466:
31:
375:
523:
260:
The Hurd House, located at 116 Bryant Street in
Bloomingdale, D.C., was the first house owned and sold to a black family in the area, infringing on the covenant's racial restrictions. This caused the neighboring whites, Lena and Frederic Hodge, to sue the Hurd family for violating the covenant which
631:
264:
Charles
Hamilton Houston, the Hurd’s family attorney, a black man who attended Howard University, had evidence that revealed the covenants in Bloomingdale did not uphold keeping the neighborhood white, however, the D.C. court upheld the covenant.
256:
The
Bloomingdale area was an epicenter of legal challenges regarding Blacks attempting to move into racially restricted housing. Bloomingdale was attractive to middle-class Black Families because of the proximity to Howard University.
611:
276:
The Hurd V Hodge decision was a large win for the civil rights movement, in addition to the
Shelley V Kreamer decision. These decisions paved the way for the following cases similar to these.
213:
651:
392:
322:
288:
72:
564:
93:
The
Fourteenth Amendment prohibits a federal court from enforcing restrictive covenants that would prohibit a person from owning or occupying property based on race or color.
601:
656:
430:
661:
606:
216:
prohibits a federal court from enforcing restrictive covenants that would prohibit a person from owning or occupying property based on race or color.
616:
557:
636:
621:
507:
666:
646:
550:
473:
35:
641:
626:
221:
500:
245:
465:
248:
and treating persons in the
District of Columbia like those in the states would forbid restrictive covenants.
379:
231:
448:
583:"Civil Rights Tour: Legal Campaigns - Hurd v. Hodge, Landmark Supreme Court Case - 116 Bryant Street NW"
530:
396:
326:
152:
64:
493:
124:
421:
294:
240:
208:
160:
136:
148:
128:
534:
477:
412:
273:
Now, the Hurd House is a historical site for the civil rights movement which can be toured.
225:
582:
403:
108:
439:
342:
329:
595:
190:
Reed, Jackson and
Rutledge took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.
140:
364:
Civil Rights Tour: Legal
Campaigns - Hurd v. Hodge, Landmark Supreme Court Case.
67:
244:. In Hurd, the Court found against the segregationists by holding that both the
374:
235:
116:
79:
632:
African-American history between emancipation and the civil rights movement
522:
238:, and so the decision varied from the Fourteenth Amendment ruling in
30:
220:
also involved racially restrictive covenants on houses in the
538:
481:
234:
does not explicitly apply to a U.S. territory not in a
612:
United States
Supreme Court cases of the Vinson Court
289:
List of United States
Supreme Court cases, volume 334
181:
173:
168:
97:
87:
59:
54:
Hurd et al. v. Hodge et al., Urciolo et al. v. Same
49:
42:
23:
177:Vinson, joined by Black, Douglas, Murphy, Burton
261:barred the house’s sale to African Americans.
206:, 334 U.S. 24 (1948), was a companion case to
558:
501:
8:
652:United States racial discrimination case law
565:
551:
508:
494:
20:
602:United States equal protection case law
574:
311:
18:1948 United States Supreme Court case
7:
657:May 1948 events in the United States
519:
517:
462:
460:
212:, in which the Court held that the
343:"Hurd v. Hodge, 334 U.S. 24 (1948)"
537:. You can help Knowledge (XXG) by
480:. You can help Knowledge (XXG) by
474:Supreme Court of the United States
36:Supreme Court of the United States
14:
662:United States Supreme Court stubs
607:United States Supreme Court cases
521:
464:
399:24 (1948) is available from:
373:
29:
617:United States land use case law
637:Civil rights movement case law
622:1948 in United States case law
1:
533:–related article is a
472:This article related to the
298:(1948), a companion case to
667:Civil rights movement stubs
647:Housing in Washington, D.C.
683:
516:
459:
43:Argued January 15–16, 1948
189:
102:
92:
28:
642:1948 in Washington, D.C.
246:Civil Rights Act of 1866
627:Housing rights activism
232:Equal Protection Clause
531:civil rights movement
214:Fourteenth Amendment
449:Library of Congress
45:Decided May 3, 1948
295:Shelley v. Kraemer
241:Shelley v. Kraemer
209:Shelley v. Kraemer
137:William O. Douglas
113:Associate Justices
78:68 S. Ct. 847; 92
546:
545:
489:
488:
378:Works related to
194:
193:
153:Wiley B. Rutledge
149:Robert H. Jackson
129:Felix Frankfurter
674:
587:
586:
579:
567:
560:
553:
525:
518:
510:
503:
496:
468:
461:
453:
447:
444:
438:
435:
429:
426:
420:
417:
411:
408:
402:
377:
358:
357:
355:
353:
339:
333:
316:
226:Washington, D.C.
