80:, in which the attacker makes independent connections with the victims and relays messages between them to make them believe they are talking directly to each other over a private connection, when in fact the entire conversation is controlled by the attacker. In this scenario, the attacker must be able to intercept all relevant messages passing between the two victims and inject new ones. This is straightforward in many circumstances; for example, an attacker within range of a
105:
345:. To detect potential attacks, parties check for discrepancies in response times. For example: Say that two parties normally take a certain amount of time to perform a particular transaction. If one transaction, however, were to take an abnormal length of time to reach the other party, this could be indicative of a third party's interference inserting additional latency in the transaction.
310:, in which both the server and the client validate the other's communication, covers both ends of a MITM attack. If the server or client's identity is not verified or deemed as invalid, the session will end. However, the default behavior of most connections is to only authenticate the server, which means mutual authentication is not always employed and MITM attacks can still occur.
323:(HPKP), sometimes called "certificate pinning", helps prevent a MITM attack in which the certificate authority itself is compromised, by having the server provide a list of "pinned" public key hashes during the first transaction. Subsequent transactions then require one or more of the keys in the list must be used by the server in order to authenticate that transaction.
317:), or recorded attestments such as audio/visual recordings of a public key hash are used to ward off MITM attacks, as visual media is much more difficult and time-consuming to imitate than simple data packet communication. However, these methods require a human in the loop in order to successfully initiate the transaction.
87:
As it aims to circumvent mutual authentication, a MITM attack can succeed only when the attacker impersonates each endpoint sufficiently well to satisfy their expectations. Most cryptographic protocols include some form of endpoint authentication specifically to prevent MITM attacks. For example,
257:
This example shows the need for Alice and Bob to have a means to ensure that they are truly each using each other's public keys, and not the public key of an attacker. Otherwise, such attacks are generally possible, in principle, against any message sent using public-key technology.
124:
wishes to intercept the conversation to eavesdrop (breaking confidentiality) with the option to deliver a false message to Bob under the guise of Alice (breaking non-repudiation). Mallory would perform a man-in-the-middle attack as described in the following sequence of events.
427:
surveillance device that mimics a wireless carrier cell tower in order to force all nearby mobile phones and other cellular data devices to connect to it. The tracker relays all communications back and forth between cellular phones and cell towers.
458:
access to its customers' encrypted browser traffic. Nokia responded by saying that the content was not stored permanently, and that the company had organizational and technical measures to prevent access to private information.
306:(CA). If the original key to authenticate this CA has not been itself the subject of a MITM attack, then the certificates issued by the CA may be used to authenticate the messages sent by the owner of that certificate. Use of
278:
All cryptographic systems that are secure against MITM attacks provide some method of authentication for messages. Most require an exchange of information (such as public keys) in addition to the message over a
1135:
Sasikaladevi, N. and D. Malathi. 2019. “Energy
Efficient Lightweight Mutual Authentication Protocol (REAP) for MBAN Based on Genus-2 Hyper-Elliptic Curve.” Wireless Personal Communications 109(4):2471–88.
370:
from what is suspected to be an attack can be analyzed in order to determine whether there was an attack and, if so, determine the source of the attack. Important evidence to analyze when performing
266:
MITM attacks can be prevented or detected by two means: authentication and tamper detection. Authentication provides some degree of certainty that a given message has come from a legitimate source.
887:
1027:
355:. Protocols based on quantum cryptography typically authenticate part or all of their classical communication with an unconditionally secure authentication scheme. As an example
1461:
1415:
232:
However, because it was actually encrypted with
Mallory's key, Mallory can decrypt it, read it, modify it (if desired), re-encrypt with Bob's key, and forward it to Bob:
1322:
287:, have been developed with different security requirements for the secure channel, though some have attempted to remove the requirement for any secure channel at all.
574: – a cryptographic guarantee of the authenticity of a text, usually the result of a calculation only the author is expected to be able to perform.
