Knowledge (XXG)

Grady v. Corbin

Source 📝

1483: 31: 315:
as he drove his automobile across the center line of a New York highway and collided with two oncoming vehicles. Brenda Dirago, the driver of the second vehicle, died in this accident while her husband was seriously injured. Later that same day, Corbin was charged with DUI and pleaded guilty.
302:
bars a subsequent prosecution if, to establish an essential element of an offense charged in that prosecution, the government will prove conduct that constitutes an offense for which the defendant has already been prosecuted."
142:
bars a subsequent prosecution if, to establish an essential element of an offense charged in that prosecution, the government will prove conduct that constitutes an offense for which the defendant has already been
1553: 375: 1558: 1543: 620: 477: 452: 406: 360: 273: 122: 72: 370: 715: 253: 706: 718: 1568: 1548: 365: 1563: 1524: 1187: 699: 561: 1490: 35: 732: 345:, which rejected the same conduct test in favor of the longstanding same element test. The same element test had been the law since 1336: 932: 1112: 692: 999: 1136: 1069: 833: 472: 347: 876: 312: 295: 427: 1424: 1352: 761: 1517: 1236: 900: 777: 534: 108: 1344: 1203: 1482: 1152: 1392: 1248: 1384: 1144: 1088: 1034: 967: 959: 892: 793: 684: 528:
Brudzinski, Walter J.; Farashahi, Afshin (1992). "Double Jeopardy in Successive Prosecutions: The Impact of
325: 884: 667: 1368: 1312: 1018: 991: 983: 916: 857: 849: 814: 447: 381: 341: 299: 268: 198: 166: 139: 112: 1416: 1288: 1256: 1128: 1026: 745: 624: 481: 456: 410: 277: 125: 64: 1272: 588: 328:, the Supreme Court ruled that to subsequently try him for homicide would constitute double jeopardy. 1510: 1179: 1050: 1408: 1376: 1328: 1320: 1280: 1096: 940: 649: 100: 1360: 1296: 1264: 1211: 1195: 785: 507: 658: 631: 1400: 1104: 1042: 924: 597: 570: 543: 516: 190: 178: 158: 1494: 1448: 1304: 1171: 1120: 640: 1440: 908: 210: 1432: 769: 484: 459: 432: 413: 280: 202: 186: 1537: 1456: 753: 67: 174: 586:: Successive Prosecutions Must Survive Heightened Double Jeopardy Protection". 117: 83: 601: 574: 547: 520: 79: 54:
William V. Grady, District Attorney of Dutchess County v. Thomas J. Corbin
676: 376:
List of United States Supreme Court cases by the Rehnquist Court
1234: 812: 730: 688: 30: 339:
was only valid law for three years. It was overturned by
1554:
United States Supreme Court cases of the Rehnquist Court
1498: 559:: Doubling the Scope of the Double Jeopardy Clause". 361:
List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 495
227:
Brennan, joined by White, Marshall, Blackmun, Stevens
371:
Lists of United States Supreme Court cases by volume
