Knowledge (XXG)

Re Saul D Harrison & Sons plc

Source 📝

89:. The petitioner had "class C" shares, which gave her rights to dividends and capital distribution in a liquidation. But she had no entitlement to vote, and the company had been running at a loss. She alleged that the directors (who were her cousins) had unfairly kept running the business just so they could pay themselves cushy salaries. Instead, she said, they should have closed down the business and distributed the assets to the shareholders. 218: 97:
On the facts, there was no unfairly prejudicial conduct. The board of directors were bound to manage the company in accordance with their fiduciary obligations, the articles of association and the Companies Act. The unfair prejudice action does protect certain legitimate expectations, akin to those
80:
Saul D Harrison & Sons plc ran a business that was established in 1891 by the petitioner's great grandfather. It made industrial cleaning and wiping cloths, made from waste textiles. It operated from
98:
which may affect one's conscience in equity, from being disappointed. But here there was no legitimate expectation for more than the duties discharged, and so no obligations had been breached.
411: 406: 401: 139: 252: 49: 162: 303: 167: 237: 247: 262: 232: 278: 242: 207: 132: 86: 333: 283: 187: 52:
and deals with the concept of members of a business having their "legitimate expectations" disappointed.
17: 372: 192: 177: 172: 125: 323: 257: 65: 45: 41: 197: 328: 313: 298: 182: 37: 338: 202: 69: 107: 33: 395: 308: 348: 318: 217: 358: 353: 148: 61: 57: 379: 343: 53: 293: 288: 82: 121: 117: 271: 225: 155: 56:at first instance had denied the petition, and 133: 8: 140: 126: 118: 412:Court of Appeal (England and Wales) cases 18:In re Saul D. Harrison & Sons Plc. 7: 25: 29:Re Saul D Harrison & Sons plc 216: 407:1995 in United Kingdom case law 402:United Kingdom company case law 1: 263:Courts of England and Wales 428: 32:1 BCLC 14, BCC 475, is a 367: 214: 48:). It was decided in the 304:British Virgin Islands 36:case on an action for 72:upheld the judgment. 85:and after 1989 from 168:Administrative law 46:Companies Act 2006 42:Companies Act 1985 389: 388: 16:(Redirected from 419: 284:Northern Ireland 226:Further subjects 220: 142: 135: 128: 119: 38:unfair prejudice 21: 427: 426: 422: 421: 420: 418: 417: 416: 392: 391: 390: 385: 363: 339:Anglo-Saxon law 272:Related systems 267: 253:Civil procedure 238:Competition law 221: 212: 203:Retained EU law 163:UK Constitution 151: 146: 116: 104: 95: 78: 70:Court of Appeal 50:Court of Appeal 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 425: 423: 415: 414: 409: 404: 394: 393: 387: 386: 384: 383: 376: 368: 365: 364: 362: 361: 356: 351: 346: 341: 336: 331: 326: 321: 316: 311: 306: 301: 296: 291: 286: 281: 275: 273: 269: 268: 266: 265: 260: 255: 250: 248:Commercial law 245: 240: 235: 229: 227: 223: 222: 215: 213: 211: 210: 205: 200: 195: 190: 185: 180: 175: 170: 165: 159: 157: 153: 152: 147: 145: 144: 137: 130: 122: 115: 112: 111: 110: 108:UK company law 103: 100: 94: 91: 77: 74: 34:UK company law 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 424: 413: 410: 408: 405: 403: 400: 399: 397: 382: 381: 377: 375: 374: 370: 369: 366: 360: 357: 355: 352: 350: 347: 345: 342: 340: 337: 335: 334:United States 332: 330: 327: 325: 322: 320: 317: 315: 312: 310: 307: 305: 302: 300: 297: 295: 292: 290: 287: 285: 282: 280: 277: 276: 274: 270: 264: 261: 259: 256: 254: 251: 249: 246: 244: 241: 239: 236: 234: 231: 230: 228: 224: 219: 209: 206: 204: 201: 199: 196: 194: 191: 189: 186: 184: 181: 179: 176: 174: 171: 169: 166: 164: 161: 160: 158: 156:Core subjects 154: 150: 143: 138: 136: 131: 129: 124: 123: 120: 113: 109: 106: 105: 101: 99: 92: 90: 88: 84: 75: 73: 71: 67: 63: 59: 55: 51: 47: 43: 39: 35: 31: 30: 19: 378: 371: 193:Property law 178:Contract law 173:Criminal law 96: 79: 40:under s.459 28: 27: 26: 359:Hue and cry 354:Bloody Code 324:New Zealand 233:Company law 149:English law 58:Hoffmann LJ 44:(now s.994 396:Categories 344:Common law 258:Family law 243:Labour law 54:Vinelott J 329:Singapore 314:Hong Kong 299:Australia 198:Trust law 373:Category 289:Scotland 208:Case law 183:Tort law 102:See also 93:Judgment 83:West Ham 66:Waite LJ 62:Neill LJ 279:UK-wide 188:Privacy 87:Hackney 68:in the 380:Portal 349:Equity 309:Canada 319:India 294:Wales 114:Notes 76:Facts 64:and 398:: 60:, 141:e 134:t 127:v 20:)

Index

In re Saul D. Harrison & Sons Plc.
UK company law
unfair prejudice
Companies Act 1985
Companies Act 2006
Court of Appeal
Vinelott J
Hoffmann LJ
Neill LJ
Waite LJ
Court of Appeal
West Ham
Hackney
UK company law
v
t
e
English law
UK Constitution
Administrative law
Criminal law
Contract law
Tort law
Privacy
Property law
Trust law
Retained EU law
Case law

Company law

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.