Knowledge (XXG)

Image schema

Source 📝

20: 410: 126: 441:. This provides a feasible foundation for knowledge representation to represent each individual image schema as well as their interconnection as relationships in a 3D space. One formal language to describe them is the ISL (Image Schema Language), a logic language combined by different formal calculi and 101:
mappings. Learned in early infancy they are often described as spatiotemporal relationships that enable actions and describe characteristics of the environment. They exist both as static and dynamic version, describing both states and processes, compare Containment vs. Going_In/Out, and they are
417:
While originally a theory for cognitive linguistics, the theory of image schemas and the underlying ideas behind embodied cognition have become of increased interest in artificial intelligence and cognitive robotics to help solve issues with natural language comprehension and the application of
117:. The influences of image schemas is not only seen in cognitive linguistics and developmental psychology, but also in interface design and more recently, the theory has become of increased interest in artificial intelligence and cognitive robotics to help ground meaning. 448:
In artificial intelligence, image schemas are also used as an inspiration to advance natural language comprehension of metaphors, conceptual blending and creative language use. This is extended to also include non-linguistic reasoning such as
223:
Johnson argues that more abstract reasoning is shaped by such underlying spatial patterns. For example, he notes that the logic of containment is not just a matter of being in or out of the container. For example, if someone is in a
228:
depression, we know it is likely to be a long time before they are well. The deeper the trajector is in the container, the longer it will take for the trajector to get out of it. Similarly, Johnson argues that transitivity and the
347:
by Brugman, Lakoff's use of image schema theory also drew extensively on Talmy and Langacker's theories of spatial relations terms. Other theories making use of similar conceptual primitives to capture meaning include
201:
Experientially basic and primarily spatial image schemas such as the Containment schema and its derivatives the Out schemas lend their logic to non-spatial situations. For example, one may metaphorically use the term
148:
time. Moreover, they are multi-modal patterns of experience, not simply visual. For instance, consider how the dynamic nature of the containment schema is reflected in the various spatial senses of the English word
469:(p. 126), his diagrams for them are scattered throughout his book and he only diagrammed a portion of those image schemas he listed. In his work, Lakoff also used several additional schemas. 1508:
Robert St. Amant, Clayton T. Morrison, Yu-Han Chang, Paul R. Cohen, and Carole Beal. An image schema language. In International Conference on Cognitive Modeling (ICCM), pages 292–297, 2006.
288:. This analysis raised profound questions about how image schemas could be grouped, transformed, and how sequences of image schemas could be chained together in language, mind, and brain. 1397:
Bennett, B., & Cialone, C. (2014, September). Corpus Guided Sense Cluster Analysis: a methodology for ontology development (with examples from the spatial domain). In
401:
offer the affordance of moving something from one point to another as an image-schematic combination of Source-Path-Goal and Containment (alternatively Support).
1595:) — A recent book chapter which explores the evidence from cognitive neuroscience and cognitive science for the neural underpinnings of image schemas. 704:
The first conceptual representations to include non-spatial elements, by projecting feelings or non-spatial perceptions to blends structured by image schema
445:
that builds on creating hierarchical families of logical micro-theories that is able to represent different degrees of specification of the image schemas.
418:
affordances. The research on formal accounts (e.g.) of these abstract patterns date back several decades and has been proposed as a way to deal with
175:
may also be used to indicate those cases where the trajector is a mass that spreads out, effectively expanding the area of the containing landmark:
457:
and the approach made to describe it image-schematically) and the formal structure of events prototypical as some of the biggest challenges in AI.