224:neighborhood of
161:Harold H. Burton
98:Court membership
33:
32:
21:
682:
681:
677:
676:
675:
673:
672:
671:
592:
591:
590:
581:
580:
576:
572:
571:
515:
514:
457:
451:
445:
442:
436:
433:
427:
424:
418:
415:
409:
406:
400:
370:
362:
361:
351:
349:
341:
340:
336:
317:
313:
308:
285:
279:
271:
254:
199:
151:
139:
127:
125:Stanley F. Reed
83:
44:
38:
19:
12:
11:
5:
680:
678:
670:
669:
664:
659:
654:
649:
644:
639:
634:
629:
624:
619:
614:
609:
604:
594:
593:
589:
588:
573:
570:
569:
562:
555:
547:
544:
543:
526:
513:
512:
505:
498:
490:
487:
486:
469:
455:
454:
431:Google Scholar
385:
369:
368:External links
366:
360:
359:
334:
310:
309:
307:
304:
303:
302:
291:
284:
281:
270:
267:
253:
250:
198:
195:
192:
191:
187:
186:
183:
179:
178:
175:
171:
170:
166:
165:
164:
163:
114:
111:
109:Fred M. Vinson
106:
100:
99:
95:
94:
90:
89:
85:
84:
77:
61:
57:
56:
51:
50:Full case name
47:
46:
40:
39:
34:
26:
25:
17:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
679:
668:
665:
663:
660:
658:
655:
653:
650:
648:
645:
643:
640:
638:
635:
633:
630:
628:
625:
623:
620:
618:
615:
613:
610:
608:
605:
603:
600:
599:
597:
584:
578:
575:
568:
563:
561:
556:
554:
549:
548:
542:
540:
536:
532:
527:
524:
520:
511:
506:
504:
499:
497:
492:
491:
485:
483:
479:
475:
470:
467:
463:
458:
450:
441:
432:
423:
414:
413:CourtListener
405:
398:
394:
390:
389:Hurd v. Hodge
386:
384:at Wikisource
383:
382:
381:Hurd v. Hodge
376:
372:
371:
367:
365:
352:September 30,
348:
344:
338:
335:
331:
328:
324:
320:
319:Hurd v. Hodge
315:
312:
305:
301:
300:Hurd v. Hodge
297:
296:
292:
290:
287:
286:
282:
280:
277:
274:
268:
266:
262:
258:
251:
249:
247:
243:
242:
237:
233:
230:However, the
228:
227:
223:
219:
218:Hurd v. Hodge
215:
211:
210:
205:
204:
203:Hurd v. Hodge
196:
188:
184:
180:
176:
172:
169:Case opinions
167:
162:
158:
154:
150:
146:
142:
138:
134:
130:
126:
122:
118:
115:
112:
110:
107:
105:Chief Justice
104:
103:
101:
96:
91:
86:
81:
75:
74:
69:
66:
62:
58:
55:
52:
48:
41:
37:
27:
24:Hurd v. Hodge
22:
16:
577:
539:expanding it
528:
482:expanding it
471:
456:
388:
380:
363:
350:. Retrieved
346:
337:
332: (1948).
318:
314:
299:
293:
278:
275:
272:
263:
259:
255:
239:
229:
222:Bloomingdale
217:
207:
202:
201:
200:
156:
144:
141:Frank Murphy
132:
120:
71:
53:
15:
185:Frankfurter
182:Concurrence
596:Categories
347:Justia Law
306:References
252:Background
236:U.S. state
117:Hugo Black
269:Aftermath
80:L. Ed. 2d
60:Citations
387:Text of
283:See also
197:The Case
174:Majority
422:Findlaw
404:Cornell
88:Holding
452:
446:
443:
440:Justia
437:
434:
428:
425:
419:
416:
410:
407:
401:
321:,
159:
157:·
155:
147:
145:·
143:
135:
133:·
131:
123:
121:·
119:
529:This
476:is a
395:
325:
535:stub
478:stub
397:U.S.
354:2023
327:U.S.
82:1187
73:more
65:U.S.
63:334
393:334
323:334
598::
391:,
345:.
330:24
68:24
585:.
566:e
559:t
552:v
541:.
509:e
502:t
495:v
484:.
356:.
76:)
70:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
