Knowledge (XXG)

Synonym (taxonomy)

Source 📝

338:
next available junior synonym must be used for the taxon. For other purposes, if a researcher is interested in consulting or compiling all currently known information regarding a taxon, some of this (including species descriptions, distribution, ecology and more) may well have been published under names now regarded as outdated (i.e., synonyms) and so it is again useful to know a list of historic synonyms which may have been used for a given current (valid) taxon name.
240:
change may be due to purely nomenclatural reasons, that is, based on the rules of nomenclature; as for example when an older name is (re)discovered which has priority over the current name. Speaking in general, name changes for nomenclatural reasons have become less frequent over time as the rules of nomenclature allow for names to be conserved, so as to promote stability of scientific names.
36: 176:). A synonym cannot exist in isolation: it is always an alternative to a different scientific name. Given that the correct name of a taxon depends on the taxonomic viewpoint used (resulting in a particular circumscription, position and rank) a name that is one taxonomist's synonym may be another taxonomist's correct name (and 729:. Thus, it could be said that Verbenaceae pro parte is a synonym of Acanthaceae, and Verbenaceae pro parte is also a synonym of Lamiaceae. However, this terminology is rarely used because it is clearer to reserve the term "pro parte" for situations that divide a taxon that includes the type from one that does not. 126:
In zoology, moving a species from one genus to another results in a different binomen, but the name is considered an alternative combination rather than a synonym. The concept of synonymy in zoology is reserved for two names at the same rank that refers to a taxon at that rank – for example, the name
614:
In botany, although a synonym must be a formally accepted scientific name (a validly published name): a listing of "synonyms", a "synonymy", often contains designations that for some reason did not make it as a formal name, such as manuscript names, or even misidentifications (although it is now the
424:
At the species level, subjective synonyms are common because of an unexpectedly large range of variation in a species, or simple ignorance about an earlier description, may lead a biologist to describe a newly discovered specimen as a new species. A common reason for objective synonyms at this level
219:
defines the term as "a taxonomic name which has the same application as another, especially one which has been superseded and is no longer valid". In handbooks and general texts, it is useful to have synonyms mentioned as such after the current scientific name, so as to avoid confusion. For example,
183:
Synonyms may arise whenever the same taxon is described and named more than once, independently. They may also arise when existing taxa are changed, as when two taxa are joined to become one, a species is moved to a different genus, a variety is moved to a different species, etc. Synonyms also come
337:
and therefore, unless other restrictions interfere, must be used for the taxon. However, junior synonyms are still important to document, because if the earliest name cannot be used (for example, because the same spelling had previously been used for a name established for another taxon), then the
214:
To the general user of scientific names, in fields such as agriculture, horticulture, ecology, general science, etc., a synonym is a name that was previously used as the correct scientific name (in handbooks and similar sources) but which has been displaced by another scientific name, which is now
239:
Changes of scientific name have two causes: they may be taxonomic or nomenclatural. A name change may be caused by changes in the circumscription, position or rank of a taxon, representing a change in taxonomic, scientific insight (as would be the case for the fruit fly, mentioned above). A name
390:
Objective synonyms are common at the rank of genera, because for various reasons two genera may contain the same type species; these are objective synonyms. In many cases researchers established new generic names because they thought this was necessary or did not know that others had previously
637:
If the name of a species changes solely on account of its allocation to a new genus ("new combinations"), in botany this is regarded as creating a synonym in the case of the original or previous combination but not in zoology (where the fundamental nomenclatural unit is regarded as the species
363:, there is no such shared type, so the synonymy is open to taxonomic judgement, meaning that there is room for debate: one researcher might consider the two (or more) types to refer to one and the same taxon, another might consider them to belong to different taxa. For example, 623:
Although the basic principles are fairly similar, the treatment of synonyms in botanical nomenclature differs in detail and terminology from zoological nomenclature, where the correct name is included among synonyms, although as first among equals it is the "senior synonym":
527:
of the taxon as considered in the particular botanical publication. It is always "a synonym of the correct scientific name", but which name is correct depends on the taxonomic opinion of the author. In botany the various kinds of synonyms are:
441:. This rule exists primarily to prevent the confusion that would result if a well-known name, with a large accompanying body of literature, were to be replaced by a completely unfamiliar name. An example is the European land snail 605:
into many, quite restricted species. The name of each such species has its own type. When the common dandelion is regarded as including all those small species, the names of all those species are heterotypic synonyms of
1132:
McNeill, J.; Barrie, F.R.; Buck, W.R.; Demoulin, V.; Greuter, W.; Hawksworth, D.L.; Herendeen, P.S.; Knapp, S.; Marhold, K.; Prado, J.; Prud'homme Van Reine, W.F.; Smith, G.F.; Wiersema, J.H.; Turland, N.J. (2012),
638:
epithet, not the binomen, and this has generally not changed). Nevertheless, in popular usage, previous or alternative/non current combinations are frequently listed as synonyms in zoology as well as in botany.
