220: (Supreme Court of California Nov 24, 1937) ("The presumption is against repeals by implication, especially where the prior act has been generally understood and acted upon. To overcome the presumption the two acts must be irreconcilable, clearly repugnant, and so inconsistent that the two cannot have concurrent operation. The courts are bound, if possible, to maintain the integrity of both statutes if the two may stand together. Where a modification will suffice, a repeal will not be presumed.").
1216:
232:
1228:
71:
In
Canadian law, it is possible for a law to be protected from implied repeal by way of a "primacy clause" which states that the act in question supersedes all other statutes until it is specifically repealed. Acts with such primacy clauses are called quasi-constitutional.
147:
law, "implied repeal" is a disfavored doctrine. That is, if a court can reconcile the two statutes with any reasonable interpretation, that interpretation is preferred to one that treats the earlier statute as invalidated by the later one.
50:(or of some other legislature) conflicts with an earlier one, the later Act takes precedence and the conflicting parts of the earlier Act become legally inoperable. This doctrine is expressed in the Latin phrase
200:
780:
923:
870:
865:
860:
855:
850:
845:
840:
835:
830:
825:
820:
815:
810:
805:
800:
795:
790:
785:
775:
770:
765:
760:
755:
750:
745:
1082:
740:
735:
730:
725:
720:
715:
710:
705:
700:
695:
307:
918:
950:
561:
556:
551:
546:
541:
523:
518:
513:
393:
490:
485:
327:
886:
332:
1264:
687:
133:
971:
480:
998:
1112:
300:
1195:
122:
114:
1259:
902:
273:
99:
95:
98:
hold a higher status in UK law and are not subject to the doctrine of implied repeal. The case specifically dealt with s.2(2) of the
966:
508:
82:
566:
352:
1232:
1051:
373:
293:
129:
can only be expressly repealed; it cannot be impliedly repealed; that is because of its 'fundamental constitutional nature'."
201:
Adam Perry and Farrah Ahmed: Are
Constitutional Statutes 'Quasi-Entrenched'? Blog of the UK Constitutional Law Association
103:
1147:
961:
368:
1101:
623:
658:
602:
378:
1020:
1003:
452:
457:
435:
1185:
1127:
1015:
440:
388:
337:
66:
1190:
1142:
976:
678:
467:
424:
316:
266:
110:
are "constitutional statutes" and in his opinion may not be subject to the doctrine of implied repeal.
107:
39:
217:
1137:
1132:
1072:
1077:
475:
57:
Implied repeal is to be contrasted with the express repeal of legislation by the legislative body.
1254:
1157:
1152:
1117:
986:
608:
445:
363:
1067:
1030:
405:
259:
126:
91:
43:
243:
981:
663:
628:
618:
1062:
1008:
47:
87:
1248:
1220:
1122:
1025:
399:
144:
185:
17:
231:
613:
668:
647:
383:
167:
162:
157:
285:
35:
102:, but in his judgment Lord Justice Laws also held the view that the
1174:
1099:
1049:
948:
645:
591:
422:
350:
289:
239:
593:
Amendments and other constitutional documents 1867–1982
247:
880:
Part II – Rights of the
Aboriginal peoples of Canada
911:
895:
879:
686:
677:
532:
499:
466:
896:Part III – Equalization and regional disparities
688:Part I – Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
400:Report on the Affairs of British North America
301:
267:
113:A decade later in 2012, in a case before the
52:leges posteriores priores contrarias abrogant
8:
394:Declaration of Independence of Lower Canada
1171:
1096:
1046:
945:
683:
674:
642:
588:
496:
463:
419:
353:Pre-Confederation constitutional documents
347:
308:
294:
286:
274:
260:
669:Kitchen Accord/Night of the Long Knives
562:Fines and penalties for provincial laws
178:
134:In re Jim Allister and others (EU Exit)
999:Individual ministerial responsibility
213:Penziner v. West American Finance Co.
96:constitutionally significant statutes
7:
567:Matters of a local or private nature
228:
226:
1196:Constitution Act (British Columbia)
54:or "lex posterior derogat priori".