1377: 1340: 1291: 1197: 1041: 1001: 959: 847: 50:, image schemas are formed from our bodily interactions, from linguistic experience, and from historical context. The term is introduced in 284:). Furthermore, Lakoff identified a group of "transformational" image schemata such as rotational schemas and path to object mass, as in 1129: 1162: 1614: 1588: 419: 193:
is also often used to describe motion along a linear path where the containing landmark is implied and not defined at all:
375: 1364:, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4736, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 152–168, 213:(4a) I don't want to leave any relevant data out of my argument. (Schema metaphorically projected onto argumentation.) 216:(4b) Tell me your story again, and don't leave out any details. (Schema metaphorically projected onto story-telling.) 105:
Evidence for image schemas is drawn from a number of related disciplines, including work on cross-modal cognition in
925: 230: 264:. Moreover, Lakoff gave a detailed accounting of how these schemas were interrelated in terms of what he called a 1327:. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Vol. 10640. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 256–268. 1121: 1609: 834:, Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, vol. 150, Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, p. 3, 720: 51: 437:, formal approaches to image schemas often limit the research area by looking at image schemas exclusively as 268:. For example, these six schemas could be both further specified by other spatial schemas such as whether the 692:
The first building blocks that allow us to understand what we perceive: PATH, CONTAINER, THING, CONTACT, etc.
157:
may be used in cases where a clearly defined trajector (TR) leaves a spatially bounded landmark (LM), as in:
877: 782: 725: 730: 698:
Representations of simple spatial events using the primitives: PATH TO THING, THING INTO CONTAINER, etc.
450: 94: 946:, Cognitive Linguistics Research, vol. 29, Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 165–198, 210:(4) Leave out that big log when you stack the firewood. (Schema used directly and non-metaphorically.) 1234: 773: 740: 434: 253: 787: 454: 312:
put forth by him. For the force group of image schemas Johnson also drew on an early version of the
1316: 882: 750: 745: 427: 349: 301: 219:(4c) She finally came out of her depression. (Schema metaphorically projected onto emotional life.) 98: 1547: 1440: 1203: 1047: 903: 808: 329: 97:, an image schema is considered an embodied prelinguistic structure of experience that motivates 87: 67: 47: 269: 260:
given by Johnson, Lakoff argued that there were six basic spatial schemas for the English word
1539: 1491: 1432: 1373: 1336: 1320: 1287: 1252: 1193: 1158: 1135: 1125: 1094: 1086: 1037: 997: 955: 895: 868:
Boroditsky, L (2000). "Metaphoric structuring: Understanding time through spatial metaphors".
843: 800: 442: 309: 1270:
Chang, Yu-Han; Cohen, Paul R.; Morrison, Clayton T.; Amant, Robert St.; Beal, Carole (2006),
171:
In the most prototypical of such cases the landmark is a clearly defined container. However,
1531: 1481: 1471: 1424: 1365: 1328: 1279: 1242: 1185: 1113: 1078: 1029: 989: 947: 887: 835: 792: 735: 305: 1317:"Between Contact and Support: Introducing a Logic for Image Schemas and Directed Movement" 387: 357: 337: 46:
processes which establishes patterns of understanding and reasoning. As an understudy to
1238: 233:
in logic are underlaid by preconceptual embodied experiences of the Containment schema.
380: 325: 313: 75: 1458:
Hedblom, Maria M.; Kutz, Oliver; Peñaloza, Rafael; Guizzardi, Giancarlo (2019-07-17).
1181:
Image Schemas and Concept Invention: Cognitive, Logical, and Linguistic Investigations
1067:"Saying what you mean, meaning what you say: language, interaction and interpretation" 1066: 1025:
Image Schemas and Concept Invention: Cognitive, Logical, and Linguistic Investigations
891: 1603: 1551: 1207: 1179: 1082: 1051: 1023: 366: 333: 59: 1444: 1223:"Choosing the Right Path: Image Schema Theory as a Foundation for Concept Invention" 907: 812: 371: 321: 114: 1412: 1357: 981: 1428: 1369: 1332: 993: 939: 951: 715: 110: 19: 1476: 1459: 796: 1189: 1033: 390: 106: 1543: 1519: 1495: 1436: 1256: 1090: 397:
affords the image schema Containment to liquids and an abstract concept like
1535: 1315:
Hedblom, Maria M.; Kutz, Oliver; Mossakowski, Till; Neuhaus, Fabian (2017).
1139: 827: 317: 43: 1247: 1222: 1098: 899: 839: 433:
As a direct relation to embodied cognition, and more specifically embodied
1571:
The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason
804: 1271: 771:
Mandler, J. M. (1992). "How to build a baby: II. Conceptual primitives".
