Knowledge (XXG)

History of contract law

Source 📝

797:
increases, though many protection was abolished during the 1980s. This reduced the scope of the general law of contract, and meant that most contracts individual people made in their ordinary lives were shielded from the power of corporations to impose whatever terms they chose in selling goods and services, at work, and in people's home. Nevertheless, classical contract law remained at the foundation of specific contracts, unless particular rights were given by the courts or Parliament.
63: 22: 471: 587:" and an "autonomy of the will" on the grounds that the Man, created by God who made him free, have an autonomy in the management of his goods and of his commitments. However, this liberty isn't complete because it cannot overstep the principle of free consent and because the contrat cannot ignore the formalism required by the authorities or have an immoral object. 122: 736: 715:. Further requirements of fairness in exchanges between unequal parties, or general obligations of good faith and disclosure were unwarranted because was said that liabilities "are not to be forced upon people behind their backs". Parliament's statutes, outside general codifications of commercial law like the 672:
in 1842 was the fabled notion that if people had promised something "let us keep our promise". But then, as if everybody had the same degree of free will, a generalised law of contract purported to cover every form of agreement was expounded. Courts were suspicious of interfering in agreements,
774:
Over the 20th century, legislation and changes' in court attitudes effected a wide-ranging reform of 19th century contract law. First, specific types of non-commercial contract were given special protection where "freedom of contract" appeared far more on the side of large businesses. Consumer
796:
where workers had rights, like a minimum wage, fairness in dismissal, the right to join a union and take collective action, and these could not be given up in a contract with an employer. Private housing was subject to basic terms, such as the right to repairs, and restrictions on unfair rent
363:. Despite this liberalisation, in the 1200s a threshold of 40 shillings for dispute value had been created. Though its importance tapered away with gradual inflation, it foreclosed court access to most people. Moreover, freedom to contract was firmly suppressed among the peasantry. After the 541:
actively incorporated the principles of international trade law and custom into English common law as they saw it: principles of commercial certainty, good faith, fair dealing, and the enforceability of seriously intended promises. As Lord Mansfield held, "Mercantile law is not the law of a
529:
In the 1500s, litigation sharply increased, although the causes are unclear and it may have been due to a centralization of lawsuits in the King's Bench and Common Pleas. The Chief Justices received a large portion of their income from fees paid by litigants, mostly in civil disputes.
706:
or disclosure requirements in some transactions) always taking precedence. But the essential principles of English contract law remained stable and familiar, as an offer for certain terms, mirrored by an acceptance, supported by consideration, and free from duress, undue influence or
378:
With the courts' hostility to restraints on trade, the doctrine of consideration was forming, that to enforce any obligation something of value needed to be conveyed. Some courts remained sceptical that damages might be awarded purely for a broken agreement (that was not a
971:
Watkins’ or Wykes’ case (1425) Baker & Milsom 380, 383, where a man had promised to build a mill, but had failed, per Martin, J., 383, ‘if this action should be maintained
 then a man would have an action of trespass for every broken covenant in the
791:
created the jurisdiction to scrap contract terms that were "unreasonable" considering the bargaining power of the parties. Collective bargaining and growing number of employment rights carried the employment contract into an autonomous field of
594:, that contracts have been established for common utility and consequently, that natural law can't tolerate a privileged party. To allow the application of this principle of commutative justice, they elaborated the concept of 185:
dates back to ancient civilizations and the development of contract law has been heavily influenced by Ancient Greek and Roman thought. There have been further significant developments in contract law during and since the
652:". It was partly a sign of progress, as the vestiges of feudal and mercantile restrictions on workers and businesses were lifted, a move of people from "status to contract". On the other hand, a preference for 216:- an action for such an unfulfilled agreement should be brought in the tribal courts, if the parties have not previously been able to reconcile their differences before arbitrators (their neighbors, that is)." 809:, which aimed to harmonise significant parts of consumer and employment law across member states. Moreover, with increasing openness of markets commercial contracts were receiving ideas from abroad. Both the 564:
The School of Salamanca played a great role in the diffusion of the contractual consensualism. If this idea was already admitted in canon law since the 12th Century and the application of the principle
1049: 426:(for non-payment) could be made against a defendant. But if a claimant wanted to simply demand payment of the contractual debt (rather than a subsequent promise to pay) he could have to risk a 1555: 1531: 306: 1065: 277:). More than appeared from the general rules in Ancient Greece, Roman law represented an early division between specific kinds of contract, depending on the transaction's nature. 900: 314:). They risked perjury if they lost the case, and so this was strong encouragement to resolve disputes elsewhere. The royal courts accepted claims, without a wager of law, if " 249:
identified discrete categories of contractual transaction, each with its own requirements, which needed to be fulfilled in order for promises to be enforced. The general kind,
759: 73: 817: 755: 675: 492:
guaranteed merchants "safe and secure" exit and entry to England "for buying and selling by the ancient rights and customs, quit from all evil tolls". In 1266
820:, and the practice of international commercial arbitration was reshaping thinking about English contract principles with the rest of the globalising economy. 442:
held that "every contract importeth in itself an Assumpsit". Around the same time the Common Pleas indicated a different limit for contract enforcement in
322:
to meet in London, some breach of the King's peace had to be alleged. But gradually, the courts allowed claims where there had been no such trouble, no
775:
contracts came to be regarded as "contracts of adhesion" where there was no real negotiation and most people were given "take it or leave it" terms.
143: 130: 1615: 1453: 392:
where a defendant had agreed in London, where the City courts' custom was to allow claims without covenants under seal, to sell 28 acres of land in
35: 359:
a claim was allowed, without any documentary evidence, against a ferryman who dropped a horse overboard that he was contracted to carry across the
1409: 1077: 1092:
Francis, Clinton W. (1983-01-01). "The Structure of Judicial Administration and the Development of Contract Law in Seventeenth-Century England".
438:" actions (for obligations being assumed) simply from proof of the original agreement. With a majority in the Exchquer Chamber, after six years 561:
First movement to systematise contract law, the contractual doctrin of School of Salamanca is based on two pillars : freedom and equity.
418:
named Slade claimed that Morley had agreed to buy wheat and rye for ÂŁ16, but had backed out. Actions for debt were in the jurisdiction of the
422:, but it had required that there needed to be both (1) proof of a debt, and (2) a subsequent promise to repay the debt, so that a finding of 682:
proclaimed that "contracts when entered into freely and voluntarily shall be held sacred and shall be enforced by Courts of justice." The
810: 763: 340: 331:, even though it was still necessary to inventively plead this. For instance, in 1317 one Simon de Rattlesdene alleged he was sold a 168: 103: 49: 1392: 245:
devoted little attention to forms of agreement, but recognized the same basic categories for cancelling agreements as exist today.
404:, but essentially based on a failure to convey the land. The resolution of these restrictions came shortly after 1585, when a new 1672: 1365: 999:
e.g. D. Ibbetson, 'Sixteenth Century Contract Law: Slade's Case in Context' (1984) 4(3) Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 295, 296
300:, the English court system was minimal and so a number of In the local and manorial courts, according to the first treatise by 419: 291: 205: 355: 1501: 788: 659: 1427: 1512: 542:
particular country but the law of all nations", but also that "the law of merchants and the law of the land is the same".
500:
a charter to trade in England. The "Easterlings" who came to trade brought goods and money that the English came to call "
1542: 449: 431: 41: 262: 372: 343:
started to allow claims without the fictitious allegation of force and arms from around 1350. Otherwise, a breach of
310:
in 1188, if people disputed the payment of a debt they, and witnesses, would attend court and swear oaths (called a
1516: 945: 784: 405: 783:
In the UK, the courts began by requiring entirely clear information before onerous clauses could be enforced, the
488:
Increasingly, English contract law was affected by its trading relations with northern Europe, particularly since
335:
of wine that was contaminated with salt water, "with force and arms, namely with swords and bows and arrows". The
135: 1484: 727:
until the property qualifications for Parliament were reduced, and the electoral vote finally became democratic.