1056:
909:"Development of field programmable gate array–based encryption module to mitigate man-in-the-middle attack for nuclear power plant data communication network"
73:
between two parties who believe that they are directly communicating with each other, as the attacker has inserted themselves between the two user parties.
1685:
737:
302:
against MITM attacks. In such structures, clients and servers exchange certificates which are issued and verified by a trusted third party called a
942:"Detection of man-in-the-middle attacks using physical layer wireless security techniques: Man-in-the-middle attacks using physical layer security"
1167:
341:
Latency examination can potentially detect the attack in certain situations, such as with long calculations that lead into tens of seconds like
1537:
1233:
974:
326:
329:
extends the DNS protocol to use signatures to authenticate DNS records, preventing simple MITM attacks from directing a client to a malicious
1388:
1190:
792:
619:
1349:
1031:
522:
1838:
1437:
472:, a wireless communication protocol, has also been susceptible to man-in-the-middle attacks due to its wireless transmission of data.
1843:
1802:
1493:
1458:
1690:
756:
1833:
1517:
1405:
1326:
1756:
518:
uses MITM attacks to inject JavaScript code to 3rd party web pages, showing their own ads and messages on top of the pages
299:
342:
1070:
550: – the plot against Elizabeth I of England, where Francis Walsingham intercepted the correspondence.
1776:
568: – the art of deciphering encrypted messages with incomplete knowledge of how they were encrypted.
544: – a British radio transmitter used for World War II "intrusion" operations, an early MITM attack.
538:– a technique by which an attacker sends Address Resolution Protocol messages onto a local area network
356:
1644:
291:
267:
32:
1145:
Heinrich, Stuart (November 28, 2013). "Public Key
Infrastructure based on Authentication of Media Attestments".
1578:
541:
295:
89:
991:
Callegati, Franco; Cerroni, Walter; Ramilli, Marco (2009). "Man-in-the-Middle Attack to the HTTPS Protocol".
598: – a cryptographic protocol for establishing a key in which both parties can have confidence.
1654:
320:
819:
586: – a specific protocol to circumvent a MITM attack when the keys may have been compromised.
1705:
1532:
1097:
607:
595:
436:
420:
400:
284:
1215:
1486:
784:
640: – Cyber attack in which a person or program successfully masquerades as another by falsifying data
613:
394:
307:
303:
93:
81:
77:
888:"From cookie theft to BEC: Attackers use AiTM phishing sites as entry point to further financial fraud"
1812:
1807:
1766:
1695:
1553:
625:
559:
348:
211:
Alice encrypts a message with what she believes to be Bob's key, thinking that only Bob can read it:
1102:
1761:
191:
Mallory replaces Bob's key with her own, and relays this to Alice, claiming that it is Bob's key:
1746:
1583:
1563:
1196:
1146:
1115:
1008:
601:
583:
485:
352:
70:
1438:"Comcast using man-in-the-middle attack to warn subscribers of potential copyright infringement"
873:
592: – how to manage cryptographic keys, including generation, exchange and storage.
1771:
1725:
1634:
1384:
1296:
1186:
1175:
2009 Third
International Conference on Emerging Security Information, Systems and Technologies
788:
616: – how communicating parties establish confidence in one another's identities.
571:
553:
371:
46:
28:
1786:
1751:
1479:
1376:
1178:
1107:
1000:
953:
920:
760:
577:
807:
capability from the server response, they can easily downgrade the connection to plaintext.
775:
722:
610: – a similar attack, giving only regular access to a communication channel.
1781:
1720:
1465:
643:
637:
104:
845:
723:"Monsters in the Middleboxes: Introducing Two New Tools for Detecting HTTPS Interception"
777:
Why TLS Is Better
Without STARTTLS: A Security Analysis of STARTTLS in the Email Context
482: – the first public implementation of MITM attacks against SSL and SSHv1
1741:
1715:
1522:
941:
774:
Poddebniak, Damian; Ising, Fabian; Böck, Hanno; Schinzel, Sebastian (August 13, 2021).
