Knowledge

James M. Symes

Source đź“ť

285:. Perlman's comments on this proposed New England system were dubious at best, as he also testified to the ICC that the Boston and Albany was a "marginal operation that regularly lost money." The Boston and Maine was struggling under its own debt load and itself went bankrupt in 1970. Neither Symes nor Perlman offered an explanation of how one marginally-successful road could be integrated into a bankrupt road and a soon to be bankrupt road and be made to perform. What was clear was that both men, with decades in the railroad industry, viewed the New Haven as outright poison. Symes testified that if inclusion of the New Haven were made a condition of the merger he would recommend to his board that the merger not "go forward." Perlman was even more adamant, stating that "should this railroad, with all its inefficiencies and its liabilities today, be taken over by systems that are still solvent, without first being made to help itself . . . it would be a grave mistake and a burden on interstate commerce and not in the public interest." 253:.) The Central would thus go out of business as a corporate entity, while the corporate existence of the Pennsylvania would continue under a new name. By 1962 the Pennsy and Central boards approved a Penn Central merger where one share of Pennsy stock would be exchanged for one share of the new company's stock, and 1.3 shares of Central stock would be exchanged for one share of the new Penn Central stock. Board representation would be based on shares outstanding in 1961—about 6.5 million for the Central, about 13.2 for the Pennsy—the outstanding shares, resulted in a sixty-forty split on the new board in favor of the Pennsy shareholders. By the end of the year the roads applied to the Interstate Commerce Commission for permission to merge. 261:
nation, with assets of $ 5 billion and nearly 185,000 employees. H. Roger Grant notes that "Symes boasted that the combination could generate savings of $ 100 million annually and perhaps even more." What was not as large were net earnings and return on investment. The Penn Central would be far down the list of U.S. railroads in terms of profitability. In spite of this, Symes declared the merger would "preserve and strengthen these railroads in the public interest and for the national defense, to arrest their physical deterioration of the last fifteen years, and to avert possible bankruptcy that could eventually lead to nationalization."
313:
merger finally went into effect on February 1, 1968, at which time Penn Central was the 10th largest business in the U.S., with more than 100,000 employees, 20,000 route miles of track, and operations in fourteen states and two Canadian provinces. At the end of 1961, the two roads had 120,416 employees, 247,766 freight cars, 7,009 passenger cars and 4,805 locomotives. On the last day of 1968 the Penn Central totals stood at 94,453 employees, 187,362 freight cars, 4,976 passenger cars and 4,404 units; 21% fewer employees; 24% fewer freight cars, 29% fewer passenger cars.
327:
elsewhere. The role of the New Haven remains disputed. Symes stated to Daughen and Binzen that the inclusion of the New Haven was a major factor in the collapse of Penn Central. Symes' hand-picked successor, Stuart T. Saunders, disagreed. In 1970, after two years of losses and major under-performance in freight and passenger rail operations, Penn Central announced in February, 1970 that 1969 rail operations generated a loss of $ 56 million versus $ 5.1 million for the year before. Ominously, income dropped from $ 88 million to $ 4.38 million between 1968 and 1969. As a
22: 339:'s own analysts' negative forecasts for Penn Central led the company to sell more than 134,000 shares on May 22, 1970. Four days later, Chase's Investment Department officially changed its recommendation to "sell". Penn Central was rapidly using up its lines of credit and unable to secure additional funding for operations through private institutions. Saunders approached the federal government for financing via 193:, former vice-president in charge of transportation and maintenance, succeeding Symes as president. Behind the scenes, Ball noted, "The one-time unimagineable, unthinkable scenario of Pennsy and New York Central discussing survival by merging the two properties had begun." Retired Penn Central executive Peter E. Lynch noted in his history of the Penn Central that "A severe 361:
meeting, the Penn Central Transportation Company filed for Chapter 77 bankruptcy protection. The company Jim Symes worked for more than ten years to create lost over a half-million dollars a day by 1970, but the Board of Directors continued paying cash dividends; some subsidiaries would not stop paying dividends until a month after the parent company declared
146:
the largest business concerns in the U.S. It bought and carried miles of steel rails, bought and carried millions of tons of anthracite coal, carried more tonnage and earned more income than almost any other road in the nation. Symes was rapidly promoted through the World War One era and the era of nationalization under the
322:
that time. Adversarial management teams, poorly-planned attempts to diversify away from railroading, failure to adopt a standardized computer system, years of deferred maintenance, federal regulation and federally subsidized competition (the interstate highway system, the St. Lawrence seaway), coupled with