428:
A junior synonym can be given precedence over a senior synonym, primarily when the senior name has not been used since 1899, and the junior name is in common use. The older name may be declared to be a
467: 501:
To qualify as a synonym in zoology, a name must be properly published in accordance with the rules. Manuscript names and names that were mentioned without any description (
168:
a synonym is not interchangeable with the name of which it is a synonym. In taxonomy, synonyms are not equals, but have a different status. For any taxon with a particular
1136:
International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (Melbourne Code) adopted by the Eighteenth International Botanical Congress Melbourne, Australia, July 2011
970: 172:, position, and rank, only one scientific name is considered to be the correct one at any given time (this correct name is to be determined by applying the relevant 276:
names published for it, while the same is applicable at higher ranks such as genera, families, orders, etc. In each case, the earliest published name is called the
232:)". Synonyms used in this way may not always meet the strict definitions of the term "synonym" in the formal rules of nomenclature which govern scientific names 285: 260: 945:
Falkner, G., Ripken, T. E. J. & Falkner, M. 2002. Mollusques continentaux de France. Liste de référence annotée et bibliographie. – pp. , 1–350, . Paris.
348:
and same rank (more or less the same taxon, although circumscription may vary, even widely). This may be species-group taxa of the same rank with the same
1043: 674:(or "for part") synonyms. These are caused by splits and circumscriptional changes. They are usually indicated by the abbreviation "p.p." For example: 579:. A homotypic synonym need not share an epithet or name with the correct name; what matters is that it shares the type. For example, the name 1144: 1117: 1084: 113:
was the first to give a scientific name (under the currently used system of scientific nomenclature) to the Norway spruce, which he called
924:
p. 43 in Beck, H. 1837. Index molluscorum præsentis ævi musei principis augustissimi Christiani Frederici. – pp. 1–100 , 101–124 . Hafniæ.
448: 76: 1183: 1134: 284:. In the case where two names for the same taxon have been published simultaneously, the valid name is selected accorded to the 1173: 395:
Beck, 1837, which was established for a group of terrestrial snails containing as its type species the Burgundy or Roman snail
814: 987: 375:, based on a pair of horns. However, it is now commonly accepted that his specimen was an unusual individual of the species 744: 647:
Scientific papers may include lists of taxa, synonymizing existing taxa and (in some cases) listing references to them.
312:
becoming the junior synonym. (Incidentally, this species has since been reclassified and currently resides in the genus
1178: 54: 708: 520: 474:. The two are related, with only one word difference between their names.) For example, the scientific name of the 470:(ICZN) approves an application. (Here the C in ICZN stands for Commission, not Code as it does at the beginning of 169: 466:
Such a reversal of precedence is also possible if the senior synonym was established after 1900, but only if the
356:
or if their type species are themselves objective synonyms, of family-group taxa with the same type genus, etc.
1093:
Dubois, A. (2000), "Synonymies and related lists in zoology: general proposals, with examples in herpetology",
455:
Draparnaud, 1801 referred to the same species, but this name had never been used after 1899 and was fixed as a
1012: 978: 326: 221: 58: 757: 516: 46: 598: 475: 184:
about when the codes of nomenclature change, so that older names are no longer acceptable; for example,
102: 867: 650:
The status of a synonym may be indicated by symbols, as for instance in a system proposed for use in
602: 249: 631:
The homotypic or nomenclatural synonyms in botany are equivalent to "objective synonyms" in zoology.
