Knowledge (XXG)

Herbrandization

Source đź“ť

1051: 755:
of a formula is obtained similarly, except that in the second step above, we would delete quantifiers on variables that are either (1) existentially quantified and within an even number of negations, or (2) universally quantified and within an odd number of negations. Thus, considering the same
196:
Second, delete all quantifiers on variables that are either (1) universally quantified and within an even number of negation signs, or (2) existentially quantified and within an odd number of negation signs.
279: 438: 325: 902: 746: 510: 487: 633: 979: 557: 464: 774: 597: 577: 530: 345: 217: 191: 167: 140: 120: 96: 937:
Skolem, T. "Logico-combinatorial investigations in the satisfiability or provability of mathematical propositions: A simplified proof of a theorem by
51:(Skolem 1920). Herbrand worked with this dual notion of Herbrandization, generalized to apply to non-prenex formulas as well, in order to prove 908: 52: 122:
contains no variable that is bound by two different quantifier occurrences, and that no variable occurs both bound and free. (That is,
988: 912: 48: 1105: 965: 1131: 972: 944:
Herbrand, J. "Investigations in proof theory: The properties of true propositions". (In van Heijenoort 1967, 525-81.)
222: 1015: 1010: 924: 354: 997: 142:
could be relettered to ensure these conditions, in such a way that the result is an equivalent formula).
1035: 1020: 284: 32: 782: 641: 1030: 1024: 1005: 938: 947: 59: 1100: 1077: 1067: 492: 469: 1059: 602: 99: 1095: 1087: 67: 28: 535: 1050: 24: 443: 1126: 759: 582: 562: 515: 330: 202: 176: 152: 125: 105: 81: 63: 40: 1120: 36: 1040: 44: 466:
are the kind we consider for the second step, so we delete the quantifiers
327:
are the variables that are still quantified, and whose quantifiers govern
957: 941:
and generalizations of the theorem". (In van Heijenoort 1967, 252-63.)
70:: the resulting formula is valid if and only if the original one is. 951:
From Frege to Gödel: A Source Book in Mathematical Logic, 1879-1931
62:
to the original one. As with Skolemization, which only preserves
961: 907:
To understand the significance of these constructions, see
440:. There are no free variables to replace. The variables 66:, Herbrandization being Skolemization's dual preserves 785: 762: 644: 605: 585: 565: 538: 518: 495: 472: 446: 357: 333: 287: 225: 205: 179: 155: 128: 108: 84: 1086: 1058: 996: 896: 768: 740: 627: 591: 571: 551: 524: 504: 481: 458: 432: 339: 319: 273: 211: 185: 161: 134: 114: 90: 559:(since there were no other quantifiers governing 43:had considered the Skolemizations of formulas in 973: 8: 980: 966: 958: 864: 824: 790: 784: 761: 714: 677: 649: 643: 610: 604: 584: 564: 543: 537: 517: 494: 471: 445: 356: 332: 311: 292: 286: 274:{\displaystyle f_{v}(x_{1},\dots ,x_{k})} 262: 243: 230: 224: 204: 178: 154: 127: 107: 83: 58:The resulting formula is not necessarily 776:from above, its Skolemization would be: 433:{\displaystyle F:=\forall y\exists x} 173:First, replace any free variables in 7: 199:Finally, replace each such variable 351:For instance, consider the formula 953:. Harvard University Press, 1967. 848: 845: 799: 695: 658: 496: 473: 403: 400: 370: 364: 320:{\displaystyle x_{1},\dots ,x_{k}} 14: 1049: 897:{\displaystyle F^{S}=\forall y.} 741:{\displaystyle F^{H}=\exists x.