209: (Supreme Court of California Nov 24, 1937) ("The presumption is against repeals by implication, especially where the prior act has been generally understood and acted upon. To overcome the presumption the two acts must be irreconcilable, clearly repugnant, and so inconsistent that the two cannot have concurrent operation. The courts are bound, if possible, to maintain the integrity of both statutes if the two may stand together. Where a modification will suffice, a repeal will not be presumed.").
1205:
221:
1217:
60:
In
Canadian law, it is possible for a law to be protected from implied repeal by way of a "primacy clause" which states that the act in question supersedes all other statutes until it is specifically repealed. Acts with such primacy clauses are called quasi-constitutional.
136:
law, "implied repeal" is a disfavored doctrine. That is, if a court can reconcile the two statutes with any reasonable interpretation, that interpretation is preferred to one that treats the earlier statute as invalidated by the later one.
39:(or of some other legislature) conflicts with an earlier one, the later Act takes precedence and the conflicting parts of the earlier Act become legally inoperable. This doctrine is expressed in the Latin phrase
189:
769:
912:
859:
854:
849:
844:
839:
834:
829:
824:
819:
814:
809:
804:
799:
794:
789:
784:
779:
774:
764:
759:
754:
749:
744:
739:
734:
1071:
729:
724:
719:
714:
709:
704:
699:
694:
689:
684:
296:
907:
939:
550:
545:
540:
535:
530:
512:
507:
502:
382:
479:
474:
316:
875:
321:
1253:
676:
122:
960:
469:
987:
1101:
289:
1184:
111:
103:
1248:
891:
262:
88:
84:
87:
hold a higher status in UK law and are not subject to the doctrine of implied repeal. The case specifically dealt with s.2(2) of the
955:
497:
71:
555:
341:
1221:
1040:
362:
282:
118:
can only be expressly repealed; it cannot be impliedly repealed; that is because of its 'fundamental constitutional nature'."
190:
Adam Perry and Farrah Ahmed: Are
Constitutional Statutes 'Quasi-Entrenched'? Blog of the UK Constitutional Law Association
92:
1136:
950:
357:
1090:
612:
647:
591:
367:
1009:
992:
441:
446:
424:
1174:
1116:
1004:
429:
377:
326:
55:
1179:
1131:
965:
667:
456:
413:
305:
255:
99:
are "constitutional statutes" and in his opinion may not be subject to the doctrine of implied repeal.
96:
28:
206:
1126:
1121:
1061:
1066:
464:
46:
Implied repeal is to be contrasted with the express repeal of legislation by the legislative body.
1243:
1146:
1141:
1106:
975:
597:
434:
352:
1056:
1019:
394:
248:
115:
80:
32:
232:
970:
652:
617:
607:
1051:
997:
36:
76:
1237:
1209:
1111:
1014:
388:
133:
174:
220:
602:
657:
636:
372:
156:
151:
146:
274:
24:
91:, but in his judgment Lord Justice Laws also held the view that the
1163:
1088:
1038:
937:
634:
580:
411:
339:
278:
228:
582:
Amendments and other constitutional documents 1867–1982
236:
869:
Part II – Rights of the
Aboriginal peoples of Canada
900:
884:
868:
675:
666:
521:
488:
455:
885:Part III – Equalization and regional disparities
677:Part I – Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
389:Report on the Affairs of British North America
290:
256:
102:A decade later in 2012, in a case before the
41:leges posteriores priores contrarias abrogant
8:
383:Declaration of Independence of Lower Canada
1160:
1085:
1035:
934:
672:
663:
631:
577:
485:
452:
408:
342:Pre-Confederation constitutional documents
336:
297:
283:
275:
263:
249:
658:Kitchen Accord/Night of the Long Knives
551:Fines and penalties for provincial laws
167:
123:In re Jim Allister and others (EU Exit)
988:Individual ministerial responsibility
202:Penziner v. West American Finance Co.
85:constitutionally significant statutes
7:
556:Matters of a local or private nature
217:
215:
1185:Constitution Act (British Columbia)
43:or "lex posterior derogat priori".