610:
F.H.Wigg. Reducing a taxon to a heterotypic synonym is termed "to sink in synonymy" or "as synonym".
634:
The heterotypic or taxonomic synonyms in botany are equivalent to "subjective synonyms" in zoology.
1035: 684: 173: 165: 559:
is taken to be the correct genus for this species (there is almost complete consensus on that),
89:
The Botanical and Zoological Codes of nomenclature treat the concept of synonymy differently.
1140: 1113: 1080: 679: 443: 273: 1073: 1027: 862: 364: 844: 670:
The traditional concept of synonymy is often expanded in taxonomic literature to include
597:, or taxonomic, synonyms (sometimes indicated by =) have different types. Some botanists 1107: 658:
before the year would indicate that the authors have inspected the original material; a
117:. This name is no longer in use, so it is now a synonym of the current scientific name, 749: 544: 540: 524: 349: 345: 330: 265: 194: 1150: 715:"are much reduced compared to a decade or so ago, and many genera have been placed in 1167: 853: 692:
Stokes (1787) pro parte as a synonym, but explicitly excluded the type (specimen) of
437: 431: 397: 334: 297: 189: 110: 220:
if the much-advertised name change should go through and the scientific name of the
822: 651: 482:
was published by Buren in 1972, who did not know that this species was first named
353: 314: 199: 94: 391:
established another genus for the same group of species. An example is the genus
228:, it would be very helpful if any mention of this name was accompanied by "(syn. 726: 712: 503: 119: 536: 380: 255: 17: 141:, being names for different seasonal forms of the species now referred to as 739: 721: 716: 486:
by Santschi in 1916; as there were thousands of publications using the name
372: 301: 662:
that they take on the responsibility for the act of synonymizing the taxa.
272:. For example, a particular species could, over time, have had two or more 300:
in the same work at the same date for the taxon now determined to be the
1039: 161: 1112:(4th ed.), The International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature, 490:
before anyone discovered the synonymy, the ICZN, in 2001, ruled that
1031: 628:
Synonyms in botany are equivalent to "junior synonyms" in zoology.
269: 106: 413:
was an objective synonym (and useless). On the same occasion,
29: 1139:, vol. Regnum Vegetabile 154, A.R.G. Gantner Verlag KG, 507:) are not considered as synonyms in zoological nomenclature. 109:
that (now) goes by a different scientific name. For example,
1106:
International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature (1999),
725:, which was once included in Verbenaceae has been moved to 333:) name, the senior synonym, by default takes precedence in 615:
usual practice to list misidentifications separately).
567:. However, if the species were considered to belong to 451:, 1805). In 2002, researchers found that an older name 156:
in the taxonomic sense employed by the Zoological code.
711:'s summary of plant classification states that family 571:(now unlikely) the relationship would be reversed and 264:, synonyms are different scientific names of the same 535:, or nomenclatural, synonyms (sometimes indicated by 468:
International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature
329:is that the earliest correctly published (and thus 1072: 868:10.2305/IUCN.UK.2021-3.RLTS.T22689055A205475036.en 519:, a synonym is a name that is not correct for the 352:, genus-group taxa of the same rank with the same 583:for a species of dandelion has the same type as 383:in 1815. Ord's name thus takes precedence, with 971:"Notes on open nomenclature and synonymy lists" 1013:"The concept of "potential taxa" in databases" 1109:International Code of Zoological Nomenclature 261:International Code of Zoological Nomenclature 8: 421:, but it is older and so it has precedence. 57:. There might be a discussion about this on 27:Scientific name that also applies to a taxon 405:was already the type species for the genus 308:has been selected as the valid name, with 866: 77:Learn how and when to remove this message 587:L. The latter is a homotypic synonym of 769: 425:is the creation of a replacement name. 619:Comparison between zoology and botany 288:such that, for example, of the names 7: 936:, Art. 23.9 "reversal of precedence" 654:by Rudolf Richter. In that system a 575:would become a homotypic synonym of 1075:Taxonomy: A text and reference book 854:IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 387:being a junior subjective synonym. 325:One basic principle of zoological 25: 781:, "Glossary", entry for "synonym" 435:, and the junior name declared a 34: 1049:from the original on 2016-09-10 843:BirdLife International (2021). 494:would be given precedence over 286:principle of the first reviser 280:, while the later name is the 258:nomenclature, codified in the 148:, the map butterfly. However, 1: 745:Glossary of scientific naming 484:Solenopsis saevissima wagneri 471: 344:refer to taxa with the same 459:under this rule by Falkner 1200: 1071:Blackwelder, R.A. (1967), 1011:Berendsohn, W. G. (1995), 819:Oxford Dictionaries Online 709:Angiosperm Phylogeny Group 563:is a homotypic synonym of 409:Linnaeus, 1758, the genus 296:(Aves), both published by 268:that pertain to that same 247: 217:Oxford Dictionaries Online 215:regarded as correct. Thus 986:: 713–719, archived from 861:: e.T22689055A205475036. 371:in 1855 for a species of 206:and is thus its synonym. 969:Matthews, S. C. (1973), 954: 799: 776: 551:L. has the same type as 543:(specimen) and the same 1184:Zoological nomenclature 230:Drosophila melanogaster 226:Sophophora melanogaster 134:is a junior synonym of 1174:Botanical nomenclature 758:Superseded combination 754: – a case history 517:botanical nomenclature 164:in other contexts, in 95:botanical nomenclature 696:from the new species 476:red imported fire ant 417:is also a synonym of 385:Antilocapra anteflexa 377:Antilocapra americana 369:Antilocapra anteflexa 248:Further information: 959:, Recommendation 50D 608:Taraxacum officinale 589:Taraxacum officinale 581:Taraxacum officinale 547:. The Linnaean name 250:Valid name (zoology) 174:code of nomenclature 152:is not a synonym of 47:confusing or unclear 1079:, New York: Wiley, 585:Leontodon taraxacum 555:(L.) H.Karst. When 367:published the name 361:subjective synonyms 55:clarify the article 1179:Taxonomy (biology) 685:Galium tricornutum 480:Solenopsis invicta 342:Objective synonyms 105:that applies to a 1146:978-3-87429-425-6 1119:978-0-85301-006-7 1086:978-0-471-07800-5 444:Petasina edentula 205: 192: 147: 140: 133: 87: 86: 79: 16:(Redirected from 1191: 1160: 1159: 1158: 1149:, archived from 1128: 1127: 1126: 1102: 1089: 1078: 1058: 1057: 1055: 1054: 1048: 1017: 1008: 1002: 1001: 999: 998: 992: 975: 966: 960: 