Knowledge (XXG)

Goff & Jones

Source 📝

22: 206:, described it as "admirable". The book's propositions, however, caused some confusion in academic circles. Not knowing where it fitted, a university library classified it as Criminal Law, and a library of one of the Inns of Court refused to take the book in at all. The book's propositions were also not unanimously welcomed. For example, they were resisted by 689:
3 All ER 1, "My Lords, there is no general doctrine of unjust enrichment recognised in English law. What it does is to provide specific remedies in particular cases of what might be classified as unjust enrichment in a legal system that is based upon the civil law. There are some circumstances in
183:, made the authors pay for a second set of proofs. As a result, Goff and Jones made practically no money from the first edition of the book, and Goff complained that Sweet & Maxwell "appeared to understand nothing about writing pioneering books". The book was finally published in 1966. 136:
In 1952, Goff was appointed to a Common University Fund lectureship in law, to take effect in 1953. In this capacity, he was required to give a series of lectures on any area of interest to him. When exploring texts for inspiration, he chanced upon "quasi-contracts", a concept traceable to
178:
The book publication took much longer than either Goff or Jones anticipated. The manuscript was submitted in late 1964. The page proofs, which arrived in 1965, had so many mistakes and required so many alterations that the publishers,
149:, he set up a series of seminars in Restitution, also described as "Unjustifiable Enrichment" and "Quasi Contract". On the basis of these lectures, Goff began work on the book that would later become 93: 175:), with whom he would eventually publish the book. Goff would later describe Jones as "the ideal co-author" and "beyond doubt, one of the finest teachers in the common law world". 601: 605: 83:
formally recognised unjust enrichment as a separate branch of jurisprudence. It is notable that a number of the key decisions in the field have been handed down by
597: 122:
of the English Law of Restitution ... Out of a few weak and scattered settlements they founded a powerful city whose hegemony now extends far and wide."
172: 151: 80: 115: 79:
As a textbook it is somewhat remarkable in that although the first edition was published in 1966, it was not until 1991 (25 years later) that the
110:
It has been said "t is no exaggeration to say that the law of unjust enrichment would not exist, certainly not as we know it, if it was not for
568:. Jones, Gareth H., Mitchell, Charles (Charles Christopher James),, Mitchell, Paul, 1972-, Watterson, Stephen, 1975- (Ninth ed.). London. 573: 378: 210:, who as late as in 1977 continued to declare judicially that "there is no general doctrine of unjust enrichment recognised in English law". 159:. In 1959, as a junior barrister with a growing practice, Goff realised that if his book was to be completed, he would need a collaborator. 131: 84: 65: 425: 358: 481: 199: 191: 630: 439: 730: 357:
Although Lord Goff rarely referred to his own text in judicial decisions, other judges have frequently done so, including the
103:
of restitution for mistake", but largely reflected the same rationalisation of the law in this area which he had supported in
690:
which the remedy takes the form of 'subrogation', but this expression embraces more than a single concept in English law."
403: 321: 654: 456: 168: 519: 146: 186:
Upon its release, the book was quickly recognised as a significant work, and was largely favourably reviewed.
203: 164: 69: 99: 701: 485: 725: 648: 591: 382: 180: 73: 636: 626: 579: 569: 435: 119: 61: 160: 431: 719: 625:. Jones, Gareth H., Cornish, W. R. (William Rodolph), 1937-. Oxford: Hart Pub. 1998. 706: 623:
