Knowledge (XXG)

Glomar response

Source 📝

418: 389: 358: 94: 31:, refers to a response to a request for information that will "neither confirm nor deny" (NCND) the existence of the information sought. For example, in response to a request for police reports relating to a certain person, the police agency may respond: "We can neither confirm nor deny that our agency has any records matching your request." The phrase was notably used to respond to requests for information about the 244:. Acknowledgement of the existence or non-existence of the information you request could reasonably be expected to result in the compromise of important intelligence operations and significant scientific and technological developments relating to the national security, and might also result in a disruption in foreign relations significantly affecting the national security. 47:, the integrity of an ongoing investigation, or a person's privacy. For example, disclosing that a police department has documents about a current investigation into a criminal conspiracy, even if the content of the documents is not disclosed, would make it public that the investigation is happening and could help suspects destroy evidence. 239:
Mr. Duckett has determined that, in the interest of national security, involvement by the U.S. Government in the activities which are the subject matter of your request can neither be confirmed nor denied. Therefore, he has determined that the fact of the existence or non-existence of any material or
157:
In 1976, Phillippi appealed, arguing that the Agency "should have been required to support its position on the basis of the public record. This means that the Agency should have to provide a public record "explaining in as much detail as it possible the basis for its claim that it can be required
145:
In a subsequent lawsuit, Phillippi requested "all records relating to the Director's or any other agency personnel's attempts to persuade" media to refrain from publishing further stories about the clandestine project. Additionally, she asked the court to demand the Agency to provide a "detailed
58:
must disclose information. The term "Glomar" originated in association with the FOIA law. Lower courts have thus far ruled the Glomar response to have potential merit if the secretive nature of the material truly requires it, and only if the agency provides "as much information as possible" to
42:
policies, governments are often required to tell people who request information (e.g. journalists or attorneys) whether they located the requested records, even if the records end up being kept secret. But at times, a government may determine that the mere act of truthfully disclosing that the
591:, 1976. (LEXSEE 546 f2d 1009. Phillippi v. CIA, No. 76-1004, United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. 178 U.S. App. D.C. 243; 546 F.2d 1009; 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 6221; 2 Media L. Rep. 1208. Argued April 19, 1976; decided November 16, 1976.) Retrieved from 162:, arguing that because an official acknowledgement of the existence or nonexistence of a certain project could "severely damage the foreign relations and the national defense of the United States." However, the affidavit used was actually already submitted in another case, 146:
justification" for the information said to be "exempt from disclosure." The government responded with a motion for summary judgement, which the district court granted, stating that the materials were "exempt from disclosure under the provision of the third exemption of
89:
automobile. When the governor of Kansas was questioned in 1920 about a report addressing a state official's potential ouster, he responded that he would "neither confirm nor deny" the report's existence.
231:
We can neither confirm nor deny the existence of the information requested but, hypothetically, if such data were to exist, the subject matter would be classified, and could not be disclosed.
240:
documents that may exist which would reveal any CIA connection or interest in the activities of the Glomar Explorer is duly classified Secret in accordance with criteria established by
194: 687: 170:). In its holding, the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit stated that "we cannot sustain summary judgment for the on the basis of documents filed (the 606: 151: 147: 51: 189:, and the government's position on the matter changed, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the grant of summary judgement in favor of the CIA. 186: 142:
the story. In response, the CIA chose to "neither confirm nor deny" both the project's existence and its attempts to keep the story unpublished.
55: 555: 203: 527: 271: 111: 219:
podcast, the original text of the Glomar response was written by the Associate General Counsel at the CIA, under the
67:
The phrase itself, "neither confirm nor deny", has long appeared frequently in news reports, as an alternative to a "
520:
Matter of Risk: The Incredible Inside Story of the CIA's Hughes Glomar Explorer Mission to Raise a Russian Submarine
166:, 418 F. Supp 876 (D.D.C. 1976) (where the plaintiff wanted copies of contracts for construction and operation of 192:
The "Glomar response" precedent still stood, and has since had bearing in FOIA cases such as in the 2004 lawsuit
72: 85:
representatives said they would "neither confirm nor deny" that price cuts were in the offing for its popular
376: 276: 207: 158:
neither to confirm nor to deny the existence of the records." This request was refuted through a Government
417: 388: 357: 241: 174:
affidavit) in a separate case concerned with different, although related, issues." The case was remanded.
39: 610: 266: 182: 123: 235:
The original text of the CIA's reply of May 21, 1975, to Phillippi's FOIA request, seems to have been:
371: 636: 402: 178: 135: 16:
Response to an information request that will "neither confirm nor deny" the information's existence
340: 82: 59:
justify its claim. Otherwise, the principles established in FOIA may outweigh claims to secrecy.
523: 199: 44: 302: 692: 584: 93: 77: 206:
and CIA's use of the Glomar response in refusing to release documents and photos depicting
115: 104: 32: 138:
requested that the CIA provide disclosure of both the Glomar project and its attempts to
592: 410: 381: 350: 281: 681: 316: 666: 345: 224: 71:" response when the respondent does not wish to answer. In 1911, for example, the 130:. In February 1975, the CIA became aware of a story awaiting publication in the 126:
of Global Marine Development, the company commissioned by the CIA to build the
43:
records do or do not exist would pose some actual or possible harm, such as to
632: 261: 252:
account with, "We can neither confirm nor deny that this is our first tweet."
139: 68: 81:
it would "neither confirm nor deny" reports about its future plans. In 1916,
220: 159: 119: 215: 648: 249: 86: 92: 50:
Glomar responses are commonly associated with the United States
633:"We can neither confirm nor deny that this is our first tweet" 607:"How The CIA Found a Soviet Sub — Without the Soviets Knowing" 227:
either what the CIA knew or did not know, the response read:
583:
Quoted in the majority opinion penned by Circuit Judge
481:, 178 U.S. App. D.C. 243, 546 F.2d 1009, 1013-14 (1976) 195:
American Civil Liberties Union v. Department of Defense
593:
https://nsarchive.gwu.edu/NSAEBB/ciacase/Phillipi.doc
493:, 178 U.S. App. D.C. 243, 546 F.2d 1009, 1015 (1976) 469:, 178 U.S. App. D.C. 243, 546 F.2d 1009, 1013 (1976) 457:, 178 U.S. App. D.C. 243, 546 F.2d 1009, 1012 (1976) 445:, 178 U.S. App. D.C. 243, 546 F.2d 1009, 1012 (1976) 317:"Neither Confirm Nor Deny | Radiolab | WNYC Studios" 545:, 211 U.S. App. D.C. 95, 655 F.2d 1325, 1326 (1981) 507:. College Station: Texas A&M University Press. 403:"May Ask Kansas Bank Commissioner to Quit Office" 433:, 178 U.S. App. D.C. 243, 546 F.2d 1009 (1976) 301:FOIA Update, Vol. VII, No. 1, Page 3 (1986). 8: 118:"—an attempted salvaging of a sunken Soviet 667:"Project Jennifer - Hughes Glomar Explorer" 223:of Walt Logan. So as not to divulge to the 688:Freedom of Information Act (United States) 579: 577: 110:was a large salvage vessel built by the 303:"OIP Guidance: Privacy "Glomarization"" 293: 305:. United States Department of Justice. 54:(FOIA), which generally dictates how 7: 150:. This claim stood, and Phillippi's 372:"Report says Ford price to go down" 562:. Radiolab, WNYC. 12 February 2014 14: 671:Federation of American Scientists 605:Myre, Greg (18 September 2017). 518:Varner, Roy D (1 January 1978). 416: 387: 356: 349:. February 10, 1911 – via 19:In United States law, the term 272:Policy of deliberate ambiguity 164:Military Audit Project v. Bush 154:(FOIA) request was rejected. 1: 409:. June 26, 1920 – via 380:. July 31, 1916 – via 248:In 2014, the CIA opened its 112:Central Intelligence Agency 38:In national or subnational 709: 556:"Neither Confirm Nor Deny" 522:. New York: Random House. 503:Burleson, Clyde W (1997). 