952: 946: 943: 937: 931: 925: 922: 916: 910: 904: 898: 892: 886: 880: 879: 877: 875: 870: 840: 834: 833: 831: 830: 821:. Archived from 811: 805: 797: 791: 788: 782: 774: 661: 657: 603:common dandelion 539:) have the same 523:, position, and 365:John Edward Gray 224:were changed to 203: 188: 150:Araschnia levana 146:(Linnaeus, 1758) 145: 143:Araschnia levana 138: 131: 82: 75: 71: 68: 62: 38: 37: 30: 21: 1199: 1198: 1194: 1193: 1192: 1190: 1189: 1188: 1164: 1163: 1156: 1154: 1147: 1131: 1124: 1122: 1120: 1105: 1092: 1087: 1070: 1067: 1062: 1061: 1052: 1050: 1046: 1032:10.2307/1222443 1015: 1010: 1009: 1005: 996: 994: 990: 973: 968: 967: 963: 953: 949: 944: 940: 932: 928: 923: 919: 911: 907: 899: 895: 887: 883: 873: 871: 847:Bubo scandiacus 842: 841: 837: 828: 826: 825:on June 3, 2011 813: 812: 808: 798: 794: 789: 785: 775: 771: 766: 736: 704:was subdivided. 668: 659: 655: 645: 621: 521:circumscription 513: 438:nomen protectum 359:In the case of 320:Bubo scandiacus 290:Strix scandiaca 252: 246: 212: 170:circumscription 103:scientific name 83: 72: 66: 63: 52: 39: 35: 28: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 1197: 1195: 1187: 1186: 1181: 1176: 1166: 1165: 1162: 1161: 1145: 1129: 1118: 1103: 1090: 1085: 1066: 1063: 1060: 1059: 1026:(2): 207–212, 1003: 961: 947: 938: 926: 917: 905: 893: 881: 835: 806: 792: 783: 768: 767: 765: 762: 761: 760: 755: 751:Ornithocheirus 747: 742: 735: 732: 731: 730: 705: 698:G. tricornutum 667: 664: 644: 641: 640: 639: 635: 632: 629: 620: 617: 612: 611: 592: 545:taxonomic rank 512: 509: 472:§ Zoology 453:Helix depilata 304:, the epithet 282:junior synonym 278:senior synonym 266:taxonomic rank 245: 242: 211: 208: 186:Erica herbacea 158: 157: 154:Papilio levana 139:Linnaeus, 1758 136:Papilio levana 132:Linnaeus, 1758 129:Papilio prorsa 124: 85: 84: 42: 40: 33: 26: 24: 18:Junior synonym 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1196: 1185: 1182: 1180: 1177: 1175: 1172: 1171: 1169: 1153:on 2013-11-04 1152: 1148: 1142: 1138: 1137: 1130: 1121: 1115: 1111: 1110: 1104: 1100: 1096: 1091: 1088: 1082: 1077: 1076: 1069: 1068: 1064: 1045: 1041: 1037: 1033: 1029: 1025: 1021: 1014: 1007: 1004: 993:on 2018-12-31 989: 985: 981: 980: 979:Palaeontology 972: 965: 962: 958: 957: 951: 948: 942: 939: 935: 930: 927: 921: 918: 915:, Art. 61.3.3 914: 909: 906: 903:, Art. 61.3.1 902: 897: 894: 890: 885: 882: 869: 864: 860: 856: 855: 850: 848: 839: 836: 824: 820: 816: 810: 807: 804:, Appendix IV 803: 802: 796: 793: 787: 784: 780: 779: 773: 770: 763: 759: 756: 753: 752: 748: 746: 743: 741: 738: 737: 733: 728: 724: 723: 718: 714: 710: 706: 703: 699: 695: 691: 687: 686: 681: 677: 676: 675: 673: 665: 663: 653: 648: 643:Synonym lists 642: 636: 633: 630: 627: 626: 625: 618: 616: 609: 604: 600: 596: 593: 590: 586: 582: 578: 574: 570: 566: 562: 558: 554: 550: 546: 542: 538: 534: 531: 530: 529: 526: 522: 518: 510: 508: 506: 505: 499: 497: 493: 489: 485: 481: 477: 473: 469: 464: 462: 458: 457:nomen oblitum 454: 450: 446: 445: 440: 439: 434: 433: 432:nomen oblitum 426: 422: 420: 416: 412: 408: 404: 403:Helix pomatia 400: 399: 398:Helix pomatia 394: 388: 386: 382: 379:published by 378: 374: 370: 366: 362: 357: 355: 351: 350:type specimen 347: 343: 339: 336: 335:naming rights 332: 328: 323: 321: 317: 316: 311: 307: 303: 299: 295: 291: 287: 283: 279: 275: 271: 267: 263: 262: 257: 251: 243: 241: 237: 235: 231: 227: 223: 218: 210:General