Knowledge (XXG)

HIH Casualty and General Insurance Ltd v Chase Manhattan Bank

Source 📝

256:
the contract terms indicate he has chosen to do; and if the contract terms can take legal and practical effect without denying him the rights he would ordinarily enjoy if the other party is negligent, they will be read as not denying him those rights unless they are so expressed as to make clear that they do. But, as the insurers in argument fully recognised, Lord Morton was giving helpful guidance on the proper approach to interpretation and not laying down a code. The passage does not provide a litmus test which, applied to the terms of the contract, yields a certain and predictable result. The courts' task of ascertaining what the particular parties intended, in their particular commercial context, remains.
41: 664: 213:. Intermediaries who knew about movies, much more than either the bank or the insurer, negotiated. The bank made a claim for insurance cover. HIH resisted the bank's claim and in doing so alleged misrepresentations, both negligent and fraudulent, by the bank’s agents (not the bank itself). The insurance contract contained disclaimers for misrepresentations by the bank. One issue was whether the disclaimers could absolve the bank of liability for misrepresentation. 1267: 1243: 1255: 255:
AC 192 at 208. There can be no doubting the general authority of these principles, which have been applied in many cases, and the approach indicated is sound. The courts should not ordinarily infer that a contracting party has given up rights which the law confers upon him to an extent greater than
237:) held the disclaimers could exclude liability for negligent misrepresentation, but not for fraud, were it established. One could exclude liability for someone else's fraud, but not for one's own. They said that to try to exclude liability for one's own fraud would be contrary to public policy. 277:
observed that the guidelines established in Canada Steamship Lines v The King had been emphasised by Bingham to be "helpful guidance on the proper approach to interpretation and not laying down a code ...".
542: 244:
11. In submitting that phrase does not deny the insurers their usual legal remedies for negligent misrepresentation by Heaths, the insurers drew sustenance from the well-known principles propounded by
374: 307: 234: 122: 1293: 390: 110: 1303: 594: 54: 1208: 246: 1032: 494: 300: 260: 251: 126: 40: 917: 336: 1123: 982: 1022: 952: 627: 977: 536: 520: 293: 165: 118: 1118: 1082: 904: 506: 230: 1213: 425: 1298: 962: 643: 413: 587: 453: 1168: 497: 1183: 481: 1173: 818: 467: 403: 205: 1259: 997: 909: 845: 179:
was in the highly speculative business of lending money against receipts from five future movies (in this case,
1266: 1077: 1027: 222: 199: 114: 1308: 1247: 1193: 1178: 755: 580: 1148: 1057: 1042: 510: 1188: 1163: 1153: 1072: 1062: 1017: 770: 735: 17: 209:). The bank wanted to protect against its substantial risk. So it took out a policy of insurance with 1158: 992: 987: 927: 922: 745: 693: 531: 176: 161: 1067: 800: 653: 564:
Biffa Waste Services Ltd & Anor v Maschinenfabrik Ernst Hese GmbH & Ors (2008) EWHC 6 (TCC)
1228: 1133: 1037: 967: 957: 881: 832: 187: 181: 663: 1223: 1087: 1007: 765: 750: 648: 138: 886: 810: 795: 790: 730: 632: 193: 1128: 1108: 1103: 1012: 1002: 348: 1113: 972: 873: 805: 785: 775: 740: 603: 563: 457: 324: 1271: 443: 429: 1287: 1203: 947: 937: 868: 760: 704: 439: 274: 263: 210: 1218: 1198: 1138: 932: 725: 485: 471: 360: 157: 380: 364: 1143: 1047: 860: 855: 709: 687: 617: 226: 942: 850: 780: 622: 1052: 285: 562:
England and Wales High Court (Technology and Construction Court),
270: 142: 572: 566:, paragraph 181, delivered 11 January 2008, accessed 9 March 2023 576: 543:
JPMorgan Chase Bank v. Traffic Stream (BVI) Infrastructure Ltd.
289: 153:
HIH Casualty and General Insurance Ltd v Chase Manhattan Bank
376:
Hedley Byrne & Co Ltd v Heller & Partners Ltd
1096: 895: 831: 718: 680: 671: 610: 225:
gave a speech. The majority of the House of Lords (
132: 106: 101: 93: 88: 68: 60: 50: 31: 242: 588: 301: 8: 392:Car and Universal Finance Co Ltd v Caldwell 1204:Indiana Michigan Power Center (Fort Wayne) 677: 595: 581: 573: 308: 294: 286: 39: 28: 1209:JPMorgan Chase Building (San Francisco) 555: 18:HIH Casualty Ltd v Chase Manhattan Bank 1033:National Bank of Commerce in New York 495:Unfair Commercial Practices Directive 252:Canada Steamship Lines Ltd v The King 7: 1254: 1124:270 Park Avenue (2021–present) 918:Banca Commerciale Italiana Trust Co. 337:Erlanger v New Sombrero Phosphate Co 249:giving the judgment of the Board in 1294:English misrepresentation case law 1023:Mechanics and Metals National Bank 25: 1169:Chase Tower (Englewood, Colorado) 1119:270 Park Avenue (1960–2021) 45:One of the five films in the deal 1265: 1253: 1242: 1241: 978:Fourth National Bank of New York 662: 537:Misrepresentation in English law 521:Misrepresentation in English law 1304:2003 in United Kingdom case law 1083:Valley National Bank of Arizona 507:Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 1214:JPMorgan Chase Tower (Houston) 426:Esso Petroleum Co Ltd v Mardon 33:HIH Ltd v Chase Manhattan Bank 1: 963:Dime Savings Bank of New York 644:Highbridge Capital Management 414:Lambert v Co-op Insurance Ltd 953:Continental Bank & Trust 454:Royscot Trust Ltd v Rogerson 1184:Chase Tower (Oklahoma City) 482:Shogun Finance Ltd v Hudson 1325: 1174:Chase Tower (Indianapolis) 637:Chase Card Services Canada 468:Saamco v York Montague Ltd 404:Misrepresentation Act 1967 206:The People vs. Larry Flynt 1237: 1224:One Chase Manhattan Plaza 910:American Savings and Loan 660: 518: 504: 492: 478: 464: 450: 436: 422: 410: 401: 387: 371: 357: 345: 333: 321: 316:Misrepresentation sources 221:All of the judges except 137: 38: 1078:Trust Company of America 1028:National Bank of Detroit 200:The Mirror Has Two Faces 1194:Chase Tower (Rochester) 1179:Chase Tower (Milwaukee) 1058:Robert Fleming & Co 756:William B. Harrison Jr. 247:Lord Morton of Henryton 1149:Chase Tower (Amarillo) 1043:New York Trust Company 258: 1189:Chase Tower (Phoenix) 1164:Chase Tower (El Paso) 1154:Chase Tower (Chicago) 1073:The Manhattan Company 1063:State Bank of Chicago 1018:Manufacturers Hanover 993:HF Ahmanson & Co. 988:Hambrecht & Quist 771:Douglas A. Warner III 736:Junius Spencer Morgan 340:(1878) 3 App Cas 1218 158:[2003] UKHL 6 1299:House of Lords cases 1159:Chase Tower (Dallas) 943:Chase Manhattan Bank 928:Bank United of Texas 746:Henry Sturgis Morgan 726:John Pierpont Morgan 694:Mary Callahan Erdoes 640:EMC Mortgage Company 532:English contract law 271:Biffa Waste Services 177:Chase Manhattan Bank 162:English contract law 1068:Texas Commerce Bank 914:Anchor Savings Bank 801:Dennis Weatherstone 654:One Equity Partners 240:Lord Bingham said: 145:, exclusion clauses 74:1 All ER (Comm) 349 1229:The Qube (Detroit) 1134:383 Madison Avenue 1038:National Park Bank 1008:JP Morgan & Co 983:Great Western Bank 958:Corn Exchange Bank 882:Phebe N. Novakovic 649:JP Morgan & Co 328:(1766) 3 Burr 1905 1281: 1280: 1088:Washington Mutual 