1163: 1080: 1061: 1010: 951: 868: 825: 247: 239: 231: 223: 218: 147: 132: 96: 91: 59: 49: 42: 23: 505:: An Unsuccessful Effort to Define Same Offense". 1559:Overruled United States Supreme Court decisions 1544:United States Double Jeopardy Clause case law 1518: 700: 8: 1525: 1511: 1231: 822: 809: 727: 707: 693: 685: 20: 366:List of United States Supreme Court cases 428:"Double-Jeopardy Ruling Compounds Grief" 395: 311:In the fall of 1987, Thomas Corbin was 1188:Louisiana ex rel. Francis v. Resweber 18:1990 United States Supreme Court case 7: 1479: 1477: 243:Scalia, joined by Rehnquist, Kennedy 562:Ohio Northern University Law Review 1497:. You can help Knowledge (XXG) by 1491:Supreme Court of the United States 426:Foderaro, Lisa W. (June 2, 1990). 36:Supreme Court of the United States 14: 1569:United States Supreme Court stubs 1549:United States Supreme Court cases 627:508 (1990) is available from: 1481: 933:Bravo-Fernandez v. United States 29: 1564:1990 in United States case law 1: 716:United States Fifth Amendment 294:, 495 U.S. 508 (1990), was a 115:714, 545 N.Y.S.2d 71 (1989); 1489:This article related to the 1137:Puerto Rico v. Sanchez Valle 1070:Blockburger v. United States 834:Blockburger v. United States 473:Blockburger v. United States 348:Blockburger v. United States 298:decision holding that: "the 877:United States v. Randenbush 535:Thomas Jefferson Law Review 313:driving under the influence 296:United States Supreme Court 1585: 1476: 1425:J. D. B. v. North Carolina 1353:Dickerson v. United States 762:Wong Wing v. United States 677:Oyez (oral argument audio) 1337:Mitchell v. United States 1243: 1237:Self-Incrimination Clause 1230: 1081:Dual sovereignty doctrine 901:Fong Foo v. United States 826:Meaning of "same offense" 821: 808: 778:United States v. Moreland 740: 726: 555:McGinnis, L. A. (1990). " 266: 259: 252: 152: 137: 28: 1345:United States v. Hubbell 1204:North Carolina v. Pearce 1153:Denezpi v. United States 1113:United States v. Wheeler 1393:Corley v. United States 1385:United States v. Patane 1249:Curcio v. United States 1145:Gamble v. United States 1035:United States v. Dinitz 968:Ludwig v. Massachusetts 960:United States v. Wilson 893:Burton v. United States 794:United States v. Cotton 1369:Yarborough v. Alvarado 1089:United States v. Lanza 1019:United States v. Perez 1000:Smith v. United States 992:United States v. Dixon 984:United States v. Felix 917:Burks v. United States 858:United States v. Dixon 850:United States v. Felix 815:Double Jeopardy Clause 582:Webre, C. J. (1990). " 448:United States v. Dixon 382:United States v. Felix 342:United States v. Dixon 300:Double Jeopardy Clause 269:United States v. Dixon 167:William J. Brennan Jr. 140:Double Jeopardy Clause 1417:Berghuis v. Thompkins 1257:Griffin v. California 1129:United States v. Lara 1027:United States v. Jorn 885:Ball v. United States 746:Hurtado v. California 78:110 S. Ct. 2084; 109 43:Argued March 21, 1990 1313:Doe v. United States 1180:Palko v. Connecticut 1051:Blueford v. Arkansas 501:Barton, S. (1990). " 320:Opinion of the Court 254:U.S. Const. amend. V 45:Decided May 29, 1990 1409:Maryland v. Shatzer 1377:Missouri v. Seibert 1329:McNeil v. Wisconsin 1321:Illinois v. Perkins 1281:Williams v. Florida 1097:Bartkus v. Illinois 1062:Multiple punishment 941:McElrath v. Georgia 668:Library of Congress 199:Sandra