248:
Financial pressures brought Perlman on October 25, 1961 to Symes and they agreed to take up where they had left off twenty-one months before. Agreement on key issues was quickly reached. The Central would sell its twenty percent interest in the Baltimore and Ohio. The Pennsy would divest itself, over
145:
Symes joined the Pennsylvania Railroad as a clerk in 1916. One of the earliest—and largest railroads in the United States—the Pennsylvania began styling itself the "Standard Railroad of the World" the same year James Symes went to work for the company. One of the largest railroads, it was also one of
321:
The merger proved to be one of the largest debacles in corporate history. On January 1, 1969, as part of the Interstate Commerce Commission's conditions to approve the merger, the New Haven was absorbed as well. Within just two years, the Penn Central became the largest bankruptcy in U.S. history to
260:
meant permission to merge would not be granted for an additional two years. Symes, first to testify before the ICC, touted the size of the system resulting from the merger—largest in terms of miles of track—largest in terms of gross revenue. Penn Central would be the tenth largest corporation in the
312:
Concessions by Penn Central management to employees (inclusion of the bankrupt New Haven, reinstatement of laid-off workers, job protection agreements) finally overcame objections from the Johnson administration's Department of Justice, which ended its opposition in November, 1967. The Penn Central
244:
during its Chessie system hearings in 1960 "that he did not oppose the Baltimore and Ohio/Chesapeake and Ohio merger and remained open to merging with the Central." In fact, Joseph Daughen and Peter Binzen write that Symes was a surprise witness at the hearings, asked by the Chessie's management to
360:
on June 12, 1970. The same day Saunders and Perlman submitted their resignations to the Penn Central board. Attempts by the Nixon administration and Penn Central officials on June 20 failed to change Patman's views; no federal funding would be forthcoming. The following day, after a special board
326:
in the heart of the Penn Central's territory, quickly overwhelmed the company. Failure to integrate the computer system alone meant that the company lost waybills, lost freight cars and clogged rail yards. Freight customers, who had the option of switching to sea or truck, took their business
180:
He returned to the Pennsy in 1939 as general manager for the Western Region at Chicago. In the 1940s and early 1950s, Symes was promoted into the top operational positions on the Pennsylvania. These were vice-president at Chicago (1942–46), deputy vice-president for operations at Philadelphia
334:
From spring through summer 1970, Penn Central's financial position with the financial community declined precipitously, the first quarter losses being reported as $ 100 million, compared to $ 220 for the entire twelve months of 1969. The company was $ 2.6 billion in debt. Large investors and
388:
pointed out it had 95,000 employees, 4,877 locomotives, and 162,000 freight cars; it owned one of every ten U.S. rail cars, one in every six locomotives, employed one in every five rail employees. Of its locomotive fleet, 493, or ten percent, were out of service. According to
297:; the board unanimously elected Saunders as Chairman/CEO effective October 1, 1963. As the merger approached, Symes and Saunders found themselves embroiled in political battle for the governorship of the state of Pennsylvania, where Democratic candidate 272:
to New York line, heavily engaged in money-losing long-haul and local passenger operations. Under questioning, both Symes and Perlman rejected the notion of including the New Haven into the Penn Central. Both preferred the New Haven to be merged into a
288:
On October 1, 1963, one day before ICC hearings on the Penn Central merger ended, Symes stepped down as chairman of the Pennsy board (he would remain as chairman of the board's Executive Committee through 1968). In letter full of praise to
165:, from 1927 to 1928. Following this posting, he was appointed superintendent for passenger transportation on the western half of the Pennsy system, again headquartered in Chicago. In 1934 he went to the road's headquarters in 176:
for a four-year period, serving as vice-president, operations and maintenance, for the industrial association of American's largest systems. He worked out of the AAR's headquarters in
382:
reported Penn Central suffered 1783 derailments in the first two months of the year, an increase of 878 percent for the same period in 1975. When Conrail took over on April 1, 1976,
368:
Penn Central struggled on for over five more years as managers and politicians sought solutions to the railroad problems of the Northeast. The political solution turned out to be
249:
time, of its one-third interest in the Norfolk and Western. (Penn Central's financial officer, David C. Bevan, would use the $ 300 million realized from this sale on non-rail
604: 301:
ran on a platform which included dire predictions against the proposed merger. One of Shapp's key charges was that the new company would re-route freight traffic out of
594: 51: 245:
show up and support their merger. Symes went out of his way to say that if the New York Central knocked on the Pennsy's door, "that door would not be closed".