699: 368: 1385: 1132:(1692) 2 Salk 443, "we take notice of the laws of merchants that are general, not of those that are particular. 917: 712: 1576:
F Kessler, 'Contracts of Adhesion—Some Thoughts About Freedom of Contract (1943) 43(5) Columbia Law Review 629
1473:
F Kessler, 'Contracts of Adhesion—Some Thoughts About Freedom of Contract (1943) 43(5) Columbia Law Review 629
1637: 1527: 1423: 1128: 905: 716: 679: 459: 213: 931: 1677: 1603: 1497: 1360: 1076:
HS Barker, 'The Rise of the Lex Mercatoria and Its Absorption by the Common Law of England' (1916–1917)
668: 85: 1159: 834: 787:
switched the burden of proof onto business to show misleading statements were not negligent, and the
767: 609: 515: 493: 315: 580: 510:, the laws of the merchants. Merchant custom was most influential in the coastal trading ports like 1044: 720: 683: 649: 584: 567: 556: 439: 380: 350: 301: 257: 662:
in contracts of employment, consumer, and tenancy. At the centre, captured in nursery rhymes like
1109: 958: 724: 687: 571:, the civil law only followed this way in the 16th century after the call of famous jurists like 519: 261:
it could be written down. There were four categories of consensual agreement, and four kinds of
1655:
Theologians and Contract Law : The Moral Transformation of the Ius commune (ca. 1500-1650)
860: 747: 648:
Over the industrial revolution, English courts became more and more wedded to the concept of "
636: 605: 576: 336: 235:
English contract law's history was heavily influenced by Ancient Greek and Roman thought. In
1101: 1009: 703: 497: 475: 318:" was alleged. A jury would be called, but to access the royal courts, which were fixed by 1396: 854: 829: 695: 663: 388: 1389: 1025:
See further, J. H. Baker, ‘New Light on Slade's Case’ (1971) 29 Cambridge Law Journal 51
1142: 806: 708: 600: 591: 572: 538: 523: 506: 501: 480: 410: 383: 345: 1457:(Oxford 1979), MJ Horwitz, 'The historical foundations of modern contract law' (1974) 1319:
Decock, Wim (2022). "Droit, morale et marchĂ© : l'hĂ©ritage thĂ©ologique revisitĂ©".
707:
misrepresentation, would generally be enforceable. The rules were exported across the
1666: 1646: 1642: 793: 654: 630: 534: 454: 427: 360: 311: 191: 458:". Now that wager of law, and sealed covenants were essentially unnecessary, the 1622: 1173: 1062: 751: 489: 415: 364: 327: 319: 297: 187: 204:"If a man fails to fulfill an agreed contract - unless he had contracted to do 613: 595: 332: 251: 1632: 1627:
A History of the Common Law of Contract: the Rise of the Action of Assumpsit
1610: 1598: 1448: 1014:
A History of the Common Law of Contract: the Rise of the Action of Assumpsit
612:
and a sin for the other. Only a restitution of the undue prince enables the
444: 435: 397: 246: 470: 121: 1461:
and AWB Simpson, 'The Horwitz Thesis and the History of Contracts' (1979)
371:
prevented any increase in workers' wages, fuelling among other things the
1435: 1431: 872: 866: 814: 739: 691: 237: 226: 212:, or was involuntarily prevented from fulfilling his contract because of 1653: 462:
codified the contract types that were thought should require some form.