Day O'Connor 101:Writ of prohibition 1361:Chavez v. Martinez 1297:Edwards v. Arizona 1289:Michigan v. Tucker 1265:Miranda v. Arizona 1212:Benton v. Maryland 1196:Baxstrom v. Herold 786:Beck v. Washington 719:criminal procedure 508:Georgia Law Review 163:Associate Justices 1506: 1505: 1471: 1470: 1467: 1466: 1401:Florida v. Powell 1273:Boulden v. Holman 1226: 1225: 1222: 1221: 1105:Waller v. Florida 1043:Oregon v. Kennedy 925:Evans v. Michigan 804: 803: 589:Loyola Law Review 324:In an opinion by 287: 286: 179:Thurgood Marshall 159:William Rehnquist 105:Corbin v. Hillery 1576: 1527: 1520: 1513: 1485: 1478: 1449:Salinas v. Texas 1305:Oregon v. Elstad 1232: 1172:Ex parte Bigelow 1121:Heath v. Alabama 952:After conviction 823: 810: 728: 709: 702: 695: 686: 681: 675: 672: 666: 663: 657: 654: 648: 645: 639: 636: 630: 605: 578: 551: 524: 488: 469: 463: 444: 438: 437: 423: 417: 400: 148:Court membership 33: 32: 21: 1584: 1583: 1579: 1578: 1577: 1575: 1574: 1573: 1534: 1533: 1532: 1531: 1474: 1472: 1463: 1441:Howes v. Fields 1239: 1218: 1159: 1076: 1057: 1006: 976:Grady v. Corbin 947: 909:Ashe v. Swenson 869:After acquittal 864: 842:Grady v. Corbin 817: 800: 736: 722: 713: 679: 673: 670: 664: 661: 655: 652: 646: 643: 637: 634: 628: 617:Grady v. Corbin 612: 584:Grady v. Corbin 581: 557:Grady v. Corbin 554: 530:Grady v. Corbin 527: 503:Grady v. Corbin 500: 497: 495:Further reading 492: 491: 470: 466: 445: 441: 425: 424: 420: 403:Grady v. Corbin 401: 397: 392: 357: 334: 326:Justice Brennan 322: 309: 291:Grady v. Corbin 262: 211:Anthony Kennedy 201: 191:John P. Stevens 189: 177: 87: 44: 38: 24:Grady v. Corbin 19: 12: 11: 5: 1582: 1580: 1572: 1571: 1566: 1561: 1556: 1551: 1546: 1536: 1535: 1530: 1529: 1522: 1515: 1507: 1504: 1503: 1486: 1469: 1468: 1465: 1464: 1462: 1461: 1453: 1445: 1437: 1433:Bobby v. Dixon 1429: 1421: 1413: 1405: 1397: 1389: 1381: 1373: 1365: 1357: 1349: 1341: 1333: 1325: 1317: 1309: 1301: 1293: 1285: 1277: 1269: 1261: 1253: 1244: 1241: 1240: 1235: 1228: 1227: 1224: 1223: 1220: 1219: 1217: 1216: 1208: 1200: 1192: 1184: 1176: 1167: 1165: 1161: 1160: 1158: 1157: 1149: 1141: 1133: 1125: 1117: 1109: 1101: 1093: 1084: 1082: 1078: 1077: 1075: 1074: 1065: 1063: 1059: 1058: 1056: 1055: 1047: 1039: 1031: 1023: 1014: 1012: 1011:After mistrial 1008: 1007: 1005: 1004: 996: 988: 980: 972: 964: 955: 953: 949: 948: 946: 945: 937: 929: 921: 913: 905: 897: 889: 881: 872: 870: 866: 865: 863: 862: 854: 846: 838: 829: 827: 819: 818: 813: 806: 805: 802: 801: 799: 798: 790: 782: 774: 770:Maxwell v. Dow 766: 758: 750: 741: 738: 737: 731: 724: 723: 714: 712: 711: 704: 697: 689: 683: 682: 650:Google Scholar 611: 610:External links 608: 607: 606: 579: 552: 525: 496: 493: 490: 489: 464: 439: 433:New York Times 418: 394: 393: 391: 388: 387: 386: 378: 373: 368: 363: 356: 353: 333: 330: 321: 318: 308: 305: 285: 284: 264: 263: 260: 257: 256: 250: 249: 245: 244: 241: 237: 236: 233: 229: 228: 225: 221: 220: 216: 215: 214: 213: 203:Antonin Scalia 187:Harry Blackmun 164: 161: 156: 150: 