609: 205:
in late 1957 about consolidation . . . . the two roads continued to talk after Young's death until early in 1959, when talks broke off because of Central's
346:, noting the company had reached its borrowing capacity. (Perhaps Penn Central could be financed federally under the Defense Production Act?) When the 340: 265: 599: 492: 473: 446: 395:, among management's first acts was to cut over 2,700 jobs and predict an annual loss of $ 364 million. U.S. Railway Administration Chairman 250: 347: 257: 328: 173: 73: 201:
to lose seventeen percent of their revenue. Symes believed Pennsy and Central to be complementary and approached the Central's
513: 241: 226: 150:
from car tracer, car distributor and statistician, moving from Pennsylvania to the general superintendent's office in
181:(1946–47), vice president, operations (1947–52), executive vice-president (1952–54), and in June, 1954, president. 408: 225:
affiliate." This planning fell apart in 1960 when the Baltimore and Ohio instead decided on consolidation with the
166: 106: 350:
announced it could subsidize Penn Central to the amount of $ 200 million, the parties were blocked by Congressman
147: 126: 34: 546: 354:, Chairman of the House Banking and Currency Committee, and the Senate Commerce Committee. This story broke in 230: 158: 44: 38: 30: 264:
Nearly as difficult for the proposed Penn Central managers was the request to the ICC by the trustees of the
356: 331:
investigation later noted, these reports " confidence in its commercial paper in the financial community."
110: 157:
In 1923, he was appointed freight movement director for the Pennsy's Central Region, with headquarters in
102: 55: 554: 290: 114: 90: 589: 584: 396: 336: 323: 214: 118: 564: 422: 391: 378:
reported that in January 1976, Penn Central had 8,478 route miles under slow orders. In February
294: 234: 210: 194: 190: 137:. On September 27, 1919, he married Fern Elizabeth Dick; they had one daughter, Jeanne Doris. 519: 509: 488: 469: 442: 282: 218: 206: 162: 113:. His later rise to prominence with the Pennsylvania earned him honorary college degrees from 465: 306: 278: 198: 177: 130: 384: 298: 268:, bankrupted in 1961, for inclusion into the new Penn Central. The New Haven, primarily a 222: 202: 151: 134: 122: 109:. He was the son of Frank H. and Clara (Heckert) Symes and graduated from high school in 578: 458: 351: 343: 302: 293:, chairman of board committee searching for Symes' replacement, Symes recommended 503: 374: 274: 399:
claimed Contrail would have a positive net income of $ 594 million "by 1985".
362: 189:
On November 1, 1959, Symes was named chairman of the board of directors with
523: 485:
Visionary Railroader: Jervis Langdon, Jr., and the Transportation Revolution
369: 269: 89:(July 8, 1897 – August 3, 1976), was the 13th president of the 487:. Bloomington, In.: Indiana University Press. pp. 66–67. 15: 161:. He then apprenticed to the road's general manager in 407:Symes died on August 3, 1976, in a nursing home in 457: 335:financial institutions sold the company's stock. 185:Death of the Pennsy and the birth of Penn Central 43:but its sources remain unclear because it lacks 281:, along with the Central's own subsidiary, the 213:would better balance the Pennsylvania and its 8: 317:The birth of Conrail and the death of Symes 256:ICC hearings and adverse reaction from the 540: 536:. New York: Simmons-Boardman. p. 516. 456:Daughen, Joseph R.; Binzen, Peter (1971). 605:20th-century American railroad executives 534:Who's Who in Railroading in North America 341:United States Secretary of Transportation 266:New York, New Haven and Hartford Railroad 197:in 1957-8 caused both the Pennsy and the 74:Learn how and when to remove this message 305:and onto former Central routes through 240:Symes was not deterred, stating to the 595:People from Glen Osborne, Pennsylvania 439:The Pennsylvania Railroad, 1940s-1950s 441:. New York: W.W. Norton. p. 33. 141:On the Standard Railroad of the World 7: 169:as chief of freight transportation. 610:People from Sewickley, Pennsylvania 348:United States Department of Defense 464:. Boston: Little, Brown. pp.  329:Securities and Exchange Commission 14: 174:Association of American Railroads 172:In 1935, he was lent out to the 20: 532:Moore, Russell F., ed. (1964). 