905:American Fletcher 827: 826: 766:Walter V. Shipley 751:David Rockefeller 527: 526: 417:2 Lloyd's Rep 485 166:misrepresentation 149: 148: 139:Misrepresentation 78:Lloyds Rep IR 230 16:(Redirected from 1316: 1269: 1257: 1256: 1245: 1244: 998:Indiana National 887:Virginia Rometty 811:Winthrop Aldrich 796:Thomas W. Lamont 791:James B. Lee Jr. 731:J. P. Morgan Jr. 678: 666: 633:Chase Paymentech 597: 590: 583: 574: 567: 560: 393: 377: 352:(1881) 20 Ch D 1 310: 303: 296: 287: 164:case concerning 102:Court membership 84:2 Lloyd's Rep 61 64:20 February 2003 43: 29: 21: 1324: 1323: 1319: 1318: 1317: 1315: 1314: 1313: 1284: 1283: 1282: 1277: 1233: 1129:277 Park Avenue 1109:245 Park Avenue 1104:125 London Wall 1092: 1013:Lincoln Savings 1003:Jardine Fleming 897: 891: 834: 823: 714: 701:Gordon A. Smith 698:Daniel E. Pinto 673: 667: 658: 606: 601: 571: 570: 561: 557: 552: 528: 523: 514: 500: 488: 474: 460: 446: 432: 418: 406: 397: 391: 383: 375: 367: 353: 349:Redgrave v Hurd 341: 329: 317: 314: 284: 269:In the case of 219: 174: 125: 121: 117: 113: 83: 81: 79: 77: 75: 73: 46: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 1322: 1320: 1312: 1311: 1309:JPMorgan Chase 1306: 1301: 1296: 1286: 1285: 1279: 1278: 1276: 1275: 1263: 1251: 1238: 1235: 1234: 1232: 1231: 1226: 1221: 1216: 1211: 1206: 1201: 1196: 1191: 1186: 1181: 1176: 1171: 1166: 1161: 1156: 1151: 1146: 1141: 1136: 1131: 1126: 1121: 1116: 1114:25 Bank Street 1111: 1106: 1100: 1098: 1094: 1093: 1091: 1090: 1085: 1080: 1075: 1070: 1065: 1060: 1055: 1050: 1045: 1040: 1035: 1030: 1025: 1020: 1015: 1010: 1005: 1000: 995: 990: 985: 980: 975: 970: 965: 960: 955: 950: 945: 940: 935: 930: 925: 920: 915: 912: 907: 901: 899: 893: 892: 890: 889: 884: 879: 876: 874:Mellody Hobson 871: 866: 863: 858: 853: 848: 843: 839: 837: 829: 828: 825: 824: 822: 821: 816: 813: 808: 806:John J. McCloy 803: 798: 793: 788: 786:Blythe Masters 783: 778: 776:Temple Bowdoin 773: 768: 763: 758: 753: 748: 743: 741:George Peabody 738: 733: 728: 722: 720: 716: 715: 713: 712: 707: 702: 699: 696: 691: 684: 682: 675: 669: 668: 661: 659: 657: 656: 651: 646: 641: 638: 635: 630: 625: 620: 614: 612: 608: 607: 604:JPMorgan Chase 602: 600: 599: 592: 585: 577: 569: 568: 554: 553: 551: 548: 547: 546: 539: 534: 525: 524: 519: 516: 515: 505: 502: 501: 493: 490: 489: 479: 476: 475: 465: 462: 461: 451: 448: 447: 437: 434: 433: 423: 420: 419: 411: 408: 407: 402: 399: 398: 388: 385: 384: 372: 369: 368: 358: 355: 354: 346: 343: 342: 334: 331: 330: 325:Carter v Boehm 322: 319: 318: 315: 313: 312: 305: 298: 290: 283: 280: 273:v MEH (2008), 229:, Lord Steyn, 218: 215: 173: 170: 147: 146: 135: 134: 130: 129: 108: 107:Judges sitting 104: 103: 99: 98: 95: 91: 90: 86: 85: 70: 66: 65: 62: 58: 57: 55:House of Lords 52: 48: 47: 44: 36: 35: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1321: 1310: 1307: 1305: 1302: 1300: 1297: 1295: 1292: 1291: 1289: 1274: 1273: 1268: 1264: 1262: 1261: 1252: 1250: 1249: 1240: 1239: 1236: 1230: 1227: 1225: 1222: 1220: 1217: 1215: 1212: 1210: 1207: 1205: 1202: 1200: 1197: 1195: 1192: 1190: 1187: 1185: 1182: 1180: 1177: 1175: 1172: 1170: 1167: 1165: 1162: 1160: 1157: 1155: 1152: 1150: 1147: 1145: 1142: 1140: 1137: 1135: 1132: 1130: 1127: 1125: 1122: 1120: 1117: 1115: 1112: 1110: 1107: 1105: 1102: 1101: 1099: 1095: 1089: 1086: 1084: 1081: 1079: 1076: 1074: 1071: 1069: 1066: 1064: 1061: 1059: 1056: 1054: 1051: 1049: 1046: 1044: 1041: 1039: 1036: 1034: 1031: 1029: 1026: 1024: 1021: 1019: 1016: 1014: 1011: 1009: 1006: 1004: 1001: 999: 996: 994: 991: 989: 986: 984: 981: 979: 976: 