1586: 1579:
MJ Horwitz, 'The historical foundations of modern contract law' (1974)
1462: 1113: 255:, required various words to be used to generate an obligation, or in a 1585:
AWB Simpson, 'The Horwitz Thesis and the History of Contracts' (1979)
735: 511: 423: 401: 393: 273: 267: 209: 1580: 1458: 1105: 734: 484:, whose principles were received into the English law of contract. 469: 242: 221: 743: 323: 590:
The members of the School of Salamanca also thought, following
396:. Although the house itself was outside London at the time, in 115: 56: 15: 1050:
The Tragicall History of the Life and Death of Doctor Faustus
1658:. Leiden/Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. p. 723. 452:
to ground an assumpsit" and there had to be some "express
1556:
George Mitchell (Chesterhall) Ltd v Finney Lock Seeds Ltd
1532:
Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
70:
The examples and perspective in this article or section
448:, that "natural affection of itself is not a sufficient 408:
was established to hear common law appeals. In 1602, in
307:
Treatise on the laws and customs of the English Kingdom
81: 1321:
Revue de la faculté de Droit de l'université de LiÚge
901:
Tractatus de legibus et consuetudinibus regni Angliae
88:, or create a new article or section, as appropriate. 349:
required production of proof of an agreement from a
690:and common law, with equitable principles (such as 72:deal primarily with England and do not represent a 1177:(1759) 97 Eng Rep 614, 618; (1759) 2 Burr 882, 887 921:(1317) Year Books 10 Edw II, Selden Society vol 54 504:", and standard rules for commerce that formed a 818:Principles of International Commercial Contracts 756:Principles of International Commercial Contracts 676:Printing and Numerical Registering Co v Sampson 598:. Every violation of this notion constitutes a 386:). Other disputes allowed a remedy, notably in 202: 1587:46(3) The University of Chicago Law Review 533 1463:46(3) The University of Chicago Law Review 533 1154: 1152: 8: 1434:, equal ages for men and women to vote from 616:and bring back the contractual equilibrium. 208:by law or decree, or gave his consent under 50:Learn how and when to remove these messages 478:conducted their affairs according to the 169:Learn how and when to remove this message 104:Learn how and when to remove this message 1616:The Rise and Fall of Freedom of Contract 1454:The Rise and Fall of Freedom of Contract 146:of all important aspects of the article. 1410:Falcke v Scottish Imperial Insurance Co 845: 805:Internationally, the UK had joined the 190:and especially with the development of 1333: 1306: 1294: 1282: 1270: 1258: 1246: 1234: 1222: 1210: 1198: 1186: 533:Over the late 17th and 18th centuries 142:Please consider expanding the lead to 1428:Representation of the People Act 1883 1087: 1085: 673:whoever the parties were, so that in 7: 811:Principles of European Contract Law 764:Principles of European Contract Law 1043:In the popular consciousness, see 746:and established in 1926 under the 14: 263:contract creating property rights 31:This article has multiple issues. 