149: 145: 144: 135: 134: 130: 129: 98: 94: 93: 89: 88: 77: 61: 57: 56: 51: 50:Full case name 47: 46: 40: 39: 34: 26: 25: 17: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1581: 1570: 1567: 1565: 1562: 1560: 1557: 1555: 1552: 1550: 1547: 1545: 1542: 1541: 1539: 1528: 1523: 1521: 1516: 1514: 1509: 1508: 1502: 1500: 1496: 1492: 1487: 1484: 1480: 1475: 1459: 1458: 1457:Vega v. Tekoh 1454: 1451: 1450: 1446: 1443: 1442: 1438: 1435: 1434: 1430: 1427: 1426: 1422: 1419: 1418: 1414: 1411: 1410: 1406: 1403: 1402: 1398: 1395: 1394: 1390: 1387: 1386: 1382: 1379: 1378: 1374: 1371: 1370: 1366: 1363: 1362: 1358: 1355: 1354: 1350: 1347: 1346: 1342: 1339: 1338: 1334: 1331: 1330: 1326: 1323: 1322: 1318: 1315: 1314: 1310: 1307: 1306: 1302: 1299: 1298: 1294: 1291: 1290: 1286: 1283: 1282: 1278: 1275: 1274: 1270: 1267: 1266: 1262: 1259: 1258: 1254: 1251: 1250: 1246: 1245: 1242: 1238: 1233: 1229: 1214: 1213: 1209: 1206: 1205: 1201: 1198: 1197: 1193: 1190: 1189: 1185: 1182: 1181: 1177: 1174: 1173: 1169: 1168: 1166: 1162: 1155: 1154: 1150: 1147: 1146: 1142: 1139: 1138: 1134: 1131: 1130: 1126: 1123: 1122: 1118: 1115: 1114: 1110: 1107: 1106: 1102: 1099: 1098: 1094: 1091: 1090: 1086: 1085: 1083: 1079: 1072: 1071: 1067: 1066: 1064: 1060: 1053: 1052: 1048: 1045: 1044: 1040: 1037: 1036: 1032: 1029: 1028: 1024: 1021: 1020: 1016: 1015: 1013: 1009: 1002: 1001: 997: 994: 993: 989: 986: 985: 981: 978: 977: 973: 970: 969: 965: 962: 961: 957: 956: 954: 950: 943: 942: 938: 935: 934: 930: 927: 926: 922: 919: 918: 914: 911: 910: 906: 903: 902: 898: 895: 894: 890: 887: 886: 882: 879: 878: 874: 873: 871: 867: 860: 859: 855: 852: 851: 847: 844: 843: 839: 836: 835: 831: 830: 828: 824: 820: 816: 811: 807: 796: 795: 791: 788: 787: 783: 780: 779: 775: 772: 771: 767: 764: 763: 759: 756: 755: 754:Ex parte Bain 751: 748: 747: 743: 742: 739: 734: 729: 725: 720: 717: 710: 705: 703: 698: 696: 691: 690: 687: 678: 669: 660: 651: 642: 633: 632:CourtListener 626: 622: 618: 614: 613: 609: 603: 599: 595: 591: 590: 585: 580: 576: 572: 568: 564: 563: 558: 553: 549: 545: 541: 537: 536: 531: 526: 522: 518: 514: 510: 509: 504: 499: 498: 494: 486: 483: 479: 475: 474: 468: 465: 461: 458: 454: 450: 449: 443: 440: 435: 434: 429: 422: 419: 415: 412: 408: 404: 399: 396: 389: 384: 383: 379: 377: 374: 372: 369: 367: 364: 362: 359: 358: 354: 352: 350: 349: 344: 343: 338: 331: 329: 327: 319: 317: 314: 306: 304: 301: 297: 293: 292: 282: 279: 275: 271: 270: 265: 258: 255: 251: 246: 242: 238: 234: 230: 226: 222: 219:Case opinions 217: 212: 208: 204: 200: 196: 192: 188: 184: 180: 176: 172: 168: 165: 162: 160: 157: 155:Chief Justice 154: 153: 151: 146: 141: 136: 131: 127: 124: 120: 119: 114: 110: 106: 102: 99: 95: 90: 85: 81: 75: 74: 69: 66: 62: 58: 55: 52: 48: 41: 37: 27: 22: 16: 1499:expanding it 1488: 1473: 1455: 1447: 1439: 1431: 1423: 1415: 1407: 1399: 1391: 1383: 1375: 1367: 1359: 1351: 1343: 1335: 1327: 1319: 1311: 1303: 1295: 1287: 1279: 1271: 1263: 1255: 1247: 1210: 1202: 1194: 1186: 1178: 1170: 1151: 1143: 1135: 1127: 1119: 1111: 1103: 1095: 1087: 1068: 1049: 1041: 1033: 1025: 1017: 998: 990: 982: 975: 974: 966: 958: 939: 931: 923: 915: 907: 899: 891: 883: 875: 856: 848: 841: 840: 832: 792: 784: 776: 768: 760: 752: 744: 616: 593: 587: 583: 566: 560: 556: 539: 533: 529: 512: 506: 502: 487: (1932). 