:
562:
560:
555:
552:
548:
543:
539:
535:
533:
529:
524:
520:
518:
514:
505:
502:
498:
495:
492:
488:
485:
482:
478:
475:
472:
468:
465:
461:
458:
454:
450:
449:
448:
446:
442:
437:
434:
433:
428:
421:
416:
409:
407:
403:
401:
400:
395:
390:
386:
384:
379:
375:
371:
365:
361:
359:
353:
351:
347:
343:
338:
336:
330:
326:
323:
318:
314:
310:
309:
303:
301:
297:
293:
289:
285:
275:
272:
269:
266:
263:
260:
256:
252:
249:
246:
243:
240:
237:
233:
229:
226:
223:
220:
217:
214:
210:
206:
203:
200:
197:
194:
191:
187:
183:
180:
177:
174:
171:
168:
164:
161:Editors Adj.
141:
134:
131:
129:
120:
115:
113:
111:
107:
103:
98:
96:
92:
86:
84:
80:
76:
72:
67:
64:
60:
56:
49:
48:initial model
45:
41:
40:
34:
30:
19:
6477:
6465:
6395:
6383:
6266:Bibliography
6254:and analysis
6240:
6233:
6187:Donald Trump
6153:
6070:VisualEditor
5977:Larry Sanger
5912:David Gerard
5803:Women in Red
5782:The Signpost
5780:
5754:Art+Feminism
5705:
5640:geographical
5634:
5460:
5380:
5352:for equality
5264:Transkilling
5259:Transbashing
5213:
5134:Gender roles
4925:1710.11103v3
4894:
4890:
4871:. Retrieved
4867:the original
4862:
4846:. Retrieved
4839:the original
4819:. Retrieved
4812:the original
4785:. Retrieved
4781:the original
4776:The Atlantic
4774:
4757:. Retrieved
4752:
4737:. Retrieved
4732:
4716:. Retrieved
4712:
4696:. Retrieved
4692:
4676:. Retrieved
4659:. Retrieved
4655:
4639:. Retrieved
4624:
4611:. Retrieved
4606:
4590:. Retrieved
4586:The Atlantic
4585:
4572:
4537:
4533:
4519:
4518:
4517:profile for
4514:
4482:. Retrieved
4478:
4468:
4443:
4439:
4433:
4421:. Retrieved
4417:
4408:
4396:. Retrieved
4392:
4383:
4371:. Retrieved
4357:
4345:. Retrieved
4342:www.vice.com
4341:
4331:
4319:. Retrieved
4316:The Guardian
4315:
4305:
4283:(1): 94–99.
4280:
4276:
4270:
4258:. Retrieved
4249:
4239:
4227:. Retrieved
4218:
4208:
4196:. Retrieved
4182:
4170:. Retrieved
4162:The Guardian
4161:
4151:
4143:the original
4138:
4129:
4117:. Retrieved
4113:
4104:
4092:The Atlantic
4090:
4074:
4062:. Retrieved
4051:
4041:
4029:. Retrieved
4019:
4007:. Retrieved
3998:
3988:
3976:. Retrieved
3967:
3958:
3950:the original
3945:
3936:
3923:
3898:. Retrieved
3886:
3876:
3857:
3848:
3821:
3809:. Retrieved
3798:
3788:
3776:. Retrieved
3772:the original
3767:
3758:
3746:. Retrieved
3742:the original
3737:First Monday
3735:
3722:
3697:
3693:
3683:
3638:
3632:
3623:
3603:
3599:
3593:
3581:. Retrieved
3575:
3565:
3546:
3539:
3527:. Retrieved
3505:
3496:
3460:. Retrieved
3455:
3446:
3437:
3427:
3418:
3408:
3387:cite journal
3369:
3357:. Retrieved
3349:The Guardian
3348:
3338:
3326:. Retrieved
3318:The Guardian
3317:
3307:
3295:. Retrieved
3284:
3275:
3240:
3236:
3226:
3217:
3207:
3172:
3162:
3150:. Retrieved
3144:
3134:
3115:
3105:
3093:. Retrieved
3089:the original
3084:
3080:
3074:
3066:
3048:The Guardian
3047:
3043:
3031:. Retrieved
3022:
3012:
3007:2021 figures
2999:. Retrieved
2969:
2934:
2930:
2909:. Retrieved
2897:
2872:. Retrieved
2869:The Atlantic
2868:
2858:
2825:
2821:
2800:. Retrieved
2756:
2752:
2725:
2718:. Retrieved
2683:
2673:
2661:. Retrieved
2657:
2647:
2635:. Retrieved
2631:
2622:
2597:
2593:
2583:
2571:. Retrieved
2536:
2497:
2467:. Retrieved
2459:The Atlantic
2454:
2444:
2432:. Retrieved
2425:the original
2411:
2398:
2389:
2377:. Retrieved
2373:the original
2366:
2356:
2339:The Signpost
2337:
2327:
2296:
2288:
2281:. Retrieved
2272:
2262:
2227:
2221:
2208:
2183:. Retrieved
2174:
2170:
2145:. Retrieved
2141:the original
2120:
2110:
2098:. Retrieved
2070:
2066:
2053:
2028:
2024:
1978:
1974:
1964:
1952:. Retrieved
1935:
1929:
1919:
1910:
1900:
1888:. Retrieved
1877:
1867:
1857:23 September
1855:. Retrieved
1851:the original
1844:
1834:
1809:
1805:
1799:
1770:
1755:
1743:. Retrieved
1729:
1720:
1713:
1700:
1690:
1678:. Retrieved
1669:
1659:
1647:. Retrieved
1638:
1628:
1616:. Retrieved
1607:
1598:
1586:. Retrieved
1577:
1546:. Retrieved
1539:the original
1525:
1480:
1476:
1420:
1413:
1401:. Retrieved
1390:
1377:
1365:. Retrieved
1357:The Next Web
1352:
1342:
1291:
1287:
1277:
1265:. Retrieved
1254:The Guardian
1253:
1243:
1233:28 September
1231:. Retrieved
1227:
1218:
1206:. Retrieved
1202:
1175:. Retrieved
1163:
1134:
1122:. Retrieved
1118:
1108:
1096:. Retrieved
1091:
1082:
1033:
1022:
1015:
1012:
1003:Jessica Wade
997:
994:
988:The Guardian
986:
980:
977:
957:Wikiprojects
954:
949:Women in Red
946:
939:
935:
932:
927:edit-a-thons
924:
912:
904:VisualEditor
902:
895:
883:
862:
843:
832:
820:
819:Writing for
818:
815:
802:
798:adding to it
793:
767:
752:in 2013 and
735:
731:
727:
720:performed a
715:
706:
689:Timothy Noah
684:
681:Stacy Schiff
678:
667:
649:
645:
641:
637:
633:
629:
622:
620:
605:
602:male as norm
593:
589:
580:
567:
563:
556:
544:
540:
536:
525:
521:
516:
509:
491:misogynistic
438:
430:
429:
425:
404:
397:
391:
387:
374:Judy Wajcman
370:Heather Ford
367:
363:
354:
339:
331:
327:
306:
304:
291:
281:
132:
124:
110:Women in Red
106:edit-a-thons
99:
87:
68:
54:
53:
37:
29:
6336:Content use
6060:Scientology
6007:Molly White
6002:Jimmy Wales
5957:Jason Moore
5952:Erik Möller
5907:Sue Gardner
5829:Wiki Indaba
5819:Edit-a-thon
5798:WikiProject
5696:Reliability
5645:ideological
5412:South Korea
5407:Philippines
5397:Netherlands
5359:Afghanistan
5315:Development
5209:Gender bias
5068:Gender role
5063:Genderqueer
5027:Masculinity
4897:: 262–276.
4718:19 November
4698:19 November
4613:19 November
4418:www.nsf.gov
4393:www.nsf.gov
4347:13 December
4321:13 December
3900:22 December
3841:Jimmy Wales
3529:11 February
3328:27 February
2996:Marketplace
2493:Reidl, John
2379:29 November
1938:: 312–328.
1766:Reidl, John
1703:(opinion).
1672:(opinion).
1641:(opinion).