974: 971: 969: 968:First Chicago 966: 964: 961: 959: 956: 954: 951: 949: 948:Chemical Bank 946: 944: 941: 939: 938:CenTrust Bank 936: 934: 931: 929: 926: 924: 921: 919: 916: 913: 911: 908: 906: 903: 902: 900: 894: 888: 885: 883: 880: 877: 875: 872: 870: 869:Laban Jackson 867: 865:Timothy Flynn 864: 862: 859: 857: 854: 852: 849: 847: 844: 842:Linda Bammann 841: 840: 838: 836: 830: 820: 817: 815:Matthew Zames 814: 812: 809: 807: 804: 802: 799: 797: 794: 792: 789: 787: 784: 782: 779: 777: 774: 772: 769: 767: 764: 762: 761:John B. McCoy 759: 757: 754: 752: 749: 747: 744: 742: 739: 737: 734: 732: 729: 727: 724: 723: 721: 717: 711: 708: 706: 705:Marianne Lake 703: 700: 697: 695: 692: 689: 686: 685: 683: 679: 676: 670: 665: 655: 652: 650: 647: 645: 642: 639: 636: 634: 631: 629: 626: 624: 621: 619: 616: 615: 613: 609: 605: 598: 593: 591: 586: 584: 579: 578: 575: 565: 559: 556: 549: 545: 544: 540: 538: 535: 533: 530: 529: 522: 517: 512: 508: 503: 499: 496: 491: 487: 484: 483: 477: 473: 470: 469: 463: 459: 456: 455: 449: 445: 442: 441: 440:East v Maurer 435: 431: 428: 427: 421: 416: 415: 409: 405: 400: 395: 394: 386: 382: 379: 378: 370: 366: 363: 362: 356: 351: 350: 344: 339: 338: 332: 327: 326: 320: 311: 306: 304: 299: 297: 292: 291: 288: 281: 279: 276: 272: 267: 265: 262: 257: 254: 253: 248: 241: 238: 236: 235:Lord Hobhouse 232: 231:Lord Hoffmann 228: 224: 216: 214: 212: 211:HIH Insurance 208: 207: 202: 201: 196: 195: 190: 189: 184: 183: 178: 171: 169: 167: 163: 159: 155: 154: 144: 140: 136: 131: 128: 124: 123:Lord Hobhouse 120: 119:Lord Hoffmann 116: 112: 109: 105: 100: 97:EWCA Civ 1250 96: 92: 87: 71: 67: 63: 59: 56: 53: 49: 42: 37: 34: 30: 27: 19: 1270: 1258: 1246: 1219:McCoy Center 1199:Chater House 1139:Chase Center 933:Bear Stearns 878:Michael Neal 819:Steven Black 558: 541: 511:SI 2008/1277 480: 466: 452: 438: 424: 412: 389: 373: 361:Derry v Peek 359: 347: 335: 323: 268: 259: 250: 243: 239: 227:Lord Bingham 220: 204: 198: 192: 186: 180: 175: 152: 151: 150: 111:Lord Bingham 94:Prior action 89:Case history 32: 26: 1272:Wikiversity 1144:Chase Field 1048:Ord Minnett 896:Historical 861:Jamie Dimon 856:James Crown 846:Steve Burke 710:Jing Ulrich 688:Jamie Dimon 618:Beacon Rail 458:EWCA Civ 12 275:Lord Ramsey 1288:Categories 898:components 851:Todd Combs 781:Jes Staley 674:executives 623:Chase Bank 550:References 498:2005/29/EC 444:EWCA Civ 6 430:EWCA Civ 4 261:Lord Scott 223:Lord Steyn 182:Amy Foster 127:Lord Scott 115:Lord Steyn 1097:Buildings 1053:Providian 973:First USA 835:directors 833:Board of 611:Divisions 264:dissented 194:Apt Pupil 82:1 CLC 358 69:Citations 1248:Category 923:Bank One 672:Notable 628:Chase UK 396:1 QB 525 282:See also 217:Judgment 133:Keywords 80:ICR 1708 76:2 LLR 61 1260:Commons 681:current 486:UKHL 62 472:UKHL 10 61:Decided 719:former 381:UKHL 4 365:UKHL 1 188:U Turn 160:is an 72:UKHL 6 690:(CEO) 172:Facts 156: 143:Fraud 51:Court 203:and 1290:: 266:. 233:, 197:, 191:, 185:, 168:. 141:, 596:e 589:t 582:v 513:) 509:( 309:e 302:t 295:v 20:)

Index

HIH Casualty Ltd v Chase Manhattan Bank

House of Lords
Lord Bingham
Lord Steyn
Lord Hoffmann
Lord Hobhouse
Lord Scott
Misrepresentation
Fraud
[2003] UKHL 6
English contract law
misrepresentation
Chase Manhattan Bank
Amy Foster
U Turn
Apt Pupil
The Mirror Has Two Faces
The People vs. Larry Flynt
HIH Insurance
Lord Steyn
Lord Bingham
Lord Hoffmann
Lord Hobhouse
Lord Morton of Henryton
Canada Steamship Lines Ltd v The King
Lord Scott
dissented
Biffa Waste Services
Lord Ramsey

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.