631:
589:
547:
447:
424:
367:
280:
1288:
1827:
1700:
1619:
1527:
565:
121:
117:
113:
84:
hosting a network without encryption could insert themselves as a man in the middle.
1200:
1012:
628: – the use of quantum mechanics to provide security in cryptography.
1639:
1558:
1119:
850:
535:
510:
509:
Content
Gateway – used to perform inspection of SSL traffic at the
451:
42:
634: – a way of communicating resistant to interception and tampering.
1057:"Comcast still uses MITM javascript injection to serve unwanted ads and messages"
150:
Mallory relays this message to Bob; Bob cannot tell it is not really from Alice:
1710:
1629:
1368:
66:
1380:
439:. Subsequently, the fraudulent certificates were used to perform MITM attacks.
408:
Whether other clients, elsewhere on the
Internet, received the same certificate
1669:
1649:
1614:
1182:
1088:
Merkle, Ralph C (April 1978). "Secure
Communications Over Insecure Channels".
925:
908:
506:
455:
330:
1300:
466:
withdrew its mobile phone apps following concern about MITM vulnerabilities.
17:
1659:
1609:
1265:
892:
500:
469:
432:
1373:
2012 International
Conference on Computing, Communication and Applications
1260:
1111:
804:
1004:
1664:
1573:
1502:
515:
463:
650:
protocol that requires an adversary with a man-in-the-middle position.
622: – a protocol for establishing a key using a password.
1624:
1604:
1599:
957:
495:
479:
1350:"Here's Why Equifax Yanked Its Apps From Apple And Google Last Week"
1151:
313:
Attestments, such as verbal communications of a shared value (as in
580: – attack used against full disk encryption systems
351:, in theory, provides tamper-evidence for transactions through the
1323:"Nokia: Yes, we decrypt your HTTPS data, but don't worry about it"
975:"Comcast continues to inject its own code into websites you visit"
443:
384:
253:
Bob thinks that this message is a secure communication from Alice.
1471:
1028:"How to defend yourself against MITM or Man-in-the-middle attack"
1410:
314:
1475:
475:
Other notable real-life implementations include the following:
129:
Alice sends a message to Bob, which is intercepted by
Mallory:
647:
491:
431:
In 2011, a security breach of the Dutch certificate authority
92:
can authenticate one or both parties using a mutually trusted
1261:"Florida Cops' Secret Weapon: Warrantless Cellphone Tracking"
1289:"DigiNotar Files for Bankruptcy in Wake of Devastating Hack"
739:
Usable Authentication Ceremonies in Secure Instant Messaging
270:
merely shows evidence that a message may have been altered.
907:
Elakrat, Mohamed Abdallah; Jung, Jae Cheon (June 1, 2018).
69:
where the attacker secretly relays and possibly alters the
1369:"Analysis of Bluetooth threats and v4.0 security features"
556: – the design of secure computer systems.
1168:"Detecting Man-in-the-Middle Attacks by Precise Timing"
450:
was revealed to be decrypting HTTPS traffic on Nokia's
393:
Whether the certificate has been signed by a trusted
940:
Wang, Le; Wyglinski, Alexander M. (October 1, 2014).
1406:"NSA disguised itself as Google to spy, say reports"
1071:"diffie hellman - MiTM on RSA public key encryption"
1795:
1734:
1678:
1592:
1546:
1510:
405:Whether the certificate has been changed recently
1367:Sandhya, S; Devi, K A Sumithra (February 2012).
1234:"Network Forensic Analysis of SSL MITM Attacks"
562: – a man-in-the-middle exploit.
108:An illustration of the man-in-the-middle attack
1487:
1348:Weissman, Cale Guthrie (September 15, 2017).