423: 405:
Formal specification of image schemas and role in artificial intelligence
273: 1578:
Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal About the Mind
1486: 1283: 409: 336:
in categorization, as well as studies in experimental psychology on the
1583:
Rohrer, Tim (2006) "Image Schemata in the Brain", in Beate Hampe (ed.)
627:
Multiplex to mass (possibly the same as Johnson's undefined Mass-Count)
125: 832:
Lexical and Syntactical Constructions and the Construction of Meaning
1278:, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 369–380, 1411:
Hedblom, Maria M.; Kutz, Oliver; Neuhaus, Fabian (September 2016).
1184:. Cognitive Technologies. Cham: Springer International Publishing. 1028:. Cognitive Technologies. Cham: Springer International Publishing. 982:"A Formalization of Metaphors and Image-Schemas in User Interfaces" 1585:
From Perception to Meaning: Image Schemas in Cognitive Linguistics
408: 84:
From Perception to Meaning: Image Schemas in Cognitive Linguistics
1323:; Basili, Roberto; Ferilli, Stefano; Lisi, Francesca A. (eds.). 1221:
Hedblom, Maria M.; Kutz, Oliver; Neuhaus, Fabian (2015-12-01).
630:
Reflexive (both part-whole and temporally different reflexives)
121:
Johnson: From image schemas to abstract reasoning via metaphor
42:
are used as plural forms) is a recurring structure within our
140:
Image schemas are dynamic embodied patterns—they take place
1272:"Piagetian Adaptation Meets Image Schemas: The Jean System" 1118:
Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Theoretical Prerequisites
465:
While Johnson provided an initial list of image schemas in
386:
Image schemas have also been proposed to be descriptors of
132:- containment image schema (as applied to the English word 618:
Linear path from moving object (one-dimensional trajector)
256:
in her (1981) master's thesis. Similar to the analysis of
1518:
MANDLER, JEAN M.; PAGÁN CÁNOVAS, CRISTÓBAL (2014-05-13).
248:, Lakoff re-presented the analysis of the English word 671:
Rough-smooth/Bumpy-smooth (Rohrer; Johnson and Rohrer)
988:, Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, pp. 419–434, 1413:"Image schemas in computational conceptual blending" 986:
Cognitive and Linguistic Aspects of Geographic Space
1358:"An Image-Schematic Account of Spatial Categories" 828:"Some Properties and Groupings of Image Schemas" 113:and psychology, cognitive linguistics, and from 1460:"Image Schema Combinations and Complex Events" 1325:AI*IA 2017 Advances in Artificial Intelligence 554:Schemas listed, but not discussed, by Johnson 413:Some members of the Source-Path-Goal family. 72:The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics; 8: 422:, natural language comprehension, automatic 681:Mandler and Canovas' image schema hierarchy 1227:Journal of Artificial General Intelligence 383:'s phenomenological primitives (p-prims). 300:drew upon a 1981 doctoral dissertation by 16:Recurring structure in cognitive processes 1485: 1475: 1246: 881: 786: 664:Schemas proposed and discussed by others 124: 18: 980:Kuhn, Werner; Frank, Andrew U. (1991), 763: 296:Johnson indicates that his analysis of 1155:Semantics : Primes and Universals 920:Croft, W., & Cruse, D. A. (2004). 