471: 467: 462: (1993). 446: 442: 431: 421: 416: (1990). 402: 398: 380: 346: 340: 336: 335: 323: 310: 290: 289: 288: 267: 261:Overruled by 248:Laws applied 206: 194: 182: 170: 116: 104: 92:Case history 71: 53: 15: 283: (1993) 175:Byron White 143:prosecuted. 128:953 (1989). 1538:Categories 733:Grand Jury 390:References 307:Background 84:U.S. LEXIS 82:548; 1990 602:0192-9720 575:0094-534X 548:1090-5278 521:0016-8300 332:Aftermath 121:granted, 111:279, 543 103:granted, 80:L. Ed. 2d 60:Citations 721:case law 615:Text of 596:: 1171. 355:See also 235:O'Connor 224:Majority 641:Findlaw 569:: 873. 542:: 181. 515:: 143. 240:Dissent 232:Dissent 133:Holding 1460:(2022) 1452:(2013) 1444:(2012) 1436:(2011) 1428:(2011) 1420:(2010) 1412:(2010) 1404:(2010) 1396:(2009) 1388:(2004) 1380:(2004) 1372:(2004) 1364:(2003) 1356:(2000) 1348:(2000) 1340:(1999) 1332:(1991) 1324:(1990) 1316:(1988) 1308:(1985) 1300:(1981) 1292:(1974) 1284:(1970) 1276:(1969) 1268:(1966) 1260:(1965) 1252:(1957) 1215:(1969) 1207:(1969) 1199:(1966) 1191:(1947) 1183:(1937) 1175:(1885) 1156:(2022) 1148:(2019) 1140:(2016) 1132:(2004) 1124:(1985) 1116:(1978) 1108:(1970) 1100:(1959) 1092:(1922) 1073:(1932) 1054:(2012) 1046:(1982) 1038:(1976) 1030:(1971) 1022:(1824) 1003:(2023) 995:(1993) 987:(1992) 979:(1990) 971:(1976) 963:(1833) 944:(2024) 936:(2016) 928:(2013) 920:(1978) 912:(1970) 904:(1962) 896:(1906) 888:(1896) 880:(1834) 861:(1993) 853:(1992) 845:(1990) 837:(1932) 797:(2002) 789:(1962) 781:(1922) 773:(1900) 765:(1896) 757:(1887) 749:(1884) 735:Clause 680:  674:  671:  665:  662:  659:Justia 656:  653:  647:  644:  638:  635:  629:  600:  573:  546:  519:  476:, 451:, 405:, 385:(1993) 272:, 209: 207:· 205:  197: 195:· 193:  185: 183:· 181:  173: 171:· 169:  113:N.E.2d 109:N.Y.2d 1493:is a 1164:Other 623: 480: 455: 409: 337:Grady 276: 118:cert. 107:, 74 97:Prior 1495:stub 625:U.S. 598:ISSN 571:ISSN 544:ISSN 517:ISSN 482:U.S. 457:U.S. 411:U.S. 278:U.S. 138:The 126:U.S. 86:2698 73:more 65:U.S. 63:495 621:495 532:". 485:299 478:284 460:688 453:509 414:508 407:495 281:688 274:509 123:493 68:508 1540:: 619:, 594:36 592:. 567:17 565:. 540:14 538:. 513:25 511:. 430:. 351:. 1526:e 1519:t 1512:v 1501:. 708:e 701:t 694:v 604:. 577:. 550:. 523:. 436:. 76:) 70:(

Index

Supreme Court of the United States
U.S.
508
more
L. Ed. 2d
U.S. LEXIS
Writ of prohibition
N.Y.2d
N.E.2d
cert.
493
U.S.
Double Jeopardy Clause
William Rehnquist
William J. Brennan Jr.
Byron White
Thurgood Marshall
Harry Blackmun
John P. Stevens
Sandra Day O'Connor
Antonin Scalia
Anthony Kennedy
U.S. Const. amend. V
United States v. Dixon
509
U.S.
688
United States Supreme Court
Double Jeopardy Clause
driving under the influence

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.