1124:Received August, 1975; revised September 1977
721:Gabbi Fisher; Luke Valenta (March 18, 2019).
646: – a downgrade attack on the
604: – a type of web browser MITM
8:
946:Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing
390:Whether the certificate has been self signed
757:"Fact Sheet: Machine-in-the-Middle Attacks"
1494:
1480:
1472:
1216:"5. Unconditionally secure authentication"
745:(Dipl.-Ing.). Technische Universität Wien.
1150:
1101:
924:
1459:Finding Hidden Threats by Decrypting SSL
1166:Aziz, Benjamin; Hamilton, Geoff (2009).
103:
1418:from the original on September 15, 2013
713:
661:
161:"Hi Bob, it's Alice. Give me your key."
136:"Hi Bob, it's Alice. Give me your key."
76:One example of a MITM attack is active
1538:Timeline of computer viruses and worms
435:resulted in the fraudulent issuing of
171:Bob responds with his encryption key:
1051:
1049:
986:
984:
969:
967:
7:
1404:Moyer, Edward (September 12, 2013).
1026:Tanmay Patange (November 10, 2013).
993:IEEE Security & Privacy Magazine
620:Password-authenticated key agreement
523:Kazakhstan man-in-the-middle attack
1287:Zetter, Kim (September 20, 2011).
913:Nuclear Engineering and Technology
820:"Manipulator-in-the-middle attack"
736:Fassl, Matthias (April 23, 2018).
25:
1803:Computer and network surveillance
1321:Meyer, David (January 10, 2013).
399:Whether the certificate has been
374:on a suspected attack includes:
1518:Comparison of computer viruses
1238:NETRESEC Network Security Blog
785:30th USENIX Security Symposium
283:. Such protocols, often using
1:
1757:Data loss prevention software
1325:. Gigaom, Inc. Archived from
1259:Zetter, Kim (March 3, 2014).
300:Transmission Control Protocol
801:Meddler-in-the-Middle (MitM)
357:Wegman-Carter authentication
1075:Cryptography Stack Exchange
218:"Meet me at the bus stop!"
116:wishes to communicate with
1860:
1777:Intrusion detection system
1381:10.1109/iccca.2012.6179149
387:certificate of the server
26:
1839:Computer network security
1645:Privacy-invasive software
1464:October 18, 2017, at the
1183:10.1109/SECURWARE.2009.20
1090:Communications of the ACM
926:10.1016/j.net.2018.01.018
682:manipulator-in-the-middle
292:public key infrastructure
38:Form of message tampering
33:Meet-in-the-middle attack
1844:Transport Layer Security
854:. Mozilla. July 13, 2022
378:IP address of the server
368:Captured network traffic
296:Transport Layer Security
27:Not to be confused with
1655:Rogue security software
694:adversary-in-the-middle
488:HTTP(S) diagnostic tool
321:HTTP Public Key Pinning
285:key-agreement protocols
243:"Meet me at the park!"
1691:Classic Mac OS viruses
1533:List of computer worms
1468:(PDF). SANS Institute.
1375:. IEEE. pp. 1–4.
874:"Person-in-the-middle"
608:Man-on-the-side attack
596:Key-agreement protocol
542:Aspidistra transmitter
421:Stingray phone tracker
381:DNS name of the server
109:
1834:Cryptographic attacks
1112:10.1145/359460.359473
824:OWASP Community Pages
803:attacker removes the
678:meddler-in-the-middle
674:machine-in-the-middle
670:monster-in-the-middle
614:Mutual authentication
454:, giving the company
395:certificate authority
308:mutual authentication
304:certificate authority
262:Defense and detection
107:
94:certificate authority
1813:Operation: Bot Roast
1444:. November 23, 2015.
1059:. December 28, 2016.
1034:on November 24, 2013
977:. December 11, 2017.
