199:
27:
144:
to sell for 500 pounds. Negotiations ensued between the parties, at no stage during which was the price disputed. SA Railways made a complete and definite offer to buy the lorry. Hodgson
Brothers received the offer and accepted by post. Five days later, however, SA Railways sent a
149:
notifying
Hodgson Brothers that it had forgotten in their prior negotiations to mention that it would only pay 300 pounds for the lorry. Hodgson Brothers refused accept this, arguing that they had already agreed on the price. SA Railways contended that it had made a mistake.
240:
183:
137:
95:
67:
166:, in other words—it found that South African Railways and Harbours, by its conduct, had created in the mind of Hodgson Brothers a reasonable belief that there is
74:
81:
44:
279:
63:
233:
37:
294:
289:
259:
226:
88:
269:
52:
128:, which represented one of the first clear deployments of reliance theory or the doctrine of quasi-mutual assent.
274:
264:
167:
159:
206:
284:
210:
253:
125:
122:
198:
26:
170:
and therefore contract had occurred. The contract accordingly was upheld.
146:
118:
Hodgson
Brothers v South African Railways and Harbours 1928 CPD 257
141:
20:
64:"Hodgson Brothers v South African Railways and Harbours"
214:
48:
180:
Hodgson
Brothers v South African Railways and Harbours
158:
Although the court held that there was no subjective
136:Hodgson Brothers, a small undertaking, informed
234:
8:
53:introducing citations to additional sources
241:
227:
43:Relevant discussion may be found on the
7:
195:
193:
138:South African Railways and Harbours
14:
197:
36:relies largely or entirely on a
25:
280:South African contract case law
1:
121:was an important case in the
295:South African case law stubs
213:. You can help Knowledge by
162:between the two parties,—no
290:Western Cape Division cases
311:
192:
260:1928 in South African law
205:This article relating to
207:case law in South Africa
16:South African legal case
270:1928 in rail transport
160:meeting of the minds
49:improve this article
164:animus contrahendi
222:
221:
114:
113:
99:
302:
275:Railway case law
265:1928 in case law
243:
236:
229:
201:
194:
109:
106:
100:
98:
57:
29:
21:
310:
309:
305:
304:
303:
301:
300:
299:
250:
249:
248:
247:
190:
176:
156:
134:
126:law of contract
110:
104:
101:
58:
56:
42:
30:
17:
12:
11:
5:
308:
306:
298:
297:
292:
287:
282:
277:
272:
267:
262:
252:
251:
246:
245:
238:
231:
223:
220:
219:
202:
188:
187:
175:
172:
155:
152:
140:that it had a
133:
130:
112:
111:
47:. Please help
33:
31:
24:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
307:
296:
293:
291:
288:
286:
283:
281:
278:
276:
273:
271:
268:
266:
263:
261:
258:
257:
255:
244:
239:
237:
232:
230:
225:
224:
218:
216:
212:
208:
203:
200:
196:
191:
185:
181:
178:
177:
173:
171:
169:
165:
161:
153:
151:
148:
143:
139:
131:
129:
127:
124:
123:South African
120:
119:
108:
97:
94:
90:
87:
83:
80:
76:
73:
69:
66: –
65:
61:
60:Find sources:
54:
50:
46:
40:
39:
38:single source
34:This article
32:
28:
23:
22:
19:
215:expanding it
204:
189:
179:
163:
157:
135:
117:
116:
115:
102:
92:
85:
78:
71:
59:
35:
18:
254:Categories
174:References
75:newspapers
168:consensus
105:June 2015
45:talk page
285:Transnet
147:telegram
154:Finding
89:scholar
91:
84:
77:
70:
62:
209:is a
182:1928
142:lorry
132:Facts
96:JSTOR
82:books
211:stub
68:news
186:257
184:CPD
51:by
256::
242:e
235:t
228:v
217:.
107:)
103:(
93:·
86:·
79:·
72:·
55:.
41:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