1403:25 February
835:Jimmy Wales
746:transgender
441:Sue Gardner
420:Sue Gardner
300:Sue Gardner
102:Jimmy Wales
6495:Categories
6438:Wikiracing
6322:WikiReader
6252:References
6045:First edit
5848:Wiki Loves
5771:Edit count
5686:Plagiarism
5667:notability
5610:Censorship
5350:Ministries
5023:Femininity
4940:1501.06307
4873:6 February
4787:21 October
4119:20 October
4009:4 December
3946:FemTechNet
3778:10 October
3748:10 October
3648:2101.00078
3487:2306.03940
3462:4 February
3075:Britannica
2944:1601.04890
2911:20 October
2874:20 October
2663:20 October
2637:20 October
2506:WikiSym'11
2185:14 October
2147:14 October
2100:11 October
1954:4 November
1776:WikiSym'11
1588:31 January
1333:1501.06307
1074:References
971:, and the
925:Dedicated
685:New Yorker
650:Britannica
646:Britannica
642:Britannica
638:Britannica
634:Britannica
532:harassment
469:A lack of
451:A lack of
235:Immigrant
6128:Edit wars
6075:#1Lib1Ref
5865:Monuments
5839:Wikimania
5744:AfroCrowd
5725:Community
5715:Vandalism
5681:MediaWiki
5627:Criticism
5602:(outline)
5592:Knowledge
5487:Academics
5282:Financial
4911:182928068
4848:16 August
4821:11 August
4452:0018-2745
4423:28 August
4398:28 August
4289:0112-4099
4260:16 August
4229:16 August
4198:16 August
4172:16 August
4064:27 August
3811:7 January
3714:253379599
3675:230433680
3620:227240954
3524:226283827
3456:Knowledge
3359:3 October
3297:3 October
3267:237883867
3259:1461-4448
3033:21 August
2906:0362-4331
2842:1461-4448
2773:0306-3127
2658:The Verge
2614:214364954
2469:20 August
2434:24 August
2344:Knowledge
2137:2325-0496
2087:119259241
2045:0021-9916
1826:143468397
1731:Knowledge
1680:11 August
1649:11 August
1548:11 August
1310:237883867
1262:0261-3077
1172:0017-8012
1023:In 2015,
896:In 2017,
777:Reactions
771:homophily
738:cisgender
481:edit wars
464:free time
396:wrote in
340:In 2015,
288:UNU-MERIT
282:In 2010,
212:Children
143:Variable
59:Knowledge
6479:Category
6327:Wikiwand
6271:Cultural
6175:Coverage
5860:Folklore
5600:Overview
5533:Religion
5508:Journals
5480:Academia
5422:Tanzania
5392:Malaysia
5164:Abortion
5157:Concepts
5036:Identity
4759:9 August
4739:9 August
4678:9 August
4661:30 April
4641:9 August
4592:9 August
4575:(op-ed).
4546:24810523
4484:30 March
4460:24810523
4373:31 March
4367:Archived
4297:14929028
4254:Archived
4223:Archived
4192:Archived
4166:Archived
4083:Archived
4058:Archived
4053:New York
4031:26 March
4003:Archived
3978:31 March
3972:Archived
3928:Archived
3856:(2019).
3829:Archived
3805:Archived
3583:30 March
3353:Archived
3322:Archived
3291:Archived
3218:CBC News
3199:15730439
3056:Archived
3027:Archived
3001:3 August
2850:58008216
2793:Archived
2789:32835293
2781:28791929
2714:Archived
2710:17473183
2567:Archived
2563:17473183
2510:Archived
2463:Archived
2403:Archived
2348:Archived
2316:Archived
2305:Archived
2277:Archived
2254:17473183
2213:Archived
2211:(blog).
2179:Archived
2091:Archived
2007:Archived
2003:32835293
1995:28791929
1948:Archived
1890:13 April
1884:Archived
1788:Archived
1736:Archived
1705:Archived
1674:Archived
1643:Archived
1618:9 August
1612:Archived
1582:Archived
1517:23840366
1477:PLOS ONE
1452:Archived
1448:15730439
1397:Archived
1361:Archived
1047:See also
915:Wikidata
805:May 2021
742:come out
683:wrote a
607:Guardian
258:Student
189:Married
6377:Related
6343:DBpedia
6312:Wapedia
6307:QRpedia
6038:Nupedia
6021:History
5875:Science
5631:Biases
5369:Denmark
5289:General
4609:. NYREV
4511:Scholia
2961:1769950
2720:1 April
2573:1 April
2508:. ACM.
2283:21 June
1778:. ACM.
1508:3694126
1485:Bibcode
1367:10 June
1267:26 June
1208:26 June
1177:26 June
1124:26 June
1119:Inverse
1098:26 June
908:WYSIWYG
513:culture
455:in the
166:Female
81:, then
6511:Sexism
6295:Mobile
6222:Honors
6156:debate
5884:People
5812:Events
5764:Lsjbot
5650:racial
5635:gender
5417:Sweden
5402:Norway
5249:Sexism
5043:Gender
4909:
4713:Forbes
4632:
4544:
4513:has a
4458:
4450:
4295:
4287:
3887:Nature
3864:
3712:
3673:
3663:
3618:
3522:
3265:
3257:
3197:
3187:
3152:26 May
2959:
2904:
2848:
2840:
2787:
2779:
2771:
2708:
2698:
2612:
2561:
2551:
2252:
2242:
2135:
2085:
2043:
2001:
1993:
1824:
1745:18 May
1515:
1505:
1446:
1436:
1308:
1260:
1170:
672:won a
410:Causes
6363:Kiwix
6276:Films
6199:Death
6033:Bomis
5870:Pride
5855:Earth
5387:Japan
5379:Iran
5364:China
5018:Girls
5009:Women
4935:arXiv
4920:arXiv
4907:S2CID
4887:(PDF)
4842:(PDF)
4835:(PDF)
4815:(PDF)
4808:(PDF)
4542:JSTOR
4515:topic
4479:Axios
4456:JSTOR
3999:Slate
3800:Slate
3710:S2CID
3671:S2CID
3643:arXiv
3616:S2CID
3520:S2CID
3482:arXiv
3438:Slate
3379:(PDF)
3263:S2CID
3195:S2CID
3095:1 May
2957:S2CID
2939:arXiv
2937:(5).