686:person-in-the-middle
626:Quantum cryptography
560:Cookiemonster attack
349:Quantum cryptography
1762:Defensive computing
1679:By operating system
1005:10.1109/MSP.2009.12
876:. October 11, 2020.
1747:Antivirus software
1593:Malware for profit
1564:Man-in-the-browser
1511:Infectious malware
1214:Cederlöf, Jörgen.
1177:. pp. 81–86.
826:. OWASP Foundation
602:Man-in-the-browser
584:Interlock protocol
353:no-cloning theorem
110:
82:Wi-Fi access point
1821:
1820:
1772:Internet security
1726:HyperCard viruses
1635:Keystroke logging
1625:Fraudulent dialer
1569:Man-in-the-middle
1390:978-1-4673-0273-9
1192:978-0-7695-3668-2
794:978-1-939133-24-3
763:. March 24, 2020.
572:Digital signature
554:Computer security
494:impersonation of
415:Notable instances
372:network forensics
363:Forensic analysis
51:man-in-the-middle
47:computer security
29:Man-in-the-Mobile
16:(Redirected from
1851:
1787:Network security
1752:Browser security
1496:
1489:
1482:
1473:
1446:
1445:
1434:
1428:
1427:
1425:
1423:
1401:
1395:
1394:
1364:
1358:
1357:
1345:
1339:
1338:
1336:
1334:
1329:on April 8, 2019
1318:
1312:
1311:
1309:
1307:
1284:
1278:
1277:
1275:
1273:
1256:
1250:
1249:
1247:
1245:
1240:. March 27, 2011
1230:
1224:
1223:
1211:
1205:
1204:
1172:
1163:
1157:
1156:
1154:
1142:
1136:
1133:
1127:
1126:
1105:
1085:
1079:
1078:
1067:
1061:
1060:
1053:
1044:
1043:
1041:
1039:
1030:. Archived from
1023:
1017:
1016:
988:
979:
978:
971:
962:
961:
958:10.1002/wcm.2527
937:
931:
930:
928:
904:
898:
897:
896:. July 12, 2022.
884:
878:
877:
870:
864:
863:
861:
859:
842:
836:
835:
833:
831:
816:
810:
809:
787:. p. 4366.
782:
771:
765:
764:
761:Internet Society
753:
747:
746:
744:
733:
727:
726:
718:
701:
668:Also known as a
666:
578:Evil maid attack
337:Tamper detection
268:Tamper detection
248:
245:→
241:
237:
227:
223:
220:→
216:
206:
202:
197: ←
196:
186:
181: ←
180:
176:
166:
163:→
159:
155:
145:
141:
138:→
134:
21:
1859:
1858:
1854:
1853:
1852:
1850:
1849:
1848:
1824:
1823:
1822:
1817:
1796:Countermeasures
1791:
1782:Mobile security
1730:
1721:Palm OS viruses
1686:Android malware
1674:
1588:
1584:Zombie computer
1542:
1506:
1500:
1466:Wayback Machine
1455:
1450:
1449:
1436:
1435:
1431:
1421:
1419:
1403:
1402:
1398:
1391:
1366:
1365:
1361:
1347:
1346:
1342:
1332:
1330:
1320:
1319:
1315:
1305:
1303:
1286:
1285:
1281:
1271:
1269:
1258:
1257:
1253:
1243:
1241:
1232:
1231:
1227:
1213:
1212:
1208:
1193:
1170:
1165:
1164:
1160:
1144:
1143:
1139:
1134:
1130:
1103:10.1.1.364.5157
1087:
1086:
1082:
1069:
1068:
1064:
1055:
1054:
1047:
1037:
1035:
1025:
1024:
1020:
990:
989:
982:
973:
972:
965:
939:
938:
934:
906:
905:
901:
886:
885:
881:
872:
871:
867:
857:
855:
844:
843:
839:
829:
827:
818:
817:
813:
795:
780:
773:
772:
768:
755:
754:
750:
742:
735:
734:
730:
720:
719:
715:
710:
705:
704:
667:
663:
658:
653:
644:Terrapin attack