Restitution : past, present, and future : essays in honour of Gareth Jones
408: 421: 207: 187: 142: 87:, and often reflect the analysis which has previously expressed academically in 57: 50: 583: 553:. United Kingdom: The Honourable Society of The Inner Temple. pp. 34–36. 190:
reflected positively on it, calling it "a creative work" and comparing it to
640: 138: 21: 141:, but which was at that point unrecognised in English law. Together with 53: 20: 457:"Review - Goff & Jones: The Law of Unjust Enrichment, 8th ed" 668:
Denning, Tom (1966). "Goff and Jones's The Law of Restitution".
527:
Biographical Memoirs of Fellows of the British Academy, XVIII
94:
Barclays Bank Ltd v W J Simms, Son and Cooke (Southern) Ltd
72:, it is presently in its tenth edition. It is published by 564:
Goff of Chieveley, Robert Goff, Baron, 1926-2016. (2016).
16:
English law textbook on restitution and unjust enrichment
346:
Charles Mitchell, Paul Mitchell and Stephen Watterson
335:
Charles Mitchell, Paul Mitchell and Stephen Watterson
709:
at paragraphs 13, 14, 16, 17, 18, 21, 22, 23 and 25.
482:"Lord Goff of Chieveley, Senior Law Lord – obituary" 379:"Goff & Jones: The Law of Unjust Enrichment" 157:Goff and Jones on the Law of Unjust Enrichment) 34:Goff and Jones on the Law of Unjust Enrichment 8: 462:. Canadian Business Law Journal. p. 323 600:) CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( 194:treatise on torts and the seminal textbook 604:) CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list ( 596:: CS1 maint: location missing publisher ( 76:and forms part of the Common Law Library. 427:The Principles of the Law of Restitution 230: 225: 217: 173:Downing Professor of the Laws of England 152:Goff and Jones on the Law of Restitution 40:Goff and Jones on the Law of Restitution 370: 220: 646: 589: 513: 511: 509: 507: 505: 503: 501: 499: 497: 495: 324:, Paul Mitchell and Stephen Watterson 617: 615: 544: 542: 540: 518:Beatson, Sir Jack (23 October 2019). 7: 132:Robert Goff, Baron Goff of Chieveley 551:The Inner Temple Yearbook 2017-2018 91:. For example, Goff's judgment in 118:said that "Goff and Jones are the 14: 255:Sir Robert Goff and Gareth Jones 43:, usually simply abbreviated to 687:Orakpo v Manson Investments Ltd 533:. The British Academy: 241–273. 97:1 QB 677 was described as "the 49:) is the leading authoritative 1: 244:Robert Goff and Gareth Jones 566:The law of unjust enrichment 455:Professor Mitchell McInnes. 404:Lipkin Gorman v Karpnale Ltd 342: 339: 331: 328: 317: 314: 306: 303: 295: 292: 284: 281: 273: 270: 262: 259: 251: 248: 240: 237: 549:Tomlinson, Stephen (2018). 266:Lord Goff and Gareth Jones 747: 169:Trinity College, Cambridge 129: 147:Brasenose College, Oxford 145:, then the law Tutor at 196:Anson's Law of Contract 192:Sir Frederick Pollock's 731:1966 non-fiction books 707:[2013] UKHL 50 653:: CS1 maint: others ( 409:[1988] UKHL 12 202:, then a judge of the 29: 204:High Court of Justice 24: 670:Law Quarterly Review 155:(today published as 100:Donoghue v Stevenson 28:in its ninth edition 702:Benedetti v Sawiris 486:The Daily Telegraph 383:Sweet & Maxwell 181:Sweet & Maxwell 74:Sweet & Maxwell 64:. First written by 411: (6 June 1991) 163:introduced him to 30: 699:See for example, 575:978-0-414-05523-0 488:. 18 August 2016. 350: 349: 120:Romulus and Remus 62:unjust enrichment 738: 710: 697: 691: 684: 678: 677: 665: 659: 658: 652: 644: 619: 610: 609: 595: 587: 561: 555: 554: 546: 535: 534: 524: 515: 490: 489: 478: 472: 471: 469: 467: 461: 452: 446: 445: 418: 412: 400: 394: 393: 391: 389: 375: 322:Charles Mitchell 218: 167:(then fellow at 161:A. W. B. Simpson 112:Goff & Jones 105:Goff & Jones 89:Goff & Jones 46:Goff & Jones 26:Goff & Jones 746: 745: 741: 740: 739: 737: 736: 735: 716: 715: 714: 713: 698: 694: 685: 681: 667: 666: 662: 645: 633: 621: 620: 613: 588: 576: 563: 562: 558: 548: 547: 538: 522: 517: 516: 493: 480: 479: 475: 465: 463: 459: 454: 453: 449: 442: 434:. p. 158. 