} 98:be a formula in the language of 1106:Normal form (natural deduction) 888: 885: 876: 870: 857: 839: 836: 830: 811: 805: 732: 729: 726: 720: 701: 689: 670: 664: 622: 616: 427: 424: 412: 394: 382: 376: 268: 236: 1: 169:is then obtained as follows: 512:. Finally, we then replace 47:as part of his proof of the 31:) is a construction that is 16:Proof of Herbrand's theorem 1148: 1047: 505:{\displaystyle \exists z} 482:{\displaystyle \forall y} 913:Löwenheim–Skolem theorem 628:{\displaystyle f_{z}(x)} 49:Löwenheim–Skolem theorem 1016:Disjunctive normal form 1011:Conjunctive normal form 925:Predicate functor logic 599:with a function symbol 219:with a function symbol 74:Definition and examples 898: 770: 742: 629: 593: 573: 553: 526: 506: 483: 460: 434: 341: 321: 275: 213: 187: 163: 136: 116: 102:. We may assume that 92: 1036:Canonical normal form 1021:Algebraic normal form 899: 771: 743: 630: 594: 574: 554: 552:{\displaystyle c_{y}} 527: 507: 484: 461: 435: 342: 322: 276: 214: 188: 164: 137: 117: 93: 1132:Normal forms (logic) 1031:Blake canonical form 1025:Zhegalkin polynomial 1006:Negation normal form 783: 760: 642: 603: 583: 563: 536: 516: 493: 470: 444: 355: 331: 285: 223: 203: 193:by constant symbols. 177: 153: 126: 106: 82: 998:Propositional logic 459:{\displaystyle y,z} 1101:Modal clausal form 1078:Prenex normal form 1068:Skolem normal form 948:van Heijenoort, J. 909:Herbrand's theorem 894: 766: 738: 625: 589: 579:), and we replace 569: 549: 522: 502: 479: 456: 430: 337: 317: 271: 209: 183: 159: 132: 112: 88: 53:Herbrand's theorem 1114: 1113: 769:{\displaystyle F} 592:{\displaystyle z} 572:{\displaystyle y} 525:{\displaystyle y} 340:{\displaystyle v} 212:{\displaystyle v} 186:{\displaystyle F} 162:{\displaystyle F} 135:{\displaystyle F} 115:{\displaystyle F} 100:first-order logic 91:{\displaystyle F} 55:(Herbrand 1930). 1139: 1096:Beta normal form 1053: 982: 975: 968: 959: 903: 901: 900: 895: 869: 868: 829: 828: 795: 794: 775: 773: 772: 767: 747: 745: 744: 739: 719: 718: 682: 681: 654: 653: 634: 632: 631: 626: 615: 614: 598: 596: 595: 590: 578: 576: 575: 570: 558: 556: 555: 550: 548: 547: 532:with a constant 531: 529: 528: 523: 511: 509: 508: 503: 488: 486: 485: 480: 465: 463: 462: 457: 439: 437: 436: 431: 346: 344: 343: 338: 326: 324: 323: 318: 316: 315: 297: 296: 280: 278: 277: 272: 267: 266: 248: 247: 235: 234: 218: 216: 215: 210: 192: 190: 189: 184: 168: 166: 165: 160: 141: 139: 138: 133: 121: 119: 118: 113: 97: 95: 94: 89: 29:Jacques Herbrand 1147: 1146: 1142: 1141: 1140: 1138: 1137: 1136: 1117: 1116: 1115: 1110: 1082: 1073:Herbrandization 1060:Predicate logic 1054: 1045: 992: 986: 956: 933: 921: 860: 820: 786: 781: 780: 758: 757: 710: 673: 645: 640: 639: 606: 601: 600: 581: 580: 561: 560: 539: 534: 533: 514: 513: 491: 490: 468: 467: 442: 441: 353: 352: 329: 328: 307: 288: 283: 282: 258: 239: 226: 221: 220: 201: 200: 175: 174: 151: 150: 147:Herbrandization 124: 123: 104: 103: 80: 79: 76: 39:of a formula. 