638:Spoofing attack
531:
417:
365:
339:
276:
264:
246:
239:
235:
225:
221:
214:
204:
200:
194:
184:
178:
174:
164:
157:
153:
143:
139:
132:
102:
39:
36:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
1857:
1855:
1847:
1846:
1841:
1836:
1826:
1825:
1819:
1818:
1816:
1815:
1810:
1805:
1799:
1797:
1793:
1792:
1790:
1789:
1784:
1779:
1774:
1769:
1764:
1759:
1754:
1749:
1744:
1742:Anti-keylogger
1738:
1736:
1732:
1731:
1729:
1728:
1723:
1718:
1716:Mobile malware
1713:
1708:
1703:
1698:
1693:
1688:
1682:
1680:
1676:
1675:
1673:
1672:
1667:
1662:
1657:
1652:
1647:
1642:
1637:
1632:
1627:
1622:
1617:
1612:
1607:
1602:
1596:
1594:
1590:
1589:
1587:
1586:
1581:
1576:
1571:
1566:
1561:
1556:
1550:
1548:
1544:
1543:
1541:
1540:
1535:
1530:
1525:
1523:Computer virus
1520:
1514:
1512:
1508:
1507:
1501:
1499:
1498:
1491:
1484:
1476:
1470:
1469:
1454:
1453:External links
1451:
1448:
1447:
1429:
1396:
1389:
1359:
1340:
1313:
1279:
1251:
1225:
1206:
1191:
1158:
1137:
1128:
1096:(4): 294–299.
1080:
1062:
1045:
1018:
980:
963:
952:(4): 408–426.
932:
919:(5): 780–787.
899:
879:
865:
837:
811:
793:
766:
748:
728:
712:
711:
709:
706:
703:
702:
660:
659:
657:
654:
652:
651:
641:
635:
632:Secure channel
629:
623:
617:
611:
605:
599:
593:
590:Key management
587:
581:
575:
569:
563:
557:
551:
548:Babington Plot
545:
539:
532:
530:
527:
526:
525:
519:
513:
504:
498:
489:
483:
448:Xpress Browser
425:cellular phone
416:
413:
412:
411:
410:
409:
406:
403:
397:
391:
382:
379:
364:
361:
343:hash functions
338:
335:
281:secure channel
275:
274:Authentication
272:
263:
260:
255:
254:
251:
250:
249:
238:
230:
229:
228:
224:
209:
208:
207:
203:
189:
188:
187:
177:
169:
168:
167:
156:
148:
147:
146:
142:
101:
98:
71:communications
63:on-path attack
37:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1856:
1845:
1842:
1840:
1837:
1835:
1832:
1831:
1829:
1814:
1811:
1809:
1806:
1804:
1801:
1800:
1798:
1794:
1788:
1785:
1783:
1780:
1778:
1775:
1773:
1770:
1768:
1765:
1763:
1760:
1758:
1755:
1753:
1750:
1748:
1745:
1743:
1740:
1739:
1737:
1733:
1727:
1724:
1722:
1719:
1717:
1714:
1712:
1709:
1707:
1706:MacOS malware
1704:
1702:
1701:Linux malware
1699:
1697:
1694:
1692:
1689:
1687:
1684:
1683:
1681:
1677:
1671:
1668:
1666:
1663:
1661:
1658:
1656:
1653:
1651:
1648:
1646:
1643:
1641:
1638:
1636:
1633:
1631:
1628:
1626:
1623:
1621:
1620:Form grabbing
1618:
1616:
1613:
1611:
1608:
1606:
1603:
1601:
1598:
1597:
1595:
1591:
1585:
1582:
1580:
1577:
1575:
1572:
1570:
1567:
1565:
1562:
1560:
1557:
1555:
1552:
1551:
1549:
1545:
1539:
1536:
1534:
1531:
1529:
1528:Computer worm
1526:
1524:
1521:
1519:
1516:
1515:
1513:
1509:
1504:
1497:
1492:
1490:
1485:
1483:
1478:
1477:
1474:
1467:
1463:
1460:
1457:
1456:
1452:
1443:
1439:
1433:
1430:
1417:
1413:
1412:
1407:
1400:
1397:
1392:
1386:
1382:
1378:
1374:
1370:
1363:
1360:
1355:
1351:
1344:
1341:
1328:
1324:
1317:
1314:
1302:
1298:
1294:
1290:
1283:
1280:
1268:
1267:
1262:
1255:
1252:
1239:
1235:
1229:
1226:
1221:
1217:
1210:
1207:
1202:
1198:
1194:
1188:
1184:
1180:
1176:
1169:
1162:
1159:
1153:
1148:
1141:
1138:
1132:
1129:
1125:
1121:
1117:
1113:
1109:
1104:
1099:
1095:
1091:
1084:
1081:
1076:
1072:
1066:
1063:
1058:
1052:
1050:
1046:
1033:
1029:
1022:
1019:
1014:
1010:
1006:
1002:
998:
994:
987:
985:
981:
976:
970:
968:
964:
959:
955:
951:
947:
943:
936:
933:
927:
922:
918:
914:
910:
903:
900:
895:
894:
889:
883:
880:
875:
869:
866:
853:
852:
847:
841:
838:
825:
821:
815:
812:
808:
806:
802:
796:
790:
786:
779:
778:
770:
767:
762:
758:
752:
749:
741:
740:
732:
729:
724:
717:
714:
707:
699:
695:
691:
687:
683:
679:
675:
671:
665:
662:
655:
649:
645:
642:
639:
636:
633:
630:
627:
624:
621:
618:
615:
612:
609:
606:
603:
600:
597:
594:
591:
588:
585:
582:
579:
576:
573:
570:
567:
566:Cryptanalysis
564:
561:
558:
555:
552:
549:
546:
543:
540:
537:
534:
533:
528:
524:
520:
517:
514:
512:
508:
505:
502:
499:
497:
493:
490:
487:
484:
481:
478:
477:
476:
473:
471:
467:
465:
460:
457:
453:
452:proxy servers
449:
445:
440:
438:
434:
429:
426:
422:
414:
407:
404:
402:
398:
396:
392:
389:
388:
386:
383:
380:
377:
376:
375:
373:
369:
362:
360:
358:
354:
350:
346:
344:
336:
334:
332:
328:
324:
322:
318:
316:
311:
309:
305:
301:
298:, may harden
297:
293:
288:
286:
282:
273:
271:
269:
261:
259:
252:
244:
234:
233:
231:
219:
213:
212:
210:
199:
193:
192:
190:
183:
173:
172:
170:
162:
152:
151:
149:
137:
131:
130:
128:
127:
126:
123:
120:. Meanwhile,
119:
115:
106:
99:
97:
95:
91:
85:
83:
79:
78:eavesdropping
74:
72:
68:
64:
60:
56:
52:
48:
44:
34:
30:
19:
18:Hijack attack
1579:Trojan horse
1568:
1559:Clickjacking
1441:
1432:
1420:. Retrieved
1409:
1399:
1372:
1362:
1354:Fast Company
1353:
1343:
1331:. Retrieved
1327:the original
1316:
1304:. Retrieved
1292:
1282:
1270:. Retrieved
1264:
1254:
1242:. Retrieved
1237:
1228:
1219:
1209:
1174:
1161:
1140:
1131:
1123:
1093:
1089:
1083:
1074:
1065:
1038:November 25,
1036:. Retrieved
1032:the original
1021:
996:
992:
949:
945:
935:
916:
912:
902:
891:
882:
868:
856:. Retrieved
851:MDN Web Docs
849:
840:
828:. Retrieved
823:
814:
800:
798:
776:
769:
751:
738:
731:
716:
697:
693:
689:
685:
681:
677:
673:
669:
664:
536:ARP spoofing
474:
468:
461:
441:
437:certificates
430:
418:
366:
347:
340:
325:
319:
312:
289:
277:
265:
256:
242:
217:
198:
182:
160:
135:
111:
86:
75:
62:
58:
54:
50:
43:cryptography
40:
1711:Macro virus
1696:iOS malware
1670:Web threats
1630:Infostealer
1547:Concealment
1152:1311.7182v1
67:cyberattack
1828:Categories
1735:Protection
1650:Ransomware
1615:Fleeceware
708:References
507:Forcepoint
456:clear text
331:IP address
294:, such as
1660:Scareware
1610:Crimeware
1306:March 22,
1301:1059-1028
1266:Wired.com
1244:March 27,
1098:CiteSeerX
999:: 78–81.