208:abuse at Abu Ghraib prison 187:1976 presidential election 152:Freedom of Information Act 52:Freedom of Information Act 73:Boston and Maine Railroad 198:, wherein Federal Judge 246: 233: 172:Military Audit Project 114:(CIA) for its covert " 107:Hughes Glomar Explorer 100: 98:Hughes Glomar Explorer 40:freedom of information 611:National Public Radio 341:"Manager Barr Silent" 267:Plausible deniability 242:Executive Order 11652 237: 229: 204:Department of Defense 183:Carter administration 136:Harriet Ann Phillippi 124:syllabic abbreviation 96: 631:@CIA (6 June 2014). 505:The Jennifer Project 181:was replaced by the 148:5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(3) 179:Ford administration 185:in 1977 after the 122:. "Glomar" is the 101: 63:Origin of the term 377:Huntington Herald 277:Schrödinger's cat 200:Alvin Hellerstein 132:Los Angeles Times 45:national security 700: 674: 653: 652: 646: 644: 628: 622: 621: 619: 617: 602: 596: 589:Phillippi v. CIA 585:J. Skelly Wright 581: 572: 571: 569: 567: 552: 546: 543:Phillippi v. CIA 540: 534: 533: 515: 509: 508: 500: 494: 491:Phillippi v. CIA 488: 482: 479:Phillippi v. CIA 476: 470: 467:Phillippi v. CIA 464: 458: 455:Phillippi v. CIA 452: 446: 443:Phillippi v. CIA 440: 434: 431:Phillippi v. CIA 428: 422: 421: 420: 414: 399: 393: 392: 391: 385: 368: 362: 361: 360: 354: 337: 331: 330: 328: 327: 313: 307: 306: 298: 78:The Boston Globe 56:federal agencies 23:, also known as 708: 707: 703: 702: 701: 699: 698: 697: 678: 677: 665: 662: 657: 656: 642: 640: 630: 629: 625: 615: 613: 604: 603: 599: 582: 575: 565: 563: 554: 553: 549: 541: 537: 530: 517: 516: 512: 502: 501: 497: 489: 485: 477: 473: 465: 461: 453: 449: 441: 437: 429: 425: 415: 407:Ponca City News 401: 400: 396: 386: 370: 369: 365: 355: 339: 338: 334: 325: 323: 315: 314: 310: 300: 299: 295: 290: 258: 213:According to a 168:Glomar Explorer 128:Glomar Explorer 116:Project Azorian 65: 33:Glomar Explorer 21:Glomar response 17: 12: 11: 5: 706: 704: 696: 695: 690: 680: 679: 676: 675: 661: 660:External links 658: 655: 654: 623: 597: 595:on 2017-10-04. 573: 547: 535: 529:978-0394424323 528: 510: 495: 483: 471: 459: 447: 435: 423: 411:Newspapers.com 394: 382:Newspapers.com 363: 351:Newspapers.com 332: 308: 292: 291: 289: 286: 285: 284: 282:Warrant canary 279: 274: 269: 264: 257: 254: 64: 61: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 705: 694: 691: 689: 686: 685: 683: 672: 668: 664: 663: 659: 650: 638: 634: 627: 624: 612: 608: 601: 598: 594: 590: 586: 580: 578: 574: 561: 557: 551: 548: 544: 539: 536: 531: 525: 521: 514: 511: 506: 499: 496: 492: 487: 484: 480: 475: 472: 468: 463: 460: 456: 451: 448: 444: 439: 436: 432: 427: 424: 419: 412: 408: 404: 398: 395: 390: 383: 379: 378: 373: 367: 364: 359: 352: 348: 347: 342: 336: 333: 322: 318: 312: 309: 304: 297: 294: 287: 283: 280: 278: 275: 273: 270: 268: 265: 263: 260: 259: 255: 253: 251: 245: 243: 236: 232: 228: 226: 222: 218: 217: 211: 209: 205: 202:rejected the 201: 197: 196: 190: 188: 184: 180: 177:Although the 175: 173: 169: 165: 161: 155: 153: 149: 143: 141: 137: 134:. Journalist 133: 129: 125: 121: 117: 113: 109: 108: 99: 95: 91: 88: 84: 80: 79: 74: 70: 62: 60: 57: 53: 48: 46: 41: 36: 34: 30: 29:Glomar denial 26: 25:Glomarization 22: 670: 647:– via 643:17 September 641:. Retrieved 626: 616:18 September 614:. Retrieved 600: 588: 564:. Retrieved 559: 550: 542: 538: 519: 513: 504: 498: 490: 486: 478: 474: 466: 462: 454: 450: 442: 438: 430: 426: 406: 397: 375: 366: 346:Boston Globe 344: 335: 324:. Retrieved 320: 311: 296: 247: 238: 234: 230: 225:Soviet Union 214: 212: 193: 191: 176: 171: 167: 163: 156: 144: 131: 127: 106: 102: 97: 76: 66: 49: 37: 28: 24: 20: 18: 566:18 February 321:wnycstudios 682:Categories 326:2018-04-25 288:References 262:No comment 69:no comment 221:pseudonym 160:affidavit 120:submarine 560:Radiolab 256:See also 216:Radiolab 693:Phrases 649:Twitter 250:Twitter 87:Model-T 526:  140:censor 637:Tweet 105:USNS 75:told 645:2022 618:2017 568:2014 524:ISBN 103:The 83:Ford 27:or 684:: 669:. 609:. 587:. 576:^ 558:. 405:. 374:. 343:. 319:. 210:. 35:. 673:. 651:. 639:) 635:( 620:. 570:. 532:. 413:. 384:. 353:. 329:.

Index

Glomar Explorer
freedom of information
national security
Freedom of Information Act
federal agencies
no comment
Boston and Maine Railroad
The Boston Globe
Ford
Model-T

USNS Hughes Glomar Explorer
Central Intelligence Agency
Project Azorian
submarine
syllabic abbreviation
Harriet Ann Phillippi
censor
5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(3)
Freedom of Information Act
affidavit
Ford administration
Carter administration
1976 presidential election
American Civil Liberties Union v. Department of Defense
Alvin Hellerstein
Department of Defense
abuse at Abu Ghraib prison
Radiolab
pseudonym

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.