575:. Moreover, preceded notably by 120: 82:improve this article or section 61: 20: 962:(1414) 2 Hen. V, fol. 5, pl. 26 292:History of English contract law 134:may be too short to adequately 39:or discuss these issues on the 1502:National Minimum Wage Act 1998 789:Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 660:inequality of bargaining power 144:provide an accessible overview 1: 1513:Industrial Relations Act 1971 1078:5 Kentucky Law Journal 20, 24 981:(1442) Baker & Milsom 390 935:(1348) Baker & Milsom 358 474:Merchants trading within the 1581:87(5) Harvard Law Review 917 1543:Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 1459:87(5) Harvard Law Review 917 887:An Introduction to Roman Law 754:, maintains the influential 719:, left people to the harsh " 583:claimed the existence of a " 400:, a remedy was awarded for 84:, discuss the issue on the 1694: 1517:Employment Rights Act 1996 1213:, p. 142 and 160-161. 946:Statute of Gloucester 1278 785:Misrepresentation Act 1967 762:. A similar effort is the 702:for misrepresentation and 554: 406:Court of Exchequer Chamber 356:The Humber Ferryman’s case 289: 286:England in the Middle Ages 230:, Book 11, §23, Contracts. 214:some unlooked-for accident 1485:Olley v Marlborough Court 1430:, male suffrage with the 1422:This took place from the 432:Court of the King's Bench 369:Statute of Labourers 1351 1386:Indian Contract Act 1872 918:Rattlesdene v Grunestone 889:(Clarendon 1963) 165-193 885:See further B Nicholas, 713:Indian Contract Act 1872 711:, as for example in the 373:Peasants' Revolt of 1381 210:some iniquitous pressure 1673:History of contract law 1528:Trade Disputes Act 1906 608:, an infraction to the 434:was prepared to allow " 183:history of contract law 1424:Second Reform Act 1867 771: 717:Sale of Goods Act 1893 658:thought concealed the 485: 460:Statute of Frauds 1677 218: 1604:The Death of Contract 1498:Trade Boards Act 1909 1376:(1875) 19 Eq 462, 465 1361:Pied Piper of Hamelin 738: 669:Pied Piper of Hamelin 620:Industrial revolution 473: 420:Court of Common Pleas 271:) or a secured loan ( 1652:Decock, Wim (2013). 1323:(in French) (1): 30. 1160:Pillans v Van Mierop 835:English contract law 680:Sir George Jessel MR 610:seventh Commandments 430:. The judges of the 316:trespass on the case 265:, such as a pledge ( 1094:Columbia Law Review 1045:Christopher Marlowe 1034:(1600) Cro Eliz 756 932:Bukton v Tounesende 721:freedom of contract 684:Judicature Act 1875 650:freedom of contract 585:contractual freedom 568:pacta sunt servanda 557:School of Salamanca 551:School of Salamanca 546:Early modern period 302:Ranulf de Glanville 258:contractus litteris 206:something forbidden 1395:2011-05-22 at the 1336:, p. 516-517. 1285:, p. 419-505. 1273:, p. 329-418. 1261:, p. 215-327. 1249:, p. 169-170. 1225:, p. 151-152. 1189:, p. 171-173. 