893:Microsoft
858:August 1,
830:August 1,
700:) attack.
501:Superfish
470:Bluetooth
462:In 2017,
442:In 2013,
433:DigiNotar
1808:Honeypot
1767:Firewall
1554:Backdoor
1462:Archived
1442:TechSpot
1416:Archived
1333:June 13,
1272:June 23,
1201:18489395
1013:32996015
805:STARTTLS
529:See also
486:Fiddler2
112:Suppose
1665:Spyware
1574:Rootkit
1503:Malware
1120:6967714
799:When a
516:Comcast
503:malware
464:Equifax
401:revoked
240:Mallory
222:Mallory
201:Mallory
179:Mallory
158:Mallory
140:Mallory
122:Mallory
100:Example
65:, is a
1640:Malbot
1605:Botnet
1600:Adware
1505:topics
1422:May 8,
1387:
1299:
1220:liu.se
1199:
1189:
1118:
1100:
1011:
846:"MitM"
791:
692:), or
496:Google
480:DSniff
327:DNSSEC
59:attack
1293:Wired
1197:S2CID
1171:(PDF)
1147:arXiv
1116:S2CID
1009:S2CID
781:(PDF)
743:(PDF)
656:Notes
521:2015
511:proxy
444:Nokia
423:is a
385:X.509
236:Alice
215:Alice
195:Alice
175:Alice
154:Alice
133:Alice
114:Alice
61:, or
1424:2024
1411:CNET
1385:ISBN
1335:2014
1308:2019
1297:ISSN
1274:2014
1246:2011
1187:ISBN
1040:2014
860:2022
832:2022
789:ISBN
698:AITM
690:PITM
315:ZRTP
55:MITM
49:, a
45:and
1377:doi
1179:doi
1108:doi
1001:doi
954:doi
921:doi
648:ssh
492:NSA
446:'s
247:Bob
226:Bob
205:Bob
185:Bob
165:Bob
144:Bob
118:Bob
90:TLS
41:In
31:or
1830::
1440:.
1414:.
1408:.
1383:.
1371:.
1352:.
1295:.
1291:.
1263:.
1236:.
1218:.
1195:.
1185:.
1173:.
1122:.
1114:.
1106:.
1094:21
1092:.
1073:.
1048:^
1007:.
995:.
983:^
966:^
950:16
948:.
944:.
917:50
915:.
911:.
890:.
848:.
822:.
797:.
783:.
759:.
684:,
680:,
676:,
672:,
419:A
359:.
333:.
290:A
96:.
57:)
1495:e
1488:t
1481:v
1426:.
1393:.
1379::
1356:.
1337:.
1310:.
1276:.
1248:.
1222:.
1203:.
1181::
1155:.
1149::
1110::
1077:.
1042:.
1015:.
1003::
997:7
960:.
956::
929:.
923::
862:.
834:.
725:.
696:(
688:(
53:(
35:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