25:logical formula 21:Herbrandization 17: 12: 11: 5: 1145: 1143: 1135: 1134: 1129: 1119: 1118: 1112: 1111: 1109: 1108: 1103: 1098: 1092: 1090: 1084: 1083: 1081: 1080: 1075: 1070: 1064: 1062: 1056: 1055: 1048: 1046: 1044: 1043: 1038: 1033: 1028: 1018: 1013: 1008: 1002: 1000: 994: 993: 987: 985: 984: 977: 970: 962: 955: 954: 945: 942: 934: 932: 929: 928: 927: 920: 917: 905: 904: 893: 890: 887: 884: 881: 878: 875: 872: 867: 863: 859: 856: 853: 850: 847: 844: 841: 838: 835: 832: 827: 823: 819: 816: 813: 810: 807: 804: 801: 798: 793: 789: 765: 749: 748: 737: 734: 731: 728: 725: 722: 717: 713: 709: 706: 703: 700: 697: 694: 691: 688: 685: 680: 676: 672: 669: 666: 663: 660: 657: 652: 648: 624: 621: 618: 613: 609: 588: 568: 546: 542: 521: 501: 498: 478: 475: 455: 452: 449: 429: 426: 423: 420: 417: 414: 411: 408: 405: 402: 399: 396: 393: 390: 387: 384: 381: 378: 375: 372: 369: 366: 363: 360: 349: 348: 336: 314: 310: 306: 303: 300: 295: 291: 270: 265: 261: 257: 254: 251: 246: 242: 238: 233: 229: 208: 197: 194: 182: 158: 131: 111: 87: 75: 72: 64:satisfiability 41:Thoralf Skolem 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1144: 1133: 1130: 1128: 1125: 1124: 1122: 1107: 1104: 1102: 1099: 1097: 1094: 1093: 1091: 1089: 1085: 1079: 1076: 1074: 1071: 1069: 1066: 1065: 1063: 1061: 1057: 1052: 1042: 1039: 1037: 1034: 1032: 1029: 1026: 1022: 1019: 1017: 1014: 1012: 1009: 1007: 1004: 1003: 1001: 999: 995: 990: 983: 978: 976: 971: 969: 964: 963: 960: 952: 949: 946: 943: 940: 936: 935: 930: 926: 923: 922: 918: 916: 914: 910: 891: 882: 879: 873: 865: 861: 854: 851: 842: 833: 825: 821: 817: 814: 808: 802: 796: 791: 787: 779: 778: 777: 763: 754: 753:Skolemization 735: 723: 715: 711: 707: 704: 698: 692: 686: 683: 678: 674: 667: 661: 655: 650: 646: 638: 637: 636: 619: 611: 607: 586: 566: 544: 540: 519: 499: 476: 453: 450: 447: 421: 418: 415: 409: 406: 397: 391: 388: 385: 379: 373: 367: 361: 358: 334: 312: 308: 304: 301: 298: 293: 289: 263: 259: 255: 252: 249: 244: 240: 231: 227: 206: 198: 195: 180: 172: 171: 170: 156: 148: 143: 129: 109: 101: 85: 73: 71: 69: 65: 61: 56: 54: 50: 46: 42: 38: 37:Skolemization 34: 30: 27:(named after 26: 22: 1072: 989:Normal forms 950: 939:L. Löwenheim 906: 752: 750: 350: 146: 144: 77: 57: 20: 18: 1041:Horn clause 45:prenex form 1121:Categories 931:References 60:equivalent 849:∃ 846:¬ 843:∧ 800:∀ 696:¬ 693:∧ 659:∃ 497:∃ 474:∀ 404:∃ 401:¬ 398:∧ 371:∃ 365:∀ 302:… 253:… 991:in logic 919:See also 281:, where 68:validity 911:or the 35:to the 1127:Logic 1088:Other 23:of a 751:The 489:and 145:The 78:Let 33:dual 19:The 149:of 1123:: 915:. 635:: 362::= 1027:) 1023:( 981:e 974:t 967:v 892:. 889:] 886:) 883:z 880:, 877:) 874:y 871:( 866:x 862:f 858:( 855:S 852:z 840:) 837:) 834:y 831:( 826:x 822:f 818:, 815:y 812:( 809:R 806:[ 803:y 797:= 792:S 788:F 764:F 736:. 733:] 730:) 727:) 724:x 721:( 716:z 712:f 708:, 705:x 702:( 699:S 690:) 687:x 684:, 679:y 675:c 671:( 668:R 665:[ 662:x 656:= 651:H 647:F 623:) 620:x 617:( 612:z 608:f 587:z 567:y 545:y 541:c 520:y 500:z 477:y 454:z 451:, 448:y 428:] 425:) 422:z 419:, 416:x 413:( 410:S 407:z 395:) 392:x 389:, 386:y 383:( 380:R 377:[ 374:x 368:y 359:F 347:. 335:v 313:k 309:x 305:, 299:, 294:1 290:x 269:) 264:k 260:x 256:, 250:, 245:1 241:x 237:( 232:v 228:f 207:v 181:F 157:F 130:F 110:F 86:F

Index

logical formula
Jacques Herbrand
dual
Skolemization
Thoralf Skolem
prenex form
Löwenheim–Skolem theorem
Herbrand's theorem
equivalent
satisfiability
validity
first-order logic
Herbrand's theorem
Löwenheim–Skolem theorem
Predicate functor logic
L. Löwenheim
van Heijenoort, J.
v
t
e
Normal forms
Propositional logic
Negation normal form
Conjunctive normal form
Disjunctive normal form
Algebraic normal form
Zhegalkin polynomial
Blake canonical form
Canonical normal form
Horn clause

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