609:Additional schemas discussed by Lakoff 308:, and more generally by the theory of 197:(3) The train started out for Chicago. 1580:Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 1310: 1308: 680: 206:to describe non-spatial experiences: 102:learned from all sensorimodalities. 7: 286:Spider-Man climbed all over the wall 624:Path to object mass (path covering) 343:In addition to the dissertation on 237:Lakoff: Image schemas in Brugman's 14: 621:Path to endpoint (endpoint focus) 292:Relationships to similar theories 236: 109:, from spatial cognition in both 64:Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: 1083:10.1111/j.1468-5922.2010.01902.x 1071:Journal of Analytical Psychology 420:geographical information science 278:the plane flew over the mountain 246:Women, Fire and Dangerous Things 167:(1c) Spot jumped out of the pen. 1157:. UK: Oxford University Press. 320:, as used by linguists such as 161:(1a) John went out of the room. 244:In case study two of his book 179:(2a) She poured out the beans. 1: 1587:, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 940:"Image schemata in the brain" 892:10.1016/s0010-0277(99)00073-6 426:generation and computational 304:in linguistics at UCSD under 164:(1b) Mary got out of the car. 1429:10.1016/j.cogsys.2015.12.010 1370:10.1007/978-3-540-74788-8_10 1333:10.1007/978-3-319-70169-1_19 994:10.1007/978-94-011-2606-9_24 473:Schemas discussed by Johnson 439:spatiotemporal relationships 376:conceptual dependency theory 282:he climbed over the mountain 1520:"On defining image schemas" 1464:KI - KĂŒnstliche Intelligenz 1065:Astor, James (2011-03-15). 952:10.1515/9783110197532.2.165 656:Length (extended trajector) 324:. Other influences include 1631: 1477:10.1007/s13218-019-00605-1 1417:Cognitive Systems Research 1362:Spatial Information Theory 1178:Hedblom, Maria M. (2020). 1022:Hedblom, Maria M. (2020). 944:From Perception to Meaning 938:Rohrer, Tim (2005-12-15), 926:Cambridge University Press 797:10.1037/0033-295x.99.4.587 231:law of the excluded middle 26:- containment image schema 1276:From Animals to Animats 9 1190:10.1007/978-3-030-47329-7 1153:Wierzbicka, Anna (1996). 1122:Stanford University Press 1034:10.1007/978-3-030-47329-7 369:'s conceptual primitives, 334:Kant's account of schemas 266:radial category structure 185:(2c) Send out the troops. 182:(2b) Roll out the carpet. 66:and further explained by 1573:, University of Chicago. 721:Artificial consciousness 272:was in contact with the 1569:Johnson, Mark (1987). 1536:10.1017/langcog.2014.14 702:Schematic integrations. 615:Transformational group 1576:Lakoff, George (1987) 1524:Language and Cognition 1248:10.1515/jagi-2015-0003 840:10.1075/cilt.150.04cie 726:Cognitive architecture 461:Lists of image schemas 414: 137: 27: 1615:Cognitive linguistics 1356:Kuhn, Werner (2007), 922:Cognitive Linguistics 826:Cienki, Alan (1997), 731:Commonsense reasoning 479:Spatial motion group 451:commonsense reasoning 412: 332:structure theory and 316:schemas put forth by 128: 95:cognitive linguistics 90:and Joseph E. Grady. 