432:Clarendon Press 420: 419: 415: 401: 397: 387: 385: 377: 376: 372: 367: 355: 232:General editors 216: 143:Ronnie Maudsley 134: 128: 17: 12: 11: 5: 744: 742: 734: 733: 728: 718: 717: 712: 711: 692: 679: 660: 631: 611: 574: 556: 536: 491: 473: 447: 440: 413: 395: 369: 368: 366: 363: 354: 351: 348: 347: 344: 341: 337: 336: 333: 330: 326: 325: 319: 316: 312: 311: 308: 305: 301: 300: 297: 294: 290: 289: 286: 283: 279: 278: 275: 272: 268: 267: 264: 261: 257: 256: 253: 250: 246: 245: 242: 239: 235: 234: 229: 224: 215: 212: 130:Main article: 127: 124: 81:House of Lords 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 743: 732: 729: 727: 724: 723: 721: 708: 704: 703: 696: 693: 688: 683: 680: 675: 671: 664: 661: 656: 650: 642: 638: 634: 632:1-901362-42-6 628: 624: 618: 616: 612: 607: 603: 599: 593: 585: 581: 577: 571: 567: 560: 557: 552: 545: 543: 541: 537: 532: 528: 521: 520:"Robert Goff" 514: 512: 510: 508: 506: 504: 502: 500: 498: 496: 492: 487: 483: 477: 474: 458: 451: 448: 443: 441:0-19-876377-8 437: 433: 429: 428: 423: 422:Virgo, Graham 417: 414: 410: 406: 405: 399: 396: 384: 380: 374: 371: 364: 362: 360: 359:Supreme Court 352: 345: 338: 334: 327: 323: 320: 313: 310:Gareth Jones 309: 302: 299:Gareth Jones 298: 291: 288:Gareth Jones 287: 280: 277:Gareth Jones 276: 269: 265: 258: 254: 247: 243: 236: 233: 228: 223: 219: 213: 211: 209: 205: 201: 200:Edmund Davies 197: 193: 189: 184: 182: 176: 174: 170: 166: 162: 158: 154: 153: 148: 144: 140: 133: 125: 123: 121: 117: 113: 108: 106: 102: 101: 96: 95: 90: 86: 82: 77: 75: 71: 67: 63: 59: 55: 52: 48: 47: 42: 41: 36: 35: 27: 23: 19: 700: 695: 686: 682: 673: 669: 663: 622: 565: 559: 550: 530: 526: 476: 464:. Retrieved 450: 426: 416: 402: 398: 386:. Retrieved 373: 356: 231: 226: 221: 208:Lord Diplock 195: 188:Lord Denning 185: 177: 171:, and later 165:Gareth Jones 156: 150: 135: 111: 109: 104: 98: 92: 88: 78: 70:Gareth Jones 45: 44: 39: 38: 33: 32: 31: 25: 18: 116:Lord Rodger 66:Robert Goff 58:restitution 51:English law 720:Categories 388:27 October 126:Background 37:(formerly 726:Law books 649:cite book 592:cite book 584:944462849 365:Footnotes 353:Citations 139:Roman law 85:Lord Goff 641:40798537 424:(1999). 307:Seventh 214:Editions 54:textbook 318:Eighth 274:Fourth 252:Second 227:Edition 676:: 277. 639:  629:  582:  572:  438:  343:Tenth 332:Ninth 296:Sixth 285:Fifth 263:Third 241:First 705: 523:(PDF) 466:2 May 460:(PDF) 407: 340:2022 329:2016 315:2011 304:2007 293:2002 282:1998 271:1993 260:1986 249:1978 238:1966 655:link 637:OCLC 627:ISBN 606:link 602:link 598:link 580:OCLC 570:ISBN 468:2016 436:ISBN 390:2022 222:Year 68:and 60:and 114:." 56:on 722:: 674:83 672:. 651:}} 647:{{ 635:. 614:^ 594:}} 590:{{ 578:. 539:^ 531:18 529:. 525:. 494:^ 484:. 430:. 381:. 361:. 198:. 107:. 657:) 643:. 608:) 586:. 470:. 444:. 392:.

Index


English law
textbook
restitution
unjust enrichment
Robert Goff
Gareth Jones
Sweet & Maxwell
House of Lords
Lord Goff
Barclays Bank Ltd v W J Simms, Son and Cooke (Southern) Ltd
Donoghue v Stevenson
Lord Rodger
Romulus and Remus
Robert Goff, Baron Goff of Chieveley
Roman law
Ronnie Maudsley
Brasenose College, Oxford
Goff and Jones on the Law of Restitution
A. W. B. Simpson
Gareth Jones
Trinity College, Cambridge
Downing Professor of the Laws of England
Sweet & Maxwell
Lord Denning
Sir Frederick Pollock's
Edmund Davies
High Court of Justice
Lord Diplock
Charles Mitchell

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.