1163:(1765) 3 Burr 1663 1146:(1766) 3 Burr 1905 772: 688:Courts of Chancery 625:Continental Europe 486: 990:(1602) 76 ER 1074 898:R. de Glanville, 861:locatio conductio 748:League of Nations 731:Twentieth century 637:German Civil Code 606:unjust enrichment 577:Leonardus Lessius 337:Court of Chancery 179: 178: 171: 161: 160: 114: 113: 106: 54: 1685: 1659: 1560: 1551: 1545: 1540: 1534: 1525: 1519: 1510: 1504: 1495: 1489: 1480: 1474: 1471: 1465: 1445: 1439: 1420: 1414: 1413:(1886) 34 Ch 234 1406: 1400: 1383: 1377: 1374: 1368: 1356: 1350: 1343: 1337: 1331: 1325: 1324: 1316: 1310: 1304: 1298: 1292: 1286: 1280: 1274: 1268: 1262: 1256: 1250: 1244: 1238: 1232: 1226: 1220: 1214: 1208: 1202: 1196: 1190: 1184: 1178: 1170: 1164: 1156: 1147: 1139: 1133: 1129:Lethulier's Case 1124: 1118: 1117: 1089: 1080: 1074: 1068: 1060: 1054: 1041: 1035: 1032: 1026: 1023: 1017: 1010:A. W. B. Simpson 1006: 1000: 997: 991: 988: 982: 979: 973: 969: 963: 954: 948: 942: 936: 928: 922: 914: 908: 896: 890: 883: 877: 864:), partnership ( 850: 704:fiduciary duties 604:for one, and an 498:Hanseatic League 496:had granted the 476:Hanseatic League 231: 174: 167: 156: 153: 147: 124: 116: 109: 102: 98: 95: 89: 65: 64: 57: 46: 24: 23: 16: 1693: 1692: 1688: 1687: 1686: 1684: 1683: 1682: 1663: 1662: 1651: 1568: 1563: 1552: 1548: 1541: 1537: 1526: 1522: 1511: 1507: 1496: 1492: 1481: 1477: 1472: 1468: 1446: 1442: 1421: 1417: 1407: 1403: 1397:Wayback Machine 1384: 1380: 1375: 1371: 1357: 1353: 1344: 1340: 1332: 1328: 1318: 1317: 1313: 1305: 1301: 1293: 1289: 1281: 1277: 1269: 1265: 1257: 1253: 1245: 1241: 1233: 1229: 1221: 1217: 1209: 1205: 1197: 1193: 1185: 1181: 1171: 1167: 1157: 1150: 1140: 1136: 1125: 1121: 1106:10.2307/1122128 1091: 1090: 1083: 1075: 1071: 1061: 1057: 1042: 1038: 1033: 1029: 1024: 1020: 1007: 1003: 998: 994: 989: 985: 980: 976: 970: 966: 955: 951: 943: 939: 929: 925: 915: 911: 897: 893: 884: 880: 870:) and mandate ( 855:emptio venditio 851: 847: 843: 830:US contract law 826: 803: 781: 733: 696:undue influence 664:Robert Browning 646: 627: 622: 559: 553: 548: 468: 389:Shepton v Dogge 353:. However, in 294: 288: 283: 233: 220: 200: 175: 164: 163: 162: 157: 151: 148: 141: 129:This article's 125: 110: 99: 93: 90: 79: 66: 62: 25: 21: 12: 11: 5: 1691: 1689: 1681: 1680: 1675: 1665: 1664: 1661: 1660: 1649: 1638:The Common Law 1630: 1620: 1608: 1595: 1594: 1590: 1589: 1583: 1577: 1573: 1572: 1567: 1564: 1562: 1561: 1546: 1535: 1520: 1505: 1490: 1475: 1466: 1447:See generally 1440: 1415: 1401: 1378: 1369: 1351: 1338: 1326: 1311: 1309:, p. 512. 1299: 1297:, p. 510. 1287: 1275: 1263: 1251: 1239: 1237:, p. 168. 1227: 1215: 1203: 1201:, p. 153. 1191: 1179: 1165: 1148: 1143:Carter v Boehm 1134: 1119: 1081: 1069: 1055: 1036: 1027: 1018: 1001: 992: 983: 974: 964: 949: 937: 923: 909: 891: 878: 844: 842: 839: 838: 837: 832: 825: 822: 807:European Union 802: 799: 780: 779:United Kingdom 777: 732: 729: 709:British Empire 645: 644:United Kingdom 642: 641: 640: 634: 626: 623: 621: 618: 592:Luis de Molina 581:Pedro de Oñate 573:Luis de Molina 555:Main article: 552: 549: 547: 544: 539:Lord Mansfield 507:Lex Mercatoria 494:King Henry III 481:lex mercatoria 467: 466:European trade 464: 440:Lord Popham CJ 416:grain merchant 411:Slade v Morley 290:Main article: 