58:; in case study 2 of 22: 1120:. Stanford, Calif.: 1114:Langacker, Ronald W. 924:(p. 374). New York: 774:Psychological Review 741:Construction grammar 653:Vertical Orientation 517:Removal of Restraint 467:The Body in the Mind 455:Egg cracking problem 435:construction grammar 82:; by the collection 56:The Body in the Mind 1284:10.1007/11840541_31 1239:2015JAGI....6...21H 751:Schema (psychology) 746:Embodied philosophy 690:Spatial primitives. 428:conceptual blending 393:. An object like a 99:conceptual metaphor 1321:Esposito, Floriana 415: 354:spatial primitives 138: 48:embodied cognition 28: 1594: 1379:978-3-540-74786-4 1342:978-3-319-70169-1 1293:978-3-540-38608-7 1199:978-3-030-47328-0 1043:978-3-030-47328-0 1003:978-94-010-5151-4 961:978-3-11-018311-5 849:978-90-272-3654-8 674:Straight (Cienki) 453:(e.g. see Davis' 443:first-order logic 381:Andrea A. diSessa 310:cognitive grammar 239:The story of Over 1622: 1592: 1556: 1555: 1515: 1509: 1506: 1500: 1499: 1489: 1479: 1455: 1449: 1448: 1408: 1402: 1395: 1389: 1388: 1387: 1386: 1353: 1347: 1346: 1312: 1303: 1302: 1301: 1300: 1267: 1261: 1260: 1250: 1218: 1212: 1211: 1175: 1169: 1168: 1150: 1144: 1143: 1109: 1103: 1102: 1062: 1056: 1055: 1019: 1013: 1012: 1011: 1010: 977: 971: 970: 969: 968: 935: 929: 918: 912: 911: 885: 865: 859: 858: 857: 856: 823: 817: 816: 790: 768: 736:Conceptual space 543:Twin-Pan Balance 494:Center-Periphery 488:Source-Path-Goal 306:Ronald Langacker 93:In contemporary 1630: 1629: 1625: 1624: 1623: 1621: 1620: 1619: 1610:Visual thinking 1600: 1599: 1598: 1565: 1560: 1559: 1517: 1516: 1512: 1507: 1503: 1457: 1456: 1452: 1410: 1409: 1405: 1396: 1392: 1384: 1382: 1380: 1355: 1354: 1350: 1343: 1314: 1313: 1306: 1298: 1296: 1294: 1269: 1268: 1264: 1220: 1219: 1215: 1200: 1177: 1176: 1172: 1165: 1152: 1151: 1147: 1132: 1112: 1110: 1106: 1064: 1063: 1059: 1044: 1021: 1020: 1016: 1008: 1006: 1004: 979: 978: 974: 966: 964: 962: 937: 936: 932: 919: 915: 867: 866: 862: 854: 852: 850: 825: 824: 820: 788:10.1.1.460.5280 770: 769: 765: 760: 755: 711: 683: 666: 661: 611: 606: 595:Superimposition 556: 551: 475: 463: 407: 362:semantic primes 358:Anna Wierzbicka 350:Jean M. Mandler 338:mental rotation 294: 254:Claudia Brugman 242: 123: 80:Visual Thinking 17: 12: 11: 5: 1628: 1626: 1618: 1617: 1612: 1602: 1601: 1597: 1596: 1589:Online version 1581: 1574: 1566: 1564: 1561: 1558: 1557: 1530:(4): 510–532. 1510: 1501: 1470:(3): 279–291. 1450: 1403: 1401:(pp. 213-226). 1390: 1378: 1348: 1341: 1304: 1292: 1262: 1213: 1198: 1170: 1163: 1145: 1131:978-0804712613 1130: 1104: 1077:(2): 203–216. 1057: 1042: 1014: 1002: 972: 960: 930: 913: 883:10.1.1.11.5402 860: 848: 818: 781:(4): 587–604. 762: 761: 759: 756: 754: 753: 748: 743: 738: 733: 728: 723: 718: 712: 710: 707: 706: 705: 699: 696:Image schemas. 