1176:Provincial constitutions of Canada
1102:Interpretation of the Constitution
246:. You can help Knowledge (XXG) by
25:
967:Cabinet collective responsibility
509:Peace, order, and good government
187:BH v The Lord Advocate (Scotland)
119:BH v The Lord Advocate (Scotland)
83:Thoburn v Sunderland City Council
1227:
1226:
1214:
328:List of constitutional documents
230:
27:Concept in constitutional theory
1265:Legal doctrines and principles
436:Charlottetown Conference, 1864
333:Amendments to the Constitution
1:
1083:Other unsuccessful amendments
1148:Interjurisdictional immunity
972:Disallowance and reservation
624:Statute of Westminster, 1931
115:United Kingdom Supreme Court
524:Matters excepted from s. 92
42:which states that where an
1281:
1113:Indigenous self-government
603:British North America Acts
389:Constitutional Act of 1791
379:Royal Proclamation of 1763
374:Constitution of New France
225:
131:
64:
1260:English legal terminology
1208:
1181:
1170:
1108:
1095:
1058:
1045:
1021:Parliamentary sovereignty
962:At His Majesty's pleasure
957:
944:
654:
641:
598:
587:
557:Administration of justice
552:Property and civil rights
431:
418:
359:
346:
323:
80:In the 2002 English case
458:Fathers of Confederation
338:Quasi-constitutional law
100:European Communities Act
1186:Constitution of Alberta
1128:Equal authenticity rule
1016:Parliamentary privilege
453:London Conference, 1866
441:Quebec Conference, 1864
67:Quasi-constitutionality
1191:Constitution of Quebec
1143:Implied Bill of Rights
977:Responsible government
679:Constitution Act, 1982
659:Fulton–Favreau formula
629:Newfoundland Act, 1949
619:Saskatchewan Act, 1905
547:Works and undertakings
468:Constitution Act, 1867
317:Constitution of Canada
242:-related article is a
218:10 Cal. 2d 160
1052:Constitutional debate
364:Iroquois constitution
65:Further information:
40:constitutional theory
1073:Charlottetown Accord
369:Mi'kmaq constitution
1078:Calgary Declaration
476:Canadian federalism
18:Implicitly repealed
1158:Dialogue principle
1118:Pith and substance
987:King-in-Parliament
912:Part VII – General
609:Manitoba Act, 1870
514:Trade and commerce
446:Quebec Resolutions
384:Quebec Act of 1774
1242:
1241:
1221:Canada portal
1204:
1203:
1166:
1165:
1091:
1090:
1068:Meech Lake Accord
1041:
1040:
1031:Royal prerogative
940:
939:
936:
935:
932:
931:
637:
636:
614:Alberta Act, 1905
583:
582:
579:
578:
575:
574:
414:
413:
406:Act of Union 1840
255:
254:
92:Lord Justice Laws
44:Act of Parliament
16:(Redirected from
1272:
1230:
1229:
1219:
1218:
1217:
1172:
1153:Purposive theory
1097:
1047:
982:Fusion of powers
946:
684:
675:
664:Victoria Charter
643:
589:
497:
464:
420:
348:
310:
303:
296:
287:
276:
269:
262:
234:
227:
221:
215:
209:
203:
198:
192:
183:
108:Human Rights Act
86:(the so-called "
30:The doctrine of
21:
1280:
1279:
1275:
1274:
1273:
1271:
1270:
1269:
1245:
1244:
1243:
1238:
1215:
1213:
1200:
1177:
1162:
1104:
1087:
1063:Triple-E Senate
1054:
1037:
1009:Question Period
953:
928:
907:
891:
875:
673:
650:
633:
594:
571:
534:
528:
501:
495:
462:
427:
410:
355:
342:
319:
314:
283:
281:
280:
224:
211:
210:
206:
199:
195:
184:
180:
176:
154:
141:
136:
125:held that "the
104:Parliament Acts
94:held that some
78:
69:
63:
48:Act of Congress
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
1278:
1276:
1268:
1267:
1262:
1257:
1247:
1246:
1240:
1239:
1237:
1236:
1224:
1209:
1206:
1205:
1202:
1201:
1199:
1198:
1193:
1188:
1182:
1179:
1178:
1175:
1168:
1167:
1164:
1163:
1161:
1160:
1155:
1150:
1145:
1140:
1135:
1130:
1125:
1120:
1115:
1109:
1106:
1105:
1100:
1093:
1092:
1089:
1088:
1086:
1085:
1080:
1075:
1070:
1065:
1059:
1056:
1055:
1050:
1043:
1042:
1039:
1038:
1036:
1035:
1034:
1033:
1023:
1018:
1013:
1012:
1011:
1004:Interpellation
1001:
996:
994:Implied repeal
991:
990:
989:
979:
974:
969:
964:
958:
955:
954:
949:
942:
941:
938:
937:
934:
933:
930:
929:
927:
926:
921:
915:
913:
909:
908:
906:
905:
899:
897:
893:
892:
890:
889:
883:
881:
877:
876:
874:
873:
868:
863:
858:
853:
848:
843:
838:
833:
828:
823:
818:
813:
808:
803:
798:
793:
788:
783:
778:
773:
768:
763:
758:
753:
748:
743:
738:
733:
728:
723:
718:
713:
708:
703:
698:
692:
690:
681:
672:
671:
666:
661:
655:
652:
651:
646:
639:
638:
635:
634:
632:
631:
626:
621:
616:
611:
606:
599:
596:
595:
592:
585:
584:
581:
580:
577:
576:
573:
572:
570:
569:
564:
559:
554:
549:
544:
538:
536:
530:
529:
527:
526:
521:
516:
511:
505:
503:
494:
493:
488:
483:
478:
472:
470:
461:
460:
455:
450:
449:
448:
438:
432:
429:
428:
423:
416:
415:
412:
411:
409:
408:
403:
397:
391:
386:
381:
376:
371:
366:
360:
357:
356:
351:
344:
343:
341:
340:
335:
330:
324:
321:
320:
315:
313:
312:
305:
298:
290:
279:
278:
271:
264:
256:
253:
252:
235:
223:
222:
204:
193:
177:
175:
172:
171:
170:
165:
160:
153:
150:
140:
137:
88:Metric Martyrs
77:
76:United Kingdom
74:
62:
59:
32:implied repeal
26:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1277:
1266:
1263:
1261:
1258:
1256:
1253:
1252:
1250:
1235:
1234:
1225:
1223:
1222:
1211:
1210:
1207:
1197:
1194:
1192:
1189:
1187:
1184:
1183:
1180:
1173:
1169:
1159:
1156:
1154:
1151:
1149:
1146:
1144:
1141:
1139:
1136:
1134:
1131:
1129:
1126:
1124:
1123:Double aspect
1121:
1119:
1116:
1114:
1111:
1110:
1107:
1103:
1098:
1094:
1084:
1081:
1079:
1076:
1074:
1071:
1069:
1066:
1064:
1061:
1060:
1057:
1053:
1048:
1044:
1032:
1029:
1028:
1027:
1026:Reserve power
1024:
1022:
1019:
1017:
1014:
1010:
1007:
1006:
1005:
1002:
1000:
997:
995:
992:
988:
985:
984:
983:
980:
978:
975:
973:
970:
968:
965:
963:
960:
959:
956:
952:
947:
943:
925:
922:
920:
917:
916:
914:
910:
904:
901:
900:
898:
894:
888:
885:
884:
882:
878:
872:
869:
867:
864:
862:
859:
857:
854:
852:
849:
847:
844:
842:
839:
837:
834:
832:
829:
827:
824:
822:
819:
817:
814:
812:
809:
807:
804:
802:
799:
797:
794:
792:
789:
787:
784:
782:
779:
777:
774:
772:
769:
767:
764:
762:
759:
757:
754:
752:
749:
747:
744:
742:
739:
737:
734:
732:
729:
727:
724:
722:
719:
717:
714:
712:
709:
707:
704:
702:
699:
697:
694:
693:
691:
689:
685:
682:
680:
676:
670:
667:
665:
662:
660:
657:
656:
653:
649:
644:
640:
630:
627:
625:
622:
620:
617:
615:
612:
610:
607:
604:
601:
600:
597:
590:
586:
568:
565:
563:
560:
558:
555:
553:
550:
548:
545:
543:
540:
539:
537:
533:Powers under
531:
525:
522:
520:
517:
515:
512:
510:
507:
506:
504:
498:
492:
489:
487:
484:
482:
479:
477:
474:
473:
471:
469:
465:
459:
456:
454:
451:
447:
444:
443:
442:
439:
437:
434:
433:
430:
426:
425:Confederation
421:
417:
407:
404:
401:
398:
395:
392:
390:
387:
385:
382:
380:
377:
375:
372:
370:
367:
365:
362:
361:
358:
354:
349:
345:
339:
336:
334:
331:
329:
326:
325:
322:
318:
311:
306:
304:
299:
297:
292:
291:
288:
284:
277:
272:
270:
265:
263:
258:
257:
251:
249:
245:
241:
236:
233:
229:
219:
214:
208:
205:
202:
197:
194:
190:
188:
182:
179:
173:
169:
166:
164:
161:
159:
156:
155:
151:
149:
146:
145:United States
139:United States
138:
135:
130:
128:
124:
120:
116:
111:
109:
105:
101:
97:
93:
89:
85:
84:
75:
73:
68:
60:
58:
55:
53:
49:
45:
41:
37:
33:
19:
1231:
1212:
993:
519:Criminal law
500:Powers under
282:
248:expanding it
237:
212:
207:
196:
186:
181:
142:
127:Scotland Act
118:
112:
81:
79:
70:
56:
51:
31:
29:
1138:Living tree
1133:Paramountcy
951:Conventions
605:, 1867–1982
491:Section 125
486:Section 121
191:, para. 30.
1249:Categories
648:Patriation
535:Section 92
502:Section 91
174:References
168:Obrogation
163:Derogation
132:See also:
1255:Law stubs
542:Licensing
158:Desuetude
123:Lord Hope
90:" case),
1233:Category
696:Preamble
481:Preamble
152:See also
106:and the
189:UKSC 24
36:concept
402:(1839)
396:(1838)
216:,
143:Under
61:Canada
46:or an
238:This
34:is a
781:16.1
244:stub
240:law
38:in
1251::
924:59
919:52
903:36
887:35
871:34
866:33
861:32
856:31
851:30
846:29
841:28
836:27
831:26
826:25
821:24
816:23
811:22
806:21
801:20
796:19
791:18
786:17
776:16
771:15
766:14
761:13
756:12
751:11
746:10
121:,
117:,
741:9
736:8
731:7
726:6
721:5
716:4
711:3
706:2
701:1
309:e
302:t
295:v
275:e
268:t
261:v
250:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