1165:Provincial constitutions of Canada
1091:Interpretation of the Constitution
235:. You can help Knowledge (XXG) by
14:
956:Cabinet collective responsibility
498:Peace, order, and good government
176:BH v The Lord Advocate (Scotland)
108:BH v The Lord Advocate (Scotland)
72:Thoburn v Sunderland City Council
1216:
1215:
1203:
317:List of constitutional documents
219:
16:Concept in constitutional theory
1254:Legal doctrines and principles
425:Charlottetown Conference, 1864
322:Amendments to the Constitution
1:
1072:Other unsuccessful amendments
1137:Interjurisdictional immunity
961:Disallowance and reservation
613:Statute of Westminster, 1931
104:United Kingdom Supreme Court
513:Matters excepted from s. 92
31:which states that where an
1270:
1102:Indigenous self-government
592:British North America Acts
378:Constitutional Act of 1791
368:Royal Proclamation of 1763
363:Constitution of New France
214:
120:
53:
1249:English legal terminology
1197:
1170:
1159:
1097:
1084:
1047:
1034:
1010:Parliamentary sovereignty
951:At His Majesty's pleasure
946:
933:
643:
630:
587:
576:
546:Administration of justice
541:Property and civil rights
420:
407:
348:
335:
312:
69:In the 2002 English case
447:Fathers of Confederation
327:Quasi-constitutional law
89:European Communities Act
1175:Constitution of Alberta
1117:Equal authenticity rule
1005:Parliamentary privilege
442:London Conference, 1866
430:Quebec Conference, 1864
56:Quasi-constitutionality
1180:Constitution of Quebec
1132:Implied Bill of Rights
966:Responsible government
668:Constitution Act, 1982
648:Fulton–Favreau formula
618:Newfoundland Act, 1949
608:Saskatchewan Act, 1905
536:Works and undertakings
457:Constitution Act, 1867
306:Constitution of Canada
231:-related article is a
207:10 Cal. 2d 160
1041:Constitutional debate
353:Iroquois constitution
54:Further information:
29:constitutional theory
1062:Charlottetown Accord
358:Mi'kmaq constitution
1067:Calgary Declaration
465:Canadian federalism
1147:Dialogue principle
1107:Pith and substance
976:King-in-Parliament
901:Part VII – General
598:Manitoba Act, 1870
503:Trade and commerce
435:Quebec Resolutions
373:Quebec Act of 1774
1231:
1230:
1210:Canada portal
1193:
1192:
1155:
1154:
1080:
1079:
1057:Meech Lake Accord
1030:
1029:
1020:Royal prerogative
929:
928:
925:
924:
921:
920:
626:
625:
603:Alberta Act, 1905
572:
571:
568:
567:
564:
563:
403:
402:
395:Act of Union 1840
244:
243:
81:Lord Justice Laws
33:Act of Parliament
1261:
1219:
1218:
1208:
1207:
1206:
1161:
1142:Purposive theory
1086:
1036:
971:Fusion of powers
935:
673:
664:
653:Victoria Charter
632:
578:
486:
453:
409:
337:
299:
292:
285:
276:
265:
258:
251:
223:
216:
210:
204:
198:
192:
187:
181:
172:
97:Human Rights Act
75:(the so-called "
19:The doctrine of
1269:
1268:
1264:
1263:
1262:
1260:
1259:
1258:
1234:
1233:
1232:
1227:
1204:
1202:
1189:
1166:
1151:
1093:
1076:
1052:Triple-E Senate
1043:
1026:
998:Question Period
942:
917:
896:
880:
864:
662:
639:
622:
583:
560:
523:
517:
490:
484:
451:
416:
399:
344:
331:
308:
303:
272:
270:
269:
213:
200:
199:
195:
188:
184:
173:
169:
165:
143:
130:
125:
114:held that "the
93:Parliament Acts
83:held that some
67:
58:
52:
37:Act of Congress
17:
12:
11:
5:
1267:
1265:
1257:
1256:
1251:
1246:
1236:
1235:
1229:
1228:
1226:
1225:
1213:
1198:
1195:
1194:
1191:
1190:
1188:
1187:
1182:
1177:
1171:
1168:
1167:
1164:
1157:
1156:
1153:
1152:
1150:
1149:
1144:
1139:
1134:
1129:
1124:
1119:
1114:
1109:
1104:
1098:
1095:
1094:
1089:
1082:
1081:
1078:
1077:
1075:
1074:
1069:
1064:
1059:
1054:
1048:
1045:
1044:
1039:
1032:
1031:
1028:
1027:
1025:
1024:
1023:
1022:
1012:
1007:
1002:
1001:
1000:
993:Interpellation
990:
985:
983:Implied repeal
980:
979:
978:
968:
963:
958:
953:
947:
944:
943:
938:
931:
930:
927:
926:
923:
922:
919:
918:
916:
915:
910:
904:
902:
898:
897:
895:
894:
888:
886:
882:
881:
879:
878:
872:
870:
866:
865:
863:
862:
857:
852:
847:
842:
837:
832:
827:
822:
817:
812:
807:
802:
797:
792:
787:
782:
777:
772:
767:
762:
757:
752:
747:
742:
737:
732:
727:
722:
717:
712:
707:
702:
697:
692:
687:
681:
679:
670:
661:
660:
655:
650:
644:
641:
640:
635:
628:
627:
624:
623:
621:
620:
615:
610:
605:
600:
595:
588:
585:
584:
581:
574:
573:
570:
569:
566:
565:
562:
561:
559:
558:
553:
548:
543:
538:
533:
527:
525:
519:
518:
516:
515:
510:
505:
500:
494:
492:
483:
482:
477:
472:
467:
461:
459:
450:
449:
444:
439:
438:
437:
427:
421:
418:
417:
412:
405:
404:
401:
400:
398:
397:
392:
386:
380:
375:
370:
365:
360:
355:
349:
346:
345:
340:
333:
332:
330:
329:
324:
319:
313:
310:
309:
304:
302:
301:
294:
287:
279:
268:
267:
260:
253:
245:
242:
241:
224:
212:
211:
193:
182:
166:
164:
161:
160:
159:
154:
149:
142:
139:
129:
126:
77:Metric Martyrs
66:
65:United Kingdom
63:
51:
48:
21:implied repeal
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1266:
1255:
1252:
1250:
1247:
1245:
1242:
1241:
1239:
1224:
1223:
1214:
1212:
1211:
1200:
1199:
1196:
1186:
1183:
1181:
1178:
1176:
1173:
1172:
1169:
1162:
1158:
1148:
1145:
1143:
1140:
1138:
1135:
1133:
1130:
1128:
1125:
1123:
1120:
1118:
1115:
1113:
1112:Double aspect
1110:
1108:
1105:
1103:
1100:
1099:
1096:
1092:
1087:
1083:
1073:
1070:
1068:
1065:
1063:
1060:
1058:
1055:
1053:
1050:
1049:
1046:
1042:
1037:
1033:
1021:
1018:
1017:
1016:
1015:Reserve power
1013:
1011:
1008:
1006:
1003:
999:
996:
995:
994:
991:
989:
986:
984:
981:
977:
974:
973:
972:
969:
967:
964:
962:
959:
957:
954:
952:
949:
948:
945:
941:
936:
932:
914:
911:
909:
906:
905:
903:
899:
893:
890:
889:
887:
883:
877:
874:
873:
871:
867:
861:
858:
856:
853:
851:
848:
846:
843:
841:
838:
836:
833:
831:
828:
826:
823:
821:
818:
816:
813:
811:
808:
806:
803:
801:
798:
796:
793:
791:
788:
786:
783:
781:
778:
776:
773:
771:
768:
766:
763:
761:
758:
756:
753:
751:
748:
746:
743:
741:
738:
736:
733:
731:
728:
726:
723:
721:
718:
716:
713:
711:
708:
706:
703:
701:
698:
696:
693:
691:
688:
686:
683:
682:
680:
678:
674:
671:
669:
665:
659:
656:
654:
651:
649:
646:
645:
642:
638:
633:
629:
619:
616:
614:
611:
609:
606:
604:
601:
599:
596:
593:
590:
589:
586:
579:
575:
557:
554:
552:
549:
547:
544:
542:
539:
537:
534:
532:
529:
528:
526:
522:Powers under
520:
514:
511:
509:
506:
504:
501:
499:
496:
495:
493:
487:
481:
478:
476:
473:
471:
468:
466:
463:
462:
460:
458:
454:
448:
445:
443:
440:
436:
433:
432:
431:
428:
426:
423:
422:
419:
415:
414:Confederation
410:
406:
396:
393:
390:
387:
384:
381:
379:
376:
374:
371:
369:
366:
364:
361:
359:
356:
354:
351:
350:
347:
343:
338:
334:
328:
325:
323:
320:
318:
315:
314:
311:
307:
300:
295:
293:
288:
286:
281:
280:
277:
273:
266:
261:
259:
254:
252:
247:
246:
240:
238:
234:
230:
225:
222:
218:
208:
203:
197:
194:
191:
186:
183:
179:
177:
171:
168:
162:
158:
155:
153:
150:
148:
145:
144:
140:
138:
135:
134:United States
128:United States
127:
124:
119:
117:
113:
109:
105:
100:
98:
94:
90:
86:
82:
78:
74:
73:
64:
62:
57:
49:
47:
44:
42:
38:
34:
30:
26:
22:
1220:
1201:
982:
508:Criminal law
489:Powers under
271:
237:expanding it
226:
201:
196:
185:
175:
170:
131:
116:Scotland Act
107:
101:
70:
68:
59:
45:
40:
20:
18:
1127:Living tree
1122:Paramountcy
940:Conventions
594:, 1867–1982
480:Section 125
475:Section 121
180:, para. 30.
1238:Categories
637:Patriation
524:Section 92
491:Section 91
163:References
157:Obrogation
152:Derogation
121:See also:
1244:Law stubs
531:Licensing
147:Desuetude
112:Lord Hope
79:" case),
1222:Category
685:Preamble
470:Preamble
141:See also
95:and the
178:UKSC 24
25:concept
391:(1839)
385:(1838)
205:,
132:Under
50:Canada
35:or an
227:This
23:is a
770:16.1
233:stub
229:law
27:in
1240::
913:59
908:52
892:36
876:35
860:34
855:33
850:32
845:31
840:30
835:29
830:28
825:27
820:26
815:25
810:24
805:23
800:22
795:21
790:20
785:19
780:18
775:17
765:16
760:15
755:14
750:13
745:12
740:11
735:10
110:,
106:,
730:9
725:8
720:7
715:6
710:5
705:4
700:3
695:2
690:1
298:e
291:t
284:v
264:e
257:t
250:v
239:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