693: 682: 679: 678: 677: 676: 675: 672: 665: 662: 660: 659: 658: 657: 654: 651: 648: 645: 642: 638:Spatial group 636: 635: 634: 631: 628: 625: 622: 619: 612: 610: 607: 605: 604: 603: 602: 599: 596: 593: 590: 587: 584: 581: 578: 575: 572: 569: 566: 563: 557: 555: 552: 550: 549: 548: 547: 544: 541: 538: 534:Balance Group 532: 531: 530: 527: 524: 521: 518: 515: 512: 509: 503: 502: 501: 498: 495: 492: 489: 486: 483: 476: 474: 471: 462: 459: 406: 403: 399:transportation 326:Max Wertheimer 293: 290: 276:or not (as in 241: 235: 221: 220: 217: 214: 211: 199: 198: 187: 186: 183: 180: 169: 168: 165: 162: 122: 119: 76:Rudolf Arnheim 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1627: 1616: 1613: 1611: 1608: 1607: 1605: 1590: 1586: 1582: 1579: 1575: 1572: 1568: 1567: 1562: 1553: 1549: 1545: 1541: 1537: 1533: 1529: 1525: 1521: 1514: 1511: 1505: 1502: 1497: 1493: 1488: 1483: 1478: 1473: 1469: 1465: 1461: 1454: 1451: 1446: 1442: 1438: 1434: 1430: 1426: 1422: 1418: 1414: 1407: 1404: 1400: 1394: 1391: 1381: 1375: 1371: 1367: 1363: 1359: 1352: 1349: 1344: 1338: 1334: 1330: 1326: 1322: 1318: 1311: 1309: 1305: 1295: 1289: 1285: 1281: 1277: 1273: 1266: 1263: 1258: 1254: 1249: 1244: 1240: 1236: 1232: 1228: 1224: 1217: 1214: 1209: 1205: 1201: 1195: 1191: 1187: 1183: 1182: 1174: 1171: 1166: 1164:9780191588594 1160: 1156: 1149: 1146: 1141: 1137: 1133: 1127: 1123: 1119: 1115: 1111:For example: 1108: 1105: 1100: 1096: 1092: 1088: 1084: 1080: 1076: 1072: 1068: 1061: 1058: 1053: 1049: 1045: 1039: 1035: 1031: 1027: 1026: 1018: 1015: 1005: 999: 995: 991: 987: 983: 976: 973: 963: 957: 953: 949: 945: 941: 934: 931: 927: 923: 917: 914: 909: 905: 901: 897: 893: 889: 884: 879: 875: 871: 864: 861: 851: 845: 841: 837: 833: 829: 822: 819: 814: 810: 806: 802: 798: 794: 789: 784: 780: 776: 775: 767: 764: 757: 752: 749: 747: 744: 742: 739: 737: 734: 732: 729: 727: 724: 722: 719: 717: 714: 713: 708: 703: 700: 697: 694: 691: 688: 687: 686: 673: 670: 669: 668: 667: 663: 655: 652: 649: 646: 643: 640: 639: 637: 632: 629: 626: 623: 620: 617: 616: 614: 613: 608: 600: 597: 594: 591: 588: 585: 582: 579: 576: 573: 570: 567: 564: 561: 560: 559: 558: 553: 545: 542: 540:Point Balance 539: 536: 535: 533: 528: 525: 522: 519: 516: 513: 510: 507: 506: 504: 500:Cyclic Climax 499: 496: 493: 490: 487: 484: 481: 480: 478: 477: 472: 470: 468: 460: 458: 456: 452: 446: 444: 440: 436: 431: 429: 425: 421: 411: 404: 402: 400: 396: 392: 389: 384: 382: 378: 377: 373: 370: 368: 367:Leonard Talmy 363: 359: 355: 351: 346: 341: 339: 335: 331: 327: 323: 319: 315: 314:force dynamic 311: 307: 303: 302:Susan Lindner 299: 291: 289: 287: 283: 279: 275: 271: 267: 263: 259: 255: 251: 247: 240: 234: 232: 227: 218: 215: 212: 209: 208: 207: 205: 196: 195: 194: 192: 184: 181: 178: 177: 176: 174: 166: 163: 160: 159: 158: 156: 152: 147: 143: 135: 131: 127: 120: 118: 116: 112: 108: 103: 100: 96: 91: 89: 85: 81: 77: 73: 69: 65: 61: 60:George Lakoff 57: 53: 49: 45: 41: 37: 33: 25: 21: 1584: 1577: 1570: 1527: 1523: 1513: 1504: 1487:10281/268048 1467: 1463: 1453: 1420: 1416: 1406: 1398: 1393: 1383:, retrieved 1361: 1351: 1324: 1297:, retrieved 1275: 1265: 1233:(1): 21–54. 1230: 1226: 1216: 1180: 1173: 1154: 1148: 1117: 1107: 1074: 1070: 1060: 1024: 1017: 1007:, retrieved 985: 975: 965:, retrieved 943: 933: 921: 916: 873: 869: 863: 853:, retrieved 831: 821: 778: 772: 766: 701: 695: 689: 684: 537:Axis Balance 511:Counterforce 505:Force Group 466: 464: 447: 438: 432: 416: 398: 394: 385: 374: 372:Roger Schank 364: 361: 353: 344: 342: 322:Eve Sweetser 297: 295: 285: 281: 277: 265: 261: 257: 249: 245: 243: 238: 225: 222: 203: 200: 190: 188: 172: 170: 154: 150: 145: 141: 139: 133: 129: 115:neuroscience 104: 92: 83: 79: 71: 63: 55: 52:Mark Johnson 39: 35: 32:image schema 31: 29: 23: 876:(1): 1–28. 