2846:S2CID
2802:8 May
2796:(PDF)
2785:S2CID
2749:(PDF)
2706:S2CID
2610:S2CID
2559:S2CID
2513:(PDF)
2502:(PDF)
2428:(PDF)
2421:(PDF)
2250:S2CID
2123:(5).
2094:(PDF)
2083:S2CID
2063:(PDF)
1999:S2CID
1879:Wired
1822:S2CID
1791:(PDF)
1739:(PDF)
1726:(PDF)
1542:(PDF)
1535:(PDF)
1455:(PDF)
1444:S2CID
1328:arXiv
1306:S2CID
955:Many
822:Slate
517:et al
276:40.3
273:47.7
270:38.5
267:46.0
264:29.9
261:17.7
244:12.1
241:14.4
238:10.1
230:25.3
227:14.4
224:27.6
221:16.4
218:29.4
215:36.0
207:38.4
204:33.2
201:36.3
198:30.9
195:44.1
192:60.1
184:16.1
181:12.7
178:22.7
175:17.8
172:39.9
169:49.0
6467:List
6302:Apps
6097:2022
6087:2021
6050:Logo
5888:list
5759:Bots
5078:LGBT
5014:Boys
4875:2015
4850:2018
4823:2014
4789:2015
4761:2014
4741:2014
4720:2013
4700:2013
4680:2014
4663:2014
4643:2014
4630:ISBN
4615:2013
4594:2014
4486:2022
4448:ISSN
4425:2023
4400:2023
4375:2019
4349:2022
4323:2022
4293:OCLC
4285:ISSN
4262:2018
4231:2018
4200:2018
4174:2018
4121:2020
4066:2014
4033:2021
4011:2014
3980:2019
3902:2023
3862:ISBN
3813:2015
3780:2015
3750:2015
3661:ISBN
3585:2022
3531:2021
3464:2021
3400:help
3361:2018
3330:2019
3299:2018
3255:ISSN
3185:ISBN
3154:2021
3097:2014
3035:2017
3003:2021
2913:2020
2902:ISSN
2876:2020
2838:ISSN
2804:2019
2777:PMID
2769:ISSN
2722:2019
2696:ISBN
2665:2020
2639:2020
2575:2019
2549:ISBN
2471:2017
2436:2014
2381:2014
2302:2011
2285:2015
2240:ISBN
2187:2019
2149:2019
2133:ISSN
2102:2018
2041:ISSN
1991:PMID
1956:2018
1892:2015
1859:2014
1747:2014
1682:2014
1651:2014
1620:2014
1590:2011
1550:2014
1513:PMID
1434:ISBN
1405:2020
1369:2019
1269:2020
1258:ISSN
1235:2020
1210:2020
1179:2020
1168:ISSN
1126:2020
1100:2020
998:VICE
940:The
884:The
760:and
695:and
621:The
570:LGBT
372:and
335:STEM
286:and
253:7.4
250:8.2
247:9.8
108:and
36:The
5462:NGO
5005:Men
4899:doi
4895:163
4089:",
3891:doi
3837:BBC
3702:doi
3653:doi
3608:doi
3551:doi
3510:doi
3245:doi
3177:doi
3120:doi
2949:doi
2830:doi
2761:doi
2688:doi
2602:doi
2541:doi
2232:doi
2125:doi
2075:doi
2033:doi
1983:doi
1940:doi
1814:doi
1780:doi
1503:PMC
1493:doi
1426:doi
1296:doi
975:".
860:).
844:In
800:.
744:as
83:CEO
42:in
6497::
4905:.
4893:.
4889:.
4861:.
4773:.
4751:.
4731:.
4711:.
4691:.
4654:.
4605:.
4584:.
4571:.
4538:48
4536:.
4477:.
4454:.
4444:48
4442:.