287: 284: 282: 279: 201: 199: 196: 177: 176: 159: 158: 138:the key points 128: 126: 119: 112: 111: 76:of the subject 74:worldwide view 69: 67: 60: 55: 29: 28: 26: 19: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1690: 1679: 1676: 1674: 1671: 1670: 1668: 1657: 1656: 1650: 1648: 1645:) especially 1644: 1640: 1639: 1634: 1631: 1628: 1624: 1621: 1619:(Oxford 1979) 1618: 1617: 1612: 1609: 1606: 1605: 1600: 1597: 1596: 1592: 1591: 1588: 1584: 1582: 1578: 1575: 1574: 1570: 1569: 1565: 1558: 1557: 1550: 1547: 1544: 1539: 1536: 1533: 1529: 1524: 1521: 1518: 1514: 1509: 1506: 1503: 1499: 1494: 1491: 1487: 1486: 1479: 1476: 1470: 1467: 1464: 1460: 1456: 1455: 1450: 1444: 1441: 1437: 1433: 1429: 1425: 1419: 1416: 1412: 1411: 1405: 1402: 1398: 1394: 1391: 1387: 1382: 1379: 1373: 1370: 1367: 1363: 1362: 1355: 1352: 1348: 1342: 1339: 1335: 1330: 1327: 1322: 1315: 1312: 1308: 1303: 1300: 1296: 1291: 1288: 1284: 1279: 1276: 1272: 1267: 1264: 1260: 1255: 1252: 1248: 1243: 1240: 1236: 1231: 1228: 1224: 1219: 1216: 1212: 1207: 1204: 1200: 1195: 1192: 1188: 1183: 1180: 1176: 1175: 1169: 1166: 1162: 1161: 1155: 1153: 1149: 1145: 1144: 1138: 1135: 1131: 1130: 1123: 1120: 1115: 1111: 1107: 1103: 1100:(1): 35–137. 1099: 1095: 1088: 1086: 1082: 1079: 1073: 1070: 1067: 1064: 1059: 1056: 1052: 1051: 1046: 1040: 1037: 1031: 1028: 1022: 1019: 1015: 1011: 1008:See further, 1005: 1002: 996: 993: 987: 984: 978: 975: 968: 965: 961: 960: 953: 950: 947: 941: 938: 934: 933: 927: 924: 920: 919: 913: 910: 907: 903: 902: 895: 892: 888: 882: 879: 875: 874: 869: 868: 863: 862: 857: 856: 849: 846: 840: 836: 833: 831: 828: 827: 823: 821: 819: 816: 812: 808: 801:Globalisation 800: 798: 795: 790: 786: 778: 776: 769: 765: 761: 757: 753: 749: 745: 741: 737: 730: 728: 726: 722: 718: 714: 710: 705: 701: 697: 693: 689: 685: 681: 678: 677: 671: 670: 665: 661: 657: 656: 655:laissez faire 651: 643: 638: 635: 632: 631:Code Napoleon 629: 628: 624: 619: 617: 615: 611: 607: 603: 602: 597: 593: 588: 586: 582: 579:, the jesuit 578: 574: 570: 569: 562: 558: 550: 545: 543: 540: 536: 535:Sir John Holt 531: 527: 525: 521: 517: 513: 509: 508: 503: 499: 495: 491: 483: 482: 477: 472: 465: 463: 461: 457: 456: 451: 450:consideration 447: 446: 441: 437: 433: 429: 425: 421: 417: 413: 412: 407: 403: 399: 395: 391: 390: 385: 382: 376: 374: 370: 366: 362: 358: 357: 352: 348: 347: 342: 338: 334: 330: 329: 325: 321: 317: 313: 309: 308: 303: 299: 293: 285: 280: 278: 276: 275: 270: 269: 264: 260: 259: 254: 253: 248: 244: 240: 239: 232: 229: 228: 223: 217: 215: 211: 207: 197: 195: 193: 189: 184: 173: 170: 155: 145: 139: 137: 132: 127: 123: 118: 117: 108: 105: 97: 87: 83: 77: 75: 68: 59: 58: 53: 51: 44: 43: 38: 37: 32: 27: 18: 17: 1678:Contract law 1654: 1636: 1626: 1614: 1602: 1554: 1549: 1538: 1523: 1508: 1493: 1483: 1478: 1469: 1452: 1443: 1418: 1408: 1404: 1381: 1372: 1359: 1358:R Browning, 1354: 1346: 1341: 1329: 1320: 1314: 1302: 1290: 1278: 1266: 1254: 1242: 1230: 1218: 1206: 1194: 1182: 1172: 1168: 1158: 1141: 1137: 1127: 1122: 1097: 1093: 1072: 1058: 1048: 1039: 1030: 1021: 