716:Affordances 546:Equilibrium 482:Containment 391:affordances 340:of images. 111:linguistics 88:Beate Hampe 68:Todd Oakley 1604:Categories 1563:References 1385:2021-01-26 1299:2021-01-26 1009:2021-01-26 967:2021-01-26 855:2021-02-08 601:Collection 592:Part-Whole 580:Mass-Count 568:Full-Empty 523:Attraction 520:Enablement 508:Compulsion 107:psychology 86:edited by 1552:146194332 1544:1866-9808 1496:0933-1875 1437:1389-0417 1423:: 42–57. 1257:1946-0163 1208:219607936 1091:0021-8774 1052:219607936 878:CiteSeerX 870:Cognition 783:CiteSeerX 589:Splitting 583:Iteration 514:Diversion 388:Gibsonian 318:Len Talmy 270:trajector 189:Finally, 44:cognitive 1445:39839163 1140:37499775 1116:(1987). 1099:21434900 908:11579775 900:10815775 813:18194545 709:See also 685:Source: 647:Covering 633:Rotation 577:Near-Far 574:Matching 491:Blockage 424:ontology 274:landmark 252:done by 130:Figure 2 54:'s book 40:schemata 24:Figure 1 1235:Bibcode 805:1454900 650:Contact 598:Process 571:Merging 565:Surface 562:Contact 330:gestalt 146:through 36:schemas 1550:  1542:  1494:  1443:  1435:  1376:  1339:  1290:  1255:  1206:  1196:  1161:  1138:  1128:  1097:  1089:  1050:  1040:  1000:  958:  906:  898:  880:  846:  811:  803:  785:  644:Across 586:Object 34:(both 1548:S2CID 1441:S2CID 1319:. In 1204:S2CID 1048:S2CID 904:S2CID 809:S2CID 758:Notes 641:Above 529:Scale 497:Cycle 1540:ISSN 1492:ISSN 1433:ISSN 1399:FOIS 1374:ISBN 1337:ISBN 1288:ISBN 1253:ISSN 1194:ISBN 1159:ISBN 1136:OCLC 1126:ISBN 1095:PMID 1087:ISSN 1038:ISBN 998:ISBN 956:ISBN 896:PMID 844:ISBN 801:PMID 526:Link 485:Path 379:and 345:over 280:vs. 262:over 250:over 226:deep 144:and 38:and 1593:PDF 1532:doi 1482:hdl 1472:doi 1425:doi 1366:doi 1329:doi 1280:doi 1243:doi 1186:doi 1079:doi 1030:doi 990:doi 948:doi 888:doi 836:doi 793:doi 395:cup 360:'s 352:'s 328:'s 298:out 258:out 204:out 191:out 173:out 155:Out 151:out 134:out 78:in 74:by 70:in 62:'s 30:An 1606:: 1546:. 1538:. 1526:. 1522:. 1490:. 1480:. 1468:33 1466:. 1462:. 1439:. 1431:. 1421:39 1419:. 1415:. 1372:, 1360:, 1335:. 1307:^ 1286:, 1274:, 1251:. 1241:. 1229:. 1225:. 1202:. 1192:. 1134:. 1124:. 1093:. 1085:. 1075:56 1073:. 1069:. 1046:. 1036:. 996:, 984:, 954:, 942:, 902:. 894:. 886:. 874:75 872:. 842:, 830:, 807:. 799:. 791:. 779:99 777:. 430:. 365:, 356:, 153:. 142:in 1591:( 1554:. 1534:: 1528:6 1498:. 1484:: 1474:: 1447:. 1427:: 1368:: 1345:. 1331:: 1282:: 1259:. 1245:: 1237:: 1231:6 1210:. 1188:: 1167:. 1142:. 1101:. 1081:: 1054:. 1032:: 992:: 950:: 928:. 910:. 890:: 838:: 815:. 795:: 136:)

Index


cognitive
embodied cognition
Mark Johnson
George Lakoff
Todd Oakley
Rudolf Arnheim
Beate Hampe
cognitive linguistics
conceptual metaphor
psychology
linguistics
neuroscience

law of the excluded middle
Claudia Brugman
trajector
landmark
Susan Lindner
Ronald Langacker
cognitive grammar
force dynamic
Len Talmy
Eve Sweetser
Max Wertheimer
gestalt
Kant's account of schemas
mental rotation
Jean M. Mandler
Anna Wierzbicka

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