4416:.
4391:.
4365:.
4340:.
4314:.
4291:.
4281:31
4279:.
4252:.
4248:.
4221:.
4217:.
4164:.
4160:.
4137:.
4112:.
4056:.
4050:.
4001:.
3997:.
3970:.
3966:.
3944:.
3926:.
3922:.
3910:^
3889:.
3885:.
3835:,
3803:.
3797:.
3766:.
3734:.
3730:.
3708:.
3698:74
3696:.
3692:.
3669:.
3659:.
3651:.
3622:.
3614:.
3604:37
3602:.
3574:.
3518:.
3504:.
3472:^
3454:.
3436:.
3417:.
3391::
3389:}}
3385:{{
3351:.
3347:.
3320:.
3316:.
3283:.
3261:.
3253:.
3241:25
3239:.
3235:.
3216:.
3193:.
3183:.
3171:.
3143:.
3114:.
3083:.
3079:.
3054:.
3025:.
3021:.
2994:.
2982:^
2955:.
2947:.
2933:.
2921:^
2900:.
2896:.
2884:^
2867:.
2844:.
2836:.
2826:20
2824:.
2812:^
2791:.
2783:.
2775:.
2767:.
2757:47
2755:.
2751:.
2734:^
2724:.
2712:.
2704:.
2694:.
2682:.
2656:.
2630:.
2608:.
2598:40
2596:.
2592:.
2565:.
2557:.
2547:.
2535:.
2521:^
2504:.
2491:;
2479:^
2461:.
2457:.
2453:.
2397:.
2365:.
2346:.
2342:.
2336:.
2287:.
2271:.
2248:.
2238:.
2207:.
2195:^
2177:.
2173:.
2169:.
2157:^
2131:.
2119:.
2089:.
2081:.
2071:65
2069:.
2065:.
2039:.
2029:68
2027:.
2015:^
2005:.
1997:.
1989:.
1979:47
1977:.
1973:.
1946:.
1936:66
1934:.
1928:.
1909:.
1882:.
1876:.
1843:.
1820:.
1810:18
1808:.
1786:.
1774:.
1764:;
1728:.
1699:.
1668:.
1637:.
1606:.
1580:.
1576:.
1558:^
1511:.
1501:.
1491:.
1479:.
1475:.
1463:^
1450:.
1442:.
1432:.
1395:.
1389:.
1359:.
1355:.
1351:.
1318:^
1304:.
1292:25
1290:.
1286:.
1256:.
1252:.
1226:.
1201:.
1187:^
1166:.
1162:.
1146:^
1117:.
1090:.
967:,
963:,
848:,
618:.
447::
97:.
5890:)
5886:(
5677:"
5673:"
5584:e
5577:t
5570:v
5025:/
5016:/
5007:/
4986:e
4979:t
4972:v
4958:.
4943:.
4937::
4928:.
4922::
4913:.
4901::
4877:.
4852:.
4825:.
4791:.
4763:.
4743:.
4722:.
4702:.
4682:.
4665:.
4645:.
4617:.
4596:.
4548:.
4525:.
4488:.
4462:.
4427:.
4402:.
4377:.
4351:.
4325:.
4299:.
4264:.
4233:.
4202:.
4176:.
4123:.
4099:.
4068:.
4035:.
4013:.
3982:.
3904:.
3893::
3870:.
3815:.
3782:.
3752:.
3716:.
3704::
3677:.
3655::
3645::
3610::
3587:.
3559:.
3553::
3533:.
3512::
3490:.
3484::
3466:.
3440:.
3421:.
3402:)
3398:(
3381:.
3363:.
3332:.
3301:.
3269:.
3247::
3220:.
3201:.
3179::
3156:.
3128:.
3122::
3099:.
3085:5
3077:"
3037:.
3005:.
2963:.
2951::
2941::
2935:5
2915:.
2878:.
2852:.
2832::
2806:.
2763::
2690::
2667:.
2641:.
2616:.
2604::
2577:.
2543::
2473:.
2438:.
2383:.
2256:.
2234::
2189:.
2175:7
2151:.
2127::
2104:.
2077::
2047:.
2035::
1985::
1958:.
1942::
1913:.
1894:.
1861:.
1828:.
1816::
1782::
1749:.
1723:"
1684:.
1653:.
1622:.
1592:.
1552:.
1519:.
1495::
1487::
1481:8
1428::
1407:.
1371:.
1336:.
1330::
1312:.
1298::
1271:.
1237:.
1212:.
1181:.
1128:.
1102:.
891:'
807:)
803:(
503:.
493:.
483:.
473:.
466:.
459:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.