1013: 1004: 995: 986: 977: 967: 957: 952: 940: 930: 926: 916: 912: 899: 894: 886: 881: 871: 865: 859: 853: 848: 804: 782: 773: 674: 667: 653: 647: 599: 589: 566: 563: 560: 532: 528: 505: 487: 479: 455:quid pro quo 453: 443: 428:wager of law 409: 387: 377: 361:River Humber 354: 344: 341:King's Bench 326: 312:wager of law 305: 295: 281:Medieval law 272: 266: 256: 250: 236: 234: 225: 219: 203: 192:global trade 182: 180: 165: 149: 133: 131:lead section 100: 94:January 2020 91: 71: 47: 40: 34: 33:Please help 30: 1623:AWB Simpson 1349:(1861) ch 6 1347:Ancient Law 1345:HJS Maine, 1334:Decock 2013 1307:Decock 2013 1295:Decock 2013 1283:Decock 2013 1271:Decock 2013 1259:Decock 2013 1247:Decock 2013 1235:Decock 2013 1223:Decock 2013 1211:Decock 2013 1199:Decock 2013 1187:Decock 2013 1174:Luke v Lyde 1063:Magna Carta 959:Dyer’s case 752:private law 742:, based in 686:merged the 537:, and then 524:King's Lynn 490:Magna Carta 365:Black Death 328:vi et armis 320:Magna Carta 298:Middle Ages 296:During the 198:Ancient law 188:Middle Ages 1667:Categories 1566:References 794:labour law 700:rescission 614:absolution 596:just price 252:stipulatio 36:improve it 1647:lecture 7 1633:OW Holmes 1611:PS Atiyah 1599:G Gilmore 1449:PS Atiyah 858:), hire ( 750:to unify 723:" of the 445:Bret v JS 436:assumpsit 398:Middlesex 247:Roman law 136:summarize 86:talk page 42:talk page 1571:Articles 1530:and the 1500:and the 1488:1 KB 532 1436:RPA 1928 1432:RPA 1918 1393:Archived 873:mandatum 867:societas 824:See also 815:UNIDROIT 740:Unidroit 692:estoppel 502:Sterling 384:covenant 346:covenant 339:and the 238:The Laws 227:The Laws 152:May 2022 80:You may 1364:(1842) 1114:1122128 972:world.’ 904:(1188) 1629:(1987) 1607:(1974) 1559:QB 284 1426:, the 1112:  1053:(1604) 1016:(1987) 906:216 ff 813:, the 725:market 601:laesio 516:Boston 512:London 424:deceit 402:deceit 394:Hoxton 381:sealed 367:, the 274:mutuum 268:pignus 1593:Books 1482:e.g. 1126:e.g. 1110:JSTOR 956:e.g. 841:Notes 243:Plato 222:Plato 1643:1881 1515:and 944:See 768:2002 760:2004 744:Rome 639:1900 633:1810 522:and 520:Hull 414:, a 351:seal 324:tort 181:The 1553:cf 1390:c 9 1102:doi 1066:§41 766:of 758:of 666:'s 333:tun 1669:: 1635:, 1625:, 1613:, 1601:, 1451:, 1366:XV 1151:^ 1108:. 1098:83 1096:. 1084:^ 1047:, 1012:, 698:, 694:, 526:. 518:, 514:, 375:. 304:, 241:, 224:, 194:. 45:. 1641:( 1438:. 1399:) 1388:( 1116:. 1104:: 876:) 852:( 770:. 172:) 166:( 154:) 150:( 140:. 107:) 101:( 96:) 92:( 78:. 52:) 48:(

Index

improve it
talk page
Learn how and when to remove these messages
worldwide view
improve this article or section
talk page
Learn how and when to remove this message

lead section
summarize
provide an accessible overview
Learn how and when to remove this message
Middle Ages
global trade
something forbidden
some iniquitous pressure
some unlooked-for accident
Plato
The Laws
The Laws
Plato
Roman law
stipulatio
contractus litteris
contract creating property rights
pignus
mutuum
History of English contract law
Middle Ages
Ranulf de Glanville

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