277:system which would include the 209:'s belief that merger with the 242:Interstate Commerce Commission 1: 460:The Wreck of the Penn Central 600:Pennsylvania Railroad people 148:U.S. Railroad Administration 227:Chesapeake and Ohio Railway 626: 555:Pennsylvania Railroad 409:Feasterville, Pennsylvania 167:Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 107:Glen Osborne, Pennsylvania 561: 551: 543: 547:Walter S. Franklin (PRR) 502:Lynch, Peter E. (2004). 483:Grant, H. Roger (2008). 231:Western Maryland Railway 159:Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 29:This article includes a 508:. Saint Paul, MN: MBI. 357:The Wall Street Journal 111:Sewickley, Pennsylvania 58:more precise citations. 437:Ball, Don Jr. (1986). 505:Penn Central Railroad 421:Baer, Christopher T. 258:Department of Justice 91:Pennsylvania Railroad 337:Chase Manhattan Bank 324:deindustrialization 215:Norfolk and Western 565:Allen J. Greenough 559:1954 – 1959 392:The New York Times 295:Stuart T. Saunders 291:C. Jared Ingersoll 235:CSX Transportation 211:Baltimore and Ohio 195:economic recession 191:Allen J. Greenough 101:Symes (pronounced 87:James Miller Symes 31:list of references 571: 570: 562:Succeeded by 553:President of the 494:978-0-253-35216-3 475:978-0-316-09520-4 448:978-0-393-02357-2 283:Boston and Albany 233:, forerunners of 219:Nickel Plate Road 207:Alfred E. Perlman 163:Chicago, Illinois 84: 83: 76: 617: 544:Preceded by 541: 537: 527: 498: 479: 463: 452: 433: 431: 429: 423:"PRR Chronology" 279:Boston and Maine 199:New York Central 178:Washington, D.C. 104: 79: 72: 68: 65: 59: 54:this article by 45:inline citations 24: 23: 16: 625: 624: 620: 619: 618: 616: 615: 614: 575: 574: 567: 558: 549: 531: 528:pp. 15–20. 516: 501: 495: 482: 476: 455: 449: 436: 427: 425: 420: 417: 405: 397:Arthur D. Lewis 385:Trains magazine 319: 299:Milton J. Shapp 251:diversification 223:Wabash Railroad 203:Robert R. Young 187: 152:Cleveland, Ohio 143: 99: 80: 69: 63: 60: 49: 35:related reading 25: 21: 12: 11: 5: 623: 621: 613: 612: 607: 602: 597: 592: 587: 577: 576: 569: 568: 563: 560: 550: 545: 539: 538: 529: 514: 499: 493: 480: 474: 453: 447: 434: 416: 413: 404: 401: 318: 315: 186: 183: 142: 139: 105:) was born in 98: 95: 82: 81: 39:external links 28: 26: 19: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 622: 611: 608: 606: 603: 601: 598: 596: 593: 591: 588: 586: 583: 582: 580: 573: 566: 557: 556: 548: 542: 535: 530: 525: 521: 517: 511: 507: 506: 500: 496: 490: 486: 481: 477: 471: 467: 462: 461: 454: 450: 444: 440: 435: 424: 419: 418: 414: 412: 410: 402: 400: 398: 394: 393: 387: 386: 381: 377: 376: 371: 366: 364: 359: 358: 353: 352:Wright Patman 349: 345: 344:John A. Volpe 342: 338: 332: 330: 325: 316: 314: 310: 308: 304: 300: 296: 292: 286: 284: 280: 276: 271: 267: 262: 259: 254: 252: 246: 243: 238: 236: 232: 228: 224: 220: 216: 212: 208: 204: 200: 196: 192: 184: 182: 179: 175: 170: 168: 164: 160: 155: 153: 149: 140: 138: 136: 132: 128: 124: 120: 116: 112: 108: 96: 94: 92: 88: 78: 75: 67: 57: 53: 47: 46: 40: 36: 32: 27: 18: 17: 572: 552: 533: 504: 484: 459: 438: 428:December 15, 426:. Retrieved 406: 390: 383: 379: 373: 367: 355: 333: 320: 311: 303:Pennsylvania 287: 263: 255: 247: 239: 188: 171: 156: 144: 100: 86: 85: 70: 61: 50:Please help 42: 590:1976 deaths 585:1897 births 411:, aged 79. 380:Railway Age 375:Railway Age 275:New England 56:introducing 579:Categories 515:0760317631 415:References 363:bankruptcy 115:Waynesburg 64:April 2013 524:53356627 309:state. 307:New York 229:and the 131:Marietta 119:Duquesne 370:Conrail 127:Trinity 123:Ursinus 52:improve 522:  512:  491:  472:  445:  270:Boston 97:Family 466:59–60 403:Death 37:, or 520:OCLC 510:ISBN 489:ISBN 470:ISBN 443:ISBN 430:2016 135:Ohio 133:and 103:sÉŞmz 365:. 237:. 154:. 581:: 518:. 468:. 372:. 129:, 125:, 121:, 117:, 93:. 41:, 33:, 526:. 497:. 478:. 451:. 432:. 221:- 217:- 77:) 71:( 66:) 62:( 48:.

Index

list of references
related reading
external links
inline citations
improve
introducing
Learn how and when to remove this message
Pennsylvania Railroad
Glen Osborne, Pennsylvania
Sewickley, Pennsylvania
Waynesburg
Duquesne
Ursinus
Trinity
Marietta
Ohio
U.S. Railroad Administration
Cleveland, Ohio
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Chicago, Illinois
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Association of American Railroads
Washington, D.C.
Allen J. Greenough
economic recession
New York Central
Robert R. Young
Alfred E. Perlman
Baltimore and Ohio
Norfolk and Western

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