usage 209: 207: 202: 201: 197:in favour of 196: 191: 187: 181: 179: 175: 171: 167: 163: 155: 151: 144: 137: 130: 125: 122: 121: 116: 112: 108: 104: 100: 96: 92: 91: 90: 81: 78: 70: 60: 59:the talk page 56: 50: 48: 43:This article 41: 32: 31: 19: 1155:, retrieved 1151:the original 1135: 1123:, retrieved 1108: 1098: 1094: 1074: 1065:Bibliography 1051:, retrieved 1023: 1019: 1006: 995:, retrieved 988:the original 983: 977: 964: 955: 950: 941: 933: 929: 920: 912: 908: 900: 896: 888: 884: 872:. Retrieved 858: 852: 846: 838: 827:. Retrieved 823:the original 818: 809: 800: 795: 786: 777: 772: 750: 720: 701: 697: 693: 689: 683: 671: 669: 652:paleontology 649: 646: 622: 613: 607: 594: 588: 584: 580: 576: 572: 568: 564: 560: 556: 552: 548: 532: 514: 502: 500: 495: 491: 487: 483: 479: 465: 460: 456: 452: 442: 436: 430: 427: 423: 418: 414: 410: 406: 402: 396: 392: 389: 384: 376: 368: 360: 358: 354:type species 341: 340: 327:nomenclature 324: 319: 313: 309: 305: 294:Strix noctua 293: 289: 281: 277: 274:species-rank 259: 253: 238: 233: 229: 225: 216: 213: 200:Erica carnea 198: 185: 182: 177: 159: 153: 149: 142: 135: 128: 118: 114: 98: 88: 73: 64: 53:Please help 44: 891:, Art. 61.3 727:Acanthaceae 713:Verbenaceae 702:G. tricorne 694:G. tricorne 690:G. tricorne 688:, he cited 666:Other usage 595:Heterotypic 577:Pinus abies 573:Picea abies 565:Picea abies 561:Pinus abies 553:Picea abies 549:Pinus abies 504:nomina nuda 234:(see below) 120:Picea abies 115:Pinus abies 67:August 2020 1168:Categories 1157:2016-12-09 1125:2011-10-21 1101:(2): 33–98 1053:2009-03-21 997:2017-12-03 829:2011-11-28 764:References 682:described 449:Draparnaud 381:George Ord 256:zoological 178:vice versa 49:to readers 1095:Dumerilia 815:"synonym" 790:ICZN Code 740:Chresonym 722:Avicennia 717:Lamiaceae 672:pro parte 591:F.H.Wigg. 533:Homotypic 373:pronghorn 331:available 306:scandiaca 302:snowy owl 222:fruit fly 193:has been 1044:archived 734:See also 298:Linnaeus 244:Zoology 195:rejected 166:taxonomy 162:synonyms 111:Linnaeus 1040:1222443 719:", but 700:. Thus 496:wagneri 492:invicta 488:invicta 419:Pomatia 411:Pomatia 401:—since 393:Pomatia 160:Unlike 99:synonym 45:may be 1143:  1116:  1083:  1038:  874:26 May 511:Botany 463:2002. 461:et al. 310:noctua 1047:(PDF) 1036:JSTOR 1020:Taxon 1016:(PDF) 991:(PDF) 974:(PDF) 680:Dandy 678:When 599:split 569:Pinus 557:Picea 415:Helix 407:Helix 318:, as 270:taxon 107:taxon 101:is a 1141:ISBN 1114:ISBN 1081:ISBN 934:ICZN 913:ICZN 901:ICZN 889:ICZN 876:2024 859:2021 707:The 601:the 541:type 525:rank 346:type 315:Bubo 292:and 97:, a 1028:doi 956:ICN 863:doi 801:ICN 778:ICN 515:In 322:). 254:In 180:). 93:In 1170:: 1097:, 1042:, 1034:, 1024:44 1022:, 1018:, 984:16 982:, 976:, 857:. 851:. 817:. 498:. 478:, 236:. 204:L. 190:L. 1099:4 1056:. 1030:: 1000:. 878:. 865:: 849:" 845:" 832:. 660:. 656:v 537:≡ 447:( 123:. 80:) 74:( 69:) 65:( 61:. 51:. 20:)

Index

Junior synonym
confusing or unclear
clarify the article
the talk page
Learn how and when to remove this message
botanical nomenclature
scientific name
taxon
Linnaeus
Picea abies
synonyms
taxonomy
circumscription
code of nomenclature
L.
rejected
Erica carnea
fruit fly
Valid name (zoology)
zoological
International Code of Zoological Nomenclature
taxonomic rank
taxon
species-rank
principle of the first reviser
Linnaeus
snowy owl
Bubo
nomenclature
available

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.